Home » Culture & Society » Politics » Political Issues

The More Guns = Less Crime Guestbook

Concealed Carry of Guns = Less Crime

From the lens Guns Lower Crime.

Feel free to offer your thoughts about how more handguns in the hands of law abiding citizens = less crime! Or, maybe you don't agree?

  • News Member May 4, 2012 @ 12:50 pm | delete
    Latest Guns News:
    Guns News
  • News Member May 4, 2012 @ 12:49 pm | delete
    All the guns news here:
    Guns News
  • BillC Apr 26, 2012 @ 5:47 pm | delete
    Hi, very good lens! One correction...in Texas, if you are a valid CHL holder you are allowed to carry in church UNLESS the church has a 30.06 sign posted. I know of many congregation members who "pack in the pews".
  • Apr 26, 2012 @ 4:40 pm | delete
    Great article and well researched. Thanks for posting.
  • KReneeC Apr 14, 2012 @ 10:18 pm | delete
    Awesome lens..... You should consider running for president!
  • Hippopotamis Apr 10, 2012 @ 12:35 pm | delete
    Great lens! I just wrote an article about trying to buy one in NJ (better be patient) and one about buying your first gun and being safe about it. Keep up the good work!
  • inkbydesign Mar 18, 2012 @ 3:27 pm | delete
    more guns or less guns isnt it, its actually will we enforce crime and punishment that makes us safer
  • jammarti Mar 30, 2012 @ 1:18 am | delete
    I agree with what you said.
  • SurvivingBeingATeen Mar 13, 2012 @ 10:10 pm | delete
    http://www.squidoo.com/girls-and-guns#
    Here please check out my page :)
  • cao2fine Mar 13, 2012 @ 9:27 pm | delete
    This is a terrific lens!
  • WilliamPower Mar 5, 2012 @ 12:27 am | delete
    I own 6 guns. "Don't Tread On Me!"
  • PaperQuest Feb 29, 2012 @ 9:28 pm | delete
    Great lens. My wife and i will be getting concealed carry this year.
  • Edutopia Feb 14, 2012 @ 12:02 am | delete
    If more guns = less crime then we should be able to look at societies that have low level of private ownership of guns and expect to find high levels of crime and conversely we should find societies with high levels of gun ownership enjoy low levels of crime. Quick trip cruising official country records doesn't show this to be the case with levels of crime not directly correlating with level of gun ownership.

    That said there is clear precedent for gun ownership in the US and on a national level the issue of gun control has for the time being been resolved in favor of permissive rather than restrictive gun ownership rights. And don't take my commentary as a pro-regulatory stance, merely providing additional context and correction of some assumptions.
  • CharlieHawks Feb 12, 2012 @ 6:10 pm | delete
    Truth be told, there is only one use for a gun and that is to kill. Perhaps that should taken into consideration when weighing the pros and cons

    Charlie Fly Fishing Hawks
  • 40kTerrain Feb 8, 2012 @ 9:26 am | delete
    I wish more people in the Squidooverse wrote positively about gun ownership and also just about guns. Guns are an important part of at least American culture and the Squidoo community is missing out.
  • CPDInteractive Feb 6, 2012 @ 2:48 am | delete
    I am very thankful to this topic because it really gives useful information.
  • Athf Feb 3, 2012 @ 10:04 pm | delete
    very unique lens
  • jEsChrDs82 Jan 28, 2012 @ 1:40 pm | delete
    I totally disagree that it will lessen crime. I don't believe that much freedom should be given to us. We should teach our children good values that's the best way to save our society.

    constitution for kids
  • jimmyworldstar Jan 27, 2012 @ 11:16 pm | delete
    It's a deterrent and I'm inclined to agree with you. The only problem is that you have more unlimited access to guns and it becomes even easier for criminals to access guns or heaven forbid some crazed killer. Criminals will commit crime regardless, I doubt many do research into the homes they're robbing on whether they have or do not have firearms.
  • tomskids Jan 16, 2012 @ 6:20 pm | delete
    Great, Great, Great Lens!!! You are a great American!!! Thank you personally for taking the time that this lens took to create. We need more people like you in this country. I gave you a squidlike on this. If you get a chance please check out my lenses. Thank you again.
  • Rob_W Jan 13, 2012 @ 8:58 pm | delete
    Good lens.
  • Rob_W Jan 13, 2012 @ 8:58 pm | delete
    Good lens.
  • Rob_W Jan 13, 2012 @ 8:58 pm | delete
    Good lens.
  • BSieracki Jan 12, 2012 @ 11:27 pm | delete
    great points
  • Jeimuzu-san Jan 6, 2012 @ 2:32 pm | delete
    This reminds me of some reports i've read before;
    Free and unrestricted access to porn lowers incidents of rape.
    Lower minimum ages for smoking and drinking alcohol reduce the likelyhood of heavy drinking and heavy smoking.
    Allowing children to go out from a younger age, opposed to keeping them 'off the streets and out of harms way' reduces likelyhood of Avoidant personality disorder and other anxiety disorders.
  • Tolovaj Jan 6, 2012 @ 11:30 am | delete
    I disagree. Like I said before: number of guns is not correlated with crime. We need better schools, not more guns and that stands for the whole world.
  • tomskids Jan 16, 2012 @ 6:21 pm | delete
    You're cluless.
  • Prepperdad Jan 3, 2012 @ 7:41 am | delete
    Guns are just a tool - can be used for good or bad. Thanks for the lens!
  • David Marsh Dec 29, 2011 @ 4:57 pm | delete
    DO GUNS SAVE LIVES?NO,IN MOST CASES YOU WILL FIND THAT THE VICTIM RESPONDS TO LATE.THE ANSWER TO CRIME IS AN END TO PROHIBITION.IN BRITAIN WE NOW LIVE IN A DRINK FUELLED,DRUG FUELLED DEATH TRAP.a SOCIETY IN WHICH THE CORRUPT COURTHOUSES AWARD DAMAGES TO CRIMINALS WHO GET HURT IN THEIR ACTIVITY.ON THE DRINK AND THE POLITICIANS DRUGS.IF YOU WANT UNREALISTIC,JUST COME TO BRITAIN AND VISIT THE CORRUPT COURTHOUSES,AND WATCH THEM WALK FOR CRIMES OF MURDER RAPE,ANYTHING THAT IS SICK.IF YOUR A VICTIM OF CRIME IN BRITAIN,THEN GOD PROTECT FROM THE RAPEISTS AND MURDERERS THAT RUN THE COURTS,YOURS AT http://www.Tomthumb.info/ thank you.
  • Anderotin Dec 25, 2011 @ 6:53 am | delete
    COOL!
  • Anderotin Dec 25, 2011 @ 4:28 am | delete
    THANK YOU! THANK YOU!
  • Anderotin Dec 24, 2011 @ 7:20 am | delete
    Good gun always attracts men of the present
  • CoachJoey Dec 22, 2011 @ 11:31 pm | delete
    Really like the lense! Thanks for sharing, as noted above us folks in Illinois are getting kinda boned over at the moment with no conceal carry laws... therefore leaving more guns in the hands of criminals who will break the law and carry anyways leaving the rest of us victim...
  • GGGMarketing Dec 22, 2011 @ 2:26 pm | delete
    What a great lens! Lots of good information about guns and everything related to guns. I like to module about concealed gun law in Florida. I live in Florida and I know a ton of people that carry guns. You just never know who has one. You said the crime went down when the concealed law went into effect. Ya I can see that. Anyways thanks for adding great value to the squidoo community. Great lens!

