Accident of Nature or Intelligent Design?
Ranked #31,781 in Education, #558,953 overall | Donates to Soldiers Angels
Accident of Nature or Intelligent Design?
Life on Earth is abundant. However, life in the Universe is debatable. As of now, in 2007, we have no evidence that life as we know it exist anywhere else.
The big question becomes - why? Is our planet a freak accident of nature or are we the product of an Intelligent Design?
I will present 10 items to make the case for the latter. As an Engineer and a Scientist, I have faith I can present a convincing case. Let me know what you think at the end. Take the poll.
My Summary of 10 Items
- Speed of light.
- Tilt of the Earth on it's axis.
- Size and location of the Moon.
- Properties of water.
- The human brain and consciousness.
- Composition of Earth's atomosphere.
- Ocean salinity.
- Earth's magnetic pole.
- The 92 natural elements of the periodic table.
- Our Sun.
The speed of light
Most individuals are accustomed to the addition rule of velocities: if two cars approach each other from opposite directions, each travelling at a speed of 50 km/h, relative to the road surface, one expects that each car will perceive the other as approaching at a combined speed of 50 + 50 = 100 km/h to a very high degree of accuracy.
However, at velocities at or approaching the speed of light, this rule does not apply. Two spaceships approaching each other, each traveling at 90% the speed of light relative to some third observer between them, do not perceive each other as approaching at 90% + 90% = 180% the speed of light; instead they each perceive the other as approaching at slightly less than 99.5% the speed of light.
Remember Einstein's famous formula: E = mc2. It says mass and energy are interchangeable.
The tilt of the Earth
The Moon
Unique properties of water
The human brain
Earth's atomosphere
The ocean
Earth's magnetic pole
The periodic table of 92 basic elements.
Our Sun - the source of all life and energy
Conclusion
I think not. The various pieces seems to fit together like a giant puzzle. It is also understandable that our world was created for discovery. What I mean by that is that we are given just the right amount of information such that we have the ability to discern the secrets or mysteries of our natural world. In another word, God or some intelligent designer, provided us with the construct so that we may discover his secrets.
Some related information...
- Speed of light on wikipedia
- A detailed explanation on the speed of light.
- Tilt of the Earth on wikipedia
- The Earth's tilt on its axis.
- The moon on wikipedia
- Our Moon is our only satellite..
- Water on wikipedia
- The unique water molecule.
- DNA difference between Man and chimp
- Small difference in DNA between Man and Chimp.
- Human brain on wikipedia
- The human brain - a mystery.
- Earh's atomosphere
- Earth's atomosphere on wikipedia.
- Ocean on wikipedia
- Our ocean.
- Periodic Table on wikipedia
- The 92 basic elements.
- the Sun on wikipedia
- Our Sun.
- Some estimate of probability of life on earth
- A huge number...
- Some answers for atheists
- Some common answers.
Reader Feedback
-
-
Mr. C.
May 12, 2009 @ 5:43 pm | delete
- Design, by definition, is to make something for a purpose. Put it in another way, someone designs an object for use (utility). Whether opponents of design agree or not here are some objects and their purpose(s).
Brain...to think
Eyes...to see
Sun...to give energy
Ocean...to provide living space for acquatic animals / to support life
and the list goes on...
Another criteria for design is that an object must be capable of being mimicked, copied--in whole or in part--to suit a purpose. Examples, cameras are mimicks of the eye, computers are mimicks of the brain, nuclear plants are mimicks of the sun...etc. If the imitations are designed how much more for the original.
But, opponents of design would nitpick by saying that natural objects like a fish is capable of self-reproduction. This argument, to me, is fallacious. There are naturally sterile dogs not capable of self reproduction. On the other hand, there are designed robots capable of reproducing themselves.
-
-
-
ChrisSommovigo Feb 21, 2009 @ 8:31 am | delete
- One question I raise in my lens is simply: With all of life starting presumably at the same starting line (prokaryotes), how is it that only "man" has "evolved" a brain complex enough to invent things like computers and Starbucks and movies? You would think, if the force of evolution was so great for so long, we would be having interspecies conversations by now.
http://www.squidoo.com/Intelligent-Design-Is-Ok
-
-
-
Roger Berry
Dec 14, 2007 @ 8:30 pm | delete
- I just don't see what would stop a 2000 Lb space craft traveling at 186,282 mps from going any faster when 200,000 lb thrust has been applied, I think this sound bearier thing has gone a little too far
-
-
-
Laura S
Jul 27, 2007 @ 12:15 pm | delete
- The moon is worth a lens of its own - millions of yrs ago the moon was much closer
-
Take the following poll
Netflix Movies
The Netflix module has been phased out. You should edit your lens and try adding an Amazon module instead!Great Stuff on Amazon
by jackclee
Hi, I'm Jack. I am currently enjoying some time off from work. I worked for IBM for 28 years on various projects dealing with Museums and Libraries. I... more »
- 35 featured lenses
- Winner of 8 trophies!
- Top lens » Shu Qi
Explore related pages
- Is God Just Pretend? Is God Just Pretend?
- New Atheism | Common Questions and Misunderstandings About Atheism New Atheism | Common Questions and Misunderstandings About Atheism
- Feel As Amazing As You Are Feel As Amazing As You Are
- Your Christian Walk Your Christian Walk
- Are Science and Religion Compatible? Are Science and Religion Compatible?
- The God Delusion The God Delusion