Fuel Efficiency Comparison

1 - I can do better 2 - Jury's out 3 - Pretty darn good 4 - Splendiferous 5 - Awesometastic by 2 people | Log in to rate

Ranked #5,860 in Shopping, #45,773 overall

Review of some common properties of different types of fuel used in heating appliances (stoves, burners, fireplaces, and furnaces).

Fuel Efficiency 

Fuel Efficiency can be viewed as a multi-part aspect:

Actual fuel efficiency: how much fuel you have to spend to get some amount of heat.

Cost efficiency: how dear it is comparing to other fuel types.

Easiness: how easy it is to use, maintain, operate, and clean.

Environment impact: how much pollution it will produce.

Electricity 

Actual fuel efficiency: about 100% - there is no heat loss as for other fuel types.

Cost efficiency: electricity is the dearest type, unless you of course are using solar energy.

Easiness: most of the time, the easiest. No starting fires, no cleaning ashes, no need for chimneys of vent pipes.

Environment impact: varies depending on the source of electricity, if it's a nuclear plant, than potentially huge impact; but if it's a solar power facility, than it's perfect.

Click here to have a look at electric heating appliances that are selling now (a new window will open)

Gas (Natural and Propane) 

Actual fuel efficiency: about 80%, some heat loss.

Cost efficiency: high to medium. Natural gas is less expensive and even propane is burning hotter, it is dearer to use.

Easiness: moderate. You don't need to clean your fireplace from ashes, but most of the models require ventilation systems and installation as not as easy as for electric appliances.

Environment impact: moderate. As any fossil fuel, burning gas produces carbon dioxide, which is a pollutant, but not as much of it as coal or wood.

Click here to have a look at gas heating appliances that are selling now (a new window will open)

Wood 

Actual fuel efficiency: low, about 60%.

Cost efficiency: medium to low. It is about twice as cheap as electricity, but still not as cheap as coal.

Easiness: low. Takes more efforts to start, operate, clean, and supply fuel stock.

Environment impact: high. As a fossil fuel, wood combustion produces more pollution than other fuel types (but not as much as any automobile).

Click here to have a look at wood heating appliances that a selling now.

Wood Pellets 

Actual fuel efficiency: medium to high, it's about 80%.

Cost efficiency: medium to high. Can be a bit cheaper than using natural gas.

Easiness: medium. Not as easy as electricity and gas, but still easier than regular wood.

Environment impact: medium. Still produces pollution through combustion, but less than regular wood.

Click here to have a look at pellet heating appliances that a selling now.

Fuel Oil 

Actual fuel efficiency: medium to high, about 80%.

Cost efficiency: medium to low. Can be as cheap as using wood or natural gas.

Easiness: medium. Easier than wood or coal, but not as easy as electric ones.

Environment impact: medium. Oil fuel is another type of fossil fuel, so it will produce pollutants while burning.

Coal 

Actual fuel efficiency: medium to low, about 75%.

Cost efficiency: highest. Even with the low efficiency, it can be as trice as cheap as using electricity.

Easiness: low. Requires the most efforts to operate and maintain. It's not even easy to start a coal fire (read here).

Environment impact: highest. Produces most pollutants while burning comparing to all other fuel types listed above.

Click here to have a look at coal heating appliances that a selling now.

About this Lens 

Hopefully this lens answered some of your questions. You can have a look at the Fuel Comparison Table here if you want more information.

New Guestbook 

submit

by MKerogazov

Hello world. I'm a software developer and an apprentice affiliate marketeer. (more)

Explore related pages

Create a Lens!