What you are about to read should make your head spin and get really angry. This Hep B vaccine is one of the shots that all babies born in hospitals get just hours after they are born.

Ingredients:
Hepatitis B virus gene / yeast protein, Aluminum, Formaldehyde, Thimerosal (mercury derivative)

Adverse Reactions:
Anaphylactic Shock/Anaphylactoid, Encephalitis/ Encephalopathy, SIDS and or Deaths reported, Seizures/infantile spasms, Guillain- Barre Syndrome / Bell's Palsy, Aseptic Menningitis / Transverse myelitis, Multiple sclerosis, Arthritis / Arthralgia, Thrombocytopenia, S-J S, Erythema Multiforme, Diabetes Mellitus, Urticaria, Systemic Lupus erthematosus (SLE), Elevation of liver enzymes, Optic neuritis, Otitis Media (ear infection), Renal failure

Long-Term Studies have not been done for:
Carcinogenic, mutagenic potential or fertility impairment, developmental malformation (animal reproduction studies), effects on pregnant woman, fetus, or transmission of toxins to human breast milk

OK! Now go on and read what Dr Colette Herman says about this TOXIC Dealy vaccine.

"children younger than 14 are 3 times more likely to die or suffer adverse reactions after receiving hepatitis B vaccine than to catch the disease."
...."We estimated that immunization against hepatitis B was associated with a threefold increase in the incidence of MS within the three years following vaccination. Our analyses include 163 cases of MS and 1,604 controls"...

HEPATITIS B VACCINE REACTION REPORTS OUTNUMBER REPORTED DISEASE CASES IN CHILDREN ACCORDING TO VACCINE SAFETY GROUP:
http://www.909shot.com/PressReleases/prhepb012799.htm

Here yet again is the power of the authorities that even with clear cut data many parents will be in denial until of course it is there child that is affected. unfortunately, by then it is too late...
Given the these data, one must ask how the medical profession could subject us to such dangers? Is it any wonder that there so much Death By Medicine?
...""Unlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution... legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization."

Canadian Vaccine Laws
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/11/29/canadian_vaccine_laws.htm

Chris Gupta
Continue reading "DR. COLETTE HARMAN ON HEPATITIS B VACCINE"

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2004/09/30/dr_colette_harman_on_hepatitis_b_vaccine.htm

Permalink "DR. COLETTE HARMAN ON HEPATITIS B VACCINE"

To you health and success
Robert Keytohealth

Dr. Incao's Hepatitis B Vaccination Testimony in Ohio

Article provided by
http://www.gnhealth.com/articles/whichArticle.php?article=342

March 1, 1999
Representative Dale Van Vyven
Chairman, Health Committee
Ohio House of Representatives
77 South High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43266

Dear Representative Van Vyven:

I have been asked by Kristine M. Severyn for testimony regarding hepatitis B vaccination. Dr. Severyn is doing excellent work on behalf of the children of Ohio and of our nation and I am honored to add my voice to hers in a plea for reason and objectivity regarding vaccination policy in the U.S.

I am a physician in private general practice, having received my M.D. degree in 1966 from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City.

For 29 years I have privately and independently pursued a study of vaccinations and vaccine policy. I have served as an expert witness in court trials concerning vaccinations and have submitted medical opinions in cases of vaccine-damaged children adjudicated under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. I was an invited speaker at the First International Public Conference on Vaccinations sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center in Alexandria, Virginia in September 1997.
I am one of the two physician-signers of the cover letter to the 16-page special report "Hepatitis B Vaccine: The Untold Story" which the National Vaccine Information Center sent out recently to 55,000 U.S. pediatricians. The report was also sent to 8,000 state and federal legislators and to 1500 media outlets in the United States.

In October 1998 I was invited to speak at a special workshop on vaccinations in Manchester, New Hampshire where a citizens' initiative to roll back the hepatitis B vaccine mandate is under way.
As a private physician with no ties to any academic or government institution, I am free to give voice to my conscience without the usual constraints that group affiliation confers. In what follows I am motivated simply to express the truth as I see it, by a deep concern for the long term health of our nation's children.