    Cheers!
    Gary @ Naples Web Design
  • Matstar Dec 19, 2011 @ 11:33 am | delete
    Great lens
  • CarlittoDunaway Dec 15, 2011 @ 4:21 am | delete
    I agree. Everybody should be able to protect themselves.
  • ernieplotter Dec 9, 2011 @ 1:01 pm | delete
    Amazing lens, thanks for your work and for sharing. I may not agree with you, but sure that you make a point and it is well justified. Great lens!
  • TotusMundus Dec 4, 2011 @ 8:04 am | delete
    So glad we don't have guns in the UK. Gun crime is very low, and usually criminal on criminal, very rarely targeted at the general population, unlike US. If guns become commonplace in UK we will see a lot more random murders by the psychologically disturbed. I think Europeans on the whole have a very different mindset towards guns than Americans, thankfully.
  • CoachJoey Dec 2, 2011 @ 6:16 am | delete
    quality lense!
  • Close2Art Nov 30, 2011 @ 6:38 pm | delete
    A gun is the last defense that is used, only when your life is in danger. It's something no one knows you have, I can't stand seeing people walk around with holsters...someone could just walk up knock them over their head and take their gun, easily...hide your gun, don't show it off. Don't be the victim...Great Lens!!!Blessed...:)rob
  • PeterStreep Nov 28, 2011 @ 9:05 am | delete
    This lens is a danger for democrotie. Give everybody a gun and the result will be a war. Lawa will mean nothing anymore, everybody will take the law in their own hand.
  • HuntAndFishGuides Nov 4, 2011 @ 11:43 am | delete
    Just wanted to let you know that I nominated your lens for "lens of the day"
  • CPDInteractive Nov 3, 2011 @ 12:42 am | delete
    Thanks for Great post. I really like this article.
  • HuntAndFishGuides Oct 28, 2011 @ 6:56 pm | delete
    When seconds matter, the police are only minutes away. This is officially my new favorite lens on Squidoo.
  • SIALicenceUK Oct 28, 2011 @ 2:00 am | delete
    guns are just bad Okay
  • smetse Oct 12, 2011 @ 9:09 pm | delete
    WOW!
    This is so gooood lense!
    We need more like this.
    An armed society is a polite society.
    http://www.squidoo.com/kerrville-concealed-carry
  • ana_nimoss Oct 12, 2011 @ 2:41 am | delete
    Most people will not bother you if they know that you have guns and know how to use it to protect family. Other nations do not want to mess with countries with nuclear weapons. What's the difference?
  • CPDInteractive Oct 11, 2011 @ 12:22 am | delete
    wow, this is great information!!! Thank you for writing this :)
  • crosscreations Oct 5, 2011 @ 6:20 pm | delete
    Interesting discussion about this issue - that more guns equals less crime. Never was raised around guns and years ago I'd likely have disagreed, however I am now changing my thinking on this. Right now we can't rely on government to protect us in the US, and so folks should have the legal right to protect themselves, home & family.
  • MattKay Oct 9, 2011 @ 4:32 am | delete
    I think you're not alone. More and more people are coming around to the realization that the forefathers of the US saw. Keep in mind that our second amendment wasn't only meant as a means for us to defend ourselves from a criminal element. It was also designed to limit the power of government. Without our guns a government has the power to take any other God given right too.
  • BrassFittings Sep 29, 2011 @ 4:51 pm | delete
    I just started Googling and found many websites showing how the crime rates in the UK are the worst in Europe and all of them show 2001---2010 that Britain has worse crime rates than America and all of Europe!

    OK GUN crime is lower, but heck shoot me ANY day instead of beating me to death with a pipe or something!
  • BrassFittings Sep 29, 2011 @ 4:37 pm | delete
    Here in Texas you CAN carry in Church IF they don't have a NO CARRY sign. 30.06 sign. I have family friends and mom's group moms that carry to mass and events almost every day of the week. I don't YET, but that is because I don't have a holster that would be comfortable enough for all of the Catholic kneeling and standing:)

