The Artist-Museum Partnership Act would amend the current income tax code and establish another itemized deduction for individuals who donate literary, musical, artistic, or scholarly compositions at fair market value to tax-exempt organizations, provided that certain other conditions are satisfied.
For example, the individual must donate either the intellectual property in question, the copyrights to the property, or both at least 18 months after having created it.
The bill creates a sliding scale limit on the amount of the deduction, contingent upon the individual's adjusted gross income (AGI).

For example, the individual must donate either the intellectual property in question, the copyrights to the property, or both at least 18 months after having created it.
The bill creates a sliding scale limit on the amount of the deduction, contingent upon the individual's adjusted gross income (AGI).
In Plain English, Please?
The way the tax code is now, when an artist donates an artwork, all he or she can write off is the value of the materials used to create the artwork. Yet, art collectors and investors who donate art are able to write off the fair market value of the artwork.
Art collectors are being treated differently than the artists. If the Artist Museum Partnership Act passes, then artists will be able to also donate the fair market value.
Therefore, an artist is more likely to write a check to a charity, rather than donate artwork. Nonprofits across America that depend on art donations for their fundraising efforts are hurt by the current tax code.
To clarify, just say an artist has an oil painting that is worth $1,500, but then the artist realizes that he can only write off from his taxes the cost of supplies (let's pretend in this case it's $20). Most of the time, an artist would prefer to keep the artwork, because after all it may sell - and just write a check for $20 and not donate the artwork, which the non-profit could gain $1,500 from auctioning. In this scenario, the charitable organization would end up getting 20 bucks, not something worth $1,500.
Art collectors are being treated differently than the artists. If the Artist Museum Partnership Act passes, then artists will be able to also donate the fair market value.
Therefore, an artist is more likely to write a check to a charity, rather than donate artwork. Nonprofits across America that depend on art donations for their fundraising efforts are hurt by the current tax code.
To clarify, just say an artist has an oil painting that is worth $1,500, but then the artist realizes that he can only write off from his taxes the cost of supplies (let's pretend in this case it's $20). Most of the time, an artist would prefer to keep the artwork, because after all it may sell - and just write a check for $20 and not donate the artwork, which the non-profit could gain $1,500 from auctioning. In this scenario, the charitable organization would end up getting 20 bucks, not something worth $1,500.
Current Status of HR 1524
This bill is in the first stage of the legislative process where the bill is considered in committee and may undergo significant changes in markup sessions. The bill has been referred to the following committees: House Ways and Means
Last updated: 25 March 2008
To check current status, Click Here
Last updated: 25 March 2008
To check current status, Click Here
Easy Way To Take Action
If you would like to VOICE YOUR SUPPORT for the Artist Deduction Bill to your member of Congress, visit Americans for the Arts to fill out your name and address on the on screen template and your message will be sent to Congress.
Art Business Books & Software
ARTIST DEDUCTION BILLS CONTINUE TO GAIN SUPPORT
From: Americans for the Arts Web site, 7/9/07
"The Artist-Museum Partnership Act (commonly known as the 'Artist Deduction bill') has been gaining co-sponsors since it was re-introduced earlier this year. The House bill H.R. 1524 introduced by Reps. John Lewis (D-GA) and Jim Ramstad (R-MN) now has 50 co-sponsors. Additionally, the Senate bill S. 548 introduced by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Robert Bennett (R-UT) has 23 co-sponsors.
The legislation supports individual artists by allowing them to take a fair-market value tax deduction for tangible works they donate to nonprofit collecting and educational organizations, and it benefits the public by giving them access to more art. Many of the cosponsors are legislators who sit on the tax-writing committees, which would demonstrate a real interest in approving this legislation."
The legislation supports individual artists by allowing them to take a fair-market value tax deduction for tangible works they donate to nonprofit collecting and educational organizations, and it benefits the public by giving them access to more art. Many of the cosponsors are legislators who sit on the tax-writing committees, which would demonstrate a real interest in approving this legislation."
Bloggers on this Topic
New Guestbook
-
-
Sep 10, 2010 @ 4:17 am | delete
- Wow!
I like your lens, very useful and inspiring. thank you.
-----------------------------
Movies Capital Review
-
-
-
Sep 6, 2010 @ 4:00 am | delete
- Nice lense.
