The Film Versus Digital Debate

1 - I can do better 2 - Jury's out 3 - Pretty darn good 4 - Splendiferous 5 - Awesometastic by 10 people | Log in to rate

Ranked #578 in Tech & Geek, #14,029 overall

Film or Digital Cameras?

Film Vs Digital

Two different but similar ways to record your memories or your trips away but which one is better?

 

There could be many reasons for using either film cameras or digital cameras but there has to be one that is better than the other, doesn't there?

Now's your chance to tell me!

Post your views in this online debate: Which is better, film or digital?

SquiDirectory Squidoo Directory - A categorized Squidoo directory featuring selected pages by expert Squidoo authors, featuring a variety of interesting subjects. From art to shopping, music, people, sports, religion, how's and more.

Have a Debate!
Powered By Ringsurf



Subscribe rss feed!

An Introductory Photography workshop 

Photography for the Joy of It: An Introductory Workshop for Film and Digital Photography

Amazon Price: $14.96 (as of 07/12/2009)Buy Now
List Price: $22.00

Patterson and his teaching partner, Andre Gallant, take a look at the basics in photography, providing clear instruction for beginning color or black-and-white photographers on choosing equipment, selecting the correct exposure, understanding depth of field and much more.

Release Date: 12/31/1969

Which cameras do professional photographers use? 

My partner, Chris, is a professional Fine Arts photographer. You can view some of his work at Christopher John Ball BA (Hon's) MA - Fine Arts Photography. Warning! His site does contain some nude images.

He found...

...that many models do not even know that film still exists.
...that many professional photographers do not even know how to use film.
...that many photographers both amateur and professional will give the entire shoot of images away without working on them or sorting out the wheat from the chaff.

He uses both Digital and Film cameras and will often carry both with him out on a shoot. In fact, he will often use both high quality and professional cameras as well as the cheap, crappy ones.

So, which do you think is better? Film or Digital? 

Give your reasons why you believe one is better than the other...

Do you use one over the other?
Do you use both methods?
What do you like about digital? About film?
What does your budget allow?
Do you find using film expensive? Restrictive?
Do you find you get better quality images if you use digital?

Film or Digital?

Loading Fetching blurbs now... please stand by

Film for sure; digital is for amateurs!

danmitch says:

For black and white, no contest!

PG Forte says:

Actually, I don't think it's true that one has to be better. It depends on how you're using them and what you're hoping to achieve. Otherwise, it's a bit like saying which makes a better book: a printing press or an illuminated manuscript. Digital is quicker and doubtlessly more convenient. But it can't match a good film camera for the sheer beauty and richness of the image quality.

Digital wins hands down! Film is out of date.

RedRockPhotographer says:

I tried for awhile to do both, but found that I used the film camera less and less. Then I stopped using it at all. My film went out of date in the fridge. Digital is better for learning, because you can see your results right away, unlike slide film that you have to wait a couple weeks to see. Not to mention, 36 shots on slide film costs at least $10 for film and processing. I've shot close to 200,000 photos with my digital cameras - do the math! I love transparencies, especially 645 or larger.My favorites are Velvia 50 and Kodachrome 25. I have thousands of images on all types of film, mostly sitting in boxes not being seen and slowly deteriorating over time. With digital, it's much easier to keep them organized on a hard drive (and multiple backups), and they don't deteriorate as long as you upgrade to new hard drives every few years. Overall, digital is more convenient, better for learning, easier to store, and more fun to work with.

RedRockPhotographer says:

I tried for awhile to do both, but I found that I was just shooting film to compare the results with my digital. With digital, you don't have to wait for two weeks for your slides to be processed. You learn faster because you see results quicker. You can experiment with the light settings and see results immediately, including the histogram! And it doesn't cost $10 or more for each group of 36 shots (film and processing). But I still love Velvia and Provia. I have thousands of slides sitting in carousels that haven't seen daylight for years.

CleanerLife says:

I never took photos before getting a digital camera, now I'm taking pictures all over. I can take various pictures of the same thing, then transfer them to my PC and decide which ones to keep.

aj2008 says:

Not only do I love digital because it is much cheaper (only print the pics you want), I love the fact that you can play around with the pics in a programme like Photoshop.

spirituality says:

I love how you can edit digital images right on your own pc. And you can see them before printing.

mulberry says:

Yep digital, make all the mistakes you want and delete...doesn't cost you a thing.

inkserotica says:

I have to say Digital mainly because I'm an amateur photographer and I love the ease of use and speed of the Digital Camera.

 
 
1 of 1 page
 

Are you an Amateur or Professional photographer? 

Everything I know about cameras and photography, I have either learnt myself through trial and error or sought advice from my professional Fine Arts Photographer, fiancé. My skills as a photographer is amateur at best but I do, apparently, have a good eye for a photograph.

My thoughts on this debate are as follows:

For ease of use, Digital cameras come top. As long as you have the camera, the card to write your images to and batteries, you're ready to go. Just point and click. Okay, so there's slightly more skill to it than that.

