Bill Gates' Karma: The New Sanyasis

Ranked #597 in Nonprofits, #161,537 overall | Donates to Squidoo Charity Fund

Clean Karma, Dirty Karma

tweet



After publishing Bill Gates' $600 Billion Challenge (in which I mentioned Warren Buffet's donation of $30 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) and Five Charities Bill Gates Supports, I discovered a new phenomenon. There is in fact a large number of people who are devoting themselves to philantropy after amassing tons of money: Pierre Omidyar, Jeff Skoll, William Draper, Klaus Schwab, Sergy Brin and Larry Page, John Doerr, and many others. While discussing the matter with a friend today, he said (referring to Bill Gates specifically, and by extrapolation to the others) that "because of his bad actions before becoming a philantropist, his karma is already too dirty. Nothing will clean it now."

I replied that what we are really concerned with is not whether the new philantropists have a clean or dirty karma, whether their hands are clean or dirty, but whether their actions will help change the world, whether they will help alleviate the sufferings of the hungry, the dying, the sick, the homeless and all the vulnerable people of the world. Those people don't have the privilege of asking about the color or odor of the aid they're receiving: either they accept or they are doomed.

I thought it would be interesting to publish a lens on the world's New Sanyasis, and I'm doing it only a few hours after meeting my friend. At a later stage, I will add my thoughts about questions related to fortunes amassed through corruption, crime and organized crime.

Photo courtesy Jean-Marie Hulot, fotopedia.com.

Karma and Karmic Law

According to Merriam-Webster's dictionary, karma is "the force generated by a person's actions held in Hinduism and Buddhism to perpetuate transmigration and in its ethical consequences to determine the nature of the person's next existence."

In Hinduism, the Karmic Law is a law of cause and effect. Whenever we think or do something, we provoke a cause, which in time will bear its corresponding effects. The concept of birth and reincarnation is derived from law.

The karma of a human being is determined by his positive and negative actions.

A person with good karma will have a rewarding life in his next birth, otherwise he will live a lower life form. To achieve good karma in a life, it is necessary to live according to dharma or what is right or godly.

So, is it possible that our New Philantropists have taken their new paths because they have suddenly realized that their karma isn't good at all, having accumulated tons of money up to now? Because, let us be clear about one thing: a person who possesses much more than what is normally required to live a normal and healthy life is in fact responsible for the fate of other people's sufferings. Resources and wealth, contrary to what the protagonists of the Law of Attraction believe, are limited, and the unequal distribution and overconcentration
of wealth is one of the major causes of poverty, hunger, homelessness and spread of diseases in the world.

Yes, the philantropists have probably realized that they've made many people suffer. Now they are trying to alleviate those sufferings. Are we to tell them: "your karma is bad, you will never be able to clean it" or should we not instead commend them for changing and for taking care of the vulnerable, albeit a bit late?

By changing, they are also provoking other people with bad karma to change. This is what's going to change the world: a chain reaction from all the persons with bad karma.

If the people with good karma can't change the world, let those with bad karma do it.

Hat's off to the people with bad karma who have taken a new direction!

Let us debate

Is it important to know if a philantropist's karma is clean or dirty?

Loading

Yes, it is. The donor's dirty or bad karma will be transferred to the recipients.

Research Eugenics says:

Obviously its important-- I challenge you to discover for yourself that much of the PHILANTHROPY from Bill Gates Found or Rockefeller Foundation is NOT CHARITY... it is EUGENICS... please look it up... its more than karma, it is deceptive intention harm

No, their karma is their own business. At least their money will serve a purpose, albeit late.

karmicchristian says:

To each his own!

mismatch says:

It is not the money that can really change things -- in a longer run. In a short run it does not matter -- what does it matter if one would die of hunger, neglect or abuse today or later on another day? Change will come from a general and universal human development -- that comes slowly and must be whole throughout the entire society. It comes through information and education.

mismatch says:

No one is entirely clean or dirty. We all have weak and strong sides, good and bad sides too. Throughout a life we all have stages of change. Sizes and proportions are less important because they are relativ to situations and people we interact -- which will never entirely make happy each of them.

sabrebIade says:

Nope, "Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?"

libysquid says:

I don't believe that karma is so much transferred between people in this way. However one must consider that everything is energy and energy is never lost but transferred....so when you do things to change the karma to good or bad(sadly) the lost energy will leave you and be transferred to another. But, I don't believe it would be anyone you help or are simply in contact with.

 
view all 8 comments

Bill Gates and others: the New Sanyasis?

In India many men, including a large number who have fared very well in life, leave all material belongings and sexual attachments upon reaching the autumn of their lives to roam around the country alone or in small groups. They wear a yellow ochre or white robe. Their only possessions are a water pot, an alms bowl, prayer beads and sometimes an extra robe. These people who have taken the vow of poverty will depend on charity for the rest of their lives. They will sleep in temples, huts or caves.

They are the sanyasis of India.

