Democrat vs. Republican
Ranked #1,514 in Culture & Society, #35,743 overall
Are you a Republican or a Democrat?
You'll find articles, books, videos, links, and news feeds representing both parties here. So, if you are undecided, this page can help you make up your mind. And if you are a seasoned voter, you can help represent your party's views by participating in the polls and expressing why you chose your party. There are several articles, duels, and video clips of people sharing their reasons for being a Republican or a Democrat, some of which I ask for your opinion, starting with the 2008 Presidential Election.
First, the Republican viewpoint is represented. The Democrat viewpoint begins after the Regarding Race video. Near the bottom is a guest book where most leave comments about what they thought about how I did on putting together the site, and share random thoughts on politics. Please stay on topic when asked a question. And please give both parties equal time. In some instances, I could not find an equally intelligent or truthful resource that represents both parties. Also, where half-truths or non-truths were stated as fact, commentary was added to eliminate the promotion of false information. This page was not originally intended to be a biased source of information. But you'll see that I have been accused of that. If being biased means that I am decided and sticking with my convictions, then I am.
A Helpful Hint: Although neither is perfect, one party is always going to be more consistent with the truth than the other. After all, if they take opposite views on what is best for this country, they can't both be right. Only one of them is the better solution for America, and we must understand why. We need to know all of the facts (not just the appealing ones), all of the history (not just what supports our argument), what works, what doesn't... and we all have an opinion, including myself. It is up to you to decide for yourself which party best represents what kind of a country you and your family wish to live in. I am not responsible for what you do with the information I share with you, the decisions you make as a voter (a grown-up), or your own personal biases.
I have been accused of pushing or "forcing" my views on others. Is that possible? Unless you are a child or just extremely gullible for an adult, the answer is no. I may be able to persuade you or plant a thought in your brain for you to mull over, but it is yours to accept or reject. I cannot force you to think the way that I do. In fact, we all know that both adults and children, at any age, are quite the experts at resisting what others say. Furthermore, many people are great talkers, but few are great listeners.
As for me, well, I'm not any different. I interrupt others and bite my tongue when I have something to say but have to wait for it, for fear I will forget before they are finished. But also, like a lot of my closest personal friends, I cannot betray my convictions by promoting ideas that I think are bad for us. I cannot advertise what I loathe, not even for money. I mean, I would make a horrible salesperson for lima beans or canned spinach. But what I can do here is give every civil voice a chance for expression, whether or not I agree with it. And as long as it is clean, sincere, is not too outdated, and is NOT a sales pitch for some pointless conspiracy theory, your comments will remain for all to see.
Voters (and future voters), please be aware that every vote you cast -- at all times -- matters a great deal to many people in this country. The state of our nation, our daily lives, and the poll results below are indications that not only have some things gone very right throughout history, but occasionally, things went very wrong and have had a nationwide -- sometimes global -- impact. One example is the recent economic crash. Most of us personally know someone who has lost their home or job, or has been out of work for a very long time. Some of us are those people. Many, including myself, have since concluded that we are fed up with politics. That word -- politics -- seems to be more and more synonymous with deceit. But that doesn't mean it is time to quit voting. My personal conclusion is that people simply did not do their research and did not have enough information about the candidates or the issues before casting their votes. We were duped by the biases of the paid-for commercials and journalists who seem to be highly motivated (whether by money, social status, ratings or a combination of those, I'm not sure) to side with a certain party or opinion, even if it is not in our best interest as a nation.
So, do your homework. Use good judgment and common sense. That is why this lens was created. I've done some of it here for you. Some of you work hard and have little time to sit down and study these things out. But it is still up to you to look up a candidate's voting record to see if what they say matches their voting record, which is the best indicator of how a candidate truly feels about the issues. Politicians lie to get votes sometimes. So, the voting record helps you discover who is tickling your ears to get your vote. All I can do is provide you with links, opinions, history, resources, and some facts to supplement your political education. The rest is up to you.
So, if you haven't done your research on a candidate, or you just aren't sure who they really are, please don't guess or X the first box on the ballot. And don't choose a candidate based upon their race, gender, the way they dress or their accent, the scars on their face, their presence on stage, their size, looks, charisma, something he/she promised to do. Don't base your vote on what your friends or family are saying, or what your college professor is telling you. Look up the candidate's voting record! Find the facts. Find a voter's guide that lists the candidates' views on the issues. Know both sides of every issue and how it will affect our future. Find out if other countries have made these choices and whether the results of that decision went well for them or not. And refresh your knowledge of history. Don't simply believe what you are told.
But, if you don't have time for all that...
...leave the ballot blank.
Those are the only responsible choices a voter can make at the polls.
Regardless of whether you are undecided, have switched parties, or have been faithful to one party all your life, those who visit here want to know what brought you to this decision. Is there a personal choice that you made about a particular issue? Was there a defining moment in history? Something that happened? Or did something else sway your opinion? You are given an opportunity to answer those questions in the middle of this site.

For those who side with neither of the two political parties, please understand that the two major political parties, Republican and Democrat, are realistically the only two types of votes that count for anything in a presidential election. To side with a third party is to nullify your vote, and if enough people do it, it can split a party in half and cause the worst candidate to win. Therefore, this lens is devoted to defining the differences between two parties... Republicans and Democrats.
Inappropriate comments will not be published.
Countdown to Our Next Presidential Election
Voting Poll



The Republican Viewpoint
First, we'll look at the Republican Party... why people have chosen this party, what it stands for, how it got started, and what it has become.
For those who are new to party terminology, it will help to know that the words "conservative" and "right" describe Republicans. And likewise, the words "liberal" and "left" typically refer to Democrats.
The Republican Party - GOP History
"The Republican Party was born in the early 1850's by anti-slavery activists..." The Republican Party was born in the early 1850's by anti-slavery activists and individuals who believed that government should grant western lands to settlers free of charge. The first informal meeting of the party took place in Ripon, Wisconsin, a small town northwest of Milwaukee. The first official Republican meeting took place on July 6th, 1854 in Jackson, Michigan. The name "Republican" was chosen because it alluded to equality and reminded individuals of Thomas Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. At the Jackson convention, the new party adopted a platform and nominated candidates for office in Michigan.In 1856, the Republicans became a national party when John C. Fremont was nominated for President under the slogan: "Free soil, free labor, free speech, free men, Fremont." Even though they were considered a "third party" because the Democrats and Whigs represented the two-party system at the time, Fremont received 33% of the vote. Four years later, Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican to win the White House.
"Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican to win the White House."The Civil War erupted in 1861 and lasted four grueling years. During the war, against the advice of his cabinet, Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation that freed the slaves. The Republicans of the day worked to pass the Thirteenth Amendment, which outlawed slavery, the Fourteenth, which guaranteed equal protection under the laws, and the Fifteenth, which helped secure voting rights for African-Americans.
"The Republican Party also played a leading role in securing women the right to vote. In 1896, Republicans were the first major party to favor women's suffrage."The Republican Party also played a leading role in securing women the right to vote. In 1896, Republicans were the first major party to favor women's suffrage. When the 19th Amendment finally was added to the Constitution, 26 of 36 state legislatures that had voted to ratify it were under Republican control. The first woman elected to Congress was a Republican, Jeanette Rankin from Montana in 1917.
Presidents during most of the late nineteenth century and the early part of the twentieth century were Republicans. The White House was in Republican hands under Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush. Under the last two, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, the United States became the world's only superpower, winning the Cold War from the old Soviet Union and releasing millions from Communist oppression.
Republicans have a long and rich history with basic principles: Individuals, not government, can make the best decisions; all people are entitled to equal rights; and decisions are best made close to home.
"Individuals, not government, can make the best decisions; all people are entitled to equal rights; and decisions are best made close to home."The symbol of the Republican Party is the elephant. During the mid term elections way back in 1874, Democrats tried to scare voters into thinking President Grant would seek to run for an unprecedented third term. Thomas Nast, a cartoonist for Harper's Weekly, depicted a Democratic jackass trying to scare a Republican elephant - and both symbols stuck. For a long time Republicans have been known as the "G.O.P." And party faithfuls thought it meant the "Grand Old Party." But apparently the original meaning (in 1875) was "gallant old party." And when automobiles were invented it also came to mean, "get out and push." That's still a pretty good slogan for Republicans who depend every campaign year on the hard work of hundreds of thousands of volunteers to get out and vote and push people to support the causes of the Republican Party.
RNC Website
- Republican National Committee
- The Official GOP Site
If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat: Crushing the Democrats in Every Election and Why Your Life Depends on It
Amazon Price: $0.24 (as of 02/14/2012)![]()
Used Price: $0.01
This is a book about winning elections in an age when security has trumped almost every other issue and the technology of political effectiveness is evolving with lightning quickness. Hewitt offers real-world tactics for individuals who (1) care about the future of the United States and (2) want to work effectively to help elect candidates who will lead the country-on a national or local level-in the right direction.
In this book, Hugh Hewitt does more than rehash conservative grievances, preach to the choir, or even preach to the choir plus the undecideds. He aims to change the behavior of the choir, one reader at a time. Hewitt includes material targeted to people of faith when appropriate and appeals to all readers who consider themselves conservative or center-right.
The recklessness of our leaders on security and many other crucial issues has never been clearer, and acting in response to that recklessness has never been so urgent. The silly response is anger. The smart response is winning elections.
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Dear Mr. Obama
Why I am NOT a Liberal (Democrat)
by Dennis Prager

The following is a list of beliefs that I hold. Nearly every one of them was a liberal position until the late 1960s. Not one of them is now.Such a list is vitally important in order to clarify exactly what positions divide left from right, blue from red, liberal from conservative.
