Neo Marxism In America

Ranked #7,025 in Culture & Society, #143,296 overall

Training an Army of World Servers

"Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday." ~Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky

True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties....

"One Alinsky benefactor was Wall Street investment banker Eugene Meyer, who served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933. Meyer and his wife Agnes co-owned The Washington Post. They used their newspaper to promote Alinsky....Her series, called 'The Orderly Revolution', made Alinsky famous....

Alinsky's crowning achievement was his recruitment of a young high school student named Hillary Rodham. She met Alinsky through a radical church group. Hillary wrote an analysis of Alinsky's methods for her senior thesis at Wellesley College. ...

Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky's counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.

"Barack Obama is also an Alinskyite.... Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project.... Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer." Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky ~by Richard Poe

"His name was Saul Alinsky, the mentor of Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the concierge emeritus of modern liberalism.... Alinsky was also the subject of the previously suppressed 1969 Wellesley Thesis by one Hillary Rodham.... [In it, she wrote that Alinsky's 1971 book] Rules for Radicals provides the organizer with a tactical style for community organization that assumes an adversarial relationship between groups of people in which one either dominates or is dominated. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage." "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Rules for radicals ~by Saul Alinsky

Keyes: Stop Obama or U.S. will cease to exist

powered by Youtube

The Obama Deception

Full Length Free

powered by Youtube

A Question of Eligibility

Order the Full Version Here.

Full HD Version Fall of the Republic
powered by Youtube

Ready, set, debate

Are you ready for government to control every aspect of your life?

Loading Fetching blurbs now... please stand by

Yes, we need change...

Lenin says:

you guys are a bunch of idiots. I am a true Marxist and believe me Obama ain't no Marxist and he ain't no socialist. But he can speak with subject-verb agreement, unlike that other idiot Bush you conservative seem to worship

margodiva says:

I feel sorry that you are going to be unhappy for the next 8 years. From this lens, I can predict that even when your predictions don't come true, you will still be unhappy.

The Obama administration is going to be about personal responsibility, and not just patting the public on the head, telling them to go shopping while the government starts bogus wars, shreds the Constitution and pretends to keep us safe.

bgamall says:

I have no problem keeping an eye on the radical left, Jana. But the evil that has occurred under Bush has taken place under the radical right. The followers of Leo Strauss are atheists, as Leo Strauss was. His parents were Jewish but he was an atheist and he believed that you lie to the masses. His prize pupil was Paul Wolfowitz, who lied about WMD.

Jana, the neocons allowed 9/11 and there is a mountain of evidence, including the observed explosive squibbs shooting out of the towers in front of the collapse. The neocons have done all manner of evil and they are dangerous. If yhou add Sarah Palin, a person who believes it is her DUTY to hasten the end of the world, then you have a dangerous fusion of neoconservatism and dominionism. Her boney finger on the nuclear button will be SUICIDE for the United States. Jana, if you don't read up on Leo Strauss you will not see that right wing neocons are fascistic and mixing them with Palin risks world destruction. Fascism will sooner destroy the world than Marxism. Marxism has failed, but neocons still believe in fascism.

bgamall says:

The government began controlling every aspect of life when they started offering liar loans and created the housing bubble under REPUBLICANS. The Republicans and Greenspan destabilized the financial system. They encouraged overleveraging, which enabled investment banks and hedge funds to bypass the 50 percent margin call requirements, down payment requirements, etc. driving up the prices of commodities, stocks, bonds, and homes.

In order to fix it the REPUBLICANS have used government taxpayer funds to purchase a stake in the risky banks, hoping the economy will turn around. The difference between the Republicans and Obama is that the Republicans think that bailing out the rich alone will fix things. They don't realize that if you don't put money into the hands of the middle class, this rich man's bail out by the Republicans will be useless.

John Mc says:

Yeah whatever happened to personal responsibility anyways? Instead of blaming Democrats (as usual) and Obama who hasn't even started yet why don't republicans look inside themselves for why America rejected you in droves. Accept personal responsibility for your massive failure in letting America down bigtime. Greed, lying and corruption are not what Americans want in politicians. Republicans must take personal responsibility for the financial meltdown, Katrina victims and the Iraq massive failure. Don't look away and blame others as usual, look inside.
But you republicans won't because you're spoiled , corrupt little brats who like to blame others. America finally woke up and saw your true ugly colors.
Enjoy your hatred of all things good in the world.

