Watch 9-11 TV shots in extreme close-up: Original scenes deceived the experts too
Ranked #3,000 in News, #265,796 overall
September Clues: totally extraordinary new movie
by Mike Rose
You've probably seen much of this TV footage before... it's all been screened many times.
But when you look at these well-known shots in close-up, and in slow motion, you suddenly see the exact opposite of what they wanted you to see.
I bet you didn't notice all the fades and fakes on TV on 9-11? Even the sharpest eyes missed most of the Clues. Here's the scenes again, in exactly the same literally-incredible (=unbelievable) color as the original footage.
Every shot in this movie is what you already saw on your TV screen, but be prepared to see now exactly what deceived you on that fateful day. Be prepared after 6 years to be amazed how they almost succeeded in distracting your attention from what was really happening.
HINT: They hoped you wouldn't notice the goofs in their videos. They only gave themselves exactly 17 seconds in real time to add the images of the planes before the show hit your screen. They certainly don't want you to know how they managed to cock-up their attempts to cover-up their errors....
Everything was there for us all to see on day One, er, I mean day 9-11.
September Clues: watch this extraordinary new movie (even tho' you've seen it all before)
See what really happened on your TV screen on 9-11-01: watch the whole show frame by frame and you'll find the hidden cards
You can bet they do NOT want you to see the very many on-screen errors in the TV footage aired on 9-11.
Here's your chance to watch their sloppy editing again, and watch closely this time and you'll see that they faked the Boeings. You can also see once again the shot most people forgot they saw that day: the WTC2 fireball appearing out of blue sky....the one shot that sneaked out past the censor, unfortunately for them the faked plane was omitted for once.
HINT: Any magician knows the trick to making anything disappear is simply to arrange for it not to exist, and make sure you distract attention at the exact moment. No Boeings ever hit any buildings that day.
OK, DON'T believe me: just watch this footage again, and see if you believe your own eyes when your attention is refocused.
Watch it all in stop-frame motion again. Here's the first part of the movie.
Then watch my next video, and learn exactly how Penn and Teller make things vanish. And you'll begin to discover how the Boeings vanished...into thin air....before your very eyes.
FYI The YouTube clip here is Part 1 of the hour-long version
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8045542387672451515
Here's your chance to watch their sloppy editing again, and watch closely this time and you'll see that they faked the Boeings. You can also see once again the shot most people forgot they saw that day: the WTC2 fireball appearing out of blue sky....the one shot that sneaked out past the censor, unfortunately for them the faked plane was omitted for once.
HINT: Any magician knows the trick to making anything disappear is simply to arrange for it not to exist, and make sure you distract attention at the exact moment. No Boeings ever hit any buildings that day.
OK, DON'T believe me: just watch this footage again, and see if you believe your own eyes when your attention is refocused.
Watch it all in stop-frame motion again. Here's the first part of the movie.
Then watch my next video, and learn exactly how Penn and Teller make things vanish. And you'll begin to discover how the Boeings vanished...into thin air....before your very eyes.
FYI The YouTube clip here is Part 1 of the hour-long version
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8045542387672451515
Was it a Boeing or Was it a Fake?
...let's pretend what you saw onscreen was pure Hollywood. Ready for the ride of your life?
When you take the planes out of the equation, the otherwise-unexplainable happenings on 9-11-01 begin to be understandable...and the Crime becomes many times more sinister. It must have involved classified-top-secret star wars weapons.
The fake missile strike on the Pentagon facade failed to bring down the wall first shot: they somehow succeed second time, half an hour after the fireball. Those 30 minutes gave a nice window of opportunity for the world to photograph the inescapable evidence: the initial tiny hole blown proved that no Boeing was involved. Just keep looking for fake planes. They're on screen everywhere you look, but you must watch everything very critically.
There's a video that very astutely exposes the TV presentation that day for what it was.... a TV presentation, complete with Hollywood effects, poorly-executed images of planes, a moving background to the twin towers where the camera is stationary, and very many give-away inconsistencies from one shot to another.
Watch "September Clues" closely, hit the link on this page or go to
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice
Then watch even more closely during the coming primaries who you're voting into the White House after the present top guns are impeached.
Remember: they're still fumbling to get their faking fingers on the nuclear trigger.
So don't just replace one bunch of psychopaths with another.