    GREAT LENS!!! TWEET, +!, THUMBS UP....
  • Showpup Sep 29, 2011 @ 10:18 am | delete
    Years ago, in TX, there was a man who took it upon himself to volunteer and stand outside a storefront on a street where stores were being robbed regularly. He had a rifle, which was legal to carry in the open. The robberies stopped, finally! He said he was protecting his community with his right to carry a gun in public.
  • MattKay Oct 9, 2011 @ 4:35 am | delete
    Even criminals can do the risk analysis on that one...
  • EmpowerLiberty Aug 25, 2011 @ 1:22 pm | delete
    "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
    -George Mason
  • TIRMassageStone Aug 10, 2011 @ 4:23 pm | delete
    We always hear the stories about when guns are used in criminal activity, but we rarely hear about when a responsible citizen saves his own life or somebody else's life by using a fire arm against a criminal. I'm glad to so an informative lens educating people on the real benefits of the right to bear arms.
  • John Walker Jul 23, 2011 @ 5:32 pm | delete
    Great Lens, I think something should be said about gun safety. A biometric gun safe is a great way to keep your gun safe from children. I purchased my gun safe at http://www.bestbiometricgunsafe.com
  • CarolineS01 Jul 22, 2011 @ 11:52 pm | delete
    this could be possible but I think this would not be a good idea at all.
  • KEITH PLUMVIES Jul 14, 2011 @ 12:43 pm | delete
    GUNS MAKES IT EASY FOR THUGZ 2 COMIT CRIMES SO GUNS MEANS MORE CRIMES NOT LESS U FOOL
  • johnfn Jul 8, 2011 @ 10:06 am | delete
    Even after reading this, I still can't comprehend how more guns would equal less crime. A friend of mine almost got into a bar fight the other week and if the other guy was carrying a concealed gun, I wouldn't put it past him to have pulled it out in a threatening manor.
  • BrassFittings Sep 29, 2011 @ 4:43 pm | delete
    IN A BAR? NO NO NO

    You cannot carry in a bar.....People who spend the time and money needed to acquire a concealed carry permit don't do stupid things like breaking the terms of carry. It would strip them of their permit and ability to OWN a gun. Plus the jail time, and fine......

    Criminals do stupid things like that...

    (EVEN OUTSIDE of a BAR)

    nah that's VERY NOT LIKELY to happen with a CC weapon holder. You show you gun when you use it, NO other reason.

    NOW if your friend picked a fight with someone and that person felt like they were in mortal danger.........don't pick fights would be that lesson.

    I have had to tell 6 approaching youths asking for something or the other to stop moving toward me and speak from where they were. I made no mention of a gun or my ability's; just "please come no closer and say what you have to say."

    A criminal would have continued to move forward and surround me while himming and hawwing.....at least a little bit more:)
  • MattKay Oct 9, 2011 @ 4:46 am | delete
    You can't blame a guy for what you thought he might have done but didn't.
    Let's suppose that the guy in question was carrying illegally though. If you outlaw guns, then he's still carrying illegally isn't he? But, the law took the gun away from me and others like me who would have protected you and your friend.

    If you think that it's safer to NOT have guns then put a sign on your front door that says, "Attention Criminals: I oppose guns. I do not own them and I don't allow them in my house." If guns were outlawed would you feel any safer with the same sign on your door? As long as criminals know that guns are legal then they know that there is a possibility that one of their potential victims will be armed. It's a HUGE deterrent.
  • stella Jul 7, 2011 @ 1:41 am | delete
    Now not everybody can think about shooting as a pass-time or hobby, because many Americans join the army sooner or later and will have to face real battles on the battlefield, and training shooting is of course a good way to prepare for these life-threatening moments. Certainly you can not really compare using an AK 47 Airsoft airgun with using a real one against actual humans, but it is better than nothing and the concept of aiming, shooting and concentrating is very similar, whatever you're shooting with.
    leupold rifle scopes
  • TIRMassageStone Jun 29, 2011 @ 11:50 am | delete
    Wow. you know that just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean that they're wrong, right? Placing people's comments under 'right' and 'wrong' categories. It's OK that people don't have the same opinions.
  • JeromeWilkins May 29, 2011 @ 10:56 pm | delete
    I agree with you on the gun issue but there are many times when a non lethal weapon is needed. You can't legally use firearms in every crime incident.
  • KANEsUgAr May 21, 2011 @ 12:04 am | delete
    Love it! We have a constitution for a reason people. Definitely believe there is less crime in areas that law abiding citizens, exercise their right to keep and bear arms. Awesome lens
  • thedecoy Apr 16, 2011 @ 4:26 am | delete
    Great Lense! keep up the good work!
  • jasminesphotography Apr 5, 2011 @ 4:12 am | delete
    Great lens. A very controversial subject, but important nonetheless.
  • jamatucci1 Apr 3, 2011 @ 12:34 am | delete
    Good talking point but there is no fact to back it up. Countries with low gun ownerships have lower crimes. There is also a correlation in the US where states with fewer gun owners have fewer gun deaths. Guns are used to commit crimes, less guns = less crime. All crime statistics point solidly in that direction. Guns for hunting and to feed your family is one thing but to carry a gun because you feel insecure, sorry. I just don't feel it doing any good.
  • EQAndy Mar 25, 2011 @ 3:21 am | delete
    Very Informative -- a subject people don't like to get involved with. Great treatmwent of it here
  • 40kTerrain Mar 20, 2011 @ 5:11 pm | delete
    Ed, I agree with you. Thanks for the lens! It is the longest I've found, though!
  • tonyboy Mar 14, 2011 @ 8:21 pm | delete
    According to a friend of mine who is a Tampa criminal defense lawyer, it is true that guns can prevent crime. It's just a matter of being responsible on how you carry your gun. A person needs to have the proper documents in order to carry firearms. Guns don't kill people but irresponsible people with guns kill people!
  • comfyc Feb 23, 2011 @ 4:52 pm | delete
    You did a great job on making the lens.
  • bobskeyboardz Feb 18, 2011 @ 1:28 am | delete
    I guess Im gonna have to learn to use a knife in a fight, plus the exercise.

