Chemtrails Causing Illness

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet

The alarming decline in bee populations across the United States and Europe represents a potential ecological apocalypse, an environmental catastrophe that could collapse the food chain and wipe out humanity. Who and what is behind this flagrant abuse of the eco-system?

Many people don't realize the vital role bees play in maintaining a balanced eco-system. According to experts, if bees were to become extinct then humanity would perish after just four years.

"If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man," said Albert Einstein.

Others would say four years is alarmist and that man would find other food sources, but the fact remains that the disappearance of bees is potentially devastating to agriculture and most plant life.

Reports that bee populations are declining at rates of up to 80% in areas of the U.S. and Europe should set alarm bells ringing and demand immediate action on behalf of environmental organizations. Experts are calling the worrying trend "colony collapse disorder" or CCD.

"Bee numbers on parts of the east coast and in Texas have fallen by more than 70 percent, while California has seen colonies drop by 30 to 60 percent," reports AFP.

"Approximately 40 percent of my 2,000 colonies are currently dead and this is the greatest winter colony mortality I have ever experienced in my 30 years of beekeeping," apiarist Gene Brandi, from the California State Beekeepers Association, told Congress recently.

The article states that U.S. bee colonies have been dropping since 1980 and the number of beekeepers have halved.

Scientists are thus far stumped as to what is causing the decline, ruling out parasites but leaning towards some kind of new toxin or chemical used in agriculture as being responsible. "Experts believe that the large-scale use of genetically modified plants in the US could be a factor," reports Germany's Spiegal Online.

Bee populations throughout Germany have simultaneously dropped 25% and up to 80% in some areas. Poland, Switzerland and Spain are reporting similar declines. Studies have shown that bees are not dying in the hive, something is causing them to lose their sense of orientation so that they cannot return to the hive. Depleted hives are not being raided for their honey by other insects, which normally happens when bees naturally die in the winter, clearly suggesting some kind of poisonous toxin is driving them away.

"In many cases, scientists have found evidence of almost all known bee viruses in the few surviving bees found in the hives after most have disappeared. Some had five or six infections at the same time and were infested with fungi -- a sign, experts say, that the insects' immune system may have collapsed."

A study at the University of Jena from 2001 to 2004 showed that toxins from a genetically modified maize variant designed to repel insects, when combined with a parasite, resulted in a "significantly stronger decline in the number of bees" than normal.

"According to Hans-Hinrich Kaatz, a professor at the University of Halle in eastern Germany and the director of the study, the bacterial toxin in the genetically modified corn may have "altered the surface of the bee's intestines, sufficiently weakening the bees to allow the parasites to gain entry -- or perhaps it was the other way around. We don't know."

Kaatz was desperate to continue his studies but funding was cut off.

While we are lectured by government to change our lifestyle and cough up more taxes for the supposed peril of man-made global warming, an environmental catastrophe that could eliminate the human race in the figurative blink of an eye is looming.

Why are major environmental groups and lobbyists ignoring this mammoth threat to our very existence? Where is Greenpeace?

The hyperbole surrounding man-made global warming is swallowing up all the attention while real dangers like the rapid die-off of bee populations and its link to GM food is largely shunned by governments and activist foundations.

Is it a stretch to hypothesize that government mandated spraying of crops with deadly chemicals as well as toxic substances contained in chemtrails could be part of a deliberate program to eliminate the bee population? Or is this just another example of big business flagrantly abusing the eco-system in order to drive up profits?

The elite have publicly stated their desire to significantly reduce world population on numerous occasions. Just yesterday we featured a story about a British Government Ministry of Defense report that postulated on the future use of bio-weapons to thin the human population in under 30 years.

Making bees all but extinct would be a swift and plausibly deniable method of enacting global population reduction long dreamed of by the maniacal sociopaths that control the world.

Either way, this issue represents an overwhelming threat to the food chain and an environmental crime of the highest order, for which the perpetrators need to be brought up on charges of accessories to genocide, should a deliberate effort to endanger the food chain be proven, and the chemicals responsible immediately banned.

Please circulate this article to environmental groups and demand they investigate who and what is killing our bees!

Scientists now admit that emissions from aircraft are forming artificial clouds that block out the sun, precisely what geoengineering advocates like top eugenicist and White House science advisor John P. Holdren have called for, but the article tries to insinuate that the effect is caused by natural "vapours," when in reality it can be attributed to chemtrails that contain substances harmful to humans.