The fake missile strike on the Pentagon facade failed to bring down the wall first shot: they somehow succeed second time, half an hour after the fireball. Those 30 minutes gave a nice window of opportunity for the world to photograph the inescapable evidence: the initial tiny hole blown proved that no Boeing was involved. Just keep looking for fake planes. They're on screen everywhere you look, but you must watch everything very critically.
There's a video that very astutely exposes the TV presentation that day for what it was.... a TV presentation, complete with Hollywood effects, poorly-executed images of planes, a moving background to the twin towers where the camera is stationary, and very many give-away inconsistencies from one shot to another.
Watch "September Clues" closely, hit the link on this page or go to
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice
Then watch even more closely during the coming primaries who you're voting into the White House after the present top guns are impeached.
Remember: they're still fumbling to get their faking fingers on the nuclear trigger.
So don't just replace one bunch of psychopaths with another.
Watch this excellent demonstration from Penn & Teller
Then after you discover the secrets of how to make things disappear....
.....you'll understand how the Pentacon Boeing was made to ...without even touching the building. Here's the trick
1. Palm: To hold an object in an apparently empty hand.
(In essence this means to set up the illusion. This was done on 9/11 by showing the 2nd plane crash into the south tower in Manhattan on live TV. This mentally conditioned everyone in Arlington to instantly expect a low flying airliner headed fast towards the Pentagon to hit the building.)
2. Ditch: To secretly dispose of an unneeded object.
(Flight 77 was lost on radar as early as 8:56 while the alleged impact was not until just after 9:30. This gave the perpetrators approximately 30 minutes to "ditch" the original plane for the flyover drone.)
3. Steal: To secretly obtain a needed object.
(The plane swap was initiated as the flyover drone was launched and took over the flight path of the ditched original plane.)
4. Load: To secretly move a needed object to where it is needed.
(The drone passenger jet was put on course to the Pentagon and flown treetop level over Arlington.)
5. Simulation: To give the impression that something that hasn't happened, has.
(The plane reaches the Pentagon with a perfectly timed explosion and fireball creating the impression that it hit the building.)
6. Misdirection: To lead attention away from a secret move.
(The massive fireball and smoke plume divert attention from, and help conceal, the flyover drone as it flies away.)
7. Switch: To secretly exchange one object for another.
(The C-130, E4B, and additional flying craft in the area are introduced to serve as cover and confusion for anyone who may have witnessed the drone fly over or away from the building.)*
The fake missile strike on the Pentagon facade failed to bring down the wall with that first shot, they succeed second time, half an hour after the fireball. Just accept that the first tiny hole showed that no Boeing was involved, and keep looking for fake planes.
*Special note: Many detractors to the information we present suggest we are wrong because the witnesses at the CITGO station believe the plane hit the building. This is what true critical thinkers call circular logic. We claim the fact that the witnesses place the plane on the north side of the station proves it was used as an instrument of deception during a perfectly timed military sleight of hand illusion because it is impossible for a plane in that location to have created the physical damage. In other words; the intended goal was to fool witnesses into believing the plane hit the building. The fact that the witnesses were successfully deceived exactly as the perpetrators intended does not prove that they are incorrect in their placement of the plane. Quite the opposite is true. Their placement of the plane proves that they were deceived in regards to the impact.
1. Palm: To hold an object in an apparently empty hand.
(In essence this means to set up the illusion. This was done on 9/11 by showing the 2nd plane crash into the south tower in Manhattan on live TV. This mentally conditioned everyone in Arlington to instantly expect a low flying airliner headed fast towards the Pentagon to hit the building.)
2. Ditch: To secretly dispose of an unneeded object.
(Flight 77 was lost on radar as early as 8:56 while the alleged impact was not until just after 9:30. This gave the perpetrators approximately 30 minutes to "ditch" the original plane for the flyover drone.)
3. Steal: To secretly obtain a needed object.
(The plane swap was initiated as the flyover drone was launched and took over the flight path of the ditched original plane.)
4. Load: To secretly move a needed object to where it is needed.
(The drone passenger jet was put on course to the Pentagon and flown treetop level over Arlington.)
5. Simulation: To give the impression that something that hasn't happened, has.
(The plane reaches the Pentagon with a perfectly timed explosion and fireball creating the impression that it hit the building.)