Absolutely not, we need to embrace personal responsibility and the Constitution.

borg says:

I had a hard time picking sides on this argument because I want both things: change + personal responsibility and respect to the Constitution. I don't believe that we've been true to the document that is supposed to be running the country, and I think both the Republican side and the Democrat side are filled with pompous bigots that would sooner eat a live puppy without eating utensils than give up an ounce of power or take a fraction of a fraction of an inch backwards even if it was for the better of the people.

@Lenin- Socialism tends to mean gradual change nowadays. If Obama is Marxist, America won't be communist by the end of his term(s, but hopefully not). We'll see many other Socialist candidates making gradual changes over time; enough to satisfy his "change" slogan (in some ways, like Obamacare), but not enough to spark rallies that could harm their plans (supposedly).
@margodiva- Libya, Libya, Libya, and wars are NEVER as short as they say they will be. If some US ship sinks because it's hit by a Libyan missile, we're in for the long haul.
@John Mc- Bush seemed pretty Liberal, besides the war (but even JFK had Bay of Pigs). It seems like both sides suck something serious. I'd say vote Libertarian, but it seems like everyone who makes any headway in politics has to be corrupt somehow.

Tim says:

Here is another related video. In this video entitled "Marxism in America" General Jerry Boykin discusses his background and training in understanding Marxist insurgencies and how this parallels current government actions. http://www.morningstartv.com/oak-initiative/marxism-america

dabad says:

There is no Right or Left, they all work for the same people to further the plan of your enslavement or death. That will ultimately be their choice. Wake up you are being played for fools.

greenblue says:

Socialism never saved anybody. People who believe that are ignorant! Why do you think communism failed so miserably? Because it DOESN'T WORK!

conservative says:

Socialism will always fail and every 1% taxes are increased america becomes 1% more socialist

 
view all 25 comments

Michelle's Boot Camps For Radicals

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, September 04, 2008

Election '08: Democrats' reintroduction of militant Michelle Obama in Denver was supposed to show her softer side. But it only highlighted a radical part of her resume: Public Allies.

Barack Obama was a founding member of the board of Public Allies in 1992, resigning before his wife became executive director of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies in 1993. Obama plans to use the nonprofit group, which he features on his campaign Web site, as the model for a national service corps. He calls his Orwellian program, "Universal Voluntary Public Service."

Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth into government-funded reeducation camps where they'll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of "social change."

The pitch Public Allies makes on its Web site doesn't seem all that radical. It promises to place young adults (18-30) in paid one-year "community leadership" positions with nonprofit or government agencies. They'll also be required to attend weekly training workshops and three retreats.

In exchange, they'll get a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health and child care. They also get a post-service education award of $4,725 that can be used to pay off past student loans or fund future education.

But its real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring about "social change" through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation - the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul "The Red" Alinsky.

"Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to . . . engage in protest activities," Public Allies boasts in a document found with its tax filings. It has already deployed an army of 2,200 community organizers like Obama to agitate for "justice" and "equality" in his hometown of Chicago and other U.S. cities, including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, New York, Phoenix, Pittsburgh and Washington. "I get to practice being an activist," and get paid for it, gushed Cincinnati recruit Amy Vincent.

Public Allies promotes "diversity and inclusion," a program paper says. More than 70% of its recruits are "people of color." When they're not protesting, they're staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing criminals out of jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food stamps and other welfare.

Public Allies brags that more than 80% of graduates have continued working in nonprofit or government jobs. It's training the "next generation of nonprofit leaders" - future "social entrepreneurs."

The Obamas discourage work in the private sector. "Don't go into corporate America," Michelle has exhorted youth. "Work for the community. Be social workers." Shun the "money culture", Barack added. "Individual salvation depends on collective salvation".

"If you commit to serving your community," he pledged in his Denver acceptance speech, "we will make sure you can afford a college education." So, go through government to go to college, and then go back into government.

Many of today's youth find the pitch attractive. "I may spend the rest of my life trying to create social movement," said Brian Coovert of the Cincinnati chapter. "There is always going to be work to do. Until we have a perfect country, I'll have a job."