My point is, is that digital photography is ideal for those who do not wish to embark on a career as a professional photographer. In order to extract the images from the card you need your own computer and a memory card reader. No need to worry about sending your film off for processing and no one else has to see your images.

Digital cameras now are packed with so many features and they're relatively cheap, so they're easily accessible for the majority of us.

Film cameras are a different thing altogether.

Initial pricing for film cameras are exceptionally high and are usually only within reach for those of us who take our photography seriously. They also cost money to process them either by sending them away or by doing it yourself. With digital cameras now becoming so popular the need for film developers etc. are dwindling so it's even harder to find a shop or retailer than caters for this market. However, they are there if you know where to look and most, if not all, professional photographers would.

In terms of picture quality, they are two different mediums. No image will be exactly alike on whatever camera you take them on. Quality will also depend on any additional processes you may add i.e. scanning, quality of film developers, time and software.

Some photographers will shoot the same image on both types of cameras in order to get the maximum potential for the image.

So, really it all comes down to personal preferences and resources as to which camera you decide to use. There really is no good way of comparing the two types of photography together.

But, don't let that stop you from debating your views :)

Why I chose Digital over Film 

As a Squidoo Lensmaster, images are very important to me for improving the look of my lenses. Many of my images are displayed on my lenses using my account on Flickr.

As an amateur photographer, I believe Digital is far easier and cheaper than using a Film camera. For ease of use and speed, Digital wins hands down.

Why?

Digital Cameras are cheaper than Film: The initial cost of the camera is considerably cheaper than a Film camera. I can pick up a very good Digital Camera for under ÂŁ100, although I would be happy to pay up to ÂŁ150.

There are also no processing costs. I won't have to send my film away to be processed (though I wouldn't have to do that anyway, as I have a professional photographer on hand! ;)) All I need is a memory card (of which I have loads!), a computer and a memory card reader to transfer to my computer. I would also require editing software but these can be found on the Internet for free.

Digital Cameras are fast: Not just in the actual taking of the photograph but the processing of images to the computer. You take the images today and you can have them ready for editing the very same day maybe less than one hour after you have taken them.

Digital Cameras are Easy: For amateur photographers they are easy to use and process. Most, now, have software included to improve your images as you take them e.g. face recognition. Just point and click. All you need to worry about is composition.

I have an idea already as to the brand of Digital Camera I require. I've already used Nikons before and it appears that the most recent of these cameras are just the thing for me :) See below for the camera that I have my eye on!

Examples of Digital Photography 

Here's a slideshow of my own images using more than one Digital Camera.

Samsung S760 

Samsung S760 - Digital camera - compact - 7.2 Mpix - optical zoom: 3 x - supported memory: MMC, SD, SDHC

Amazon Price: (as of 07/12/2009)Buy Now

This is the camera I went for in the end, although I chose the colour, black. This camera was currently priced at just under 50 pounds in Jacobs. I'm very pleased so far with the results of the images and it's very easy and light to use. It's small, too, which is good for fitting into your coat pocket ready for use.

Photography links for you to visit 

Photography Resources:


Top Site Lists

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Webmaster Resources:

My Platypi - Free Do Follow Website Directory

Still need help to decide? 

Film vs. Digital
Film vs. Digital Cameras
Are film cameras better than digital cameras?
Film cameras are becoming rare. Although digital cameras have come a long way since they were first introduced there are still photographers that prefer to use old film cameras. Some of them use film
Clarkvision: Film versus Digital Summary
Film versus Digital My Summary

Bookmark This Lens 

If you enjoyed reading this lens, then why not share it with your friends.

Add this to your lens »

Bookmark and Share

 

Photobucket

Janusz wrote...

Carrie, well done on a very nice Lens... personally Im a Digi fan. Blessed by your feathered friend :)

ReplyPosted May 10, 2009

aj2008 wrote...

Love the slide show. Got to be digital for me - I am running out of space to store all the photos I have taken over the years! I am not a fan of Monkey Brain lenses but this one is just soooo well presented and makes such really good points that I just must Bless it!

ReplyPosted May 10, 2009

danmitch wrote...

Hi - thanks for publishing this. I am a big fan of film for black and white photography, but use digital most of the time. There is a real problem getting good quality developing and printing of B&W film now at a sensible price.

ReplyPosted February 22, 2009

hlkljgk wrote...

great debate. i learned with film and switched to digital. i really love editing digital images. also, film has a gelatin coating, and i'm vegetarian, so i like to avoid it.

ReplyPosted January 27, 2009

tdove wrote...

Thanks for joining G Rated Lense Factory!

ReplyPosted January 12, 2009

 
1 of 2 pages

by inkserotica

I moved to London, UK in the year 2000 and since then have slowly built up an on line presence as a Freelance writer and Reviewer.

Photobucket Photobucket web stats (more)
Create a Lens!