Bessemer Mounds: Older Than Moundville
View Larger Map
1890 Excavation Report
In 1890, Cyrus Thomas recorded the first excavation. In the report "Mound Exploration" he wrote:
"Near Jonesboro is a small group of mounds on the planatation of N.D. Tailey. The valley of the small creek that flows along the northern and eastern sides of the field in which the group is located is quite wide at this point, the round knob-like hills which form its boundary standing at quite a distance from the mounds.
"The surface of the field immediately around the mounds is comparatively flat, pitching in a steep bank to the water a few feet of Mound No. 1 (small burial mound). Northeast of this mound the surface has the appearance of having been dug or probably washed out by the creek. East of mound three (domiciliary mound) is what might be called the first bottom land, about 4 feet lower than the suface of the field. This point is above the overflow of the small creek, while farther down the valley the land is frequently inundated and had been under water a short time previous to excavation."
"No 1 is an oblong mound, measuring 30 feet east and west, and about 4 feet height at its highest point. A few small pine and hack berry trees have grown on the sides since it was built. It is made of clay, sandy soil as that found in the fields which it stands. Only a few coals and shovelfuls of ashes were found in it, which had been thrown there at the time it was built and may have been scraped up from the surface of the field with the rest of the mound, but in hunting the field over for any specimen that might have washed out or plowed up, no ash beds were seen, nor did any of the tenants of the land remember plowing through such fields.
"No 2 (the ceremonial mound) has the appearance of an oval platform with a small mound at one end of it. The longer diameter of the base of the platform is about 140 feet, the greatest width 100 and the height 5 feet. The height of the upper mound, which is on the smaller end of the platform is 7 feet, the diameter of the flattened top is 30 feet. Its western slope is continuous with that of the platform. The upper mound has been considerably torn up by treasure hunters, but scattered over the top was a large quantity of burnt clay, much of which bore the impression of a stamp made apparently of split cane. A trench lengthwise through the platform showed that the top layer consisted of 4 feet of red sandy soil, evidently taken from the surface of the surrounding field, the remainder, to the original surface of the ground, of pure river sand. The upper mound was comprised of sandy soil down to the platform, and hence it is reasonable to conclude that it was built at the same time that the upper layer was placed on the platform. No bones, ashes, charcoal, or vestiges of art were observed in any part."
"No 3 (the domiciliary mound), is a circular mound, about 110 feet in diameter at the base and 60 feet across the top, which is flat; height 8 feet. A trench across it through the center showed that it was constructed of sandy solid from the surrounding field. In the central portion, about half way down, was a layer of clear river sand 3 inches thick and about five feet in diameter. Nothing else was found in it."
Excavations: 1934 - 1941
A layer of stone pavement formed the base of the Ceremonial Mound. Added to a height of 10 feet was red clay, loam and white sand. The mound contained one burial, scattered potsherds and stone artifacts, fresh water shells, and charcoal. The burial was placed there during construction and was that of a young female. Potsherds were scattered between the rocks of the stone pavement at the base of the mound. One small chert blade and a broken celt were found in the knob. Bits of red and yellow ochre, projectile points, an abrader, a flint knife, and pottery fragments were also found.
The remains of a village was found under the ceremonial mound. All of the structures were square and rectangular, with signs of wood poles being used as support. A stone grave contained two human burials and one dog burial.
The Domiciliary Mound was built in six construction stages. A ramp of steps led to the top. Two large village areas were partly beneath the mound. Some of the structures were round. Four pits were found, probably built for the purpose of refuge. In total, there were thirteen structural above ground structural patterns.
The Burial Mound was built is two stages. The first stage contained three burials. The top mound contained twenty burials. Projectile points, celts, shell beads, bowls, and antler tips were found with some of the burials. Only one human skill was found.
Before the Mound Builders
The only known Paleo site in Jefferson County is near McCalla, about five miles south of the mounds. During the construction of Interstate 459, a site was partially excavated and found to have been inhabited by Indians from 8,000 B.C. to 1000 A.D. Near the site is a cave on the banks of Five mile Creek. Excavated in 1974, evidence was found that human activity at the cave dates back to 7,500 B.C. Pearl beads, shell artifacts, and basketry fragments were found in the cave.
State of Mound Site Today
Future development threatens to totally destroy what is left.
It is sad that so much of the site has been destroyed, but what remains could still become an archaeological park that would be an asset to the city and state. This would require some common sense and foresight.
Link to Bessemer Mound Photos
- Bessemer Mounds Photos
- COLLECTION 1934.009
EXCAVATIONS AT THE BESSEMER SITE, SITE 1JE12
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
Moundville
- Moundville Alabama Archaeological Site
- Read about Moundville here. At one time, Moundville was the largest city in North America.


More Reading
The American Indian in Alabama and the Southeast by John Franklin Phillips
Things Remembered: Stories About Western Jefferson County by James H. Walker
Great Stuff on Amazon
New YouTube vids
arrowhead hunting in missouri
arrowhead hunting with my son,little artifactman





Runtime: 8:03 | 3690 views | 27 Comments
automatically generated by YouTube
New Guestbook
-
Reply
- Pat Pat Oct 1, 2009 @ 12:40 pm | in reply to Scott
- There is no access to this mound site, The State of Alabama and Jefferson County are not interested in preserving the mounds. Neither, I might add is Oxford, AL who is allowing the destruction of a mound, it will be used as fill dirt for a shopping complex.
On a good note , the sewer expansion in Jefferson County, AL has been a disaster, the Watermark shopping center can't keep businesses and is a disaster and the amusement park isn't worth the addmission . Go to show that when mounds are protected by a higher power, nothing succeeds in their place.
-
Reply
- Billco Billco Nov 18, 2008 @ 4:57 am
- Scott, No there isn't. All of the recent development in the last decade has seen to that. It is a shame that the mounds weren't protected. Most people who have lived in the area all of their lives have no idea that the mounds ever existed.
-
Reply
- Scott Scott Nov 17, 2008 @ 10:53 pm
- Any idea if there is any access to bessemer mound area now?
-
Reply
- Jun 18, 2008 @ 1:39 am
- wow!
what terrific information about Indian Mounds and i like very much those mounds.
I have created one more useful lens about excavation work.
-
Reply
- EvieJewelry EvieJewelry Mar 18, 2008 @ 6:30 pm
- Very interesting
-
Reply
- kiwisoutback kiwisoutback Mar 5, 2008 @ 6:38 pm
- Wow, that interesting! Sounds like you did a lot of research on this old site. Great lens!
-
Reply
- Signhappy Signhappy Feb 14, 2008 @ 10:07 am
- Very interesting lens. Hope that the mounds can be preserved. As if we need another outlet mall in the world. 5 Stars!!
Fetching new data from eBay now... please stand by




