Equus - starring Daniel Radcliffe and Richard Griffiths.

Equus Poster
"This is a performance by an actor of real potential," Michael Billington (The Guardian.)
"The emergence of young Dan Radcliffe in the artistic raw, tested as an actor and found equal to a stretching role." Quentin Letts (The Daily Mail)
Read the Script
Equus
Amazon Price: $4.57 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
An explosive play that took critics and audiences by storm, Equus is Peter Shaffer's exploration of the way modern society has destroyed our ability to feel passion. Alan Strang is a disturbed youth whose dangerous obsession with horses leads him to commit an unspeakable act of violence. As psychiatrist Martin Dysart struggles to understand the motivation for Alan's brutality, he is increasingly drawn into Alan's web and eventually forced to question his own sanity. Equus is a timeless classic and a cornerstone of contemporary drama that delves into the darkest recesses of human existence.

Alan and his Horses
What Did I Think?
I saw this production of Equus, in London 2007. I thought it was alright, but I wanted more from Radcliffe. I saw the second preview, so his performance was still finding it's feet (there was a rather embarrasment moment at the end, where Richard Griffiths had to show him how to bow!)I really wanted to love this show, as I was in a production of it with a theatre company a few years previously, but I was left with a strange taste in my mouth. I couldn't help feeling that there are better actors out there who could take on the role. Radcliffe was, for me, just OK. He didn't have enough diversity in his performance, the only diversity was in his vocal projection - quiet, loud, or shouting. Richard Griffiths was superb, as I had hoped. The production as a whole was 'revived' from it's original conception in the 70s, recreating the wired horse masks, as using a minimalistic set.

Promo Shots
Harry Potter Gets His Wand Out
The strange taste in my mouth, was scepticism. After seeing Radcliffe's disappointingly bland and shouty performance, I couldn't help feeling that it was stunt casting that gave him the part. Having a name like, Daniel Radcliffe, in a lead role that goes fully naked on stage, is a guaranteed sell out. Who isn't interested to see whether or not he actually takes his clothes off?I find something distasteful about it. I don't know why. I'm not a prude by any means. I only find it distasteful because Radcliffe is so strongly associated with Harry Potter - an icon of children's literature. Millions of children look up to him and adore him...and now, still a teenager, he is appearing naked infront of hundreds of people.
I suppose I also wouldn't mind so much, if it wasn't the topic of conversation everytime someone talks about the show. If there's a publicity shot, it's of Radcliffe topless. No-one stops and talks about the fundamental issues of a young teenager growing up with psychiatric help. No-one talks about the interesting stage design or the beautiful horse mask. All people seem to care about is Daniel Radcliffe getting taking his clothes off and showing everyone his 'wand'.
Watch the Film
Equus
Amazon Price: $6.97 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
This Oscar®-nominated* adaptation of Peter Shaffer's Tony Award-winning play erupts on the screen with the same power and passion as the stage original. Richard Burton gives "one of his best performances ever" (Boxoffice) in this "elegant and provocative" (Newsweek) tale ofmyth and madness. What would drive Alan Strang (Peter Firth), a troubled adolescent stable boy, to blind six horses with a metal spike? Psychiatrist Martin Dysart (Burton) investigates these unspeakable acts and delves deep into Alan's psyche, confronting the mysteries of sexual passion and madnessas well as the dark demons buried within his own soul. *1977: Actor (Burton),Supporting Actor (Firth), Adapted Screenplay

