How to Fix Easy Mistakes in Grammar

Ranked #18,006 in Education, #379,387 overall

Do Squidmasters find grammar mistakes in your lenses?

One thing I've noticed, is that when people submit their lenses to be critiqued in the Squid U forum, the first thing people comment on is the grammar. It's nearly always simple little mistakes that can easily be fixed, but wouldn't it be better if these mistakes were fixed before submitting your lens, so the Squidmasters can offer advice that's even more helpful than, "you forgot an apostrophe"?

So, in this lens, my aim is to help those who frequently mix up "your" and "you're", "it's" and "its", "there" "their" and "they're", and not only help them to fix their lenses, but help them remember the rules of these words so they won't have mistakes to change in the first place.

So, are you ready?

Your and You're

This is the most common and most preventable mistake

The most common mistake I see in writing is using "your" instead of "you're". Here's the difference:

YOUR - belonging to you
"It's your turn"

YOU'RE - abbreviation of "you are"
"I think you're gorgeous"

Simple, right? When writing a sentence, ask yourself, "what am I actually saying? Am I saying "you are"? What have I written?"

You might find you've written "your" instead of "you're". The difficulty lies in the way the English language is spoken. Ideally, we should be able to tell the difference between the words "your" and "you're" when they're said out loud, but we can't. "Your" should sound like "ore", as in core and "you're" should sound more like "ure" as in pure. However generally, "you're" is pronounced the same way as "your", and this is why it's so easy to use the wrong one.

You will very rarely see people use "you're" instead of "your", it's always the other way around. So as a simple rule of thumb, if you've used "you're", you're probably right to. But if you've used "your", just check it one more time and think about what your sentence is saying.

There, Their and They're

3 VERY different words

OK, these might be slightly harder to remember, but here are some useful tips to help you figure out which one you need to use.

THERE - indicating a specific place
"It's over there"

THEIR - belonging to a group of people (as opposed to belonging to one person, ie his and hers)
"They took their cat to the vet"

THEY'RE - abbreviation of "they are"
"I think they're crazy"

In the same way that "your" is often used wrongly, "there" seems to be the word of choice for all 3 of these terms. So here is how you can remember which one you should use for each situation.

There - just remember "here and there". The word "there" contains the word "here", so you'll know if you have the right one.

Their - Remember I said this is the plural of his or hers? Just remember that with the letters in "theirs", you can make the words "his" and "hers". Then you'll know if you're using the right word.

They're - Use the same rule as you would for "you're". Read your sentence and ask yourself "what is the sense of what I'm saying?"

It's and Its

Apostrophe, or no Apostrophe?

This one is easy once you know how, but why do people always get these mixed up?

Here's why. In school we were taught that if something is possessive, it should have an apostrophe. For example, "John's bike" or "Jane's shoes." So surely, if we want to say an object possesses something, we should use an apostrophe, right?

Wrong.

IT'S - abbreviation of "it is"
"It's a pleasure to meet you"

ITS - belonging to something
"The dog chased its tail"

But the tail belongs to the dog! It should have an apostrophe!

No. In this case (and only in this case), using an apostrophe with "its" means "it is", each and every time.

So once again, read your sentence, and ask yourself "am I saying "it is" or am I saying something belongs to something else?" Only use an apostrophe if you are abbreviating "it is."

Could have, would have, could of, should of

Coulda woulda shoulda

No no no no NO!

This next one is my absolute pet hate. And once again, we have the spoken language to blame.

There is no instance when you should use the word "of" after the words would, could or should, unless your sentence starts "this is how to write English very badly."

"If I could have taken the test again, I would have." This is correct.

"If I could of taken the test again, I would of." No no no! This is wrong and bad and evil!!!

This horrible error has crept into English writing because of the way we speak. "Would have" becomes "would've", and before you know it you're saying would of. Don't do it. It's very very bad.

This one might be the hardest to remember, and also one that is least noticed, but it's just as important as the others.

So just remember:

Would've = Would have
Could've = Could have

Remember what it's short for - the "ve" should be a BIG clue. It's "have", not "of".

Useful Links

Here are some links to some helpful resources related to grammar

BBC - Skillswise - Words - Grammar
BBC page to help children (and adults!) with grammar
Guide to Grammar and Writing
Guide to Grammar and Writing
10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
Nice little article that picks up common mistakes

Learn Better Grammar with Amazon

Now you know the basics, here's how you can improve even more

Loading

Let's see what you've remembered

Try this quiz, and if you get any wrong, go back and look over the lens again, you should find answers to any of the questions somewhere on this page.

Did you find any grammatical mistakes on this page?

Didn't think so!

Please leave a comment (and please don't forget to rate my lens, thanks)

  • Shibamom Jan 27, 2010 @ 11:32 am | delete
    Well yeah for me, I finally got a 100 on a Squidoo quiz! You have written a very useful and well laid out lens, that will certainly help many people here at Squidoo. I could of used it a few days ago....just kidding, couldn't resist!
  • Ramkitten Jan 27, 2010 @ 7:41 am | delete
    Oh, yeah. I see these goofs all the time. Thing is, even those who know the differences sometimes make these errors just because they're typing quickly, and then it's difficult to see the errors with our own eyes. And, of course, spell-checkers don't pick up on them, because the words technically aren't spelled incorrectly. Anyhow, nice job on this lens.
  • theraggededge Jan 27, 2010 @ 7:28 am | delete
    Good idea. Covers basic errors which we see all the time. There's a difference between the odd typo and someone who can't be bothered to check their English grammar. Having said that, I love hearing an 'accent' in writing that is written by someone who does not use English as a first language - the syntax or patterning may be off a little but I find it charming.

My Featured Lenses

If you liked this lens, please take a moment to look at some of my other passions

Loading

by

Beth_Rudkin

Beth Rudkin is a 25 year old computer geek who works from home. She plays guitar and piano, and writes good songs sung badly.

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!