Crazy Creationists
Ranked #14,470 in Culture & Society, #289,316 overall | Donates to Earthjustice
A Circus of Crazy Creationists
They're the daring circus of crazy creationists!
In this lens, we focus on the far-out claims of modern-day creationists. Why? Because it's just plain fun to examine the weird every now and then. Just as we can indulge our curiosity in learning about people who spend their lives trying to prove the existence of Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster or fairies, we can get a lot of entertainment in watching people ignore some of the most significant discoveries of science in order to try to prove that people thousands of years ago knew all that there is to know about the creation of the universe.
They may get it wrong, but boy, they get it wrong with panache!
News About Creationism
Irregular Times reports the latest on kooky creationist plots
Fetching RSS feed... please stand byPresident Obama's Creationist Advisor - Rick Warren
Why is Barack Obama giving special White House privileges to Creationist Rick Warren?
Is Creation Science Really Science At All?
We'll throw a little Intelligent Design into the mix as well...
Is Creation Science, including its subcategory of Intelligent Design, really science?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byYes.
niteryder says:
Most likely. After reading this lens , I am starting to doubt evolution. In one of the first links from this lens, (see above) it states "These fossils could be the first". Tha is true, it COULD BE. There are no facts. Then it states "they're very ancient: At least 635 million years ancient. That's the age of rocks". Huh? How were these rocks dated? And who says it was not 330 million years? That makes it a false statement. In both arguments you need to be AWAKE and carefull for statemens like these.
Posted July 17, 2009
No.
Joe says:
Teaching or believing in creationism is tantamount to thinking that America attacked Japan at Okinawa on Dec. 7th, 1941 instead of what really happened.
Posted January 15, 2012
nevets_sdoow says:
Of course creationism isn't a science. If creationism were a science, most scientists would BE creationists! They are not. In fact, almost none are.
Posted April 07, 2011
Andres1000 says:
fuck no
Posted December 23, 2010
PizmoBeach says:
I just can't see any basis for creationism in science or fact.
Posted September 28, 2010
thinking person says:
definitely not. not even close. they are just a bunch of idiots who are scared of losing their religious believers, because as science advances it will be obvious that more and more lies of religion and bible will be revealed. they are trying to stop that from happening, but hey, it will happen sometime, and they are only slowing it down.
Posted September 23, 2010
Charles Darwin Talks Back to Rick Warren
Darwin chastises Barack Obama for placing a Creationist preacher in his Inauguration
Books About Creationism
The facts about Creationism, including its newest form, so-called Intelligent Design
Defending Darwin
Use this pro-evolution gear to defend the insights of Charles Darwin from ignorant fundamentalism
by irregularworld
I am native resident of Upstate New York who lives in the 24th congressional District, in the village of Trumansburg, in the town of Ulysses, in Tompk... more »
- 61 featured lenses
- Winner of 7 trophies!
- Top lens » Ram Bomjon Is A Fake
Explore related pages
- Church Signs Sayings Church Signs Sayings
- Velankanni - A Popular Holy Place in Tamil Nadu Velankanni - A Popular Holy Place in Tamil Nadu
- New Atheism: Common Questions and Misunderstandings About Atheism New Atheism: Common Questions and Misunderstandings About Atheism
- Creationism or Evolution? Creationism or Evolution?
- Sociobiology Sociobiology
- There is no God There is no God