I believe in American exceptionalism, meaning that (a) America has done more than any international organization or institution, and more than any other country, to improve this world; and (b) that American values (specifically, the unique American blending of Enlightenment and Judeo-Christian values) form the finest value system any society has ever devised and lived by.
"In the 20th century, the powerful state, not religion, was the greatest purveyor of evil in the world."I believe that the bigger government gets and the more powerful the state becomes, the greater the threat to individual liberty and the greater the likelihood that evil will ensue. In the 20th century, the powerful state, not religion, was the greatest purveyor of evil in the world.
I believe that the levels of taxation advocated by liberals render those taxes a veiled form of theft. "Give me more than half of your honestly earned money or you will be arrested" is legalized thievery.
I believe that government funding of those who can help themselves (e.g., the able-bodied who collect welfare) or who can be helped by non-governmental institutions (such as private charities, family, and friends) hurts them and hurts society.
I believe that the United States of America, from its inception, has been based on the Judeo-Christian value system, not secular Enlightenment values alone, and therefore the secularization of American society will lead to the collapse of America as a great country.
I believe that some murderers should be put to death; that allowing all murderers to live does not elevate the value of human life, but mocks it, and that keeping all murderers alive trivializes the evil of murder.
I believe that the American military has done more to preserve and foster goodness and liberty on Earth than all the artists and professors in America put together."I believe that some murderers should be put to death; that allowing all murderers to live does not elevate the value of human life, but mocks it, and that keeping all murderers alive trivializes the evil of murder."
I believe that lowering standards to admit minorities mocks the real achievements of members of those minorities.
I believe that when schools give teenagers condoms, it is understood by most teenagers as tacit approval of their engaging in sexual intercourse.
I believe that the assertions that manmade carbon emissions will lead to a global warming that will in turn bring on worldwide disaster are a function of hysteria, just as was the widespread liberal belief that heterosexual AIDS will ravage America.
I believe that marriage must remain what has been in every recorded civilization -- between the two sexes.
I believe that, whatever the reasons for entering Iraq, the American-led removal of Saddam Hussein from power will decrease the sum total of cruelty on Earth.
I believe that the trial lawyers associations and teachers unions, the greatest donors to the Democratic Party, have done great harm to American life -- far more than, let us say, oil companies and pharmaceutical companies, the targets of liberal opprobrium.
I believe that nuclear power, clean coal, and drilling in a tiny and remote frozen part of Alaska and offshore -- along with exploration of other energy alternatives such as wind and solar power -- are immediately necessary.
I believe that school vouchers are more effective than increased spending on public schools in enabling many poorer Americans to give their children better educations.
I believe that while there are racists in America, America is no longer a racist society, and that blaming disproportionate rates of black violence and out-of-wedlock births on white racism is a lie and the greatest single impediment to African-American progress.
"I believe that school vouchers are more effective than increased spending on public schools in enabling many poorer Americans to give their children better educations."I believe that America, which accepts and assimilates foreigners better than any other country in the world, is the least racist, least xenophobic country in the world.
I believe the leftist takeover of the liberal arts departments in nearly every American university has been an intellectual and moral calamity.
I believe that a good man and a good marriage are more important to most women's happiness and personal fulfillment than a good career.
I believe that males and females are inherently different. For example, girls naturally prefer dolls and tea sets to trucks and toy guns -- if you give a girl trucks, she is likely to give them names and take care of them, and if you give a boy trucks, he is likely to crash them into one another.
I believe that when it comes to combating the greatest evils on Earth, such as the genocide in Rwanda, the United Nations has either been useless or an obstacle.
I believe that, generally speaking, Western Europe provides social and moral models to be avoided, not emulated.
I believe that America's children were positively affected by hearing a non-denominational prayer each morning in school, and adversely affected by the removal of all prayer from school."I believe that bilingual education does not work, that for the sake of immigrant children and for the sake of the larger society, immersion in the language of the country, meaning English in America, is mandatory."
I believe that liberal educators' removal of school uniforms and/or dress codes has had a terrible impact on students and their education.
I believe that bilingual education does not work, that for the sake of immigrant children and for the sake of the larger society, immersion in the language of the country, meaning English in America, is mandatory.
I believe that English should be declared the national language, and that ballots should not be printed in any language other than English. If one cannot understand English, one is probably not sufficiently knowledgeable to vote intelligently in an English-speaking country.
Finally, I believe that there are millions of Americans who share most of these beliefs who still call themselves "liberal" or "progressive" and who therefore vote Democrat. They do so because they still identify liberalism with pre-1970 liberalism or because they are emotionally attached to the word "liberal."
I share that emotion. But one should vote based on values, not emotions.
Think a Second Time
Think a Second Time
Amazon Price: $6.76 (as of 02/14/2012)![]()
A self-described "highly passionate moderate," radio and TV commentator Prager offers a series of brief essays on current and eternal topics, grounded in his Jewish sense of ethics that is more accessible than preachy. Prager says a politician's adultery matters little; his or her "public actions and speech" count the most. Despite such dissents from the moralistic position, Prager is a strong critic of liberalism, decrying its supporters' attitudes toward church-state separation, abortion, capital punishment and race. He has little sympathy with portraying the Los Angeles rioters of 1992 as victims: "moral people control their rage, and immoral people don't." Yet his call to ban affirmative action while encouraging employers to "recruit and train blacks" seems somewhat myopic. Prager recognizes that most people are diverted from moral issues; his solution to evil is "ethical monotheism" (a term made popular by the Jewish thinker Leo Baeck), warning against attention to false gods like art or compassion. However, he warns against expecting God to prevent our suffering; leading a religious life, he asserts, is a reward in itself.
~ Publishers Weekly
What do you think of the above video?
Tell us how the video impressed you. Go ahead... smather it with your opinion!
-
Reply
-
gosssysas
Jan 3, 2012 @ 11:57 am | delete
- good lens
-
-
Reply
-
clifRad
Dec 8, 2011 @ 6:23 pm | delete
- Good lens. It seems Obama will take us to more taxes and regulation faster than the Republicans but I have hope that the awakening that Obama has caused will shift us to more freedom, less regulation. I hope this will provide more self-reliance and less government.
-
-
Reply
-
lilymom24
Nov 12, 2010 @ 4:09 pm | delete
- Very nice! Loved all the polls =)
-
-
Reply
-
KhalilMalik-able Oct 22, 2010 @ 2:24 am | delete
- I absolutely loved this! Please if you can read a mine and give me some feed back i would love that.
-
-
Reply
-
ZablonMukuba Oct 19, 2010 @ 10:25 pm | delete
- it gives a unique perspective
-
-
Reply
-
Kara Natale
Sep 9, 2010 @ 6:27 pm | delete
- AWESOME!!
-
-
Reply
-
bubba
Aug 11, 2010 @ 12:16 pm | delete
- hick
-
-
Reply
-
Beautiful_GreenBeans
Oct 27, 2009 @ 8:37 pm | in reply to Adonay | delete
- I have to interject- I happen to agree with your statement here: "Bilingual people are smarter! Bilingual people are a commodity. Speaking two languages should be a requirement." You are certainly correct as studies show bilingual children use more areas of the brain during development, and there's a litany of benefits to add.
However, if a French child comes to America, and is educated in their native French (by your logic) then how does that make them bilingual? The very same studies cited above also indicate that immersion is the key to learning language. Your thoughts?
-
-
Reply
-
Beautiful_GreenBeans
Oct 25, 2009 @ 12:11 am | delete
- This video presents an interesting juxtaposition against the history of the republican party, just as you spot the "offensiveness" you remember it's quite the opposite. Have our Republican leaders strayed so far from the values that make the GOP "gallant" that this is a knee-jerk reaction with the opposite impression?
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Aug 18, 2009 @ 4:27 pm | in reply to Adonay | delete
- Adonay, you put your name to shame; your opinion here is just another prime example of the kind of ignorance that got us where we are today. Your attitude fosters division rather than unity. You have no idea who made the video you are commenting about. Yes, she is white. You have a problem with that? If so, you are the racist, not her. She is a good, church-going, arms-bearing, law-abiding, willing to die for you citizen, with a multi-generational military family who is proud to have served and protected our country (that means YOU). She and I are both white. The majority of people, even long ago, in our country are and were white. If you don't like that, tough, but know that we would be willing to die for you. Would you be willing to do that for us? This young lady's military ancestors fought to stop Hitler.
It's time for you to stop playing the race card. It no longer is an issue unless YOU make it one Adonay. It's up to you to get a life and stop complaining!
-
- Load More
The prior video was removed by the user. I did my best to replace it. Your comments on the previous video have been left here, so if some of the comments don't seem to apply, it is because the original video is different and is no longer available.
What do you think of the above video?
The above video is of a woman who switched from being a Democrat supporting Carter to being a Republican supporting Reagan. Her reasons for being each are what I think typically happen in America. People often do not vote according to all of the facts, only what they have been told by their peers, and then find out later that much of what they knew before was propaganda.
***Please view the video and tell us what you think. Stay on topic. If you have NON-related comments, please post them in the guest book at the bottom of the page, or you risk deletion. I value your opinion, but if you have NASTY comments, I GUARANTEE that they will not be posted.***
-
Reply
-
livingfrontiers Oct 27, 2010 @ 10:51 am | delete
- I believe the party system is broken, and the tea party is cashing in on this fact. I do not think the democrats treat americans like a pet. I do not like how right and left the entire discussion has gotten, because if you have a moderate view in life, you are going to be more open minded to new ideas. That is what makes our country great! Being a moderate thinker means being able to adapt and prosper from any challenge and event.
