Child Support Payroll Garnishment

Ranked #3,750 in Parenting & Kids, #120,668 overall

When Being Current Is Not Current

Under the Child Support Enforcement Act of 1988, all child support owed by salaried employees was to be placed under a payroll attachment, to address a perceive problem of non-payments, which was based simply on telephone interviews with mothers owed child support. The presumption was that they would not fib about such an important matter.

However, the poor accounting habits of the states made this all inclusive remedy nearly impossible. Payments were not being posted to the right case numbers, and/or not posted at all.

It was not until nearly the turn of the century, as computer technology grew, before this could be widely applied. In the last 10 years, as a growing number of child support cases are being placed on payroll attachment, this has created a whole new set of problems.

Payroll Garnishment For Child Support Video

For Additional Videos On Child Support, Click Here.

powered by Youtube

The Problem

When a child support obligor is under a weekly, or biweekly, payroll attachment for child support, he may not know that for eight (8) months out of the year, he is in arrears. This can result in an unexpected attachment to a Tax Return, with up to 20% in Interest Penalties. Or worse, after years of paying, and the children are aging out from getting child support, you suddenly learn you are tens of thousands of dollars in arrears, with more than a decade to go in continuing payments.

The problem that arises is both in the way employers are calculating payroll attachments, and how the computers at the State Child Support Enforcement Agency are registering each received payment.

Employers want to take the attachment, and send a check right away, so they take what is ordered for each month, and determine the total for the year. From that total, they divide it by 52 or 26, depending on their payroll setup. As an example, we will use a support payment amount of $500 per month, for a yearly total of $6000.

There are an average of four and a quarter weeks per month. This means that for eight months a person gets four weekly, or two biweekly, paychecks, but for the other four months, there are five weekly, or three biweekly paychecks.

The employer is deducting $115.39 from a weekly paycheck, or $230.78 from a biweekly paycheck, and mailing each amount in. This means that a total of $461.56 a month is sent in for 8 months of the year, while the other four months, the payments total $576.95 per month due to the extra paycheck in those months.

Unfortunately, the state computers processing the payments see them as totaling $461.56 for a month as an underpayment, of $38.44. However,
rather than a balancing of the accounts for the year when receiving the $576.95, those are treated as an overpayment or gift of $76.95 to the other parent.

At the end of the year, this leaves a balance owing of $307.52, which then triggers an interest penalty. That interest penalty can run from 3% to 20%, depending on the state.

Using Wisconsin as an example with an 8.2% penalty, there can be an attachment to a tax return of $332.73. However, consider if the state simply accumulates the amount over the period of the child support order.

For Wisconsin, over a ten year period, the total owed would be $3075., with an interest penalty of $2,745, for a grand total owing of $5,820. Nearly another year of child support payments.

For a man paying as a result of a one-night-stand, over an 18 year time period, and not accounting for adjustments, the accumulated amount owed would be $5,535, with an interest penalty of $8,927, for a grand total of $14,462 still owed more than one more year in payments, which will still be collecting even more interest.

Add to this the fact that with four months per year there was an overpayment of $76.95, by the time the $14,462 is paid off, there would be a total overpayment exceeding $20,000, equally nearly three additional years of child support.

For a child support obligor ordered to pay $1000 a month, including interest, the final balance owing would be over $36,000. (Child Support Arrears Calculator)

Employers do not look favorably on making payroll attachments of varying amounts, as it can create an accounting nightmare. As such, a method must be determined to address this issue. The simplest would be an adjustment to the programming of the computers processing the child support payments. However, in this economy, the states will not be willing to pay for a programming change.

That leaves two options:

  • Have your employer deduct 25% of the payment from each weekly paycheck, or 50% of the payment from each biweekly paycheck. This would result in a 10% yearly overpayment, but that can be addressed whenever there is a motion to modify the payment, whether up or down. Note that every three years, there is an automatic review of the case by the state that is required by federal law.
  • A second option would be to request an employer to deduct a full child support payment out of one payroll check per month, though that may not be possible if the payment exceeds the amount of one check.

In the long term, it should be demanded that Child Support Enforcement Correct this problem in the software that processes payments.

Please Sign The Guest Book & Leave A Comment

Wriring Letters

Fathers are a frequent a target of the media, and politicians, in citing what they think is wrong with America.

They blame us for fatherless children, even though 40% of divorced/single mothers
deny fathers access to their children.

They call us deadbeat dads, even though only 3% of those ordered to pay child support refuse to.

They claim that millions of single mothers are not getting child support, without mentioning that 75% of single mothers never applied for any, either due to them cohabiting with the father, or not knowing who the father is.

Aside from addressing this problem with child support attachments, if we are to curb the negative picture presented about fathers, then fathers need to be expressing their opinions on it. You can be doing that by writing letters to your politicians, and to the Editorial Letter page of local and national newspapers.

These links will teach you how to do just that. Consider doing it at least once a month.

We cannot make our voices heard if we are not willing to speak up.

Loading

Reading Corner

Loading

Reader Feedback

  • Kenneth-Gearheart May 10, 2012 @ 12:27 am | delete
    Interesting to hear this story told from the fathers perspective..usually its the other way around.
  • LewesDE Feb 17, 2012 @ 1:27 pm | delete
    I hope to make my first lens as good as this one!
  • tam1not2 Jul 14, 2011 @ 12:57 pm | delete
    I am in california, do they calculate my payments in this manor? also, have there been any instances where the argument has been used in court on arrears cases? It seems to me that if one has proof of this happening ( what is "proof"?) you should be able to ask for a consideration of interest and penalties be dismissed or SOMETHING right?
  • tam1not2 Nov 17, 2011 @ 6:33 am | delete
    can anybody answer my question about using this argument in court on arrears cases? has it been argued ? How was it presented? what was the outcome?
  • tim May 1, 2011 @ 10:18 pm | delete
    I've been told u must keep one full payment ahead to help keep this from happening. Here in cali i've got those letters stating I short paid and owed. When I called Child support they told me done worry it all works out by the end of the year. They don't tell you they make there money from u this way.
  • Load More

by

George_McCasland

For 22 years, I've used my spare time to work with fathers in distress. This can range from the father dealing with daily abuse of a violent spouse or... more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!