    Plus most gang members carry guns and dispute the TV shows making it seem its difficult to get a direct hit, its pretty easy to shoot a person and the less guns the better, we need stricter laws.
  • c Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:42 pm | delete
    haha. you are a silly man. good reading!
  • darciefrench Jan 19, 2011 @ 12:55 am | delete
    We've been through an attempted home invasion- a gang carrying golf clubs in the middle of the night came looking for the previous tenants of a rental unit we'd recently moved into. Because the place was known to the police (unbeknown to us), they took 20 minutes to respond and by then the attackers had dispersed. Ever since then I have understood that given the opportunity I would keep a gun in the home. We do have other potentially protective items that could serve, in case, that are appropriately situated in the home.
  • dogodor Jan 11, 2011 @ 2:09 pm | delete
    I agree with this great lense. If you take away all the guns the only people with guns are the criminals. I grew up near Pearl Mississippi. The reason you have never heard of it is because the principle of the school neutralized the school's student shooter with his personal handgun before the student killed several other students. If this principle wasn't an avid marksmen Pearl would be synonymous with Columbine. But since this principle saved countless lives people have never heard of it. (Feel free to Goggle this story. It is true if visitors of this lense don't find this true) Guns in the right hands do many positive things that go unreported. Many times it is only the bad news that makes the news.
  • photofk3 Jan 11, 2011 @ 10:08 am | delete
    Excellent, awesome lens. I absolutely agree with you. Guns deter crime, they restrict evil. That's what America's Founding Fathers thought. And that's what I think, too. Congratulations on this lens.
  • jackiebolen Jan 9, 2011 @ 4:58 am | delete
    Hmmm...interesting idea but I don't agree. What about countries like Korea or Japan where nobody has guns? There just isn't violent crime!
  • FFL Jan 3, 2011 @ 6:15 pm | delete
    I'm in complete agreement with you, I appreciate the time you took on this lens
  • Tipi Jan 1, 2011 @ 9:51 pm | delete
    A global ban on guns would be a wrong move by politicians. No!
  • TWOnline2 Dec 25, 2010 @ 12:04 am | delete
    much work into this lens
  • patriotique Dec 10, 2010 @ 10:58 am | delete
    Yeah great ... if everyone has a gun we will be just like Afghanistan. Really safe over there.
  • GunLover Dec 10, 2010 @ 8:23 am | delete
    We need to get guns into schools. Hear me out on this - the earlier we introduce our kids to guns and their safe usage, the less hassle we'll have later on. Children learning how to shoot makes our country a safe place for all. When Palin gets in after terrible Obama I know this is the kind of policy she'd drive through!
  • ShamanicShift Dec 9, 2010 @ 2:46 pm | delete
    Excellent lens -- hits the mark!
  • hotbrain Dec 4, 2010 @ 1:32 pm | delete
    Great lens! Blessed by an angel. Congratulations!
  • AllyVuitton Nov 30, 2010 @ 2:11 pm | delete
    If you're actually in known danger, fine, carry a gun. Personally, I think it's a vicious circle - like playground kids always wanting to get the last word. Really? Come on! Imagine a scenario:
    You and your wife are fighting about something HUGE!
    You feel so angry, without thinking you pick up your gun and ...
    Yeah, so you get the point.
  • damagedinc Nov 26, 2010 @ 2:25 pm | delete
    Defend the Constituion and the 2nd amendment before they are to weak to Defened you!
  • Nov 11, 2010 @ 7:44 am | delete
    crime gun lens.. different perception..
  • williammason Oct 23, 2010 @ 10:43 pm | delete
    All that I know is that there's a lot of nut cases out there so in a way I do agree with Ted Nugent's perception. The thing to remember is that guns may and not be legal in a state and may and may not require an Federal Firearms License (ffl) license. Check out this site to find out if guns are legal in your area http://1-inmate-locator.blogspot.com/ and protect your love ones!
  • Oct 22, 2010 @ 2:15 am | delete
    Good lens!if you use GUN you have to get the good Lawyer too.so beware to use Guns:).
  • tonyboy Oct 19, 2010 @ 12:20 am | delete
    You have definitely let the light shine on everybody! It's true! This is what a Tampa criminal attorney told me months ago! Guns are not the evil ones but it depends on the person holding it!
  • SereneSea Oct 18, 2010 @ 10:31 pm | delete
    A country can be very peaceful and law-abiding without guns. Imagine a scenario where all the citizens are educated, no employment issues, no-crimes and every-one is wealthy. The people in this ideal place are spiritual , artistic and engrossed in their professions minus stress and worries. Crime rate = Big 0 . Where is the need of arms, ammunition and guns?
  • AmericanDreamer Nov 9, 2010 @ 4:17 pm | delete
    Unfortunately...that is altogether an impossibility. Utopia does not exist in this lifetime, at least not for very long. Plenty of people have tried it, but all have failed. Note that most of those people were socialist or communist in nature, because that is the only way that the idea of socialism works, is under the supposition that mankind is somehow perfectable by man itself.

    The reason that this will never happen is indeviduality. People's inherant differences create conflict. You find somthing that makes another person different from you, in creed or character or even body, then you will forever be at odds with that person, even if that person is your closest friend, as your two differing points of view compete for dominance.

    This is usually done in a non-violent, even friendly way, debate or even good natured joshing, because we place a much greater value on the things which unite us then those that devide us. However somtimes those deviations begin to compound, one on top of the other, until what was once a ripple is now a full on tear. This leads to hatred and disgust on behalf of one person for another. Sometimes this turns violent, and that is where crime, violent crime, stems from. The larger a society is, the faster this occurs.

    Chaos begits chaos, and somtimes these differences in people can be caused by the most unguilty of things. A baby dies as it is born and it's mother feels alone in her grief because no one else can possibly empathise with her pain. A single house on a street burns down and the owner now feels seperate from their neighbors, an outsider in some way, perhaps with a feeling of discontent or even rage that everyone around them was spared a pain which they had to endure. A person has to watch a member of their family die in a hospital after having punctured a lung while falling off of the roof, and even this person knows that nothing could have been done on a conscious level, they still feel a pulse of hatred towards the doctors grip at them, which soon grows to hatred for the medical community as a whole and then eventually all of society.

    My point is that, no matter how perfect your world is, crime will never be at the "Big 0" because there will always be unpredictabiliy and chaos, and that, combined with human ideviduality, will always compound into violence, at least for some people. There will always be a human variable, which can never be accounted for. Most of the time this is a good thing, as it leads to innovation, creation, and growth. But with the good must also come the bad, and creation and evolution are a distructive force in nature. A positive destructive force, but a destructive force none-the-less.

    Even if your utopia were possible, I wouldn't want to live in it. Such a world of ease and lack of conflict would make people dull-minded, stupid, weak, and naive. People arn't meant to live that way. We are meant to grow through adversity. We are meant to climb the mountains in order to reach better lands. In your hypothetical, there would be no purpose, because a good life would be promised to you no matter what. In such a world, good would not exist, because evil would not exist. There would be no such thing as happyness because stress and worry and strife would not be there in which to differentiate it from.