-
-
Reply
-
Oct 5, 2010 @ 9:04 am | delete
- I think that what she says has a lot of merit, many people just keep on voting in the same party year after year because that is what they have always done.
I agree with the thought that who ever controls the money, controls you. I am a big supporter of less government, which is directly 180 degrees from where the democrats are on things, not sure if I am for republican values but I know for sure I am not for democrats.
thank for the video
-
-
Reply
-
Nancy G.
Apr 8, 2010 @ 12:18 pm | delete
- I too feel the same about the Democratic party, that they seek control, and that we are just to be non self-sufficient parties to their rule. I was raised Republican and with the values that this lady says her family raised her. You don't ask for hand outs, you take care of yourself, we believed in Christ, and the home was based on that. Seems anymore that that Christianity, the constitution, and morality, and being self sufficient, are gone down the tubes now with the democratic party.
-
Giuliani Compares Palin and Obama on Experience
Media Bias
Obama interview:
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to "win"?
How does your family feel about your "winning" breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor's [Clinton] speech?
Palin interview:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you're seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren't you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy:
territorial integrity of Georgia
allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
NATO treaty
Iranian nuclear threat
what to do if Israel attacks Iran
Al Qaeda motivations
the Bush Doctrine
attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
There's no doubt the Charles Gibson interviews showed extreme prejudice against Palin and extreme favoritism towards Obama.... He constantly questioned her ability to lead but never questioned Obama's ability to lead, all the more amazing considering that Palin was the only one with executive experience and the presidency is the highest level executive job in politics.
Press Bias Only Hurts Credibility
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 by K. W. Patten for The Cultural Observer

As most of the press were following Barack Obama around the Middle East like swooning teens, tossing soft pitches across the plate, and giving free passes to any inconsistencies, John McCain arrived at a speaking engagement in New Hampshire to a rousing throng of one reporter. Sadly many Americans who support Obama have no issue with this, but they should.
"This one sided reportage not only damages credibility, but reinforces the press' irrelevance to an ever changing viewer/readership." This one sided reportage not only damages credibility, but reinforces the press' irrelevance to an ever changing viewer/readership. The Society of Professional Journalists lists the code of ethics that journalists should follow. Let us review a partial list in context:
-Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
- Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.
- Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
- Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
- Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
- Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.
- Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.
- Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid bidding for news.
"Television has won the race, sadly and the biggest loser is the American people, whose limited awareness of the world around it only further dooms it to mediocrity."So what do you think? Has the press been consistent with it's code in regards to Obama, and McCain? Me thinks not. This could leave a mark.
The newspaper industry has sadly been languishing for years, and it's demise is in all likelihood not far off, as fewer and fewer Americans find reading news print preferable to it's inferior electronic deliverance. Television has won the race, sadly and the biggest loser is the American people, whose limited awareness of the world around it only further dooms it to mediocrity. Since the 80's inception of the 24 hour cable news cycle, newspaper readership has plummeted, and it only stands to get worse. Reading takes effort, watching does not. One it seems can never underestimate the public's desire to avoid effort. Just ask print media.
As the public accepts the continued erosion of ethical adherence in journalism the public's awareness of the difference between news and commentary will become so blurred that all news will be suspect, and facts will become debatable. The lines have blurred to the point today where many people can site one or more TV news outlets who they perceive as being slanted. Some of this perception is due to the ignorance of the American people in being able to distinguish news from commentary, and some from journalists limiting coverage to shape opinion. Journalism is a cornerstone of democracy. When journalism fails us, and we fail to notice, so fails democracy.
The Candidates on the Issues
- Voter Guide
- Traditional Values Coalition of California
- Value Voters USA
- For God and Country
- FRC Action
- Defending Faith, Family and Freedom
Have you switched parties? What made you decide to do so?
-
Reply
-
Arizona Mildman
Sep 18, 2010 @ 9:17 pm | delete
- George Bush always complained that the "evil media" was after him. Just like the rest of this biased commentary, you ask questions that only have a specific answer that doesn't compare adjunctly with the article. Why would you ask this when the article was about media bias? If you keep voting for a PARTY rather than a candidate then you are stupid because both parties come up with idiots at times. If you are ignorant enough to want to vote for "Our Idiot" so you can brag you voted for a party, then you aren't paying attention. The reason the power shifts back and forth is the strength of the candidate, not the party. Parties are about politics and LYING A LOT to rationalize their idiot's mistakes. If I was the Republican Party I wouldn't allow Sarah Palin or Rudy Giuliani near a microphone or camera because they both hurt any credibility that the part had. Asking Sarah Palin if she was qualified was the same thing they asked Obama before he beat Hillary Clinton. His reply was, "I don't have twenty years in the Senate screwing up the national economy over and over.". McCain on the other hand, did. That message resounded. Get better candidates and keep idiots from making you look bad. There is good and bad in every party. Both sides need to weed out the bad ones of their own, not keep blaming the other side as if bad talking and mud slinging amount to supporting your candidate.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Oct 7, 2010 @ 11:06 am | delete
- I'm not sure what questions you are referring to in this response, so I can't answer your question until you clarify that.
You are right that every individual needs a good personal investigation by every American citizen. But, in general, every party has it's own set of stances regarding the issues that is currently quite consistent. Each party's agenda can either be good or bad for our country. And it is vital that we are thoroughly educated about political parties and candidates both before we vote. It is better not to vote at all than to vote for someone just because someone you know is voting for them. I continually find myself repeating this: DO YOUR HOMEWORK. And perhaps that is what you are saying, but it cannot be stressed enough.
I do agree that no party is perfect. I also agree that not everyone associating with a corrupt party will vote accordingly. But I can say that a person's voting record on the issues most likely reveals the true nature of a candidate's agenda. It is safe to assume that the voting record will not change after he/she is voted into office. Such is the case with Obama and the majority of Democrats in Congress before the 2010 mid-term election. I think that if more people had done their homework in 2008, they would NOT have voted for Obama, Pelosi, and several others whose jobs will be shortened because the people are now dissatisfied (an understatement) with their performance. And I think that the poll questions at the top vouch for that.
-
-
Reply
-
JCSeattle
Jan 11, 2010 @ 4:48 pm | delete
- Although I agree with you, I fear the Republican party (or at least the vast majority of our elected Republicans) are only marginally better then the Democrat Party. I am saddened that my vote is for the candidate that is slightly better then the blatant socialist. That being said, I will always vote for the pro-life, small government, pro personal freedom, pro constitution regardless of party.
-
-
Reply
-
Aaron_Howard
Oct 21, 2008 @ 12:19 pm | delete
- I've flipped parties a couple of times. What I came to recognize as I grew older was this: I vote for the individual that I feel will represent and serve our country best. Political bias is its own form of racism. You "have" to put your foot in one circle or the other. However don't vote based upon the candidates designated party - do the research - help by looking out for America's best interests.
-
-
Reply
-
democracy_conservator
Aug 30, 2008 @ 9:57 am | delete
- You've put together a lot of great information here. Very nice lens. No matter which political party you belong to, you need to make your vote count. Please feel free to visit my lens and say hello anytime.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Jul 23, 2008 @ 2:58 am | delete
- I was raised in a family of democrats. I thought I was one of them until I was educated about the differences between the two parties. The republican party stands for what I believe in. Less government control, the sanctity of life, etc. Power to the people!
-
-
Reply
-
McMick
Jun 30, 2008 @ 11:46 pm | delete
- I grew up during WW2 in a total FDR family. My father was one of the millions helped by FDR'S New Deal. Still love FDR despite some mistakes.
I voted for JFK, am still glad that I did and was a staunch Democrat until George McGovern became the nominee in 1972.
In the late 60's the flower children took over the Democrat Party, welfare got out of control, the Supreme Court (the Warren Court) issued ridiculous decisions leading to today's political correctness and probably having something to do with why Democrat Ed Koch has for years called himself "A liberal with sanity." Ed Koch is also a truthful Democrat, which is rare.
I also started operating my own income tax business in the late 60's and soon realized a key word that applied to Republicans. (persistence). Many of them also looked tired.They were responsible, very family oriented, worked harder for their necessities than my fellow Democrats who seemed to be making excuses more and more, instead of persisting. Out of words.
-
The 10 Big Lies About America: Combating Destructive Distortions About Our Nation
Amazon Price: $4.26 (as of 02/14/2012)![]()
Used Price: $0.14
"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us into trouble,nineteenth-century humorist Josh Billings remarked. "It's the things we know that just ain't so."
In this bold and brilliantly argued book, acclaimed author and talk-radio host Michael Medved zeroes in on ten of the biggest fallacies that millions of Americans believe about our country-in spite of incontrovertible facts to the contrary. In The 10 Big Lies About America, Medved pinpoints the most pernicious pieces of America-bashing disinformation that pollute current debates about the economy, race, religion in politics, the Iraq war, and other contentious issues.
The myths that Medved deftly debunks include:
Myth: The United States is uniquely guilty for the crime of slavery and based its wealth on stolen African labor.
Fact: The colonies that became the United States accounted for, at most, 3 percent of the abominable international slave trade; the persistence of slavery in America slowed economic progress; and the U.S. deserves unique credit for ending slavery.
Myth: The alarming rise of big business hurts the United States and oppresses its people.
Fact: Corporations played an indispensable role in building America, and corporate growth has brought progress that benefits all with cheaper goods and better jobs.
Myth: The Founders intended a secular, not Christian, nation.
Fact: Even after ratifying the Constitution, fully half the state governments endorsed specific ChrisÂtian denominations. And just a day after approving the First Amendment, forbidding the establishment of religion, Congress called for a national "day of public thanksgiving and prayer" to acknowledge "the many signal favors of Almighty God."