We are now seeing the emergence of a new breed of sanyasis: the New Sanyasis of the Information Age.

I don't know whether India benefits from it's sanyasis, whether the abandoned wives lead a miserable life after the departure of the husbands, whether the children, young or old, suffer from the absence of the fathers, but I'm certain of one thing: the New Sanyasis are paving the way to a completely new way of thinking that will change the world.

Bill Gates' Karma


Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons



Bill Gates leaves Microsoft to devote himself to a new career: philantropy.

Warren Buffet donates $30 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Pierre Omidyar, the founder of ebay, quits his job except the chairmanship of the company, to create the Omidyar Network.

William Draper, one of the biggest venture capitalists in Silicon Valley, creates the Draper Richards Foundation.

Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum (Davos), founded the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship.


In the footsteps of the New Sanyasis

Do the followers' have bad karma too? That doesn't matter.

Others are not far from following the New Sanyasis in their steps by turning into social activists:

Jeff Skoll, cofounder of ebay, also runs a company which makes socially conscious films: Participant Productions.

The founders of Google, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, after raising the company to an unprecedented summit, created Google.org. This charity supports social entrepreneurs and has raised more than $1 billion.

John Doerr, the well-known venture capitalist, is the prime mover of an effort to raise $100 million for microcredit loans.

Books about the New Philantropists

Loading

Squid Angel Blessings

This lens has been blessed by Jack2205 and Margo_Arrowsmith. Thank you, Jack 2205 and Margo.

You liked this hub? Don't forget to rate it.

You can also bookmark it, or Digg it, or Stumble it.

This module only appears with actual data when viewed on a live lens. The favorite and lensroll options will appear on a live lens if the viewer is a member of Squidoo and logged in.

Add this to your lens »

Please leave a few words

  • karmicchristian Jul 22, 2011 @ 12:37 am | delete
    Merely by giving away money, one cannot atone for what karma or fate or destiny has in store! Let God be the judge and the jury for each actions of everyone. :)
  • UKGhostwriter Mar 19, 2011 @ 4:16 pm | delete
    Let him give, and give, and give
  • Margo_Arrowsmith Mar 16, 2011 @ 5:26 am | delete
    I note that the one guy quit Ebay to give the charity while Meg Whitman used her money to run or office so that she could give more to the wealthy She lost. Maybe that is Karma also.

    Angel Blessed and lensrolled to Blessed by an Angel
  • ---Chazz Mar 11, 2011 @ 12:14 pm | delete
    What about Ben & Jerry of the ice cream emporium? Their foundation does some great work. I wonder if the "bad karma" philanthropists were influenced by eating ice cream with good karma?
  • libysquid Mar 9, 2011 @ 1:53 pm | delete
    I certainly believe in good karma and bad karma. I never would have thunk that the people with bad karma would be the ones changing the world. But it makes perfect sense. I certainly believe in karma being existent, and I have to wonder is anyone of us without bad karma. Considering that we were all born in sin etc? Hmmm??? This is an interesting lens. I would like to learn more so I hope you update it often Rafick...:)
  • Rafick Mar 9, 2011 @ 9:41 pm | delete
    Thanks, libysquid. I only had the idea to publish this lens yesterday and here it was a few hours later. I will certainly update as new ideas crop up and as I gather more information on the New Sanyasis.
  • libysquid Mar 12, 2011 @ 8:24 pm | delete
    Hey Rafick,
    Thanks for being inspired to build this, I'm thouroughly enjoying it. It interest me greatly the good and the bad in the world, and we all know karma has almost everything to do with it. I'm intrigued to know if these people that seek this last ditch attempt to clean their karmic lives up are actually successful. I mean isn't doing a good deed for gain make the good deed alot less relevant. Good is suppose to be done simply in the name of good. Am I wrong?
  • Rafick Mar 13, 2011 @ 1:44 pm | delete
    Well, I think everyone deserves a second chance, libysquid, even the ruthless super-rich.

    As far as good deeds are concerned, it's the result that counts, not the one who accomplishes it. According to me, the reasons for which the New Sanyasis are engaged in philantropy is their private concern.

    To take it to another level, there are so many corrupt people in the world, many of whom are not identified, and these people are involved in philantropy. Many of them are regarded as clean and good people (whereas they are criminals, probably much worse people than the new philantropists). Are we concerned with whether philantropists are criminals hiding behing a veil of honesty or should we not leave that to investigators and concentrate on the good deeds?

Squidoo Charity Fund is a Great Charity

The Squidoo Charity Fund has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for charity. Thanks to the Squidoo community, we've built schools in Cambodia, given underprivileged classrooms computers and software, funded important reseach against Juvenile Diabetes

You might also like to visit

Loading

by

Rafick

Hello all. I am a world citizen. I worked for many years as an architect and a real estate promoter in Mauritius.
I am now devoted full-time to writing...
more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!

Featured Lenses 

Loading

Amazon Spotlight Personal Review