Build My Rank vs Unique Ariticle Wizard

Since BMR is closed, why not take a look at some of these Wallpapers:

iPad HD Wallpaper








New iPad Wallpaper








Scarlett Johansson Wallpaper








Hobbit Wallpaper








Avengers Wallpaper

Unique Article Wizard (UAW) has been around for a long time and has a lot of fans who think highly of it. I have used UAW on a couple of sites and miscellaneous articles and I have seen a resulting positive effect.

Here is how UAW works:

You write three versions of an article. Each should have the same amount of paragraphs with the same basic content. UAW will then shuffle these paragraphs to give you multiple unique articles.

These can differ from truly "spun" content because each article is unique and written for human consumption, so you do not get a lot of those "phrases that sound awkward and stilted.

If you desire "further" spinning, the system also accepts spin-text to make your article really and truly unique.

Each article is then checked by a real person. They do not ensure that every spun version will be "perfect" but they read a spun output and ensure that there are no major errors and that the output has a certain quality level.

The spun output is then sent to hundreds of blogs that are looking for content. But it is not just any blogs but only ones that fall under the general categories you choose. This can mean that your posts are sent to anywhere from 20 blogs to 400-500 hundred.

After that it is all in the hands of the blog owners. Some will not publish your content at all; while others will publish everything that gets sent to them. You can figure to have about 30-50% of the blogs that UAW posts to actually get published.

Generally this gives you A LOT of links from a wide variety of sources.

The strength of UAW is this VOLUME of links. Many of these linking sites may be low in authority and pagerank, but if you get enough links coming in it can matter.

Build My Rank works in a completely different fashion.

Here is how BMR works:

First of all the entire idea of the BMR system is dead set against any sort of spinning. In fact, spinning can get you banned.

On one hand this means more work for you, but on the other hand it means that the "company" you have on the websites where your article is published will be of higher quality.

Another difference is length of the article.

BMR is strict on a 1 link for 150 words policy. This means that most articles clock in a little bit on the "thin" side at only 150-200 words.

Once you write your article it is quality checked. They are serious about this too. A misplaced punctuation, or misspelled word will quickly get an article rejected for rewrite.

Once an article has been accepted it will randomly be posted on a website with a base pr of PR1 through PR 7. BMR owns thousands of these sites.

The BMR system will ensure the article is pinged and linked with social media. They keep doing this until it shows up on Google search results. This means that once you write an article you can ensure that there is at least a minimal amount of "link juice" going to the article and that it will be indexed by Google.

You may wonder at having to write each and every BMR article yourself. (or having them outsourced) But think of it this way. Without any extra spinning 3 - 600 word UAW articles take 1800 written words. That equals about 12 BMR links.

So it is 12 links VS. 20-200 for UAW.

You would think this still puts UAW ahead, and in terms of sheer volume, it does. But there is also a case of quality. The fact of the matter is that since BMR is so aggressive in quality their links are simply more valuable.

I tried BMR and UAW on two different articles for over a month. Both had similar rankings prior to starting the test. Both had similar competition and I tried to spend a similar amount of time actually using each system (about an hour a day for a month) then I waited for two more months to see what the "long term" results from each would be.

There was simple no comparison. The BMR article rose from 57 on Google search results to #5 dead in the middle of the first page of results.
The UAW Article started at 53 on Google search results for the main keywords. It rose to #19 on Google search results.

Both worked and both were my only source of back-linking. (something not really recommended). But the little difference is an important one. At #5 I am making money and growing traffic from the time I invested in the article/keywords while the other still needs more "work" to make it profitable.

Since both of these programs are on the expensive side, they may not be for you. But if you want to take a shot, I would wholeheartedly recommend BMR over UAW.