All about Fourth Edition Dungeons and Dragons
Ranked #20,577 in Entertainment, #226,908 overall
Dungeons and Dragons 4E
Make sure that you scroll all the way down, and take all of the surveys. Leave me some feedback in my guestbook, too. Let me know how I can make this lens better!
Countdown to Release of Fourth Edition
4E is coming
Will you be ready?
While 4E will incorporate many of the strengths of 3E and 3.5 D&D, it will also offer gamers a variety of new and exciting possibilities, in terms of game mechanics. In many ways, 4E will borrow from the recent Tome of Battle: Book of Nine Swords, as well as Star Wars: Saga edition. These products were, to some extent, proving grounds for new mechanics and changes to be used in 4E.
Beyond this, the changes that Wizards of the Coast has made to the flavor of the game should prove interesting. For example, getting rid of elven subraces, and creating the new Eladrin race to replace the "higher" elves. In addition, Tieflings are now a core race, as are Dragonborn. Gnomes, however, are gone from the Player's Handbook.
There are, obviously, going to be other changes to flavor, as well. For example, the cosmology of the D&D world is changing. Civilization is now like a "point of light" surrounded by darkness. Even the Forgotten Realms will experience great changes as the Spellplague works itself out.
Be sure to take the surveys below, sound off on what you think 4E will be like, and leave me a note in the guestbook!
The Great Controversy
For and Against
Against
- It is way too soon for a new edition. It has only been 5 years since 3.5 was released.
- The new flavor of the game is unappealing, because they are changing too many standard D&D ideas.
- 4E is going to make changes to my favorite campaign setting that I won't like.
- I've got too much money invested in 3rd edition to have to buy all new books.
- 3rd edition was nearly the best RPG system ever; 3.5 took it the rest of the way. Why try to improve on perfection?
- Wizards of the Coast is just being a greedy, evil corporation, and aren't concerned with their fans.
- All of the best game developers, like Monte Cook, have all jumped ship or been thrown overboard. 4E can't be good.
- They're just trying to make D&D more like Everquest or World of Warcraft, which it isn't, can't, and shouldn't be made to be.
- I don't like it, I don't want to like it, I'm not tryin' it, and you can't make me!
For
- 3.0/3.5 was getting stagnate; a new edition and the necessary changes that come with it will make it exciting again.
- Game play, especially at high levels, has become painfully slow; 4E can fix that.
- The online tools, if they work, could prove to be invaluable to the DM.
- There are some rules in 3E that just don't work very well. 4E can fix them.
- With the glut of supplements available, there are too many rules in 3E to keep track of. A rules reset will alleviate this problem.
- My particular favorite designer (insert name here) is still with WotC.
- It is only 2 fewer years between the release of 3.0 and 4.0, than it was between 2nd edition and 3rd edition. It's not too soon.
- I like what 3rd edition did to the game; I think WotC can do it again.
- I didn't like what 3rd edition did to the game; I'm skipping from 2nd to 4th.
Then there is another camp (probably the vast majority of D&D players) that will wait until they've seen the product to make a decision. So, where do YOU fall?
4E Conversion
4E: Good or EVIL
Is Fourth Edition the Spawn of Satan (in a bad way)?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byNo. It's going to rock!
TheGeekLens says:
As someone who has played every edition of D&D for the past several decades, I have to say that 4e is probably my preferred edition. I'm not saying it's perfect and in fact other editions do certain things better, but as a whole, 4e provides the most streamlined and balanced rules set as a toolbox to play with.
Of course, others can and will disagree - but everyone looks for different things in their game system.
Posted August 22, 2011
dukethepcdr says:
My experience with D&D has been mostly from the video game aspect. I grew up playing D&D games on the NES, SNES, Gameboy and computer. Games like Eye of the Beholder and Baldurs Gate. I only started playing the table top RPG a couple of years ago. So I love the new 4th Edition! It's more like the video games I enjoy! I also love the D&D Miniatures Battle game!
Posted December 23, 2010
Bear says:
4th edition is more fluid and fun to play.
Posted August 21, 2010
Jigglebones...? says:
JIgglebones!
Posted August 08, 2010
Nord Ronnoc says:
I've played 4th edition several times and I have to say that it's easier and more fun to play as both a player and a DM.
Posted November 12, 2009
Yes. WotC is greedy and evil!
Alwin Dark says:
I've played D&D since the very earliest days of D&D Basic. AD&D was an amazing step up from that and I also liked 2e. I stopped upgrading after that and I must admit my tabletop playing days are now long gone but there is one observation I feel would be pertinent...