Myth: A war on the middle class means less comfort and opportunity for the average American.
Fact: Familiar campaign rhetoric about the victimized middle class ignores the overwhelming statistical evidence that the standard of living keeps rising for every segment of the population, as well as the real-life experience of tens of millions of middle-class Americans.
Each of the ten lies-widely believed among elites and taught as truth in universities and public schools-is a grotesque, propagandistic distortion of the historical record. For everyone who is tired of hearing America denigrated by people who don't know what they're talking about, The 10 Big Lies About America supplies the ammunition necessary to fire back the next time somebody tries to recycle these baseless beliefs. Medved's witty, well-documented rebuttal is a refreshing reminder that as Americans we should feel blessed, not burdened, by our heritage.
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Regarding Race
What are your thoughts on Morgan Freeman's point about race?
-
Reply
-
Seth1492 Sep 10, 2011 @ 3:10 pm | delete
- I love this video! Morgan Freeman makes some excellent points that we should all follow to make a better world.
-
-
Reply
-
Livinggreenandclean2011
Apr 12, 2011 @ 10:28 pm | delete
- LOVE IT!!! God sees no color and neither should we!!
-
The Democrat Viewpoint
Now, let's take a look at the Democrats: why do people choose this party? What do democrats stand for? What is the party's history? What it has become since it started?
The History of the Democratic Party
The history of the Democratic Party in the United States goes back to the time of our first Presidents. Thomas Jefferson, in the late 1700's, started the first political party with the conviction that the federal government was assuming too much power over domestic policy and should be stopped. His party became known as the "Democratic" party when candidate Andrew Jackson became President in 1828. Jackson was known as a man of the people. He took the Democratic party that Jefferson and his elite colleagues had formed and turned it over to the citizens of the United States. The party held its first convention in 1832 to re-elect Jackson to a second term.The Democratic National Convention began the Democratic National Committee in 1848. It has become the longest running political organization in the world. The Convention gave the committee the job of promoting the party causes between the conventions and also preparing for each of the next conventions.
"On the issue of slavery at the 1860 Democratic Convention, Democrats held that each State had the right to prohibit or recognize slavery." On the issue of slavery at the 1860 Democratic Convention, Democrats held that each State had the right to prohibit or recognize slavery. This position caused Northern Democrats to withdraw from the convention. The Southern Democrats and the Northern Democrats each nominated their own separate candidates for President that year. The election was ultimately lost to Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln.
The Democratic Party has met every four years since 1832 to nominate a presidential and vice-presidential candidate. From 1832 to 1968, sixteen Democratic candidates have become President including James Polk, James Buchanan, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy.
The symbol of the donkey has become known as the Democratic mascot. Thomas Nast, a famous political cartoonist, used the donkey first in an 1870 editorial cartoon to represent the an anti-war faction that he did not agree with. Nast continued using it to portray Democratic press and reporters.
DNC Website
- The Democratic Party
- The Official DNC Site
Why I am a Liberal (Democrat)
By Warren C. Norwood, Novelist - May 29, 2004
Some of my friends, family members, and co-workers wonder how I could be a political liberal in the midst of this new swell of conservatism [in] the United States. The answers to that are all too simple.I am a liberal because the system originated by liberals called Social Security has made my parents' retirement more possible and comfortable than it would otherwise have been.
[Social Security was FDR's idea, whose Presidential term was during the great depression.]
I am a liberal because the system originated by liberals called Medicare paid for my mother to have two knees and a hip replaced at a cost that otherwise could not have been born by all of her children together.
I am a liberal because Medicare paid for my father's operation to remove a cancerous kidney at a cost that would otherwise certainly have forced my parents to liquidate their assets.
I am a liberal because that system originated by liberals called WIC gives my daughter food stamps for cheese and milk and other necessities she needs to feed her children.
I am a liberal because that system demanded by liberals called company-paid employee medical insurance helps pay doctor bills for me and my wife and my daughter and son-in-law and grandchildren and sister and most of my other close relatives.I am a liberal because the idea of autonomy of the individual is a liberal idea.
[The idea was originally liberal, but it is now a conservative one. Today's liberals side with dependence upon the government rather than self-sufficiency, which is socialism.]
I am a liberal because the idea of political liberty is a liberal idea.
[Again, this idea was originally liberal, but no longer. Today, it is only liberal in comparison with other countries that do not have this liberty. Today, conservatives are more inclined to be concerned with protecting constitutional freedoms and liberty. The left now threatens the removal of such.]
I am a liberal because government by the consent of the governed is a liberal idea.
[Originally, but not anymore.]
I am a liberal because the Bill of Rights is a set of liberal ideas which protect us all. Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of worship, freedom of the press, due process of law, freedom from torture, the right to face our accusers, the writ of habeas corpus, and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure are all liberal ideas. Most people in the world do not have those rights.
[Originally, but not anymore.]
I am a liberal because those liberal ideas in our Constitution give us control of our representatives from the school board to the Senate and President of the United States, give us the liberal idea of checks and balances, and the liberal idea of no taxation without representation.
[Originally, but not anymore.]
I am a liberal because the idea of public education is a liberal idea.
I am a liberal because the idea of a five day work week is a liberal idea.
I am a liberal because the idea of a strong, well funded and disciplined military under civilian control is a liberal idea, as is the notion of Veteran's benefits and military retirement.
[The original purpose of the federal government was to protect our country with a strong military. Military and veterans benefits are also favored by conservatives. However, liberals tend to keep adding responsibilities to the federal government, which strains the ability of the government to govern these immportant issues effectively, and has caused a huge and growing deficit.]
I am a liberal because the Geneva Conventions are a liberal idea. The conventions protect American prisoners and all prisoners of signees from torture and abuse.
I am a liberal because the idea of the public maintenance of roads is a liberal idea.
I am a liberal because civil rights, children's rights, women's rights, and labor rights, are all liberal ideas.
[On the contrary, these rights were all granted under Republican leadership and most Republicans voted for these things, not against them. President Lincoln, the first Republican president, was responsible for signing the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed the slaves.]
I am a liberal because almost all the progressive ideas of the last four centuries have been liberal ideas registed (sic) by the conservatives of their times. Those liberal ideas make this a better place to live for me, my family, my friends, my community, my country, and my world.
[Today, "progressive" is code for abortion on demand, gay rights, ending free markets in exchange for socialism, and the liberal indoctrination of our public schools and universities. Sounds like the liberal mantra is, "Take care of me." In other words, the Democrat party has been hijacked.]
Why I am a Democrat in 2008
Appeal to Emotion
What do you think of the above video?
Do you think that the housing crisis was resolved by the Democrats? Food for thought: How many more people have lost their jobs and lost their homes since Barack Obama was elected in 2008?
-
Reply
-
ChineseKitesforKids
Mar 29, 2011 @ 10:03 am | delete
- As a Christian, I pray for discernment and don't categorize myself. I do lean more to the republican views only because some liberal views have created a sense of dependence that is draining this country, like welfare for instance. We need to stop creating this sense of dependence on government and more dependence on SELF!
-
-
Reply
-
todd
Nov 8, 2010 @ 6:42 am | delete
- Why is it that the media so easily convinces people that Bush lied about WMDs in Iraq? Almost every single person in Congress (Both Dems and Reps) agreed with the intelligence from the US, Israel, Great Britain, and from Hussein's son himself. Bush acted partially as a response to the CIA and others and Congress agreed. The real reasons he went were probably based more on protecting Israel, rescuing starving children in Iraq, redeeming his dad's name, and reeling in a dangerous dictator, but why focus on unproven intel. Furthermore, google "WMD pilots Syria barrels Sada" AND THEN "yellow cake Diego Garcia Canada". PLEASE stop being manipulated by the media and register as INDEPENDENT!!!
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Nov 8, 2010 @ 3:12 pm | delete
- I agree with you Todd on everything except that people should register as an Independent. Voting for Independent candidates wipes your vote off the map in major elections. We have never in the history of America had an Independent President, let alone a Vice President. That is not to say that it cannot happen, but it really depends on which way an Independent candidate leans, and how well liked they are by the majority of Americans. It would take an especially well-known and well-liked Independent candidate to stand a chance in a final election.
-
-
Reply
-
JUST ME
Nov 23, 2009 @ 11:08 am | delete
- i think that the video was very intersting but at the same time i believe it could have been a little better. i mean the video didn't anwser all my questions but it did anwser the majority of them. Thank you and have a great day.
-
-
Reply
-
AmoralDeviant...
Jun 27, 2009 @ 1:15 am | delete
- Well I have to agree this post is definately not a "non-partisan" lens but over filled with Republican rhetoric and opinion. I still stand undecided even after this election and stumbled upon this sight in a hopes to find a non biased opinion, but I am quickly learnin that anything posted by a republican is strictly biased and fervant to the "old-white" man. I appreciate your attempt to "convert" democrats to republicans by exemplifying the party in a "halo-wearing" light when infact the democrats, historically have done more postive for this country by making sure the majority of us are taken care, like my republican friend who receives disability benefits when she is able bodied enough to work. What we need is a non-partisan government that shares the best of both sides. That will free this country from evil, suffering and peril.
-
-
Reply
-
todd
Jun 21, 2010 @ 8:14 pm | delete
- Screen name Amoral Deviant and standing up for Liberals.