    If everyone is well-educated, then there is no point in pushing yourself to your greatest potential because adequacy will always be there and you never have to worry about falling beneath that line. If everyone is employed, then there is no sense of acomplishment that comes with holding a job. If everyone is wealthy, then wealth itself has no value, as it is commonplace.

    I personally would rather take the long and bumpy road to excellence and emerge with all the bumps and bruises that come with it, but also with the knowledge that I was capable of reaching the top of the mountain. Because success is it's own reward, because I am strong and I capable and I know that I can succeed, and because when it comes right down to it, the meaning of life is to live it, with all the ups and all the downs along the way.

    To quote a character from Disney/Pixar's WALL-E, "I don't want to exist, I want to live!"
  • AmericanDreamer Oct 14, 2010 @ 4:14 pm | delete
    ?The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the ?high powers? delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.? ? Cockrum v. State [1859]
  • Aldric_Chang Oct 11, 2010 @ 11:03 pm | delete
    Hi, really interesting read on guns here!
    Also, thank you for liking my lens on Halloween Golf Cart Decorations and leaving your valuable comments! Much appreciated!
  • scar4 Oct 10, 2010 @ 9:00 am | delete
    I don't think the point is the GUN. It's how to use the gun and who uses the gun.
  • ZablonMukuba Oct 4, 2010 @ 11:04 pm | delete
    nicely done, you have made me change my views on guns
  • WriterBuzz Oct 2, 2010 @ 9:07 pm | delete
    Nice idea for a lens. Very informative. Gave you a quick thumbs up.
  • Sami4u Sep 30, 2010 @ 11:46 pm | delete
    Hi,

    Well written! I keep getting this dropdown in my dashboard that says to nominate a lens for LotD. I just used it on this lens. Best of luck. Congratulations on the purple star.
  • WildFacesGallery Sep 28, 2010 @ 5:46 pm | delete
    Congrats on your purple star for this lens. I can see why, this is a great debate topic.
  • GrowWear Sep 28, 2010 @ 4:29 pm | delete
    Congratulations for your purple star for Guns Save Lives. ...Still must say that not all "responsible" citizens "want" a gun.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 28, 2010 @ 5:42 pm | delete
    Hi GrowWear:

    Thanks for the kind words about my purple star. I totally respect your opinion that not all responsible citizens want to own guns and I'm totally cool with that. Not everyone wants to own a car, or hunt, or fish or whatever. That's what makes the USA such a great place - if someone is fortunate enough to live here. ;-)
  • Sep 26, 2010 @ 6:30 am | delete
    great lens great debate like it.:) good poles.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 28, 2010 @ 5:43 pm | delete
    Hi simonw1979:

    Thanks for the kind words and thanks for stopping by.
  • wickless-candles Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:05 pm | delete
    I disagree about more guns, more guns equal no law.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 23, 2010 @ 10:29 am | delete
    Hi wickless-candles: Thanks for stopping by and I appreciate your comment. However, I don't understand what you mean. All the police officers carry guns and they enforce the law. The don't carry guns to enforce the law - they carry guns for their own personal safety. Not sure what you mean??
  • pyle_mountain Sep 23, 2010 @ 10:29 am | delete
    Hi wickless-candles: Thanks for stopping by and I appreciate your comment. However, I don't understand what you mean. All the police officers carry guns and they enforce the law. The don't carry guns to enforce the law - they carry guns for their own personal safety. Not sure what you mean??
  • JHFSEO Sep 18, 2010 @ 9:01 pm | delete
    Great expansive lens on the benefits of and reasons for concealed carry. Here in Arizona, open carry is legal, and frankly, I think folks should have them on their hip. It says: "I'm carrying, bother someone else, and/or bother me at your own risk." but of course, concealed carry makes crooks wonder if you're packing or not, and since they're dumb and opportunistic, they won't think about whether you're packing. Still, that doesn't change the fact that folks should own, train and carry.

    Everyone should at least take classes, understand the function of guns, and their proper maintenance and use, and then consider buying and training with the right gun for them. If they do, then they should take proper gun defense courses including use of force and train regularly.

    Keep up the good work.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 23, 2010 @ 10:28 am | delete
    I agree with you, JHFSEO. With the proper training for weapon retention, etc. and background checks, I believe open carry is great. I do like the gun laws out in Arizona. I'm not sure about your background checks, though. Has the law been changed recently out there? I was thinking you don't need a license there, but what about background checks?
  • TheyCallMeVarmit Sep 15, 2010 @ 10:55 pm | delete
    I liked your lens and agree with pretty much everything in it. I've had guns for 24 years and plan to keep owning them too. Hopefully this lens will wake some people up.

    How many times have you heard about a legal carrier being the victim versus a non-carrier, in a violent crime? Know what I'm sayin'?

    Have a good one.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 18, 2010 @ 1:49 pm | delete
    Thanks for stopping by, Varmit. I know what you're saying', and I agree with you. ;)
  • RyanRE Sep 13, 2010 @ 1:44 pm | delete
    You need to get a photo of "Mr Larson" from Happy Gilmore on this lens wearing his shirt that says "Guns don't kill people, I do"
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:07 am | delete
    Hey RyanRE, thanks for stopping by. I might have to do that, I had forgotten about that shirt until you brought it up. Would add an interesting element to the lens... ;-)
  • riff999 Sep 11, 2010 @ 11:36 am | delete
    You present your point of view very well. I found your examples very interesting. Kudos.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:04 am | delete
    Thanks, riff999! This is a lens I've worked very hard on. And I'll probably continue to try and make it better. I definitely need to go back and make the writing better, but I love the examples.
  • SemperFidelis Sep 10, 2010 @ 7:45 pm | delete
    Very cool lens pyle_mountain! :)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:02 am | delete
    Thanks for stopping by, Semper and thanks for the kind words!
  • flowergardener Sep 9, 2010 @ 5:37 pm | delete
    EXCELLENT! I love my guns. I respect them and have learned from 30 years of hunting how to use them very well. I would gladly fight for my right to own them!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 10, 2010 @ 11:44 am | delete
    Hi flowergardener:

    You sound much like myself. I've also got around 30 years of hunting and shooting experience and I've enjoyed every minute of it!
  • j_barnhart4 Sep 9, 2010 @ 11:37 am | delete
    I just love this lens. Being a mom of three little girls and having a husband who is away a lot, I knew I had to have a gun. I got my carry permit earlier this year and bought a Taurus 38 Special and I love it. I am one of the most unsuspecting people to have a gun but that is why I need it. I am very petite and would make a good target to criminals. I think I am being proactive for my family. More people should take control of their own safety. The police are great but they should be a back up, not a primary source of protection. If people learn how to safely use a firearm and know their state laws, then I have no problem with everyone carrying a gun. I just wish someone would come out with the perfect women's holster. They are all too obvious on me. I either have to put it in my purse (ugh) or carry on my ankle...not real great during the summer. :)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 10, 2010 @ 11:42 am | delete
    Hi J_barnhart4: I really appreciate you sharing this story and I love to hear thoughts like this - especially from women. My observation has been that far too many women are afraid of guns (or just don't understand them) - leaving themselves vulnerable to crimes. I truly wish more people would embrace your thinking and let go of their fears and irrational thinking. I always cringe when I see the commercial where the lady runs to the phone when a man is breaking into her house. I love a good alarm system, but I'm thinking those ladies should get their gun first, then answer the phone.
  • Obscure_Treasures Aug 9, 2010 @ 12:08 pm | delete
    Favourite and 5 *****
    Excellent lens.
    Thank so much for sharing this information.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 10, 2010 @ 11:38 am | delete
    Hi Obscure_Treasures: Thanks for stopping by and thanks for your comment.
  • AmericanDreamer Jul 21, 2010 @ 2:34 pm | delete
    Increadible lens which states the most common-sense concept out there in a way which makes it impossible for people who don't think things all the way through to argue against unless they simply don't read it all.

    Here is another interesting statistic for you (and please note that I am recalling this from MEMORY so it might be slightly off) pointed towards all those people who try to point fingers at America's so called "high" crime rates (which in and of itself is a misleading statement).

    Did you know that about 25% of all violent crimes in America occur in only four cities? Care to guess which ones? Detroit, Washington D.C., New York City, and New Orleans. What do they all have in common? They all have INCREADIBLY strict gun laws. I believe that guns are either totally or mostly illegal in all four. Something tells me you won't hear that on MSNBC.

    Include Chicago, LA, San Fransisco, ect. all other cities in America famous for their high crime rate, and all with very strict gun laws, and I'd be willing to bet that the percentage would go up quite a bit. Fascinating, no? I defy anyone to find a city in America with very light or no gun laws which have ultra-high violent crime rates.

    The anti-second amendment people just don't understand basic reason and logic.
  • AmericanDreamer Jul 23, 2010 @ 2:05 pm | delete
    Oh, and in case anyone want's to check that statistic, I believe that it was in either Larry Elder's book *The Ten Things You Can't Say in America* or his documentary *Micheal and Me* (I can't remember which, but I am almost certain it came from him).
  • pyle_mountain Sep 10, 2010 @ 11:37 am | delete
    Hi AmericanDreamer: I wanted to thank you for all the great comments, and intellectual (fact driven) posts to this lens. Far too often it seems people are so emotional about guns and it clouds their mind - preventing them from seeing truths that to you and I are obvious. Thanks again, pyle_mountain (aka Ed).
  • AmericanDreamer Sep 15, 2010 @ 2:52 pm | delete
    You're quite welcome Ed :) I just believe in making sure that the good guys are the ones who are more powerful then the bad. A gun can make all the difference for one person to defend themselves against a group of gangsters, a small woman to defend herself against a strong male rapist, or an old man to defend himself against a young criminal.

    I love your lens, and would even go so far as to say that it is my favorite one on Squidoo. The only thing that dissapoints me is that you forgot my personal favorite manufacturer on your poll ;D I personally have always prefered Colt for my handgun of choice.

    Anyways, great lens. I think that if good, moral people were better prepared to defend themselves, the world would be a much better and much safer place. I'm not the best shot in the world, but I can shoot a golf ball from 20-30 yards away with an air gun and I'm darn proud of it because it means that I know that I am capable of protecting my home and family if ever it came to that.

    God made man, Colt made them equal. ;)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 15, 2010 @ 4:06 pm | delete
    Oh, wow, how could I forget Colt?? I didn't leave them off on purpose, that's for sure. I don't receive many requests for holsters to fit Colts so they're not on my mind as much. But I did go back and try to add Colt into the poll, but the only problem is the system wouldn't allow me to place them with the other gun choices. Colt would be the bottom choice, below "other" and the last choice. What do you think? Should I add Colt below the last choice in the poll? I was thinking that might make the poll look weird and Colt owners might not even glance that far down....

    Shooting a golf ball at 20 to 30 yards is certainly very good shooting for anyone. I can do it with a sighted rifle, but don't think I can with a handgun. Shooting a golf ball that far (75 feet or so) with a handgun is impressive. I might be able to do is with my Glock 21, but it would be 1 out of ___ number of shots. :)

    Back to Colt again, I do like Colt handguns. After all, they got the awesome 1911 started and it seems that every gun manufacturer out there today has some sort of 1911 clone. Although I don't own one (yet), the Colt Python is my 2nd favorite revolver - 2nd only to my S&W Model 629 with an 8 3/8" barrel.

    Anyway, thanks again for the kind words and all the support!

    Sincerely,

    Ed
  • AmericanDreamer Sep 16, 2010 @ 2:42 pm | delete
    Yeah, my Grandpa, the guy who taught me how to shoot, owns a Colt Diamondback Revolver which he has slightly customized, a variation of the Python, and it is my personal favorite. I've always prefered revolvers myself, just because they fit better in my hand. Never used the S&W Model 629 but I hear it's an excellent gun.

    I hate to say that it would probably be unnesicarrily cumbersome to add Colt to the poll at this point. Besides looking odd, a whole bunch of people have already voted, some maybe for the "other" choice because they prefer Colt as well, and to add on another choice now would leave you with skewed results. Oh well, I voted for "other" for that reason :) I considered S&W or Kimber, as they are my favorites that you listed, but I decided that wouldn't be totally truthful.