The present growing distrust of vaccinations by concerned parents nationwide is a grassroots movement that will not go away because it springs from a very real source: from a frequency of acute and chronic adverse effects of vaccinations far greater than is being officially acknowledged. This grassroots movement is only bound to increase until its concerns are acknowledged and dealt with in a scientifically objective and forthright manner.

In 1979 the Centers for Disease Control stated: "Vaccinations are recommended and administered to millions of children and other individuals each year on the presumption (emphasis mine) that the benefits far outweigh the risks. The benefit side of the equation is straightforward: vaccinations can prevent serious disease. The risk side is not as straightforward since it includes factors that are known and others that may exist but have not yet been discovered. It is necessary, therefore, to maintain surveillance of potential risks of vaccination to continually reevaluate whether individual
vaccinations are, on balance, good for people."

The above clear statement of purpose to monitor vaccine safety has unfortunately been totally eclipsed by our nations' enormous intellectual, bureaucratic and economic commitment to vaccination as the method to eradicate illness.

This commitment has made it virtually impossible to achieve an open, fair and unbiased risk-benefit evaluation of any vaccination in use today. With a conflict of interest of this magnitude, the pressures that exist to maintain the momentum of our national vaccine initiative and to avoid "alarming the public" overshadow by far those voices who might question the wisdom of such a one-sided and politicized health agenda.

In addition, severe constraints are placed on the media in the name of "responsible journalism" with the result that the American public very seldom hears both sides of the vaccination story, and comes to have an unquestioning faith in vaccinations as our greatest hope against future imagined disease plagues. In this fear-based scenario, the questioning voice of reason is drowned out amid the hysteria surrounding the emerging "killer infections" which are such a favorite media topic.
This propagation of fear by the media and by its sources in the public health industry has resulted in a growth of power of this industry far beyond the usual checks and balances of our democracy.
One aspect of this power is the ability of many state health departments to legally mandate a new vaccination for all children completely bypassing any discussion or deliberation in that state's legislature. In a democracy this cannot and must not be.

Practicing physicians and the general public rely on the monitoring capacity and the scientific objectivity of the C.D.C., the F.D.A. and the health departments of our 50 states to alert us to the very real risks of vaccinations in use today, and to provide us with as accurate an assessment of that risk, both acute and chronic, as is scientifically possible.
In fact, the C.D.C. has retreated utterly from its 1979 statement quoted above emphasizing the importance of vaccine safety monitoring.

It is extremely regrettable, but no exaggeration to say that with regard to informing physicians and the public on vaccine safety, the responsible agencies have failed the American people.
In support of this assertion, I cite the following facts:

1. In 1994 a special committee of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences published a comprehensive review of vaccine safety which had been commissioned by federal law. Of five possible and plausible adverse effects of the hepatitis B vaccination which the committee investigated, they were unable to come to any conclusion for four of them because they found to their dismay that the relevant research had not been done!
Why aren't the agencies responsible for vaccine safety commissioning such research? For the fifth adverse effect, anaphylactic shock, the committee concluded that the evidence positively established a causal relation to the hepatitis B vaccination.

2. In contrast to the lack of research on the adverse effects of hepatitis B vaccination found by the Institute of Medicine, the National Vaccine Information Center in its recent special report on hepatitis B vaccination sites 38 reports in the international medical literature, some dating back to 1987, that hepatitis B vaccination is causing chronic autoimmune and neurological disease in children and adults.

3. In July 1998, 15,000 French citizens filed a class action lawsuit against the French government accusing it of understating the risks of hepatitis B vaccine and of exaggerating its benefits for the average person. In October 1998 the French government declared a moratorium on hepatitis B vaccination in public schools while it evaluates more carefully the true risk-benefit profile of the vaccine.