6. Misdirection: To lead attention away from a secret move.
(The massive fireball and smoke plume divert attention from, and help conceal, the flyover drone as it flies away.)
7. Switch: To secretly exchange one object for another.
(The C-130, E4B, and additional flying craft in the area are introduced to serve as cover and confusion for anyone who may have witnessed the drone fly over or away from the building.)*
The fake missile strike on the Pentagon facade failed to bring down the wall with that first shot, they succeed second time, half an hour after the fireball. Just accept that the first tiny hole showed that no Boeing was involved, and keep looking for fake planes.
*Special note: Many detractors to the information we present suggest we are wrong because the witnesses at the CITGO station believe the plane hit the building. This is what true critical thinkers call circular logic. We claim the fact that the witnesses place the plane on the north side of the station proves it was used as an instrument of deception during a perfectly timed military sleight of hand illusion because it is impossible for a plane in that location to have created the physical damage. In other words; the intended goal was to fool witnesses into believing the plane hit the building. The fact that the witnesses were successfully deceived exactly as the perpetrators intended does not prove that they are incorrect in their placement of the plane. Quite the opposite is true. Their placement of the plane proves that they were deceived in regards to the impact.
What Really Never Happened
A Gospel from the New Apocrypha
What Never Really Happened
In case any Believers finds their Faith is wavering as we approach the anniversary of 9-11, Let Us Never Forget the text of the most ludicrous conspiracy theory of all.
A Gospel from the New Apocrypha
[Dead-Scrolls, Maison-Blanche, NY, 2001]
Tim Osman is a 44-year-old former CIA intern who operates from a Middle Earth cavern, fully-equipped with high-tech stuff like electricity and post-modern telecoms.
Early in the year AD 2001, Osman switched to his muslim nom-de-plane, studied a few videos, and lifted a a fiendish idea straight out of Blackadder's script. Osama hatched a cunning plan:
* 19 dropouts from 5 fledgling flight-training schools would simultaneously hijack 4 airliners
* any allah-fearing airman only needs a couple of hours to buzz the most secure airspace in the world, so all 35 USAF bases within range of target practice are switched to hold-your-fire exercise orders just for the day
* the incompetent pilots would then score a bulls-eye hit at 2 Manhattan skyscrapers so they manage to demolish all 3 of them
* another muslim, a total imbecile who couldn't balance a bike, would aim his Boeing a hole-in-one at the super-fortified but totally undefended headquarters of the world's greatest military establishment
* the fourth novice flyer would then be free to aim for the only patch of dirt in the US that apparently swallows planes on touchdown, so that no more than a charred passport would survive the impact.
Osama's script is so reminiscent of any Western, it would have scored a rejection slip even at Bollywood.
How many long-suffering families of victims of the tragedy agree that this conspiracy theory doesn't even begin to explain the catastrophic events of that day?
Of course, we know now that Osama
is just as much an invention of CNN
as those faked CGI planes that fooled
so many Western-watchers on world TV.
In case any Believers finds their Faith is wavering as we approach the anniversary of 9-11, Let Us Never Forget the text of the most ludicrous conspiracy theory of all.
A Gospel from the New Apocrypha
[Dead-Scrolls, Maison-Blanche, NY, 2001]
Tim Osman is a 44-year-old former CIA intern who operates from a Middle Earth cavern, fully-equipped with high-tech stuff like electricity and post-modern telecoms.
Early in the year AD 2001, Osman switched to his muslim nom-de-plane, studied a few videos, and lifted a a fiendish idea straight out of Blackadder's script. Osama hatched a cunning plan:
* 19 dropouts from 5 fledgling flight-training schools would simultaneously hijack 4 airliners
* any allah-fearing airman only needs a couple of hours to buzz the most secure airspace in the world, so all 35 USAF bases within range of target practice are switched to hold-your-fire exercise orders just for the day
* the incompetent pilots would then score a bulls-eye hit at 2 Manhattan skyscrapers so they manage to demolish all 3 of them
* another muslim, a total imbecile who couldn't balance a bike, would aim his Boeing a hole-in-one at the super-fortified but totally undefended headquarters of the world's greatest military establishment
* the fourth novice flyer would then be free to aim for the only patch of dirt in the US that apparently swallows planes on touchdown, so that no more than a charred passport would survive the impact.