Online Affiliate Coaching Review
One Week Marketing Review
One Minute Cure Review
One Minute Cure Review
One Dollar Cash Site Review
One A Day Wonder Review
Omni Forex Signals Review
Oblivion Secrets Review
Numerologist Review
Nuclear Affiliate Review
Nobs Blueprint Review
Noadware Review
Ninety Day Powerseller Review
Night club Promoter Review
Niche Blueprint Review
Net Gold 365 Review
Natural Cure For Yeast Infection Review
New Line Equity Review
National Grant Secret Review
Nasty Dirty Money Review
Mystery Shopper Agency Review
My Shed Plans Review
My Solar Plans Review
My Web Opinions Review
My Portrait Drawing Review
My Porn Blocker Review
My Phone Riches Review
My Pad Media Review
My Out Of Control Teen Review
My Online Income System Review
My Miracle Loans Review
My Homebreware Review
My Home Wealth System Review
My Grape Vine Review
My Cash Printer Review
My Air Fare Secrets Review
Muscle Imbalances Revealed Review
Muscle Gaining Secrets Review
Multi Profit Websites Review
Muscle Gain Truth Review
Model trains For Beginners Review
Movies Capital Review
Model Train Help Review
Money Siphon System Review
Reimage Review
Moles Warts Removal Review
Mrgreen Review
Gain Opinion Review
Internet Marketer Review
Ivy Bot Review
Intelligent Cruiser Review
InteliGator Review
I satellite link Review
Instant Product Lock Review
I want A Teaching Job Review
ames Dean 3 Red Light Fix Review
Jamorama Review
Job Interview Answers Review
Job Interview Secret Review
keep Your Marriage Review
Jump Manual Review
kettlebell Workouts Review
Key Jobs Online Review
Keyword Elite Review
Keyword Research pro Review
Kidney Stone Remedy Review
Kill Your Stutter Review
Killer Interview Secrets Review
Killer Video Squeeze Pages Review
Kingdom of Pets Review
Joanas World Review
Klariti Review
Kozen Guide Review
La Ink Tattoo Designs Review
Laptop Repair Videos Review
Launch Raider Review
Lay False Favourites Review
Lazy Cash Formula Review
Learn Horse Riding Review
Learn Photoshop Now Review
Legit Online Jobs Review
Learn Digital Photography Now Review
Lick by Lick Review
Light Speed Pc Review
Linden Method Review
Link Builder Pro Review
Linux for ps3 Installer Review
List Laundering 2 Review
Live Rosacea Free Review
Living On A Dime Review
LMT Forex Formula Review
Local Lead Plan Review
Locate People Review
Lose Man Boobs Review
Lose The Back pain Review
Lottery Method Review
Lower Body Make Over Review
Lumbridge City Review
Lung Detox Review
Maestroshechiceros Review
-
-
-
ddixonart
Mar 10, 2008 @ 2:16 pm | delete
- I'm sorry for the confusion. What I mean was this - just say an artist has an oil painting that is worth $1,500, but then they find that they can only write off from their taxes the cost of supplies (let's pretend in this case it's $20), then wouldn't the artist rather write a check for $20 and not donate the artwork, which the non-profit could gain $1,500 from auctioning? Therefore the non profit would end up getting 20 bucks, not something worth $1,500.
Yes, non profits are FOR this legislation (and I am as well) because it is better for the non profits if an artist can deduct the full fair market value of his/her artwork.
-
-
-
GA artist
Mar 9, 2008 @ 2:09 pm | delete
- I'm not sure I am grasping your logic in the following statement. Will you elaborate?
"Therefore, an artist is more likely to write a check to a charity, rather than donate artwork. Nonprofits across America that depend on art donations for their fundraising efforts end up being the biggest losers in this inequity."
Many non-profit art organizations are supporting this legislation. It seems that more artists would donate their art for fundraisers if this bill passes. Maybe the devil is in the details??
-
New Amazon
New Text / Write module
This UpMarket page written by
ddixonart
My name is Darla Dixon. I am a . My artwork has been published several times and has sold internationally. more »
Deluxe. Remarkable. Creative. Unusual. Successful. Upmarket businesses push the envelope -- does yours?
Connect with UpMarket
This author recommends...
-
Donate Used Items to Support the Needy
Most of us have a lot of stuff, and it's likely that we aren't using some of it... -
eBay Tax Tips
Hey eBay sellers! Now that you're making a profit on eBay, you're probably wonde... -
How to advertise your art business with little or no money
When you are starting out in your art business, you need customers and you don't... -
Tax Benefits for Home Owners
Owning a home is the American dream. But did you know it can also be a taxpayer'... -
Top 10 Overlooked Tax Deductions and Credits - 2012
As we gear up to finish up our taxes and wait to get our tax refund, it'd pay to... -
10 Gift Ideas to woo her!
Gifts are an incredible thing, when it comes to relationships. Do you want to br...