4. Since July 1990, 17,497 cases of hospitalizations, injuries and deaths in America following hepatitis B vaccination have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of the U.S. government. This figure includes 146 deaths in individuals after receiving only hepatitis B vaccine without any other vaccines, including 73 deaths in children under 14 years old.
In 1996 alone there were 872 serious adverse events in children under 14 years old reported to VAERS. 658 of those injuries were following hepatitis B vaccination in combination with other vaccinations and 214 of these injuries were after hepatitis B vaccination alone. In these children under 14 years old, there were 35 deaths after hepatitis B vaccination in combination and 13 deaths after hepatitis B vaccination alone, for a total of 48 deaths. Compare these statistics with the total number of hepatitis B cases nationwide reported that same year (1996) in children under 14, just 279, and the conclusion is obvious that the risks of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh its benefits.

In those infants who died under one month of age, most of the deaths are classified as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). However, in the past this syndrome has never struck infants so young, and SIDS is officially defined as beginning only after one month of age.

With 6,000 children dying of SIDS every year, we have no idea how many of these deaths are actually caused by hepatitis B vaccination. Though the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system was created by federal law to permit a more accurate assessment of the risks of vaccination, and although the raw data it generates is analyzed, the individual reports of injury or death are rarely, if ever, investigated. If one factors in that fewer than 10% of physicians report adverse reactions to vaccines because we are taught to regard them as merely "temporally related", as only a coincidence, it would be quite plausible to say that the risks of hepatitis B vaccination clearly outweigh its benefits for 99% of the children who receive it.

5. The best way to determine the risk-benefit profile of any vaccination is well known and in theory is quite simple: Take a group of vaccinated children and compare them with a matched group of unvaccinated children. If the groups are well-matched and large enough and the length of time the children are observed following vaccination long enough, then such a study is deemed the "gold standard" of vaccine research because its data is as accurate a reflection as medical research is capable of achieving of how vaccinations are actually affecting our nation's children.

Incredible as it sounds, such a common-sense controlled study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children has never been done in America for any vaccination.

This means that mass vaccination is essentially a large-scale experiment on our nation's children.

6. A critical point which is never mentioned by those advocating mandatory vaccination of children is that children's health has declined significantly since 1960 when vaccines began to be widely used. According to the National Health Interview Survey conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics since 1957, a shocking 31% of U.S. children today have a chronic health problem , 18% of children require special health care or related services and 6.7% of children have a significant disability due to a chronic physical or mental condition. Respiratory allergies, asthma and learning disabilities are the most common of these.

Three controlled studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children in England and New Zealand have shown that the vaccinated children have significantly more asthma, ear infections, hospitalizations and inflammatory bowel disease than their unvaccinated cohorts.

Since vaccinations have a lasting effect on the immune system, and since it is known that many vaccines shift the balance of the immune system away from its acutely-reacting "Th1" side and toward its chronically-reacting "Th2" side , it is a very plausible scenario that vaccines are contributing greatly to the large-scale and unprecedented increase in chronic conditions such as allergies, asthma, diabetes and a wide range of neurological dysfunctions including learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, seizures and autism in U.S. children today.

The shocking facts that 31% of U.S. children today suffer from a chronic condition and that the rate of disability from such chronic conditions in children has seen nearly a fourfold increase since 1960 ought to seriously challenge our medical research establishment.

But, far from taking a proactive approach toward these disturbing facts, our medical establishment remains curiously uninterested in children's chronic diseases and instead continues to pursue its narrow focus of using vaccines to eradicate every possible acute childhood illness, even those like hepatitis B and chicken pox which pose no threat to 99% of children.

The idea that illnesses exist in an ecological balance like everything else in nature and that eradicating acute diseases could very likely upset the balance and cause chronic disease to increase is not seriously considered or pursued in medical science today. Whenever any evidence pointing in this direction is published, usually in the international medical literature, it is usually dismissed out of hand by American physicians or angrily repudiated with the implication that such research is "irresponsible" because it might cause the American public to lose trust in our vaccination program.
With such a total commitment of our medical community to a policy of universal vaccination, is it any wonder that new and potentially upsetting discoveries relating to the role of vaccinations in the alarming prevalence of chronic illness in our children are never seriously considered much less pursued?