Osama's script is so reminiscent of any Western, it would have scored a rejection slip even at Bollywood.
How many long-suffering families of victims of the tragedy agree that this conspiracy theory doesn't even begin to explain the catastrophic events of that day?
Of course, we know now that Osama
is just as much an invention of CNN
as those faked CGI planes that fooled
so many Western-watchers on world TV.
Was New York an even crazier place after 911?
Bike messengers on Crack
Amazon Celebrates 9-11 Anniversary with these Bargains
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies
Amazon Price: $16.34 (as of 12/03/2009) 
The Third Option
Amazon Price: $7.99 (as of 12/03/2009)
Running QuickBooks in Nonprofits: The Only Comprehensive Guide for Nonprofits Using QuickBooks
Amazon Price: $23.07 (as of 12/03/2009)
Running QuickBooks 2010 Premier Editions: The Only Definitive Guide to the Premier Editions
Amazon Price: $24.39 (as of 12/03/2009)
The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World
Amazon Price: $10.88 (as of 12/03/2009)
Reader Feedback
submit
-
Reply
- Evelyn_Saenz Evelyn_Saenz Feb 17, 2008 @ 3:51 pm
- Your lens is thought provoking. 911 brought fear and mistrust to our lives. How are we going to recover our trust and feeling of safety? One wonders how to bring back trust and love for mankind.
So, there never was a Boeing in the picture.....
...the planes were real onscreen Hollywood images?
BTW: That photo, Mr S-W, does it look to you like a Nevada H-bomb test?
Yeah, I thought so too.
Let's start rewriting your script.
I'm not a conspiracy type: I belong to no 911-Truth group: I'm actually a long-retired ex-pat London architect. My very considerable working knowledge and understanding of skyscraper design and operation leaves me especially concerned about What Really Happens when a plane supposedly hits a building.
Trust me, I'm an architect: NO fire ever brought down any skyscraper, anywhere, ever. That absolute certainty in my mind is what has motivated my passionate concern in this affair.
Yet what actually happened on and after 9-11 was crazier by far than any of us could possibly imagine, especially in the first months after the event .
Five years and 2000 days along the timeline an enormous amount of research has emerged. Put what's been published online together, eliminate what's impossible, and whatever is left, however improbable, must contain the truth...to paraphrase what Sir Arthur* famously said.
But the conclusions begger belief. Until this year (2007) I could not reconcile the insuperable problems presented by the alleged crashing planes, whether flown by Arabs or flown by radio control.
The turning point came in my mind when I came across research which was based on information which was available on the BTS website, the Official Govt website records of ALL plane movements into and out of US airports.
If you think I am crazy for believing now that 2 the four Boeings did NOT even fly that day, and the other 2 planes were both flying 4 years later, you will think I am certifiable under the Mental Health Act of 1884, if I dared mention the ultimate, but ultimately inescapable, conclusion as to what hit the towers. I believe that the truth is so much more terrible than airplanes crashing into towers, that the Perps would have the story remain hidden, whatever the cost.
Yet the truth is readily searchable if you know what you're looking at and looking for: you don't even need the benefit of stopped-frame video, although I've found some slow motion sure helps clarify quite a few inconsistencies.
You are an historian, and I'd presume as such you are passionately interested in establishing the truth. I would accordingly draw your attention to the research starting with this website http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/archive/dialoguewithholmgren.htm
This link is also particularly relevant http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren_interview.htm
You may wish to note these officially-recorded facts and consider the implications if just one of them completely negates your published (perfectly understandable) viewpoint:
(a) which planes did or did not fly on 09-11-01
(b) which of the planes which didn't fly were nonetheless deregistered in Jan 2002?
(c) which of the planes were still registered (and flying?) 4 years later? How could either plane have crashed in 2001?
(d) which pilots and co-pilots alleged to have flown held current licenses? (apparently none)
(e) which of those pilots and co-pilots are demonstrably still alive, with SSN data to prove this?
You have a very wide and well-educated readership, and you can only afford to offer a contrarian viewpoint in certain cases
Start off by eliminating the impossible: if the official BTS info was correct (and Holmgren establishes exactly how credible it is) there were no planes flying. If there were no planes flying then HOWEVER IMPROBABLE that fact is, the entire Arab hijack story can be totally discredited, and what are we left with?