At least you are true to yourself. You have moral integrity,
-
-
Reply
-
Whit
Jul 11, 2010 @ 8:33 pm | delete
- AmoralDeviant, there is no such thing as a non-partisan individual, let alone a non-partisan government. The latter is a spooky thought, if you ask me. Those in the government are plagued by temptations of power, fame, and fortune. The idea of this website is to get people to think about what they stand for and get their voice back, for the sake of everyone who lives in this country. Am I biased? Unashamedly, yes! I stand for something rather than nothing. I believe in the people's right to make a living and keep what is earned, rather than give nearly half of it back to a wasteful, irresponsible government; a monster that is out of control, too proud to care about individuals, and it is untying itself from accountability as we speak. Do I want you all to know that? Definitely.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
May 28, 2009 @ 9:25 am | in reply to Canada | delete
- The national debt is said to have been 11 Trillion when Bush left office. Considering that Bush didn't create the entire debt... that it was there when Clinton left office, we also need to take into consideration that the majority of Congress during the latter years of Bush's administration were Dems (well-known spenders). Bush attempted to compromise to get Congress to remove the gridlock on his agenda before leaving office. (Bad form in my opinion.)
The point: There is no comparing the two on spending. Obama's feet hit the floor spending. Instead of using it to keep the country safe from terrorism, he has spent it on bailing out those who made financial mistakes, etc., etc., etc., and we can't even keep up with counting how much more he has spent in the first 100 days in office than Bush did in eight years! The word Maniac comes to mind.
-
-
Reply
-
kaykay
Nov 3, 2010 @ 11:42 pm | delete
- actually, there was not a debt when clinton left office, we did have a surplus of money. gas and food prices were down. people were not being foreclosed on, and America was working. Bush came in and gave tax breaks to the rich, the middle and poor class were carrying the burden of paying taxes. Obama took office promising a change, it took Bush 8 yrs to mess up our system and you people want him to fix it over night. Remember, Bush lied and said those countries has weapons of mass destructions, and have we found any of that? No! It is his fault we are at war, in two different countries, and did he ever locate Bin Loden? You have CEO's, Presidents, ect... of these company getting million dollar bonus;and people were loosing their jobs. We have more homeless, and jobless people now than ever, even in the Great Depression. Which if Bush or any other Republican was in office now we mostlikey would be having the next Great depression. Is this what you people really want? You have to spend money to make money, and to make money for all classes of people not just the rich. So stop blaming Obama for this Country's problems. Problems which started the day Bush took office. Both parties need to come together and support the President before there is no country left to destroy.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Nov 5, 2010 @ 1:51 pm | delete
- kaykay: check your facts. There was a national deficit when Clinton started office. You may be referring to the decrease of the national debt under the Clinton admin, which was only .2%... yes, that is a decimal in front of the number two. But there was still a debt that had been left there by previous administrations. From what I can see, there has never been a time when we have been without a debt. It has increasingly grown since we began. It has gone down and it has gone up, but it has never been paid in full. It has always been used for political gain.
The national debt when Clinton entered office was 5.369 trillion dollars. And when he left office (after his second term), it was 5.638 trillion dollars. That is an increase. The lowest the debt has ever been since having one was under Andrew Jackson, who brought it down under $100,000. That was during the 1800's, and it was a lot of money at the time. Republicans and Democrats have been almost equal regarding spending until now. But no president has ever out-spent, out-taxed, and out-socialized (all three at once) our country as much as Obama.
Our government has always been in debt, which means that Bush s not solely responsible for messing it up in only eight years. Nor is Clinton responsible for messing it up solely in his eight years. And we are only asking Obama to freeze spending on luxury items that come across his table to sign. But instead, he and the Dems are attaching pork and all kinds of things we never knew to the bills they attempt to pass while they have the chance, and it us and our children who are being borrowed from with our tax dollars. With all the jobs that are gone now, the only ones with money to pay those kinds of taxes will be the rich, and the rich are who the Dems wish to tax the most. There goes both the jobs AND the rich! Because the rich provide jobs plus 40% of the total U.S. tax dollars that the government collects to pay for it's spending habits.
Regarding Bin Laden, Clinton had him at sniper point three times and let him go. One of those times, his reason was because he was playing celebrity golf.
As for your claim that we have more homeless and jobless people now than during the Great Depression: the percentage of unemployment during the Great Depression was at 25%, whereas unemployment in September 2010 was at 9.2%. January was when it was at its highest, at 10.6%. This is hardly a Great Depression. People were living in boxes lining the streets of New York and other places then. You don't see that here. We are FAR better off than they were. The unemployed still drive diesel engine pick up trucks and live in two story homes with pools today. Even people who have just lost their homes can still rent a house or apartment and find shelter.
Regarding your claim that you have to spend money to make money: if you are talking about business, you are right. But the Federal Government's purpose is not to make money. It is NOT a business.
I am not blaming Obama for all of the problems this country faces. But I am saying that his policies are not good for us and our children. You ask me to stop blaming Obama. Well, isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You just blamed Bush for all of our problems. It's true that we need to come together, but it is not true that we need to support Obama's efforts to bankrupt us and make us more vulnerable to terrorist attack.
-
-
Reply
-
Canada
May 28, 2009 @ 7:35 am | delete
- There is no doubt that during Bush's 8 year reign over the united states, that he doubled the countries debt from 5 trillion to almost 10 trillion. You cannot defend that. It is a fact.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Nov 9, 2010 @ 10:15 am | delete
- Canada, there is no doubt that Bush raised the debt faster than anyone before him, but does that justify how Obama plans to triple the speed of Bush? Watch this video for an illustration.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Feb 24, 2009 @ 1:11 pm | in reply to your name here | delete
- Republican debt? Wow... so, trillions were just passed by Obama in the name of bailout, yet when he does it, it is helping the country... it's not debt that we the taxpayers and generations to come will have to pay?
-
-
Reply
-
Angelina_Howard
Oct 20, 2008 @ 1:53 pm | delete
- Another great political lens. 5* Well done. I like when all content flows nicely.
-
-
Reply
-
Portable_eBay
Oct 19, 2008 @ 3:44 am | delete
- Both parties have its strong and weak points. I wonder what would happen if they get together.
-
- Load More
Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That Is Destroying America
Amazon Price: $3.43 (as of 02/14/2012)![]()
Used Price: $1.60
Inspired by their popular USA Today column, conservative Cal Thomas and liberal Bob Beckel show politicians of both stripes how to get beyond partisanship, restore civility, and move our country forward. Thomas and Beckel are a unique pair in today's political climate-pundits from opposite sides who not only talk to each other but work together to find common ground on some of the most divisive issues facing us, from the war in Iraq to gay marriage to the Patriot Act. Common Ground unmasks the hypocrisy of many of the issues, organizations, and individuals who created and deepened the partisan divide at the center of American politics, and makes a strategic case for why this bickering must stop.
Throughout, Thomas and Beckel explode conventional wisdom and offer surprising new conclusions:
* The Red State/Blue State divide: Myth!
* A "common ground" presidential candidate can win in 2008: Reality!
* "Polarizers" like Ann Coulter and Michael Moore are the future of political debate: Myth!
* Major-party politics faces extinction: Reality!
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
What do you think of the above video?
What about this one?
-
Reply
-
nachoooo
Jul 28, 2010 @ 7:50 am | delete
- People believe that the war in iraq is foolish and a mistake. I understand of the sacrifices the soldiers have made. The war continues and still young adults continue to enlist in the military and why they enlist? Is because they believe in a cause that can create a better life for iraq and the afgan people. I have been in iraq for 8 months and all I have seen are civilians wanting freedom wanting to go to school and a chance to walk the streets without there being a shooting. Just because its a different language and a different country we turn our backs on them. Thats like saying turn your back on your neighbor because he is not family. We have our differences but we are all created in gods image and on his image is what makes everybody in this world a person.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Oct 6, 2010 @ 8:01 pm | delete
- Well said, Nachoo.
-
-
Reply
-
Jan 23, 2010 @ 8:23 pm | delete
- Great read!
Thank you! 5*& Fav.
Best wishes.
-
-
Reply
-
reviewpro
Dec 30, 2009 @ 11:18 am | delete
- WhitU4ever wrote: "Nika, you forget that if the war were not taken overseas, it would have taken place here"
Do you believe that because that is what Bush said?
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Jan 10, 2010 @ 8:15 pm | delete
- No. History is a great teacher, reviewpro. It teaches us that when a country is attacked and attacks back on the perpetrator's soil (where it hurts them most), not only does the one who made himself our enemy become his own country's embarrassment, but he is not likely to try it again soon, not unless he feels he has a good chance of succeeding without consequence. Going to their territory was a very reasonable consequence and a brilliant way to protect our citizens against further injury and attack. Who would we fight here? The heightened security against terrorism was also helpful. (If you only knew how many more jihadist threats have been since stopped.) Going there shows them that we will not tolerate a repeat offense. But "negotiating" with a people group that wants nothing more than to annihilate this country sends them a triple message: 1. that we don't have a clue about the motives of a jihadist, 2. that we are weak, and 3. that they are able to do it again, as often as they can get away with it. It is elementary. If someone does something that hurts others, something that would normally carry serious consequence, but the consequences are removed, it will happen again until someone does something about it.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
May 20, 2009 @ 9:12 am | in reply to Nika | delete
- Nika, you forget that if the war were not taken overseas, it would have taken place here. We are all safer that terrorism was fought against, and continues to be fought against in Iraq, and that Homeland Security was created to protect us from further foreign and domestic threats of terrorism.
-
-
Reply
-
Schatzi
Mar 27, 2010 @ 12:03 pm | delete
- duh, we would rather fight a war on foreign soil, but how do you justify starting a war in Iraq, and yes WE started that war, when the terrorists who attacked us (15 of 19) were from Saudi Arabia? Oh that's right, because the Saudi royals are long-time friends of the Bush family and Cheney's company, Halliburton, stood to profit from a war.
