What Do You Think About Fifth Edition?

Are You Clamoring for a New Edition Yet (Already?)

From the lens 40k Rulebook - A Look at the Rulebooks Through the Ages.

  • 40kTerrain Jan 31, 2012 @ 10:02 pm | delete
    .retteb sdiN' dna GI rof selur de ht4 eht dekil I tub ,enif si de ht5

    Happy backward day... I guess.
  • Squidspeed May 11, 2011 @ 7:46 pm | delete
    I skipped from first to third to fifth editions, and I must admit that 5th edition is much more balanced and playable. I found the early editions were all about creating unstoppable Independent Characters (ICs), and whomever created the most overpowered army would win. Now... it seems a little more balanced, such that even the footsloggers can do some decent damage, and ICs left alone can be overwhelmed.
  • JHFSEO May 11, 2011 @ 8:32 pm | delete
    I agree with you there. GW has simplified the rules considerably in 5th edition while adding a ton of new elements, units and rules to give older armies new life. ICs are indeed a little more vulnerable, but with so many dangerous new units on the table, you have to be smart and flexible.

    I had to learn a bunch of new rules, but I feel they are stronger than 3rd/4th ed.

    Cheers. What armies do you field?
  • JamesPittman Oct 25, 2010 @ 6:59 pm | delete
    Very nice lens. I had forgotten about Rogue Trader. Thanks for having my memory refreshed of the good ol' days.

by

JHFSEO

Hi all. I develop content for fun and for clients, and enjoy writing on everything that catches my attention including Arizona, sports, politics, civics,... more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!