Don't place too much credence on Prof Steve Jones' demolition conspiracy theory. Controlled Demolition certainly brought down WTC7, but conventional explosives by controlled demolition were equally certainly NOT the principal means used to demolish WTC2 and WTC1.
It is with the greatest reluctance that I have come eventually to believe that it is the very-high-tech means used to demolish the towers that is what the perpetraitors will use every available means at their disposal to keep top-secret.
Every perpetraitor's fingerprint points to no-planes demolition: anything pointing away is one type of disinformation or another ...."however improbable" is that disinformation.
[*It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must contain the truth - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle aka Sherlock Holmes]
Yeah, I thought so too.
Let's start rewriting your script.
I'm not a conspiracy type: I belong to no 911-Truth group: I'm actually a long-retired ex-pat London architect. My very considerable working knowledge and understanding of skyscraper design and operation leaves me especially concerned about What Really Happens when a plane supposedly hits a building.
Trust me, I'm an architect: NO fire ever brought down any skyscraper, anywhere, ever. That absolute certainty in my mind is what has motivated my passionate concern in this affair.
Yet what actually happened on and after 9-11 was crazier by far than any of us could possibly imagine, especially in the first months after the event .
Five years and 2000 days along the timeline an enormous amount of research has emerged. Put what's been published online together, eliminate what's impossible, and whatever is left, however improbable, must contain the truth...to paraphrase what Sir Arthur* famously said.
But the conclusions begger belief. Until this year (2007) I could not reconcile the insuperable problems presented by the alleged crashing planes, whether flown by Arabs or flown by radio control.
The turning point came in my mind when I came across research which was based on information which was available on the BTS website, the Official Govt website records of ALL plane movements into and out of US airports.
If you think I am crazy for believing now that 2 the four Boeings did NOT even fly that day, and the other 2 planes were both flying 4 years later, you will think I am certifiable under the Mental Health Act of 1884, if I dared mention the ultimate, but ultimately inescapable, conclusion as to what hit the towers. I believe that the truth is so much more terrible than airplanes crashing into towers, that the Perps would have the story remain hidden, whatever the cost.
Yet the truth is readily searchable if you know what you're looking at and looking for: you don't even need the benefit of stopped-frame video, although I've found some slow motion sure helps clarify quite a few inconsistencies.
You are an historian, and I'd presume as such you are passionately interested in establishing the truth. I would accordingly draw your attention to the research starting with this website http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/archive/dialoguewithholmgren.htm
This link is also particularly relevant http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren_interview.htm
You may wish to note these officially-recorded facts and consider the implications if just one of them completely negates your published (perfectly understandable) viewpoint:
(a) which planes did or did not fly on 09-11-01
(b) which of the planes which didn't fly were nonetheless deregistered in Jan 2002?
(c) which of the planes were still registered (and flying?) 4 years later? How could either plane have crashed in 2001?
(d) which pilots and co-pilots alleged to have flown held current licenses? (apparently none)
(e) which of those pilots and co-pilots are demonstrably still alive, with SSN data to prove this?
You have a very wide and well-educated readership, and you can only afford to offer a contrarian viewpoint in certain cases
Start off by eliminating the impossible: if the official BTS info was correct (and Holmgren establishes exactly how credible it is) there were no planes flying. If there were no planes flying then HOWEVER IMPROBABLE that fact is, the entire Arab hijack story can be totally discredited, and what are we left with?
Don't place too much credence on Prof Steve Jones' demolition conspiracy theory. Controlled Demolition certainly brought down WTC7, but conventional explosives by controlled demolition were equally certainly NOT the principal means used to demolish WTC2 and WTC1.
It is with the greatest reluctance that I have come eventually to believe that it is the very-high-tech means used to demolish the towers that is what the perpetraitors will use every available means at their disposal to keep top-secret.
Every perpetraitor's fingerprint points to no-planes demolition: anything pointing away is one type of disinformation or another ...."however improbable" is that disinformation.
[*It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must contain the truth - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle aka Sherlock Holmes]
9-11 was an American conspiracy
by hommedespoir
Explore related pages
Conspiracy Theories- I have long been fascinated by Conspiracy Theories - 911, The Illuminati, Diana'...
The President's 9-11 conspiracy theory exposes Him to Impeachment- Now that the fake planes have been exposed ("September Clues" below), in case th...