When the Institute of Medicine published its Federally mandated reports on vaccine safety in 1991 and 1994, their disturbing conclusion was that there is very little data on vaccine safety because the necessary research is simply not being done.

7. Eugene Robin, M.D., Emeritus Professor of Medicine from Stanford Medical School is one of the world's leading experts on risk/benefit analysis in medicine. He authored the definitive book on the subject, Matters of Life and Death: Risks vs. Benefits of Medical Care.

In a statement at the First International Public Conference on Vaccination in September, 1997, Dr. Robin said the following:

"%u2026The scientists who develop vaccines should be given great credit and respect for their pioneering work. But it must be recognized that once a promising vaccine is available, that should be the beginning and not the end of the process.
Accurate assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of the vaccine by means of a %u2026 controlled clinical trial should be obligatory. An educational process involving the public should be mandatory in which the risks and uncertainties are described as well as the potential benefits.

So, what can we 'teach' the public if we ourselves, the medical scientific community, have not done the proper and required studies?

A true process of informed choice would, for example, raise grave questions about the vaccination of young children for hepatitis B.

We must be honest and admit that we do not know the impact of administering multiple, different vaccines on very young children or, indeed, on anyone."

8. My final comments are drawn from my 27 years of experience as a general practitioner of medicine. Twenty-three of those years were in a rural farming community in upstate New York where as many as 50% of my pediatric patients were unvaccinated due to their parents' conscientious personal choice.

When I started my practice I believed, as I had been taught in medical school, that the benefits of vaccinations outweighed the risks. I also believed that the right of parental choice in vaccinations ought to be respected.

For 23 years I had the opportunity to observe my young patients grow from infancy to young adulthood and to appraise their overall health and vitality. It was out of this experience that my present views took shape. I observed that my unvaccinated children were healthier, hardier and more robust than their vaccinated peers. Allergies, asthma and pallor and behavioral and attentional disturbances were clearly more common in my young patients who were vaccinated.
My unvaccinated patients, on the other hand, did not suffer from infectious diseases with any greater frequency or severity than their vaccinated peers: their immune systems generally handled these challenges very well.

Conclusion
Like all science, medicine has radically changed many of its views over time. What seems wise and prudent today may be totally repudiated a decade or two later.
Vaccinations are powerful medical tools which impact human immune systems to achieve the desired effect of preventing certain infectious disease manifestations.
In the early 1900's when diphtheria and whooping cough were life-threatening, the uncritical acceptance and implementation of vaccination was understandable and perhaps unavoidable. Today, when far more children suffer from allergies and other chronic immune system disorders than from life-threatening infectious diseases, it is neither reasonable nor prudent to persist in presuming that the benefit of any vaccination outweighs its risk.
When the medical scientific community makes a total and one-sided commitment to any public policy, no matter how noble its intentions, then vigorous debate and fact-finding tend to be neglected.

The facts on hepatitis B brought out by Dr. Severyn and by the special 16-page report of the National Vaccine Information Center deserve our very careful consideration. They indicate that the risk of hepatitis B vaccination outweighs its benefit for the vast majority of American children today.

When these facts are ignored, and when vital medical research on the safety and adverse effects of hepatitis B vaccine is left undone, then the truth suffers, our children suffer and we all suffer.

Yours,
Philip Incao, M.D.

Be sure to check our site for exemption form
www.Vaclib.org

Just so you know One Flu shot a year 5 years in a row will increase chances of Alzheimer's by X10 FOLD. WOW! It is criminal that now Babies at 6 months old are getting this TOXIC vaccine,

Bottom line every one that has received any shots needs to DETOX ASAP! Why you ask? Because the TOXIC load of chemicals are still in your body and your cells are replicating and every 7 years your immunity will decrease. This is part of the reason why many off the common diseases like Diabetes, Lupus, Heart problems, Asthma, Alzheimer, Parkinson's manifest early or later in live.

Call me Robert for DETOX info 407-672-6144
To you health and success
Robert

Am I glad to introduce to you Dr Rebecca Carley. This is a 21 century worrior of the highest degree that needs our support.

She is helping many people in many ways especially in legal matters that have to do with forced vaccination.
Take your time and visit her web site and get empowered to help others.