"The phenomenon occurs when aircraft fly above 25,000ft, where the air temperature is around minus 30C. This causes water vapour emitted by the engines to crystallise and form the familiar white streaks across the sky, known as contrails," writes Oliver Tree for the Daily Mail.

"Reading University's Professor Keith Shine, an expert in clouds, said that those formed by aircraft fumes could linger 'for hours', depriving those areas under busy flight paths, such as London and the Home Counties, of summer sunshine."

"Experts have warned that, as a result, the amount of sunlight hitting the ground could be reduced by as much as ten per cent. Professor Shine added: "Over the busiest areas in London and the South of England, this high-level cloud could cover the sky, turning bright sunshine into hazy conditions for the entire area. I expect the effects will get worse as the volume of air traffic increases."

The report also makes reference to a 2009 Met Office study which found that high-level winds did not disperse contrails that later formed into clouds which covered an astonishing 20,000 miles.

Of course, this is no natural phenomenon as the article claims. Ten years ago, contrails from jet aircraft disappeared within minutes, yet apparently we are led to believe that the same substance is now causing the trails to linger for hours and form into clouds. This is impossible without something within the substance having been changed.

Mainstream science and academia has gone from dismissing chemtrails as a fantasy of paranoid conspiracy theorists to now accepting that they exist but claiming that they are natural and not artificially induced.

In reality, chemtrails are the consequence of the agenda to geoengineer the earth in the name of combating climate change, a science vehemently backed by people like John P. Holdren, who in his 1977 book Ecoscience advocated poisoning the water supply to involuntarily sterilize humans as part of a "planetary regime" that would control every aspect of our existence. The fact that such eugenicists are now in control of geoengineering programs that will have a direct impact on our health is alarming.

Geoengineering programs have also been promoted by the Council on Foreign Relations, which is one of the main steering committees behind the implementation of global governance.

A recent report issued by the UK government also calls for the UN to exclusively regulate world wide geoengineering of the planet in order to stave off man made global warming.

Discussion of geoengineering technology is often framed as a future consideration, yet governments are already conducting such programs at an advanced stage.

The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program was created in 1989 with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and is sponsored by the DOE's Office of Science and managed by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research.

One of ARM's programs, entitled Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC), is aimed at measuring "cloud simulations" and "aerosol retrievals".

Another program under the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Science Program is directed towards, "developing comprehensive understanding of the atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter."

The DOE website states that, "The current focus of the program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct and indirect influences on climate and climate change."

U.S. government scientists are already bombarding the skies with the acid-rain causing pollutant sulphur dioxide in an attempt to fight global warming by "geo-engineering" the planet, despite the fact that injecting aerosols into the upper atmosphere carries with it a host of both known and unknown dangers.

The proposal to disperse sulphur dioxide in an attempt to reflect sunlight was discussed in a September 2008 London Guardian article entitled, Geoengineering: The radical ideas to combat global warming, in which Ken Caldeira, a leading climate scientist based at the Carnegie Institution in Stanford, California, promoted the idea of injecting the atmosphere with aerosols.

"One approach is to insert "scatterers" into the stratosphere," states the article. "Caldeira cites an idea to deploy jumbo jets into the upper atmosphere and deposit clouds of tiny particles there, such as sulphur dioxide. Dispersing around 1m tonnes of sulphur dioxide per year across 10m square kilometres of the atmosphere would be enough to reflect away sufficient amounts of sunlight."

Experiments similar to Caldeira's proposal are already being carried out by U.S. government -backed scientists, such as those at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, who last year began conducting studies which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case "porous-walled glass microspheres," into the stratosphere.

The project is closely tied to an idea by Nobel Prize winner Paul Crutzen, who "proposed sending aircraft 747s to dump huge quantities of sulfur particles into the far-reaches of the stratosphere to cool down the atmosphere."

Such programs merely scratch the surface of what is likely to be a gargantuan and overarching black-budget funded project to geo-engineer the planet, with little or no care for the unknown environmental consequences this could engender.

What is known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA "Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation's cultural heritage."

The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to raise serious questions about whether such programs should even be allowed to proceed.

The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.

- Neurological effects and behavioral changes

- Disturbance of blood circulation

- Heart damage

- Effects on eyes and eyesight

- Reproductive failure

- Damage to immune systems

- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder

- Damage to liver and kidney functions

- Hearing defects

- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism

- Dermatological effects

- Suffocation and lung embolism

According to the LennTech website, "Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk. Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals."

Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of tinkering with the planet's delicate eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.

"If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid," said Singer.

Even Greenpeace's chief UK scientist - a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation - Doug Parr has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet as "outlandish" and "dangerous".

Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who recently proposed a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would be used to block out the Sun, admits that geo-engineering could cause "conflicts between nations if geoengineering projects go wrong."

Given all the immediate dangers associated with bombarding the atmosphere with sulphur dioxide, along with the unknown dangers of other geo-engineering projects, many people are concerned that "chemtrails" are a secret component of the same agenda to alter the Earth's eco-system.

The fact that chemtrails are blocking out the sun, which is precisely what the geoengineering advocates call for, strongly indicates that they are an integral part of this dangerous and wide-reaching program.
This graphic proposes, "Spraying aluminum powder and barium oxide into high levels of the atmosphere, again delivered by aircraft, to increase planetary reflectance (albedo) and cloud cover." High levels of barium have been found in substances associated with chemtrails.

Reports of chemtrails, jet plumes emitted from planes that hang in the air for hours and do not dissipate, often blanketing the sky in criss-cross patterns, have increased dramatically over the last 10 years. Many have speculated that they are part of a government program to alter climate, inoculate humans against certain pathogens, or even to toxify humans as part of a population reduction agenda.

read full article: http://www.infowars.com/scientists-admit-chemtrails-are-creating-artificial-clouds-2/

Earth Day approaches. A time for appreciation, reflection and action.
Activists mobilize to defend the responsible stewardship of this precious blue
sphere. Global warming remains the big issue on the podium and in Big Media.
But the focus on chimney stacks and car exhaust rising from the ground is
distracting world attention from a far more apocalyptic operation underway in
the sky: global warming mitigation. While environmentalists have long argued
that a warm, fuzzy blanket of greenhouse gas threatens to melt polar ice caps,
one of the most ambitious global engineering initiatives in earth's history
may have already started above and over our heads.

Evidence is now literally floating in the air for various projects underway,
documented by patents and confirmed by whistleblowers, in militaryspeak:
aerial spraying, scattering and chaff operations. We, mere mortals on the
ground, may use the term "chemtrails", and without Our consent, it appears
that heavy metals are being released into the upper atmosphere at an alarming
rate - to save us from ourselves - as proposed in a paper delivered before the
22nd International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, in 1997, by E. Teller et
al.

The author, to be more precise, is 'E' for Edward, preceded by 'Dr.', the
co-father of the H-Bomb and darling savant of the US Department of Defense and
the military-industrial-academic establishment, the same Dr. T who in the 50's
invented a perky little radiation mascot, Readi Killowat, while proposing to
create artificial harbours by nuking the coastline. Although we got the bomb,
thankfully, the glowing harbours never got the green light. But on April 24,
2001, the New York Times confirmed that he had indeed "promoted the idea of
manipulating the earth's atmosphere to counteract global warming." The Spin: a
lining of aluminum chaff scattered into the upper atmosphere to create a sun
screen - like a giant emergency blanket wrapping the earth - to reflect UV
radiation back into space and save the world!

Brilliant! A chrome-plated planet. But here's the catch: What goes up, must
come down. Over three months, three separate rainwater and snow samples from
Chapel Hill, North Carolina were collected and submitted for 'double-blind'
laboratory analysis in March, 2002. Tests were ordered for several elements
which should not be present in normal rain or snow. The result was devastating
news about the health of our ecosystem: all samples consistently revealed
enough of the following materials to indicate that they were present in the
atmosphere "in large amounts... and concentrated form" through a "very
controlled delivery (dispersion)," primarily: aluminum and barium.

Follow the chemical trail, from A-Z. Aluminum, inhaled or ingested, as we have
all been warned, makes us forget the warnings that aluminum makes us
forget.... in other words: Aluminum - bad. Barium compounds that dissolve well
in water (like rain) will cause a whole host of symptoms, from breathing
difficulties to brain swelling. Barium is hygroscopic, a dessicant or drying
agent: itchy eyes, burning throat, asthma, allergies, nose and lung bleeds.
Barium - really bad. Just ask Readi Kilowatt's chemical counterpart, Mr. Yuk!
Most of us will remember the mean, green man who stopped us from downing a
bottle of Bleach when we were six. The Mr. Yuk for our corner of earth is
technically the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) in the south, and
Environment Canada, where it snows. However, barium hasn't even been
classified by the EPA with respect to human carcinogenity because no studies
have even been done on people. Surprisingly, aluminum is also a no show on the
list of haza!
rdous air pollutants.