-
-
Reply
-
todd
Jun 21, 2010 @ 8:23 pm | delete
- Schatzi,
The attack on Iraq was not retaliation on jihadists for attacking the US. The liberal media has changed your memory. We went there because of intelligence reports by the CIA, Great Britian's version of the CIA, and a son of Saddam all telling us that Saddam sought Nuclear weapons and was purchasing yellow cake uranium. This is the stuff being centrifuged in Iran for the past 2 years so they can blow away Israel. Iraq did have this stuff by the ton. Google: yellow cake uranium Diego Garcia Canada. The page fills with news articles of a pre-weapon of mass destruction that the liberal media down-played and ignored. The great part is that GW Bush kept his mouth shut so that we could easily keep it protected!
-
-
Reply
-
Whit
Jul 11, 2010 @ 7:49 pm | delete
- Iraq was already a serious national and global threat. Yes, the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. But war was already on the table. It may or may not have been avoided, had Iraq complied with U.N. sanctions regarding the search for weapons of mass destruction. But it had nothing to do with oil. That is a conspiracy theory. I like to call it the wishful thinking of anti-war activists or Bush-bashers. Come on... Haliburton? Are you serious? What other conspiracies have you believed? That 911 was an inside job? That the Bilderbergs rule the world? Or the Illuminati? Or both? Come on... you can't believe everything you hear. Do the research and don't get sloppy on me, folks.
-
-
Reply
-
Arizona Mildman
Sep 18, 2010 @ 10:06 pm | delete
- That is complete nonsense, you are delusional. The real insurgents didn't even enter Iraq until after we invaded. Bush THOUGHT it would be like before when they just gave up and asked for something to eat. There were no Iraqi Soldiers, Al Quaida trained and established a war front with true believers from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and other countries, some Arab but the Bush administration was too cowardly to threaten his daddy's buddies, the Arab Royalty who was actually responsible for Osama attacking the world trade center as a retaliation for our bombing of Beirut several years ago.
The fifteen hijackers on 9-11 were from Arabia and Pakistan so we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, does that somehow register with you, YET?
-
- Load More
What do you think of the above video?
How about that?
-
Reply
-
DanWesson
Sep 29, 2009 @ 2:46 pm | in reply to papawu | delete
- Wow, this sounds like someone who is an enemy of freedom. Fortunately they are not requiring everyone to qualify for a voting permit yet. Your post was before the election, and I'm sure you're not coming back to read so the following question is rhetorical.
How do you feel about your choice now? Do you realize that if the Independent voters had just stayed home as you wish for Republicans, that we would have a Republican president right now? Who knows if we'd be better off, but I don't think we would be much worse.
susanduffy, you are right that it is getting tougher to tell the difference between the big money politicians on both sides. That is why I am Independent.
-
-
Reply
-
blue22d
Sep 24, 2009 @ 9:07 pm | delete
- I believe there is corruption in both parties. However, I lean more toward the Republican side than the Democratic side. I would like to see less BIG government, less abuse of government. I don't appreciate being lied to by either party. I do appreciate those who have taken the time to point out the abuse of power and money, i.e. Glenn Beck, Hannity and some others. I do not want to see my country become socialistic.
-
-
Reply
-
Vanguard
May 27, 2009 @ 10:14 pm | delete
- I agree that as you say both side of the fence are the same, and also that big corporations have a hand but I also feel that the government itself had become a beast, a cancer which is dividing and killing us.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Dec 1, 2008 @ 4:02 pm | in reply to papawu | delete
- Papawu, you must do your homework before playing the blame game. It is a fact that the "mess" we are in results from Clinton's irresponsibility and the Democrat stronghold in Congress for Bush's eight years, with all of the pork barrel attachments, some with attempts at passing in the middle of the night when no one was there but Pelosi and her mimschievious minions.
-
-
Reply
-
papawu
Oct 19, 2008 @ 3:26 pm | delete
- The posturing and grandstanding which is involved in politics does nothing but serve to confuse those that are already confused. People must learn to focus on the issues and keep in mind that an honestly informed voter is a useful voter. Those that simply vote their tradition rather than their intelligence is the reason why we just had Dubya in office for 8 excruciatingly devastating years. Republican voters should just stay home this time around and let the rest of us do what we can to get us out of yet another Republican mess.
-
-
Reply
-
susannaduffy
Oct 17, 2008 @ 7:19 am | delete
- Are there only two parties in USA? I've often wondered and, to tell the truth, from where I am, it's hard to really tell any difference between these two -- apart from the personalities in the limelight.
-
-
Reply
-
dandepp
Oct 17, 2008 @ 6:04 am | delete
- I am not from the US, but I'll tell you what I think - I think both candidates are puppets in a much larger game. Both sides of the fence are essentially the same - the real rulers of the country are the big corporations.
-
Newt Gingrich: This is Why I Choose to Be a Republican
Please Tell Us Which Party You Choose and Why Below This Video
Which is Your Party?
This is a place for you to tell me why you are a Democrat or Republican. It is NOT the proper place to bash the opposite party, use foul language, make false statements as though they are true, or spread fear/hype/conspiracy theories.
If off topic or false, don't expect your comments to remain. If it is your opinion, state it as such. Thanks!
If you are registered to vote Republican or Democrat, please tell us why? If you have ever switched, please let us know.
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byRepublican, because...
Foreign says:
I agree with some Republican views - at least more than Democratic views. I believe that people should do what they want; gay marriage and abortion should be legal. But under no conditions can you take a life away.
Still, I respect the values of the Republican party. The abolitionists and female protesters were right: they would eventually get what was fair, which was anti-slavery rules enforced, and women's suffrage and abortion rights granted. I empathize with the history of the Republican party, and I only hope that the executive candidates will be better when I gain the right to vote - in a mere 5 years. See me at the We the People competition!
Posted December 06, 2011
Liberty for All says:
I've been raised on these principles and they are good. Did you know that a baby starts moving 24 hours after the sperm reaches the egg? Plus "one nation under God" the bible says homosexuality is a sin so why should it be legal! also the people can make their own decisions right? so why should government be so big? Also inflation hurts our economy not help it so all of you people that voted for Obama just hurt our economy even more! Plus Elephant crushes Donkey. Ronald Reagen was republican also and he would have been on Mount Rushmore if they had more room. Teddy Roosevelt was also republican and he's on Mount Rushmore!
Posted November 16, 2010
Joe says:
I am proud to be a republican. I was raised to be self sufficient, trustworthy, hardworking, to reach for the stars and do whatever you have to do to get there. I am a firm believer in the right to bear arms, but against abortion legislation. I find abortion fundamentally wrong, but the government has no right to regulate what a women is to do with her body. The government has no right to regulate what anyone does with there body as long as it is not harmful to other people. We should worry about the living before we worry about the unborn. Even though i hold that liberal viewpoint, i am disgusted by liberals they tax and spend hardworking people who deserve there money and give it to poor ignorant lazy people. My uncles stand in courtrooms everyday and listen to the lady who has children for money and lives in a rent controlled apartment only has to pay 29 dollars a month, but walks into court 6 months behind wearing Chanel, gold braclets and earings, designer clothes, and a smart phone. but the liberal judge gives the repeat offender who has beat the government out of money and wasted our tax dollars go uncharged. This is why i find it unimaginable for me to be a democrat.
Posted November 01, 2010
newlyrepblican says:
I am a Republican but I dont aggree with all views of the Republican party. I do think that abortion should be illegal, I believe that gay marriage should not be legal, I dont hate gays and i think love knows no boundaries but two men or two women shouldnt be married it just isnt right, I do think the war in Iraq should be ended but they do need help, freedom really is not free. I do not believe in the Death Penalty, under no circumstances should it be okay to take a man's life I'd rather him rot in jail forever.
Posted July 26, 2010
todd says:
I am a Republican because I have met God. Now that I know He exists, I can not vote for people that say a woman has more say over right and wrong than God just so she can live comfortably. Furthermore, God says in His ghost writer best seller to keep your panties on. Of course, that is a paraphrase. But this is exactly what he repeatedly says. He says the same thing to homosexuals. What I have found is that people fall to the deception and degrading shame of homosexuality because their parenting was messed up. Those parents also did not take God's advise to live selflessly, but selfishly put themselves ahead of their own children.
Having said that, I think it is time for a new third party that puts morality above selfish power trips. So, if you find a party that believes in keeping the Constitution, believes in right and wrong, and wants the USA to be strong through moral choices, check it out!
Posted June 21, 2010
Penocea says:
I am a Republican and we believe in Liberty, free will, and independence. We encourage self-empowerment, love of diversity, and individual freedom. We say, ?Follow your bliss, believe in your dreams and feel the fire in your belly because the strength of one individual empowered with the belief in self can move mountains.' We are optimistic in our speeches, believe in the American people and say that every human being has the potential for greatness.
C.S. Lewis said, ?Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.? This is the goal of every Democrat, every Socialist, every Progressive today. In creating a society where individuals give up there dependency and indiviuality to live upon the graciousness of the government, be grateful for the government is not my idea of compassion, it is the worst cruelty that can be inflicted upon man.
Republicans believe in Liberty, free will, and independence. We encourage self-empowerment, love of diversity, and individual freedom. We say, ?Follow your bliss, believe in your dreams and feel the fire in your belly because the strength of one individual empowered with the belief in self can move mountains.' We are optimistic in our speeches, believe in the American people and say that every human being has the potential for greatness.
Posted June 01, 2010
republican says:
do u know why people say republicans are the "rich" . BECAUSE WE the rightful people of america work for our money. and just to tell you , we arent rich. we just know how to manage money.