REBECCA CARLEY, M.D. TAKES ON THE CDC
TO FORCE RECOGNITION OF VIDS (VACCINE INDUCED DISEASES) AS A "MEDICAL SYNDROME"
http://www.drcarley.com/

Dr. Rebecca Carley has just been contacted by the parent of one of her patients who was reversed of vaccine injury some years ago by following Dr. Carley's Hippocrates Protocol and told that the new school the child is going to will not accept the medical exemption given to the child, and that the child must be injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine in order to stay in school. This school in Upstate NY (which will only receive federal funding if 90% of the children are inoculated with disease) contacted a NYS minion who contacted a CDC minion; the latter minion determining that "there is no such syndrome [as VIDS], and the child should be vaccinated unless [s]he has an anaphylactic allergy to hepatitis B vaccine" [which, of course, will not be known until the parent of the child plays Russian roulette with the child and allows the first Hepatitis B inoculation to be given]. As the child already developed VIDS after the inoculations given when she was younger, this protective Mom decided she did not want to play Russian roulette with her daughter's immune system, and contacted Dr. Carley to prevent activation of the SS (Social Services) and abduction of the child into foster care.

What the CDC minion does not realize is that Dr. Carley was qualified as an expert in VIDS (Vaccine Induced Disease Syndromes) by a NY Family Court judge last year (where her testimony prevented the state from abducting a 2 year old child from a mother whose child had sustained a laceration of her leg after falling on a broken glass which had just come out of the dishwasher). The homeopathically trained Mom in that case gave her child remedies against tetanus as a precaution (even though she knew tetanus would not be present on a glass which had just come out of a dishwasher), and brought the child to the local ER to have the laceration sutured. When asked if the child was "up to date" on her immunizations, the Mom told the truth, and said she did not inoculate her children with disease, and did not give consent for injection of the child with tetanus toxin, formaldehyde, ethyl mercury, dry "natural" latex rubber, aluminum potassium sulfate, ammonium sulfate and unspecified antigens from culture medium on which the Clostridium tetani are grown.

Although the wound healed beautifully (with concurrent use of colloidal silver and vitamins A, C and also zinc (which promote wound healing), this Mom's refusal to submit to the demands of the ER white coat was investigated by SS (Social "Services") minions, and Mom was deemed to have committed "medical neglect" on not only the 2 year old, but her other unvaccinated children as well. Thus, the State started proceeding to abduct all her children for placement into foster care and possible adoption.

One of this Mom's friends, whose child had been healed of autism by following Dr. Carley's Hippocrates protocol, referred this Mom to Dr. Carley for help after the hearings had been commenced. Dr. Carley appeared at the hearing on March 10, 2003 and the judge deemed that Dr. Carley's research on VIDS did (and still does, despite the "un-licensed" status of Dr. Carley) meet the legal criteria for valid science established in the US Supreme Court opinion for the purpose of admitting expert witness testimony issued in Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed. 2d 469 (1993). Thus, Dr. Carley was qualified as an expert witness in VIDS; the case was dismissed against this Mom, and she and her children returned home, where they packed their bags immediately and left NYS. Unfortunately for all parents who have investigated and decided it would be insane to allow such an assault on their children, there is nowhere to hide, as this Gestapo tactic is being used against parents all over the United States.

Dr. Carley, whose only child was abducted from her due to her "continued persistence disorder" in helping these vaccine injured children, is now going to take on the CDC and prove that VIDS has been "legally" established as a valid syndrome by the aforementioned precedent setting case where Dr. Carley was deemed an expert in VIDS. If the CDC does not now establish that such a syndrome exists, they will be charged with racketeering and fraud under the Federal Rico standards, and their collusion and conspiracy with the Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers and the Department of "Health" to experiment on US citizens under Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 & 1524 will be exposed. This case will bring down the mountain of lies on which the principle that "vaccines are safe and effective" was established.
END

Let us all keep Dr Rebecca Carley in our prayers as she continues to battle this Goliath.

To your health and success
Robert keytohealth