Waking up is unpleasant, you know. You are nice and comfortable in bed. It's irritating to be woken up. That's the reason the wise guru will not attempt to wake people up. I hope I'm going to be wise here and make no attempt whatsoever to wake you up if you are asleep. It is really none of my business, even though I say to you at times, "Wake up!" My business is to do my thing, to dance my dance. If you profit from it, fine; if you don't, too bad! As the Arabs say, "The nature of rain is the same, but it makes thorns grow in the marshes and flowers in the gardens."

source

1. He was unconventional and eventually so liberal the Catholic Church distanced itself from him


2. He learned from all spiritual traditions


3. He saw the depth in Christianity

Is it possible for the rose to say, "I will give my fragrance to the good people who smell me, but I will withhold it from the bad?" Or is it possible for the lamp to say, "I will give my light to the good people in this room, but I will withhold it from the evil people"? Or can a tree say, "I'll give my shade to the good people who rest under me, but I will withhold it from the bad"? These are images of what love is about.

Anthony de Mello on Love

When I meditate on any scene in Christ's life, I make myself present to it. I imagine I am there, taking part in all the events, speaking, listening, acting. When I return to some scene in my past life, I relive it just as it happened with one difference: this time I get Christ to take an active part in it.

The rest of this article about meditating on the life of Jesus Christ

On the question of his own Enlightenment the Master always remained reticent, even though the disciples tried every means to get him to talk.

All the information they had on this subject was what the Master once said to his youngest son who wanted to know what his father felt when he became Enlightened.

The answer was:

"A fool."
When the boy asked why, the Master had replied, "Well, son, it was like going to great pains to break into a house by climbing a ladder and smashing a window and then realizing later that the door of the house was open."

Anthony de Mello on Mysticism and Union with God

Disclaimer: I'm not a catholic

The way to put the work of Anthony de Mello in context is to first off note that he became popular in the 1970's. This is the era that the Roman Catholic Church went liberal. Married men were ordained as deacons (in 1995 women were allowed to become deacons as well). The Latin Mass was replaced for mass in the vernacular in 1970.

Part of that movement for change was one towards more religious tolerance. Jesuits were particularly suited to that task because whatever else one may say of them: they've always studied other religions besides Christianity.

What Anthony de Mello did that was different, but that did suit the times, was to take those other religions seriously and learn from them.

This lead to the official statement by the future pope Ratzinger that:

But already in certain passages in these early works and to a greater degree in his later publications, one notices a progressive distancing from the essential contents of the Christian faith. In place of the revelation which has come in the person of Jesus Christ, he substitutes an intuition of God without form or image, to the point of speaking of God as a pure void. To see God it is enough to look directly at the world. Nothing can be said about God; the only knowing is unknowing. To pose the question of his existence is already nonsense. This radical apophaticism leads even to a denial that the Bible contains valid statements about God.

Ratzinger notes: With the present Notification, in order to protect the good of the Christian faithful, this Congregation declares that the above-mentioned positions are incompatible with the Catholic faith and can cause grave harm.

Source

For my Christian readers this may be the gravest of denunciations. For me as a theosophist it means that de Mello thought for himself and sought to follow truth where it lead him.

For historical context: note that this was written in 1995, a little less than 10 years after de Mello passed away. In other words: while he was alive the RC church did not feel the need to tell Roman Catholics that de Mello was out of bounds.