Child Support Fraud

"The court today, with the use of DNA testing, does not need to have the wisdom of King Solomon to determine the biological father."

There is nothing more outrageous these days than that of paternity fraud which requires the victim to pay thousands of dollars to the perpetrator of fraud. This system places the efficiency of injustice over the inefficiency of justice, and hides in failure to do justice under the claim of "Best Interests Of The Child."

The following represents the winning strategy to set aside the paternity fraud.

• Never depend on discovery to build a case because you won't be permitted to obtain it and therefore won't have a case.
• Bring all your actions at once, because if you don't a loss in one court may prevent success in another.
• In civil actions, based on fraud you may be entitled to a jury.
• In civil actions, unless authorized by statute the mother will not be entitled to attorney's fees.
• NEVER use non-paternity as a defense in a child support enforcement action.

To succeed in trial you must:

(a) investigate
(b) educate yourself AND your attorney
(c) go on the offensive
(d) strategize

NECESSARY STEPS:
INVESTIGATION:
PROVE, THROUGH COMPETENT MEDICAL TESTING THAT YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER.
This means that you are able to take the child for a mouth swab for saliva/cheek cells which, together with your DNA can establish whether you are the biological father or not. A DNA test does not require that both parents be tested, nor does it only require a blood draw.

You cannot provide it by statements of your ex-wife because at the last minute she will deny saying it. You need DNA evidence.

FIND OUT WHO IS MOST LIKELY THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER
This is important because you will sue him for:

(a) a finding that he is the father;
(b) that he pay back child support;
(c) that he provide medical insurance
(d) that he reimburse you for necessities

LEARN IF THE MOTHER TOLD ANYBODY DURING OR AFTER HER PREGNANCY THAT YOU WERE NOT THE FATHER.
In order to sue for fraud you must allege and prove the following:

(a) she made a statement which
(b) she knew was false
(c) upon which you relied to your detriment.

Her defense may be that she made a mistake. If you can prove that she knew you weren't the father, you have evidence of fraud. If the mother had told a friend, "If my [husband or boyfriend] ever knew who the real father was, he'd kill me!", that is enough to show that she knew her statement was false. She didn't have to identify at that time who the real father was - only that you weren't the real father.

EDUCATE YOUR SELF and YOUR LAWYER
Research the following:

• DID the court have jurisdiction of a child who was not the issue of the marriage?
  Issues of jurisdiction can be raised at any time. Black letter law was that a court could not award custody of a child of the marriage to a step-parent as part of a divorce action. Consequently you should be prepared with a legal brief showing that the court had no jurisdiction over the child and therefore could award neither custody or make an order of support.


• DID the court have jurisdiction to terminate the biological parent's rights without giving him notice?
  This is the opposite of the first point. Some adoptions have been overturned because the father did not consent. Those cases sometimes involved fathers who did not know they had a child.


• DOES the court have jurisdiction to identify the biological father and order him to pay support?
  Generally one can bring a paternity action at any time during the child's minority, and one can obtain retroactive child support for two to eighteen years worth, depending on individual state statutes.


• DOES your state have a Statute for Necessities?
  The statute provides that any person, or institution who has provided necessities to a child may sue BOTH parents for reimbursement. This is often used by hospitals, doctors and dentists, but can be used by drug stores, food stores (for food) and, probably by you if you have furnished necessities. However this statute would probably have a three or six year statute of limitation.

In Connecticut there was a case in which the divorce court said that father will be responsible for all medical bills. The child went into the Elmcrest Psychiatric Hospital who sued both the mother and the father. The mother claimed no duty because the divorce court had made the father responsible for future bills. The court stated both were liable, notwithstanding the orders of the court.

• DOES your state permit jury trials on fraud cases, contract cases, and if so, does it permit double damage, punitive damages, and/or attorney's fees in fraud cases?

Start two or three lawsuits as follows:
In the family court to reopen and set aside the finding of paternity and to establish paternity. Move to implead the biological father in that action. Move for DNA paternity tests of the biological father, mother and child(ren).

In the civil court sue the mother for fraud (or mutual mistake of fact) seeking money damages, and punitive damages.

Bring a suit against the biological father and the mother for necessities and the biological father for past due support.

In the civil action, notice the person who did the DNA testing for a deposition; take the deposition and establish as a matter of fact that you are not the father.

In the civil action, notice the mother for a deposition and ask her who is the father, when she knew and if she told the father.

In the civil action, notice the biological father and see when he was told that he was or might be the father; whether he was having intercourse with the mother, etc.

• DON'T PIECEMEAL THE LITIGATION: START THEM ALL AT ONCE.


• IF YOU PIECEMEAL, YOU MAY FIND THE FAMILY COURT MAKING A FINDING THAT YOU ARE THE FATHER WHICH WILL BAR YOU IN THE CIVIL COURT.


• DO NOT TAKE DEPOSITIONS IN THE FAMILY COURT
  The judges will not be friendly in that court, may order you to pay attorneys fees etc. The judges in the civil court can't order you to pay her fees.


• WHEN YOU HAVE THE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF A DEPOSITION ABOUT THE DNA AND MOTHER, FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ATTACHING THE DEPOSITION TO THE MOTION.
  This can be filed in both courts and now the judge will have to look at the evidence.


• PREPARE FOR BEST INTEREST ARGUMENT IN FAMILY COURT
  Here you can try different approaches. It becomes a strategic planning decision.

You may, in your motion in the family court, specifically allege the failure to have contact or a relationship, and that the child will, for cultural, ethnic, or geographical reasons have a better chance with the biological father than with you. You may document the number of times of missed visitation, as well as the relocation, or other facts to show that the best interest will be serve by having you removed as the presumptive father, and the other father substituted. He may have more money and more assets, thus she would get more child support under the guidelines. For medical diagnosis and treatment, she may belong to a "favored" population or minority. She may, as a minority be entitled to preferences in hiring, and in education. Think of all the reasons why she would be better off. Make the allegation about best interests.

Or, if you want to be devious, demand custody and more time and let the mother show that the daughter hates you. It's a choice.