Not all the recruits appreciate the PC indoctrination. "It was too touchy-feely," said Nelly Nieblas, 29, of the 2005 Los Angeles class. "It's a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias."

One of those -isms is "heterosexism," which a Public Allies training seminar in Chicago describes as a negative byproduct of "capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege."

The government now funds about half of Public Allies' expenses through Clinton's AmeriCorps. Obama wants to fully fund it and expand it into a national program that some see costing $500 billion. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as the military, he said.

The gall of it: The Obamas want to create a boot camp for radicals who hate the military - and stick American taxpayers with the bill. Article Source
Hitler Control.Com

Photobucket
Chicago Chapter: Public Allies. Click this picture to learn more...

Let Your Opinion Be Heard...

I did, and now I can sleep better at night! (Well, kinda...)

submit
  • Reply
    Ron Jul 12, 2009 @ 4:20 pm | delete
    I agree with Keyes; America is in some sort of denial of consequences in thinking we can invent money from debt and give more power to the federal reserve over national value by bankrupting our future worth and going communistic to preserve those in power.

    Obama seems to be being played by every money concern in this country to absorb their debt and shift it on to the backs of Americans. He is so egocentric that they seem to be able to fain economic losses and he rides in with our check book and hands them billions as they laugh all the way to their imperial safety nets off shore and in foreign banks with the cash.

    Obama and the Pelosi/Reed leadership have sold out America for a chance at power by selling out the future into unmanageable debt and welcomed in the cloud of socialism and its exploitation with its corruption of value at the expense of everyone's liberty.
  • Reply
    Jun 22, 2009 @ 4:13 pm | delete
    Saul Alinsky was one of my heroes and so is Barack Obama. I wore out a pair of shoes canvassing for Barack, so I'm thrilled to see community organizing come into its own. Whether Barack will be the great president he potentially is, only time will tell. I expect the Prophets of Doom like Jana to be proven wrong.
  • Reply
    KimGiancaterino Jun 18, 2009 @ 11:32 am | delete
    This lens is featured on A Day of 100 Squid Angel Blessings.
  • Reply
    JanaMurray Jun 5, 2009 @ 8:40 am | in reply to JaguarJulie | delete
    Thanks for visiting this controversial lens. Unfortunately, I believe the time has past for debating. Obama is just a continuation of the Bush regime, on steroids.... Independent "Free Speech" must prevail and continue to thrive.
  • Reply
    JaguarJulie Apr 30, 2009 @ 5:39 pm | delete
    Your lens surely raises some good points for debating!
  • Reply
    EverydayNormalGuy Mar 1, 2009 @ 9:50 pm | delete
    "You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing... One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them." [in reply to Margo_Arrowsmith]
  • Reply
    Feb 21, 2009 @ 3:50 pm | delete
    I think NOW, one month (is that ALL?) into the new Administration some of these folks may be re-thinking their comments. HINT: Watch the "talking-heads" on the Financial networks who so favored the coming "progressive" administration: they are getting a deer-caught-in-the-headlights look as they continue to defend this rapid one-way, runaway Socialist Express Train. It's not just the new President. It's a total breakdown of Constitutional Government. It's a coup. It's over - it's done - Now we Americans will reap our harvest. I bear Mr. Obama no personal animus: "You get what you pay for."
  • Reply
    Squidoo-Pat Jan 18, 2009 @ 9:51 pm | in reply to Margo_Arrowsmith | delete
    The Unfairness Doctrine is a tool used by power dragons to suppress opposition. Those who claim to be the most tolerant are in reality the most intolerant!!! LMAO!
  • Reply
    Margo_Arrowsmith Jan 18, 2009 @ 6:16 pm | in reply to Squidoo-Pat | delete
    Do understand that the only people who are talking about the 'fairness doctrine' are the pundits on the right and the people who listen to them.
  • Reply
    Squidoo-Pat Jan 18, 2009 @ 4:25 pm | delete
    It's just a matter of time before "they" label speech that opposes their views "hate speech." Even Mike Savage said the other day he's waiting for Pelosi to shut him down under something like the "Fairness Doctrine." They want a country full of sheeple and useful idiots. Professional Cons know how important a dazzling smile is.....
  • Load More