Posted March 19, 2010
republican says:
i have a question to all you democrats... Do you work hard? do u EARN your money?? if the answer is yes then why do u want some of that money to go to people who are too lazy to vote , too lazy to work and EARN their own money.? Granted there ARE many people who cant get jobs and it's not because they are lazy but still . you all KNOW that there are those who just dont work and reproduce more because the more kids the more money they get. The welfare system was created for people who HONESTLY cant get work. on abortion.... how many of you democrats think its okay to shoot a newborn child? none... atleast i hope there is none. its no diff. than abortion. You are still killing an INNOCENT child. i say innocent because many of you say how can u be against abortion but for the death penalty? uhh because the death penalty is for people who murdered and deserve it. what did that poor baby do to u? nothing. how about taxes?? many democrats support an increase of taxes for the WEALTHY. so us hard workers should have to pay the taxes for nonhard workers? i dont think so. i am thirteen years old, i am in studyhall and i want to be the first republican women as president.
Posted March 19, 2010
nedluag says:
Small government, personal responsibility and independence. I'm proud of the fact that Republicans were the champions for abolishing slavery and getting women the right to vote. We were the original liberators. Now liberal has become socialism. I believe abortion shouldn't even be part of the party platform. Liberals (aka Progressives) want government out of their lives, but the more you have regulation, taxes, etc the more government will be in your life. If the government takes care of you the government gets to know all your business ( like mom and dad!) Freedom of religion means freedom to be a Christian too (liberals seem to have forgotten that) and tolerance includes tolerating Christians (oops yes you have to tolerate EVERYONE, not just alternative lifestyles).
Posted February 10, 2010
dcarrington says:
Currently, I'm a registered Republican. For the most part, it is for ideological reasons (such as the idea that government should be more localized) though I wonder if either party has much ideology left other than trying to gain political power for its own sake.
Posted November 23, 2009
Democrat, because...
True Democrat says:
I am not rich nor am I not poor, but there are so many people out there searching high and low but still can't find a job. Sure there are lazy folks out there but you can't get your mind clouded on just them. What if you're sick and can't get work, well you can depend on welfare and healthcare. That's what the democrats do, they help people. I am not a believer in abortion but I don't think death penalty is the answer. No human being deserves to die. That being said, I still think we have the right to chose. They help poor people out, people who made mistakes. A second chance is what they are giving. So go democrats!!!!!
Posted March 26, 2010
Anonymous says:
I am a teenager, and just like everything else in life, I am still figuring out which political party suits MY interests. It has been a tough decision since my social views are very liberal, and my economic views are a tad bit conservative. But in the end, I choose to register as a Democrat because I feel that, my conservative economic views are somewhat selfish. Tax breaks for the wealthy instead of the other lower half is just downright avaricious, and not to mention health care. Even though a side of me still favors private insurance companies, and making sure that doctors and physicians are living in luxury, just because I hope to be one of them someday; bottom line is that it is just unfair.
So, I am going Democrat (:
Posted February 02, 2010
lorraine says:
i am a democrat because i was raised to believe that evryone is worth something, not just rich fags. McCain isn't a bad man, he's actually one of my favorite republicans, but his views aren't that great. Most republicans are either rich or redneck white people. democrats are: white, black, red, yellow, brown... you get my point. they are for EVERYONE. Will is probably some racist redneck who obama's plan will help more than mccain's. molly is right.
Posted June 11, 2009
molly says:
I believe in the "UNITED" states of America.
Why sit and watch someone die when you can lend out a hand?
Why pretend like killing innocent Iraqi families is okay?
Why take away a womens right to have a child?
Why not give a homosexual couple the same rights as you and your wives?
As Americans we are supposed to look out for one another, not just sit back and watch someone die simply because they have no money. We need to come together as a society and help one another when times get hard not look the other way. We are all human, no one is better than anyone. No ones life is more important than any other individual. I am a democrat because i believe in PEACE LOVE and UNITY.
we must learn to help one another.
as opposed to hording everything like animals.
Posted May 04, 2009
Scott says:
The Democratic Party, like any other political party, are going to have flaws but I still think the Democrats are much better than the Republicans. I'm pro-choice. The woman should have the choice to get rid of her child if she so desired. Homosexuals should have a right to get marry. They're still citizens and they're still people. Love has no boundaries and homosexuals aren't a disease. If you're religion does go against this sort of stuff, it shouldn't matter because that's what you believe not what they believe. Religion and Politics should not mix at all.
Better healthcare is very important. I hate to see a family that can't survive without this sort of program, that could assist them. I think Barack Obama will be a very good president and as a democrat, he knows what is best for our country.
Posted March 23, 2009
KG says:
If republicans preach self responsibility, then why are they always so concerned about everybody else? if two homosexuals want to get married, how does that hurt you? and for the people who say that God hates this, i say that you don't know the true meaning of God and to find another religion which preaces hate cuz Christianity does NOT. if a man takes the life of another man, who are we as humans to turn around and give that man the death penalty and take his life? does this not sound hypocritical? I feel republicans are all about $$$ and don't give a damn about helping mankind. and for those who think that humans are not somewhat responsible for global warming you are on crack. are there some points of the republican views i agree with, yes. but Our country was founded by democrats and i think there is a reason why this party has continued to prosper ever since and serve the people of this country
Posted March 17, 2009
yoyoyoyoyo says:
I think that government has become corrupt with the republicans in office. Really i dont know what i am. I think i am independent. I believe in Pro Choice on the abortion issue. I dont ness. agree with the issue. I think that every woman should be given the natural right to abortion. If thats what she wants, it is her body and that is what she should be able to do. I do not agree with the war. I think that we should try to keep peace in all aspects of our life. I do not agree with gay/lesbian marriage but i think i should be illegal. It is wrong and i think gross but to each its own.
Posted November 05, 2008
Christine says:
I was a Republican but I made the switch.
I do take a seamless approach to life: I am pro-life in all circumstances (regarding abortion and death penalty). However, I am now a Democrat because I am against the war in Iraq, I care deeply for the enviornment, and I am against big businesses. I think we need to find alternative to oil and am very much against drilling in Alaska.
Yah for California making gay marriage legal. Love has no boundaries, and if you think they do- I feel sorry for you.
And I cannot wait for Barack to rock in Washington D.C.!
Posted October 20, 2008
papawu says:
Although their idealism sometimes seems a bit naive in this day and age, it is one of the things which keeps me fighting for a Democratic America. The Republican track record alone speaks volumes about the necessity for change in our country and I just don't believe a bunch of hypocritical, war monger Republicans have a chance in hell of achieving the progress which we so desperately need and deserve.
Posted October 19, 2008
daria369 says:
I am actually neither (republican or democrat) and I can live happily ever after without politics and politicians.
One thing is for certain, though: extremists of all kinds scare me.
Posted October 15, 2008
If you liked this, you might like these...

-
Reply
-
Mermaiden
Sep 24, 2011 @ 9:33 pm | delete
- i really enjoyed your lens! Very informative.
-
-
Reply
-
jopalei
Sep 7, 2011 @ 11:50 pm | delete
- Excellent Lens with plenty of information. I'd be interested in your opinions on the subjects included in my new Lens: Food Police. Please stop by if you wish. Thanks.
-
-
Reply
-
SudokuNut
Jul 2, 2011 @ 4:09 pm | delete
- I find an increasing number of people voting AGAINST something rather than FOR something.
They support the Democrat not because they like him/her or what they stand for, but because they like other guy less and vice versa.
Consequently, these people aren't getting what they want and aren't happy with their government because they never voted for what they wanted, just against what they didn't want.
I think our options are limited by having a two party system. Ultimately, neither party has to do their best, or what's right for America, they just have to make the other side fail in what they are trying to achieve and the vote will swing their way because it has nowhere else to go.
So we get what we have today, two parties trying to make each other look bad whilst running the country into the ground. Sad.
Democrat or Republican? No thanks.
-
-
Reply
-
pawpaw911 Jun 3, 2011 @ 2:51 pm | delete
- I prefer to call the Dumacrats, and Flubupicans. Both parties are corrupt, but I vote republican, because they do less damage to the country and my family.
-
-
Reply
-
May 2, 2011 @ 12:10 pm | delete
- I'm a Democrat because Democrats haven't sold weapons to Iran. We haven't given aid to the Taliban.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
May 2, 2011 @ 12:18 pm | delete
- Tramadol, look up CAIR and how many times they have been sued for contributing to the Taliban. Then look up all of the candidates that support CAIR. Sorry to burst your bubble, but your reasons for being a Democrat are based upon false information.
-
-
Reply
-
chrispell017
May 1, 2011 @ 8:37 pm | delete
- nice lens.. very informative and nice
-
-
Reply
-
Spook
Mar 1, 2011 @ 9:57 am | delete
- It was an interesting read. I'm not an American but believe you must have people who can lead. Most countries now have parties with no clear mandate to lead so have to form partnerships to lead as a government, often from totally opposed ideologies. Of course this cannot work and people should at last be able to make up their minds. I also firmly believe that American principles have done so much for the world. Americans need to ask themselves again, just exactly what these principles were? Blessed by an Angel.
-
-
Reply
-
ThruMyEyes Nov 26, 2010 @ 11:49 am | delete
- Fiscally responsible, my favorite word...
-
-
Reply
-
MarkUpshaw Nov 8, 2010 @ 5:51 pm | delete
- Blue Dog Democrat. Fiscally responsible and socially accepting of all people.
-
-
Reply
-
irregularworld Oct 11, 2010 @ 12:41 pm | delete
- Um, I'm neither a Republican nor a Democrat. Both political parties are far too much to the Right. Neither represents principled liberals like me. Republicans and Democrats both have sold out to corporate lobbyists. So, where does that leave me in this dichotomous lens?
