The Right to a Jury
As an American citizen, we all have the right to a jury. If both the plaintiff and defendant do not desire a jury, a judge will determine and issue the judgment. However, if at least one party opts for a jury to be present, jurors must be summoned and selected for the trial.
Jury Selection Techniques
Most people have received a summons for jury duty at least once. The process varies by county and state, but most counties try to limit jury duty to once every two or three years.
The number of jurors per case is dependent upon the crime and type of court where the trial will be held. District, federal and non-district courts often have a varied number of jurors per case, usually anywhere from 6 to 12 jurors. Additionally, due to the severity of the crime, capital punishment trials will have 12 jurors.
Once the potential jurors arrive at the court house or justice center, multiple cases may be selecting jurors throughout the day. Anywhere from 30 to 60 jurors will be randomly selected for the initial screening of each case. The plaintiff's and defendant's attorneys will be present at the screening, carefully critiquing each potential juror.
A few techniques often used during this process are outlined.
1. Beliefs and Attitudes
Every individual builds a collection of beliefs and attitudes throughout a lifetime. Those beliefs become stronger with age, and a "worldview" is developed over time. This worldview is a lens through which an individual filters and processes information. By no fault of the individual, any information that does not comply with that worldview can easily become distorted. With this in mind, trial evidence and information may be subject to distortion. For instance, the defendant's attorney may not prefer to have a Mother's Against Drunk Driving (MADD) activist as a juror if the defendant is potentially at fault for a DWI car collision. The mother's attitudes and beliefs about drunk driving may distort critical evidence that might otherwise be in favor of the defendant.
2. Leaders and Followers
Similar to beliefs and attitudes, individuals within a group situation are usually prone to either rise as a leader or step in line as a follower. Any potential leaders who reveal an unfavorable impression of either the plaintiff or the defendant are problematic to the attorneys. Leaders have a tendency to stand ground with a particular viewpoint, unwilling to budge. These same leaders also often have the power to sway others who may not be in total agreement with the leader's views. Any polarizing individuals are usually avoided.
3. Likeability
Individuals have a tendency to be drawn to those who have a similar interest, hobby or profession. If the defendant is a teacher accused of sexual misconduct with a minor, a fellow teacher selected as a juror may have a biased view of the defendant. Jurors with common interests that may present a bias against an attorney's client are usually ruled out.
4. Body Language
It's no secret jury duty is not a preferred pastime among most Americans. A fellow attorney once said, "Walk into a justice center on jury duty day and you'd swear you mistakenly arrived at a funeral." With that in mind, the body language of each potential juror must be carefully monitored for any change upon presented with the case synopsis. Jurors who for one reason or another become interested in the case may suddenly wish to be selected. This can be dangerous for an attorney. Similar to a job interview, a juror may tell each attorney what he or she thinks the attorney wants to hear. This type of interest or anxiety can be due to a bias for or against one side of the case, and attorneys will usually cut these jurors quickly.
The juror screening process involves many questions that may seem simplistic, but clearly are aimed at gaining a broader view of the jurors' beliefs. Each attorney listens and watches closely to determine any roadblock against their prospective clients.
In a perfect world, each juror will be neutral toward the case. However, this is often not the case, and it's the responsibility of each attorney to review potential jurors carefully prior to the commencement of the trial.
The number of jurors per case is dependent upon the crime and type of court where the trial will be held. District, federal and non-district courts often have a varied number of jurors per case, usually anywhere from 6 to 12 jurors. Additionally, due to the severity of the crime, capital punishment trials will have 12 jurors.
Once the potential jurors arrive at the court house or justice center, multiple cases may be selecting jurors throughout the day. Anywhere from 30 to 60 jurors will be randomly selected for the initial screening of each case. The plaintiff's and defendant's attorneys will be present at the screening, carefully critiquing each potential juror.
A few techniques often used during this process are outlined.
1. Beliefs and Attitudes
Every individual builds a collection of beliefs and attitudes throughout a lifetime. Those beliefs become stronger with age, and a "worldview" is developed over time. This worldview is a lens through which an individual filters and processes information. By no fault of the individual, any information that does not comply with that worldview can easily become distorted. With this in mind, trial evidence and information may be subject to distortion. For instance, the defendant's attorney may not prefer to have a Mother's Against Drunk Driving (MADD) activist as a juror if the defendant is potentially at fault for a DWI car collision. The mother's attitudes and beliefs about drunk driving may distort critical evidence that might otherwise be in favor of the defendant.
2. Leaders and Followers
Similar to beliefs and attitudes, individuals within a group situation are usually prone to either rise as a leader or step in line as a follower. Any potential leaders who reveal an unfavorable impression of either the plaintiff or the defendant are problematic to the attorneys. Leaders have a tendency to stand ground with a particular viewpoint, unwilling to budge. These same leaders also often have the power to sway others who may not be in total agreement with the leader's views. Any polarizing individuals are usually avoided.
3. Likeability
Individuals have a tendency to be drawn to those who have a similar interest, hobby or profession. If the defendant is a teacher accused of sexual misconduct with a minor, a fellow teacher selected as a juror may have a biased view of the defendant. Jurors with common interests that may present a bias against an attorney's client are usually ruled out.
4. Body Language
It's no secret jury duty is not a preferred pastime among most Americans. A fellow attorney once said, "Walk into a justice center on jury duty day and you'd swear you mistakenly arrived at a funeral." With that in mind, the body language of each potential juror must be carefully monitored for any change upon presented with the case synopsis. Jurors who for one reason or another become interested in the case may suddenly wish to be selected. This can be dangerous for an attorney. Similar to a job interview, a juror may tell each attorney what he or she thinks the attorney wants to hear. This type of interest or anxiety can be due to a bias for or against one side of the case, and attorneys will usually cut these jurors quickly.