TIME Magazine has compared Barack H. Obama to JESUS

The FDR, MLK, and Abe Lincoln comparisons were enough to make any sane person vomit, but much of America has now apparently decided to allow this magazine to replace Jesus with BHO... We've got the Obama Channel, Obama coins for sale from some mint, Obama flags, little California kids singing about Chairman Mau-Bama in music videos, Oprah the wacko calling him The One, Farrakhan telling his millions Obama is The Messiah, 5 new Obama propaganda books released weekly... WHEN DOES IT END? I have a problem with this comparison to JESUS! BHO is not even a respectable man in my book based upon his words and actions! And we're allowing this magazine to replace Jesus with Barack Hussein Obama. I'm not as mad as I am sad...

The Obama Deception

powered by Youtube

Notes on Saul Alinsky and Neo-Marxism:

Alinsky wrote the book used by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as their political playbook

Alinsky's tactics were based, not on Stalin's revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci's transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.

Like Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachev followed Gramsci, not Lenin. In fact, Gramsci aroused Stalins's wrath by suggesting that Lenin's revolutionary plan wouldn't work in the West. Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:

"By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible.... Gramsci's master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity's transcendent God."

The Men Behind Barack Obama

Part 1

powered by Youtube

The Men Behind Barack Obama

Part 2

powered by Youtube

Forget Bill Ayers

Michael Savage interviews Carol Taber of Family Security Matters

powered by Youtube

Pentagon Plan: Deploy U.S. military to "protect" citizens

The Pentagon has released a plan to use over 20,000 uniformed troops for "domestic security"

President George W. Bush and his allies in Congress are continuing their crusade against personal freedom in the name of national security by pushing for a plan to use 20,000 uniformed U.S. military troops for domestic security.

The Posse Comitatus Act, passed in 1878, forbids the use of U.S. military forces for domestic security and law enforcement purposes.

Current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who will remain part of the Obama Administration, has expressed support for the plan, which is currently under going cost review by the Pentagon.

From the Washington Post:

The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.

The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.

There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.

But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response -- a nearly sevenfold increase in five years -- "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

...

The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011. The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., commander of the U.S. Northern Command.

If funding continues, two additional teams will join nearly 80 smaller National Guard and reserve units made up of about 6,000 troops in supporting local and state officials nationwide. All would be trained to respond to a domestic chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive attack, or CBRNE event, as the military calls it.

You Have The Right To Remain Silent. But We Hope You Won't.

powered by Youtube

The choice we face is ominous:

" We either accept world-wide authoritarian government holding together a flawed system, OR we restore the principles of the Constitution, limit government power, restore commodity money without a Federal Reserve system, reject world government, and promote the cause of peace by protecting liberty equally for all persons. Freedom is the answer."
~Ron Paul

How Obama Got Elected...

Interviews With Obama Voters

powered by Youtube

Deception '08

From Twisting Truth Through Group Consensus:
"Tension, created by diversity, is essential to the dialectic process. It energizes members and - when manipulated by well-trained facilitators - produces Synergy. You can't guide people toward synthesis (compromise) unless there are opposing views - both "thesis and antithesis." That's why the consensus process must include all these elements:

* a diverse group
* dialoguing to consensus
* over a social issue
* led by a trained facilitator
* toward a pre-planned outcome.

The true dialectic group never reaches a final consensus, for "continual change" is an ongoing process: one step today, another tomorrow. To permanently change the way we think and relate to each other, our leaders must set the stage for conflict and compromise week after week, year after year. Dialectical thinking and group consensus must become as normal as eating. Eventually, people learn to discard their old mental anchors and boundaries - all the facts and certainties that built firm convictions. They become like boats adrift, always ready to shift with the changing winds and currents." Barack Obama (Neo-Marxism, Gradualism & Slick Deceptions)

A Time for Truth

by William Simon

Time For Truth

Amazon Price: $12.95 (as of 02/13/2012)Buy Now

In his book A Time for Truth, Simon quoted himself in an appearance before Congress as follows:

You ask, Mr. Chairman, about the consequences of deficits. But we all know what they are. We all know that neither man nor business nor government can spend more than is taken in for very long. If it continues, the result must be bankruptcy.