Martin Dysart (Griffiths) and Alan Strang (Radcliffe)
What Did The Critics Say...
CHARLES SPENCER for THE DAILY TELEGRAPH says, Powerful revival...Daniel Radcliffe brilliantly succeeds in throwing off the mantle of Harry Potter, announcing himself as a thrilling stage actor of unexpected range and depth."
DAVID LISTER for THE INDEPENDENT says, "If the production is well served by Radcliffe, he is not that well served by the production. The director, Thea Sharrock, fails too often to capture the tension in this psychological thriller... No caveats can fully detract from the punch that this powerful and haunting play still packs."
MICHAEL BILLINGTON for THE GUARDIAN says, "Forget all the prurient press speculation about Harry Potter's private parts. The revelation of this revival is that Daniel Radcliffe really can act...As a story, it is compelling."
BENEDICT NIGHTINGALE for THE TIMES says, " Radcliffe proves an assured actor...though gripping and theatrically skilful, Equus is at root dated, pretentious and even a bit pernicious...good theatrical effect...an enjoyable play. "
Is Daniel Radcliffe Right For The Part?
Is it stunt casting? Are there better actors out there? Is Radcliffe too associated with Children's Literature to go naked on stage?
Is Daniel Radcliffe right for the part of Alan Strang?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byAbsolutely. He's a fine actor, why not?
dreamsgate says:
While I imagine a lot of people will go just to see him naked (which is more a comment on their own oddness ), in order to break the stereo type of being Harry Potter he needs to explore as many different types of roles as he can.
Posted September 21, 2008
No. Its stunt casting, people just want to see Harry Potter naked
trinity says:
no
Posted November 10, 2011
chathuri says:
dan Is a good actor but I think there are good actors for this rool
dan Is a liitle boy
Posted December 01, 2008
susannaduffy says:
Just call me cynical, bitter and twisted. What a publicity stunt
Posted October 02, 2008
kmdphotography says:
I think the controversy is intended just to sell more tickets!
Posted September 20, 2008
LucyVet says:
I have to say I agree with you, and don't like this kind of obsession with him being naked when he's a character very associated with children and still so young. But of course, he's perfectly entitled to take any role he wants.
Posted September 18, 2008
MarcoG says:
Ok, ok, Radcliffe is a good actor...but still, his being in THIS play, is all about selling tickets! There ARE better actors out there for this role.
Posted September 16, 2008
Get All 5 Daniel Radcliffe, Harry Potter Films
Harry Potter Years 1-5 (Widescreen Edition)
Amazon Price: $27.79 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
Get all five Potter films for a bargain price
Daniel Radcliffe = Harry Potter
Harry Potter Years 1-5 Limited Edition Gift Set
The Harry Potter Limited Edition Giftset includes more...3 points
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Full Screen Edition) (Harry Potter 1)
Rescued from the outrageous neglect of his aunt and more...0 points
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (Full-Screen Edition) (Harry Potter 2)
When the Chamber of Secrets is opened again at the more...0 points
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Widescreen Edition)
In Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Harry more...0 points
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Full Screen Edition) (Harry Potter 4)
When Harry Potter's name emerges from the Goblet o more...0 points
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Lord Voldemort has returned but few want to believ more...0 points

Alan and Gill
Plays by Peter Shaffer
More Daniel Radcliffe Films
David Copperfield
The classic David Copperfield was not just Charles more...1 point
David Copperfield
Dickens' most autobiographical book David Copperfi more...1 point
The Tailor of Panama
Tailors are the secret-keepers of the power elite; more...0 points