But check any Material Safety Data Sheet and you'll find barium clearly
marked: "DANGER! MAY BE FATAL IF SWALLOWED" with the "Health Rating: 3 -
Severe (Life)". Hey kids, bring out your "GOGGLES and GLOVES" Mr. Yuk's taking
you on a picnic! But, here's the scary part, on the same Data Sheet, under
Environmental Toxicity: "No information found". Barium has twenty times more
chronic lethality than the worse organic-chlorinated pesticide (private
interview with R. Mike Castle, Nationally Accredited Environmental Risk
Auditor). Confusing? Not really - nobody with enough acuity to read has been
reckless enough to intentionally release barium into the ecosystem. Until now.

When anhydrous barium (mon)oxide reacts with water, forming barium hydroxide
(commonly known as soluble barium salts), the chemical reaction liberates a
lot of heat. And where there's heat, there's fire. Let's connect the dots.
Follow closely: February 17, 2002 UP Science News headlines, "Pollution drying
up rainfall" - when particles are too small to seed nice fat raindrops, "the
clouds that do form... have a hard time to rain." These tiny particles are
called "aerosols" by scientists, and long term exposure is now "an important
environmental risk factor for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality"
(Journal of the American Medical Association). Bad news for the humans.

It gets worse for the earth, and here's where the heat turns up: a third of
the United States and even vast tracts of Canadian Prairie are suffering from
acute drought conditions, some of the worst shortages in years. Rivers are
literally drying up. Reservoirs are at record low levels. New York has
declared a drought emergency. Montana is officially a drought disaster area.
Even the UN warns of severe water shortages by 2025 - globally. Back to the
lab: barium has a much lower "specific heat" value of 0.19 as compared to air
(1.003) and water (4.184). When introduced at higher altitudes, barium will
have a net effect of increasing the temperature of the atmosphere. Ergo: it
gets hot and dry.

Why would anyone want to do that to the earth? Ask the military: In 2025 (a
familiar date), US aerospace forces plan to "own the weather" by "capitalizing
on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to
war-fighting applications."(The Weather as a Force Multiplier, August 1996).
In a summary table, under the column "DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES", among all the
nasty options we find: "Precipitation Denial - Induce Drought". The smoking
gun, not surprisingly always sits on the rack in a Department of Defense pick
up truck. Technicians working at the Tesla Center, Wright Patterson Air Force
Base, in Dayton, Ohio, have positively identified aluminum, barium, polymer
webs with melanin, ethylene glycol-based monoacrylates and other heavy metals
used extensively for weather modification projects for years (R. Mike Castle).

What a wicked, tangled web it is - literally. And here's where we find the
other half of our sandwich: DYN-O-Gel. Sounds like a product Ronco might
distribute, but it is actually the trade name for cross-linked aqueous
polymer, US Patent 6,315,213 awarded two years ago to one Peter Cordani - when
dispersed into a storm it forms a gelatinous substance which falls to the
ground, "thus diminishing the clouds ability to rain." Dial-O-Matic in the
weather!

And if you took your Pocket Fisherman to Florida Bay last month, you would
have probably caught some of those "gelatinous blobs floating in it and
spider-web-like filaments." In January, fishermen in the Bay of Mexico began
to report on a zone of lifeless water, about the size of Lake Athabasca, they
dubbed "black water". By early April, divers off Key West found dead and dying
sponges, a trail of devastation and no answers. Clearly, none of the baffled
marine biologists read Woman's World magazine: an article in the March 19
edition proudly announced that a Florida research firm had discovered "a
powder that will give you perfect weather every day," and that in a top-secret
test, this weather wonder drug was scattered over a storm by military planes.
The company spokesman: Peter Cordani. The product: DYN-O-Gel. The Spin: it
will "protect the lives of millions, but it'll protect your leisure time, too."

The most plausible explanation for "black water": a recent real world test on
a hurricane released enough Gel into the atmosphere to kill everything in the
sea below. What goes up, must come down. So what about humans breathing in
this miracle product? Mike Castle explains how these fine acrylic acrylate
powders will suck all the moisture from your lungs, sticking the insides
together - in two words: "extremely toxic". Not advised.

Mr. Yuk take cover! The scientists are playing God but there are no
environmental impact assessments for these compounds or any other kinds of
weather manipulation chemistry. So why are they being sprayed into our skies?