"The 'rules' are there as a player/DM aid. They aren't hard and fast rules".
When I DM'd I used my own variation of the Magic system and various other adjustments that I (and my players) liked.
I stopped at 2e because my players and I were comfortable with the way we played and let our imaginations take control, not rules.
That's the way it's supposed to be.
By all means get your 4e editions but if you don't like something, ignore it and use only those innovations that work for you.
Enjoy.
Posted March 26, 2011
dnd says:
Wasn't anywhere near as fun as the previous versions. Especially with what they did to the Forgotten Realms.
Posted September 23, 2010
Ginge says:
1st edition FTW!!!
Posted August 13, 2010
ApatheticConsumer says:
Sitting down with my stack of 3E and 3.5E books and comparing them to my 4E books leaves me a little puzzled over the hardcore supporters on either side. 4E is just a more rigid 3.5E lite with some changes to movement and the spell system. Most if not all the paragon paths and epic destinies can be traced to prestige classes. The exploits are just the tome of nine swords for all classes instead of martial and divine... I dunno know why people are making such a contrast between them, they aren't very different. I think changing players or a DM would have a bigger impact on the game than switching between 4E and 3.5E. I know I won't hesitate to play either edition.
Posted February 12, 2009
Tinka says:
I stupidly bought 3e, only to find out that 3.5 would be out in two months. I've been world building a !really! indepth campaign for 3.5 for almost a year and just feel like I'm getting ripped. I would rather see balancing issues addressed through more supplements
Posted October 23, 2008
The DM's Blog
Inside the Mind of Your DM
Fetching RSS feed... please stand byGenCon
The Gaming Life
4E Update - Elves
Elves and Eladrin
This is, obviously, a problem for the elves. Wood, Wild, Grey, High, Gold, Sun, Moon, Dark, you name it, there's probably an elf for it. So, how to fix the problem?
Well, WotC designers for Fourth Edition Dungeons and Dragons have taken the approach that most differences between elves are cultural, rather than racial. So, Wild and Wood Elves are, essentially, the same race.
But, in Fourth Edition, WotC wanted to provide a variety of options for PCs. So, they made elves one race, very woodsy. This race comprised the wood elves and wild elves. They then took some of the old elvish subraces (gold elves, high elves, grey elves, etc) and made them into Eladrin - magically-adept elf-like beings. The dark elves, already called Drow, now become a separate race called "Drow."
Semantics? Maybe. But, the mechanical differences between them will, I think in the long run, prove to be the most interesting part of the change.
Check Me Out
Go Shop NOW!
Player or DM?
DnD 4E Update - The Rogue
On my blog, I offer my initial reaction on a variety of aspects, including:
- Healing Surges
- Weapon Proficiencies
- Simplified Skill System
- Powers
- Brawny and Trickster Builds
- Sneak Attack Damage
What Say You?
Let me know what you think of this Lens, as well as what else you might like to see here!
- Reply
- Reply
-
Reply
-
dukethepcdr Dec 23, 2010 @ 10:56 am | delete
- I personally am sick of the Great Edition Wars! I love this lens! It takes such a balanced view of 4th Ed. I say that D&D is D&D. I mix the best of all editions together into my own kind-of private brew when I DM games.
I actually prefer the D&D Miniatures Game or (DDM) to the RPG. As I said in the poll, my background is more in video games than in table top games, so I find DDM's live action video game aspect to be fun! By the way, DDM still lives! Check it out at ddmguild.com
-
-
Reply
-
Chris70
Nov 13, 2008 @ 4:45 pm | delete
- Excellent lens, Five stars
-
-
Reply
-
Sep 25, 2008 @ 3:26 am | delete
- Wow!
I have ever come across and visited such a good lens, in this category. I liked it a lot and also bookmarked it. Thanks for the beautiful lens.
Checkout my the hearingaidguide blog
-
by mrboffo
Bob Younce has been DMing so long that it's gone to his head (you know what 20 years of playing god for PCs can do to a guy?)
He's also trying to write...
more »
- 1 featured lens
- Winner of 2 trophies!
- Top lens » All about Fourth Edition Dungeons and Dragons
Explore related pages
- Preorder Diablo 3 Preorder Diablo 3
- Smaug the golden dragon of the hobbit Smaug the golden dragon of the hobbit
- Dungeon Crafter 3 Custom Tiles Dungeon Crafter 3 Custom Tiles
- Geek Games for Girls Geek Games for Girls
- Dragon Fable Online Game Dragon Fable Online Game
- Persistent Browser-Based Games Persistent Browser-Based Games