Alan worshipping his God, Equus
Richard Griffiths Films
Robin Hood - Season One (5DVD)
People's hero war hero romantic hero and leader of more...1 point
The History Boys
From award-winning playwright Alan Bennett (The Ma more...1 point
Charlie Rose with Richard Griffiths; Simon Schama; Jonathan Schell (August 29, 2006)
First, Tony Award-winning actor Richard Griffiths discusses more...0 points
Way Down East
D.W. Griffith's 1920 masterpiece has been restored more...0 points
Daniel Radcliffe on eBay
Daniel Radcliffe on CafePress
My Other Theatrical Lenses
Leave Me A Message...
-
Reply
-
Holly
Jul 29, 2011 @ 10:10 am | delete
- i love it that dan is willin to step out of the harry potter spot light and express his emotions in this play he is yes known for children icons in harry potter but he is also a grown man in many peoples eyes if he has no regrets then why should we i say go for it reach for the stars dream big but never let anyone put you down ur the best dan keeping on doin the awesome
-
-
Reply
-
d-artist
Nov 26, 2008 @ 6:07 pm | delete
- don't know where I have been, never heard of this play! Interesting read...5*
-
-
Reply
-
AndyPo
Oct 29, 2008 @ 5:57 am | delete
- Excellent lens (5*) and reviews etc. I agree with the comments about using an actor associated childrens' films for a role like this. I haven't seen the play yet.
-
-
Reply
-
JustBon-Crochet-Designs
Oct 3, 2008 @ 12:25 am | delete
- I read a lot about this play when it was showing in London, but never got to see it. Remember seeing the movie some years ago, though. Great critique and lens. Thanks so much for joining [url=http://www.squidoo.com/groups/hunks]Handsome Hunky Men Group[/url]. 5*s
-
-
Reply
-
susannaduffy
Oct 2, 2008 @ 3:51 pm | delete
- Something fishy in Denmark?
-
-
Reply
-
MarcoG
Sep 25, 2008 @ 4:32 pm | delete
- Thanks for your comment Rich, I agree, I'm concerned that Radcliffe is being 'used' and will probably regret 'exposing his soul' at such a young age.
-
-
Reply
-
RichLeigh
Sep 25, 2008 @ 3:57 pm | delete
- You know; I clicked on this lens intrigued to find out what Equus was, and as it turned out I already knew about it (just not the name!) I agree with what you've said here about Daniel Radcliffe and the fact of his appearing naked here actually being a bigger issue than what the play itself is actually all about. I for example had heard about this play, knew that Daniel Radcliffe was in it and appearing naked (and had also come across some rather amusing photoshopped images), but didn't know what the play was about or in fact the name of it. I don't think it's really right that the star of Harry Potter should here be getting his 'wand' out; given the fact that so many children idolise the guy I feel that it's wrong the way the play has been marketed and the way in which Daniel Radcliffe has been used here to attract audiences. I really enjoyed your lens though, loved the pictures too, and it's a definite 5 stars from me. :)
-
-
Reply
-
aquariann
Sep 22, 2008 @ 10:08 pm | delete
- Very interesting lens. I had overheard talk of this role, and shuddered a bit. I have never seen or read the play, but what you've shared of it is quite powerful and disturbing. I know Radcliffe doesn't want to be typecast, but ... he's the face of Harry Potter!! Seeing him in Equus just seems creepy.
-
-
Reply
-
ChristiannaGarrett-Martin
Sep 22, 2008 @ 7:39 pm | delete
- A brilliant lens. Beautifully laid out. The pictures are striking! I love the wired horse heads.
I didn't think he would be a strong enough actor for this role. 5 stars from me:) *****
Christianna
-
-
Reply
-
CosmeticSurgeryIreland
Sep 20, 2008 @ 4:43 am | delete
- Oops i had meant to go and see it in the West End. I suppose I will have to fly over to US.
-
-
Reply
-
sheryll Sep 19, 2008 @ 10:23 am | delete
- good lens, I missed it when it was in London!
-
-
Reply
-
Portable_eBay
Sep 19, 2008 @ 4:09 am | delete
- Oh no... Harry Potter no more...
-
-
Reply
-
tdove
Sep 18, 2008 @ 4:50 pm | delete
- Thanks for joining G Rated Lense Factory!
-
-
Reply
-
LucyVet Sep 18, 2008 @ 2:54 pm | delete
- Great lens. I am a great Richard Griffiths fan, but it's not really my kind of show.
-
-
Reply
-
a_willow
Sep 18, 2008 @ 10:11 am | delete
- Haven't hear of this! Sounds interesting!
-
-
Reply
-
jigsaw2order
Sep 18, 2008 @ 9:10 am | delete
- Congrats on a nice lens on what I would think is quite a difficult subject for most people. Great idea though to write lenses on broadway shows.
-
-
Reply
-
lakeerieartists
Sep 17, 2008 @ 9:19 pm | delete
- Okay, that just ruined Harry Potter for me. LOL.
-
-
Reply
-
saraht43
Sep 17, 2008 @ 8:08 pm | delete
- Not my type of movie, but your lens is well presented.
-
-
Reply
-
ByRoy Sep 17, 2008 @ 6:02 pm | delete
- Great review, probably give it a miss myself though.
-
-
Reply
-
BeautifulDreamer
Sep 17, 2008 @ 5:32 pm | delete
- I think the next time I go to see a play I'll check with your lenses first!
-
- Load More
by MarcoG
I am an artist who also works in theatre. You can read my blog here. If you have any theatre based lenses, feel free to join my theatricality group x more »
- 11 featured lenses
- Winner of 4 trophies!
- Top lens » Equus
Explore related pages
- Watch Harry Potter Movies Online Watch Harry Potter Movies Online
- The Woman in Black - Susan Hill's horror story The Woman in Black - Susan Hill's horror story
- Lumiere Costume Lumiere Costume
- How To Direct a Play How To Direct a Play
- Best Theater Shirts Best Theater Shirts
- Harry Potter Spells Harry Potter Spells





