The juror screening process involves many questions that may seem simplistic, but clearly are aimed at gaining a broader view of the jurors' beliefs. Each attorney listens and watches closely to determine any roadblock against their prospective clients.
In a perfect world, each juror will be neutral toward the case. However, this is often not the case, and it's the responsibility of each attorney to review potential jurors carefully prior to the commencement of the trial.
Nh-DWI-Attorney
Fetching RSS feed... please stand byTelevision's view of Jury Duty
New Guestbook
submit
-
Reply
-
Sep 19, 2010 @ 7:12 am | delete
- Nice lense.
petsumer report review
phone number scan review
photo lines review
php o stock review
piano for all review
piano lessons 101 review
pick 3 stats review
pick 3 u win review
pigeon lover review
pilates back joint exercise review
pitch master pro review
plan my baby review
plantar fasciitis tips review
plantar fasciitis tips review
play brew station review
play worship guitar review
plr article software review
pole dancing moves review
police oral board review
poor man guides review
positive women rock review
potty train dogs review
power numerology review
power traffic pump review
power vertical review
ppc affiliate rockstar review
ppc bully review
ppc campaign builder review
ppv riches review
pregnancy without pounds review
preguntas para parejas review
premium tv for pc review
press equalizer review
prevent canary death review
pro date review
probability ea review
prodate review
product intel review
product lockdown review
professor profits review
profit lance review
project fast cash review
prostate milking review
ps3 fixer review
ps3 lights fix review
psoriasis free for life review
psp hacker review
public domain treasure hunters review
public speaking solutions review
pure jeevan review
purse party profits review
push button marketer review
putting to win review
u wanted 2 know review
ukrainian bride guide review
ultimate font download review
ultimate footer popup review
ultimate language secrets review
ultimate mma strength review
ultimate content creator review
reversing diabetes today review
rich allens picks review
rich allens picks review
rich janitor review
riding the ponzi review
rig worker review
rmt for tennis review
rocket languages review
rocket review
rosacea free forever review
racing secrets exposed review
rag quilt instructions review
rapid bartender review
rapid launch formula review
rapport master review
re attraction review
reach fame review
real cyber jobs review
real estate development coach review
real estate redneck review
recipe secrets review
reconditioning battery review
record label business plan review
records finder review
recuper ervot recopine review
recuperaatuhombre review
recuperandola review
recuperar a tu mujer review
recuperer votre copain review
reflux resolution review
reg sweep review
registry clear review
registry tool kit review
regtweake review
regtweaker review
reimage review
remedies for constipation review
reo kit review
repo profits review
resale rights blueprint review
-
-
Reply
-
Sep 19, 2010 @ 7:12 am | delete
- Nice lense.
petsumer report review
phone number scan review
photo lines review
php o stock review
piano for all review
piano lessons 101 review
pick 3 stats review
pick 3 u win review
pigeon lover review
pilates back joint exercise review
pitch master pro review
plan my baby review
plantar fasciitis tips review
plantar fasciitis tips review
play brew station review
play worship guitar review
plr article software review
pole dancing moves review
police oral board review
poor man guides review
positive women rock review
potty train dogs review
power numerology review
power traffic pump review
power vertical review
ppc affiliate rockstar review
ppc bully review
ppc campaign builder review
ppv riches review
pregnancy without pounds review
preguntas para parejas review
premium tv for pc review
press equalizer review
prevent canary death review
pro date review
probability ea review
prodate review
product intel review
product lockdown review
professor profits review
profit lance review
project fast cash review
prostate milking review
ps3 fixer review
ps3 lights fix review
psoriasis free for life review
psp hacker review
public domain treasure hunters review
public speaking solutions review
pure jeevan review
purse party profits review
push button marketer review
putting to win review
u wanted 2 know review
ukrainian bride guide review
ultimate font download review
ultimate footer popup review
ultimate language secrets review
ultimate mma strength review
ultimate content creator review
reversing diabetes today review
rich allens picks review
rich allens picks review
rich janitor review
riding the ponzi review
rig worker review
rmt for tennis review
rocket languages review
rocket review
rosacea free forever review
racing secrets exposed review
rag quilt instructions review
rapid bartender review
rapid launch formula review
rapport master review
re attraction review
reach fame review
real cyber jobs review
real estate development coach review
real estate redneck review
recipe secrets review
reconditioning battery review
record label business plan review
records finder review
recuper ervot recopine review
recuperaatuhombre review
recuperandola review
recuperar a tu mujer review
recuperer votre copain review
reflux resolution review
reg sweep review
registry clear review
registry tool kit review
regtweake review
regtweaker review
reimage review
remedies for constipation review
reo kit review
repo profits review
resale rights blueprint review
-
-
Reply
-
KimGiancaterino Nov 14, 2009 @ 5:19 pm | delete
- I've been summoned for a number of criminal trials, but attorneys never pick me for a jury. I usually give the system the benefit of the doubt, and assume the defendant is there for a good reason. It's nice to see some legal topics on Squidoo!
-
-
Reply
-
RAy
Jun 9, 2009 @ 7:47 pm | delete
- I enjoyed reading your article about closing arguments. I am also promoting a book entitled "Voir Dire and Summation", which teaches the best closing arguments and jury selection techniques and strategies.
Feel free to check it out at http://www.voirdiresummation.com
Have a great day,
Ray
-
by NH_DWI_Attorney
NH_DWI_Attorney
My name is Ryan Russman. I am a New Hampshire attorney who specializes in drunk driving (DWI/DUI) cases, personal injury law, criminal and estate litigation... more »
- 5 featured lenses
- Winner of 5 trophies!
- Top lens » How do Attorneys Select Jurors?
Feeling creative?
Create a Lens!