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Oct 11, 2010 @ 7:54 pm | delete
- Um... voteless? Coffee or Tea? =)
-
-
Reply
-
mcochs
Oct 6, 2010 @ 12:38 pm | delete
- I enjoyed stopping by!
-
-
Reply
-
visitor
Jul 25, 2010 @ 10:08 pm | delete
- this website has a lot of information and I did enjoy seeing people defending their positions and political views. Hpwever, I do think the information as far as explaining the parties falls short on the democrat platform. The republican platform explanation had a lot more helpful information.
-
-
Reply
-
Centerpiece
Jul 9, 2010 @ 11:03 pm | delete
- Wow, what a website; Very informative and interesting.
I have never been one to find an interest in politics, but I do believe in the importance of voting. I still have not made up my mind as to which party I choose to side with. I am stuck in the middle, but the information posted on this site has caught my interest by far and further informed me on certain views from each party that I had not previously been aware of. I am definately more interested in politics and wish to continue my research on both parties before making a decision.
I would appreciate for you guys to share websites similar to this one.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Nov 5, 2009 @ 7:53 pm | in reply to Beautiful_GreenBeans | delete
- I agree Beautiful, we need to pay attention.
On a side note to everyone who visits this lens, Please know that it is critically important to be informed. I noticed that some people are wavering about sticking with their current party simply because they seem like they are currently the underdogs. That is NOT a good reason to quit your party! If you are going to take action, do it so that it helps the good guys win. Do it to protect the lives and well-being of your children and your great grandchildren alike from government oppression. Be brave and stand for what matters most.
-
-
Reply
-
Beautiful_GreenBeans
Oct 28, 2009 @ 11:16 pm | delete
- Phew! I finally made it through the lens AND comments. Great, relevant lens, great duels and excellent platform for rants! I have a feeling though that this great distraction of us fighting with each other (not just here but everywhere) is totally cutting into the CSPAN viewing time :)
Folks (me included) let's pay close attention to what those people are doing in Washington, we may not all agree about who they are and what they're doing, but we can all agree that we're PAYING them to do it!
-
-
Reply
-
lollyj
Sep 25, 2009 @ 2:48 pm | delete
- Wow, indeed!! This is an excellent lens that covers your topic thoroughly.
I once was a devoted Republican. Then I became a die hard Democrat.
Finally I evolved into a person who voted for whoever seemed the least of two evils.
Yes, that sounds cynical. I'm cynical about all politicians now.
-
-
Reply
-
WhitU4ever
Aug 12, 2009 @ 9:00 pm | delete
- Thank you, Brenda! Congrats on becoming a Squid-angel! :)
-
-
Reply
-
Treasures-By-Brenda
Apr 8, 2009 @ 7:04 am | delete
- Wow! What a page you have here packed with information and reader participation. Great work that is blessed by a brand-new SquidAngel!
Brenda
-
Who Am I?
Christmas Day 1776 - "Victory or Death"
Democrat Video Gets a Fact Check
Be sure to watch the video below the text.
Fact: Republicans for Environmental Protection (REP) is a national organization of United States Republican Party voters formed in 1995. They have members in 49 states and formal chapters in 10 states.
Claim #2: "...Democrats respect a woman's right to make her own health care decisions." This is code for, "I believe women should be allowed to rid their mistakes via the death of their own unborn child.. er, mistake... er, fetus."
Fact: Republicans care about every issue regarding women's health care, including abortion. In fact, Republicans do not try to cover up the facts about abortion. Get the facts here.
Claim #3"...Democrats know... They work for me and you. They will not pander to the pressures of special interest groups."
Fact: Democrats pander to the pressures of the Sierra Club (environment), the NAACP (rights for African Americans), gay rights organizations, CAIR, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, NOW, and many other special interest groups.
Claim #4:"...Democrats will keep me safer from real terrorist threats." I admit this one made me laugh.
Fact: Democrats support CAIR, which funds terrorist activities and other groups that also support terrorist activities.
Fact: Obama is holding Arizona hostage to his political goals of amnesty for illegals, creating practically an open invitation to terrorists at the border of Mexico. If not for Arizona's stand-alone efforts to secure the border, things would be a lot worse than they already are.
Fact: During Democrat President Clinton's term, a sniper had Bin Laden in his cross-hairs three times and Clinton knowingly let him go. He was more interested in his golf game than he was in protecting innocent lives from Al Qaeda, including the lives of the soldiers camped near the top security location of Bin Laden at dusk. At night, those soldiers could have all been killed had they waited any longer for an answer from Clinton. They were forced to abort the mission for that very reason.
Fact: Republicans supported the war. Democrats did not.
Claim #5: "...Democrats will defend good-paying American jobs."
Fact: The unemployment rate under President Obama was, at the time this video was released, at 9.6%, almost 10%. Socialism is the Democrat's answer to job loss. Redistributing wealth causes people to stop trying because the fruit of their efforts is not theirs to keep. Too much of it is taken via taxes and given to others. One gets the same results regardless of the effort that goes into the work. (See The Real Story Behind Thanksgiving.) Therefore, no one has any incentive to work hard... not for strangers. When production goes down, the economy suffers. Businesses don't wish to create more jobs if they know that taxes will be higher and there are penalties and more government regulations for making more money. And it is the big businesses and the rich who provide jobs. Yet, the Obama administration wants to tax the rich and either penalize big business or bail out companies that are failing, complete with strings attached. The rich were defined as making over $300,000 per year in Obama's original proposal. Sounds good at first whisper, but... for a business, that is not rich, considering that a large percentage of those earnings are (in most cases) likely to be needed to operate the business. But if business expenses are not taken into consideration, a company making over $300,000 could very well be a small business with large operating costs. These would be hit just as hard as the big businesses that might be better capable of surviving a large tax increase. Haven't we seen by now way too many vacant retail spaces pop up all around us? Are they big business? No. These are small retail shops that can't afford to pay for the space anymore because of a recession that has continued since Obama began his term. Where did the bailout money go? Definitely not to the people. The unemployment rate hasn't changed much.
Claim #6:"...Democrats understand the complexities of global warming. They will work to keep me and my family safer from the unpredictability of climate change."
Fact: Global warming was never an issue needing to be understood by the average American until a politician named Al Gore made a lot of money on his hit "documentary," An Inconvenient Truth. But the claims he makes about global warming are simply not true. And climate change happens cyclically, and there is nothing Democrats or Republicans can do to stop it from happening. It was here before we were.
Claim #7:"...Democrats understand the importance of keeping America globally competitive. They will get public education and health back on track."
Fact: Democrats reject the idea of school vouchers because vouchers require the public schools to compete with private schools over the preferences of people like you and I rather than catering to the kind of education that the government thinks our children should have. And we all know that anything that is government run is inefficient.
Fact: Democrats say that countries like Canada and Europe have superior health systems. But what they don't say is that we already surpass other countries in the quality of health care provided in this country, as well as availability of medical services and the speed at which someone can be treated, and at a competitive price. The only problem is the middle man... the insurance company... sometimes limits our choices by limiting our physician choices and the types of care that are covered by our insurance. But not everyone has to pay for medical care via insurance. The old fashioned saving for a rainy day seems to have become a lost art unless a family makes a deliberate and self-controlled decision to set aside money for medical costs on their own. It can be done. Yet, Democrats tout that we need to compete with inferior, government-controlled, foreign health care systems. Ask a Canadian how long you have to wait for cancer treatments. Ask how long the line is. Truth be told, patients are getting worse and/or are dying during that wait. Some would not have died if they had received their care in America. Take Newfoundland's Premier, Denny Williams of Canada, as an example. He recently visited Florida to undergo heart surgery. He could have gotten this done in his country. So, if Canada is superior to America in health care programs, then why didn't he have the procedure done in Canada?
Claim #8: "...Democrats believe in equal rights, regardless of age, gender, race, sexual orientation, political preferences, religion, or lack of one.
Fact:Democrats promote special rights, not equal rights, in order to make minorities more privileged than the average American. Affirmative action was a Democrat's idea, which makes it mandatory for companies to hire people with different racial backgrounds, regardless of skill. Who would want to be hired based on the color of his/her skin? No one I know. Democrats side with Gay rights advocates who claim that homosexuals have fewer rights than the average American. But the rights of homosexuals are already protected as well as those of heterosexuals. Furthermore, a civil union is legal and affords same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples, without changing the definition of marriage for the entire nation. Democrats are famous for pieces of legislation that attempt to undermine the American family, such as awarding decisions to the government that belong to parents, removing our parental rights. (And the list goes on.)
The end of the video is Democrats at their best, saying, "Join us! Be a Democrat!"
Isn't that what Democrats do best -- they tell us to be like them and then accuse Republicans of doing the same as if it were a crime? Something to think about.
by WhitU4ever
- 121 featured lenses
- Winner of 10 trophies!
- Top lens » Log Cabins: Rustic Romantic Retreats
Explore related pages
- The Truth About Abortion The Truth About Abortion
- Discover the Bill of Rights Discover the Bill of Rights
- Terrorism: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes Hatred and Intolerance Terrorism: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes Hatred and Intolerance
- Book Review of Scorpions for Breakfast by Jan Brewer Book Review of Scorpions for Breakfast by Jan Brewer
- Is Voting a Right or a Privilege? Is Voting a Right or a Privilege?
- Political Masks | Democrats & Republicans | Kate & William, Obama, Palin, Clinton, Bush, Reagan Political Masks | Democrats & Republicans | Kate & William, Obama, Palin, Clinton, Bush, Reagan