In the case of the federal government, we can print money to pay for our folly for a time. But we will just continue to debase our currency, and then we'll have financial collapse. That is the road we are on today. That is the direction in which the "humanitarians" are leading us.

The problem of deficits, budget balancing, capital markets - all these are important. But it is more important, I think, to understand that these are just early warning symptoms of a disease that threatens the very life of our body politic.

And if we continue to move down this same path, that disease will be irreversible, and our liberty will be lost. [My italics.] I speak of this so insistently because I hear no one discussing this danger. Congress does not discuss it. The press does not discuss it. ... The people do not discuss it - they are unaware of it.

No counterforce in America is being mobilized to fight this danger. The battle is being lost, and not a shot is being fired. That, Mr. Chairman, is why for me the last few years in office have been like a bad dream. I am leaving Washington next January. I am going to go home to New Jersey a very frightened man. Warnings From Insiders - Robert Ringer (A Voice of Sanity in an Insane World

Background reading that might come in handy

Loading

Nostradamus - Obama One-Term President

By August Noble

Barack Obama may have won the 2008 election, but the real winner in the presidential lottery was none other than "Michel de Notredame," who gained newfound respect among the ranks of hardcore skeptics by prophesying the first black president, uncannily describing him as the "white and black of the two intermixed."

The Seer Extraordinaire was able to accomplish, nearly five centuries ago, what modern-day political pundits were unable to do even five short years ago. In so doing, Nostradamus turned die-hard doubters into true believers. The same ones who used to thumb their noses at his predictions are now thumbing through his quatrains, in search of further enlightenment, as in this prophetic verse:

"The great empire each year shall have more strife,
One above all others will the power obtain:
But short will be his reign and life,
Two years on stormy seas will he be able to sustain." - Nostradamus

What it says, in a nutshell, is that Barack Obama is destined be a one-term president. It is not hard to fathom why.

On his hyper-extended campaign trail, Barack made more promises than any mere mortal could ever possibly hope to keep. Now, he is seen as going back on his word, in effect, breaking his contract with America.

For instance, on the stump, he vowed to quickly shut down the "Gitmo Gulag." But, as it turns out, storming the American Bastille is a task more easily said than done.

He also pledged to end the Pentagon's precipitous preemptions and return the troops immediately. But, in the case of Iraq, he not only deferred the draw-down by several years, he has authorized a permanent occupation force to remain behind indefinitely, if not longer.

As for Afghanistan, he has already committed additional ground forces to that potential powder keg. Our continued presence on sacred soil only serves to further infuriate and embolden our sworn "Axis of Oil" enemies.

Even Vice President Joe Biden freely admits that President Obama is certain to be tested. A 9/11 event, Heaven forbid, would convince soccer moms that a Democratic president is not up to the task of protecting the homeland, driving the final nail into his campaign coffers.

Nostradamus used his prodigious prophetic powers to read the political tea leaves, but it does not require a crystal ball to read the writing on the wailing wall. Given the dire straits that he inherited, voters were more than willing to give their Anointed One a honeymoon in the White House. But if Barack Obama fails to deliver on his copious campaign promises, it is highly doubtful that they will deign to grant their Second Coming a second honeymoon in the Oval Office.

http://www.augustnoble.com

Article Source:August Noble

Be A Soldier's Angel

Soldiers' Angels is a volunteer-led nonprofit that encompasses over 20 different teams and programs. They send letters, care packages, and comfort items to deployed American service members, and we support their families here at home.

Featured Lenses

Loading

by

JanaMurray

Restore The Republic Radio more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!

Jana-Murray.com 

Loading Fetching RSS feed... please stand by

Conservative Viewpoints 

Loading

5000 Year Leap 

The 5000 Year Leap (Original Authorized Edition)

Amazon Price: $7.24 (as of 02/13/2012)Buy Now

The nation the Founders built is now in the throes of a political, economic, social, and spiritual crisis that has driven many to an almost frantic search for modern solutions. The truth is that the solutions have been available for a long time -- in the writings of our Founding Fathers -- carefully set forth in this timely book.