    Maybe I just have an affinity for the old west, since I also really like the old Winchester lever action rifles a whole lot. I know that I always prefer to use American whenever possible. Sig, Glock, and Beretta are fine guns, but I do have my patriotic loyalty to consider.
  • Mickie_G Jul 14, 2010 @ 8:25 am | delete
    An informative and interesting article about a controversial topic.
    Blessed by a Squid Angel Today.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 10, 2010 @ 11:35 am | delete
    Thanks for the blessing, Mickie_G! I appreciate that.
  • New-York-Personal-Injury-Lawyer Jul 7, 2010 @ 7:29 am | delete
    The problem is not with Guns. THe problem is when Guns reach bad people. A bad person knows that most of the good people at the crime scene wont be able to do anything.
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:44 pm | delete
    Hi New-York-Personal-Injury-Lawyer:

    I agree 100%. And a crime is usually committed when a gun reaches one of those "bad people."
  • martialartstraining Jun 18, 2010 @ 7:55 am | delete
    Hi,
    I think that there is nothing worng with haveing guns. It is not the gun that is bad it is hte people that use them and not every one is useing them in bad way.
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:45 pm | delete
    Absolutely! It's not the gun, it's the person using a gun.
  • RuneGard May 23, 2010 @ 7:03 am | delete
    Amazing! Very sad. In the early 1970's I thought by the time I reached my fifties the world would be a kinder/gentler place. When we enter into debates about weapons our speech automatically shifts to violence and "us" against "them". This was true about apartheid South Africa where every white man and many times "their" women felt it an aboslute to arm themselve to the teeth against the very people they disenfranchised. The gun in this country also has a negative history. First used to shoot out and obliterate its indegenous populous, and then ironically, turned on one another. As for Nugent, he clearly isn't pro-life. Pro-Life begins with the fork, not dessimating what remains of wildlife and excusing the behavior as being self sufficient. It's 2010, time to start thinking more progressively, rather than primitively.
  • mickey54 Jun 23, 2010 @ 7:44 pm | delete
    Do you really think before you comment, or does stuff just kinda float out of your keyboard?
  • christoformia Jul 13, 2010 @ 2:35 pm | delete
    I think stuff just floats from his keyboard. And I believe he has his definitions of primitive and progressive -- in the true sense of progress -- confused.
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:41 pm | delete
    Hi RuneGard:

    Thanks for stopping by. You're right about one thing: "Very sad." But it's sad that places like Chicago (where guns were banned) only became more dangerous - as law-abiding citizens were helpless to defend themselves. I'm not sure how anyone could call that "progress". True "progressives" in the USA are in favor of more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens and less guns in the hands of criminals.
  • paintballgunsandgear May 21, 2010 @ 2:20 am | delete
    I am more into paintball guns but I feel that law abiding citizens do have the right to bear arms.
    As for the more guns = less crime equation. I really don't see the connection unless crimes in progress are being stopped by citizens with guns. Therefore taking the criminals off the street by either holding them at gunpoint until the police arrive or blowing their a** away. If this is the case then the impact on crime is going to be minimal and will only prevent future crimes from these perpetrators.
    One thing that I do believe is that a total ban of guns in the hands of citizens (like some lawmakers would like) would = much more crime.
    I think the saying goes "if owning a gun is a crime, then only criminals will own guns." But I guess that is a topic for another debate.
    Anyway, I am new to squidoo and really enjoyed your lens. I look forward to reading your others but just had to comment on this one. Keep up the good work. 5 stars in my book.
    BTW.....loved the Ted Nugent video!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:12 am | delete
    Hi paintballgunsandgear: The biggest point I'm trying to make is that carrying guns lowers crime because guns are a deterrent to crime. It's just the way the world works. Criminals that are capable of committing violent crimes aren't much above wild animals in my opinion. If you look to the animal kingdom, we see that animals attack the weak and respect strength - same thing with criminals. Would a rapist prefer to attack an unarmed woman or an armed woman? If a criminal believes a person is armed, don't you believe the criminal is less likely to carry out a crime against the armed person? I do.
  • skiesgreen May 19, 2010 @ 3:03 am | delete
    Although I disagree with the point of the argument the lens is well done and a good debate. Blessed and featured on Sprinkled with Stardust
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:36 pm | delete
    Hi skiesgreen:

    Thanks for the kind words and I certainly respect your opinion. :)

    Sincerely,

    Ed
  • Airinka Apr 12, 2010 @ 6:18 am | delete
    I don't agree thay guns can save our life.
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:34 pm | delete
    Hi Airinka:

    Thanks for stopping by and I appreciate your thoughts. But I would like to know why you believe this? Police carry guns to protect themselves. I wonder how many law enforcement officers lives have been saved because they carry guns?
  • VinnyP Mar 13, 2010 @ 11:35 pm | delete
    people have minds
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:35 pm | delete
    Hi VinnyP:

    From reading some of these anti-gun comments - I wonder a lot about that. :)
  • j_barnhart4 Feb 13, 2010 @ 1:54 am | delete
    Great lens. After years of constant nagging by my husband, I finally decided to learn how to safely handle and shoot a gun. One trip to the range and I was shocked. A week later, a was applying for my carry permit and buying a revolver. I think that most opposition over guns is a fear...fear of the unknown. Most people don't know how to use them safely and aren't properly trained. It is our right, and our duty, to learn how to defend ourselves and our family. Great job on this. Blessed :)
  • pyle_mountain Jul 13, 2010 @ 4:31 pm | delete
    Hi j_barnhart4:

    Thanks for stopping by. I love your story and totally agree with you about fear. So many of the anti-gun folks I meet are simply afraid of guns. I believe they've been "taught" to be afraid, so they demonize guns. It's ironic, really, that people have blamed guns to the extent that true causes of crime have not been addressed. In that sense, gun control, is an easy scapegoat for politicians like Daley (in Chicago). Since they don't really want take on the true causes of crime, blame guns! Crazy....
  • Tipi Feb 3, 2010 @ 1:15 am | delete
    Would love to see this on the Top 100 List, best wishes!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:21 am | delete
    Thanks, Tipi, I would love to see it there too. I'm still working hard to keep it up high, but those top spots seem to keep eluding me. But, I'll continue to work on the lens and see how high I can make it go. It stays ranked really high, but not quite high enough. :)
  • tandemonimom Feb 1, 2010 @ 8:53 am | delete
    Excellent - congrats on the purple star!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:21 am | delete
    Thanks tandemonimom: The purple star is a huge honor.
  • familystorykeeper Jan 30, 2010 @ 7:48 pm | delete
    As I've read your lens my thoughts go to something I just read regarding guns and freedom. I think quoting from the article written by a woman who lived in Austria when Hitler took over is the best thing to do. So as you read this quote the question should be, "Will more guns = more freedom?
    "America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don't Let Freedom Slip Away
    By: Kitty Werthmann
    What I am about to tell you is something you've probably never heard or will ever read in history books.
    I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We elected him by a landslide ? 98% of the vote. I've never read that in any American publications. Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force....
    The Final Steps - Gun Laws:
    Next came gun registration. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily. The NRA keeps fighting for us, but we fools don't give them much support. "
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:24 am | delete
    Hi familystorykeeper: That's an awesome history lesson you just gave us all. Thanks for stopping by and sharing your wisdom.
  • Sylvestermouse Jan 30, 2010 @ 9:17 am | delete
    Congratulations on your purple star! I read this lens originally a few months ago. Excellent lens! I couldn't do this before but now I can say Angel Blessed and added to my Squid Angel Mouse Tracks lens.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:24 am | delete
    Hi Sylvestermous: Thanks for stopping by and thanks for the Angel Blessing. :) You are appreciated!
  • Joan4 Jan 29, 2010 @ 9:16 pm | delete
    Congratulations on your purple star! This is a well researched and well prepared lens!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:25 am | delete
    Thanks, Joan4: I'm very honored to receive the purple star - it means a great deal to me.
  • Spitfire70 Jan 17, 2010 @ 1:03 pm | delete
    Personally, I have owned a 38 revolver for several years just for my own protection. I'm not afraid to use it and I feel much safer owning it. Very good lens with tons of information. 5* to you!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:26 am | delete
    Hi Spitfire70: Thanks for stopping by. It's good to hear you take responsibility for your own safety. And, .38 revolvers are awesome handguns.
  • loganadrian Jan 13, 2010 @ 10:20 pm | delete
    Interesting idea. good job
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:27 am | delete
    Thanks, loganadrian!
  • Ohrana Dec 4, 2009 @ 3:11 am | delete
    I am from Russia and i work in security agency Oskord!

    Gun problem fo commercial structure is the most problem for security bussines in Russia.

    It's veru difficult to use guns fo commersial sructure but not a problem for police or FSB
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:27 am | delete
    Hi Ohrana: Thanks for stopping by. I imagine there are many things in Russia that are different than they are here.
  • elliminate Nov 19, 2009 @ 3:01 am | delete
    thank you for great job!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:28 am | delete
    Hi elliminate: Thanks for the kind words and for stopping by!
  • elmikeo Nov 5, 2009 @ 10:31 pm | delete
    I don't think guns are a great thing, but I don't want a few people to have guns and use them to control the ones that don't. that just isn't right. I maybe it would work for the swiss family Robinson, but i think anyone else would have some troubles.

    Mike- http://www.onedollarglobeinsurance.com- for the times when you can't expect the unexpected.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:32 am | delete
    Hi elmikeo: Thanks for stopping by. Your point of view is appreciated and respected.
  • crosscreations Oct 18, 2009 @ 5:36 pm | delete
    OWNING a gun should be a right, yet still the way one uses it a responsibility. Like the guy said above..."Guns don't kill people, PEOPLE kill people!" Owning a gun is one thing, yet if you use it for anything but target practice or self-defense, you go to jail. Simple as that.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:33 am | delete
    Well said, crosscreations! It's very simple, isn't it.
  • jaye3000 Oct 15, 2009 @ 3:45 pm | delete
    Thank you!! People who break the law as a career have guns, I think it's a great idea to have one to fight off those types. Christmas is coming & I'm practically begging for an H&K :)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:33 am | delete
    You're so right, jaye3000!
  • paintlandscape Oct 10, 2009 @ 1:48 pm | delete
    Hi. I wrote to Tony Martin while he was in jail after being refused parole, Shoots a burglar and gets thrown in a cell? They should have given him a small medal and a cash prize, not jail time.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:34 am | delete
    Good for you paintlandscape! It's hard to believe he was put in jail for defending his life!
  • Benarda Sep 27, 2009 @ 6:13 am | delete
    I have owned firearms since I was an 8-year old boy during WW2, and am, and have always been, a believer in the right to possess and bear arms. I am now 74 years old and have never shot at any person in peacetime. Having lived in the UK for fifty years and had to tolerate its politically-motivated strict anti-gun laws, I moved to France and then Spain where I was able to legally own my revolver and compete with it in target shooting. Many of my neighbours here in Madrid own arms, and we have never had any trouble.
    Gun control laws work badly. Gun ownership simply requires self-discipline and the ability to keep one's temper and think before acting. It is better to carry your pistol 2,000 times and never have to use it, than to need to use it once and not have it.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:35 am | delete
    Well said, Bernarda! Your perspective is greatly appreciated.
  • mitchking Sep 17, 2009 @ 12:15 pm | delete
    This reminds me of the bumper sticker that guns do not kill people, people kill people. I live in an area where lots of people have conceal carry permits and this is well known. I rarely hear about crime in my area because criminals do not want to approach those who are carrying guns to commit their crimes.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:36 am | delete
    Exactly right, mitchking. Criminals want easy targets, not targets that can defend themselves.
  • Beautiful_GreenBeans Sep 16, 2009 @ 8:10 pm | delete
    You've presented an exhaustive exploration of this debate, and accomplished such without taking yourself too seriously: kudos!
    I'd love to see the guns vs. underwear statistics, those wedgies can be deadly!

    Guns, in general, are weapons designed to hurt, maim and kill. Be it for protection or aggression, this speaks to the operator. Unlike many deadly vices and devices that are accessible, at least they're honest and upfront about their function.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:37 am | delete
    Thanks for stopping by Beautiful_GreenBeans: You thoughts are greatly appreciated!
  • gabrielangel Sep 5, 2009 @ 12:08 am | delete
    I definitely agree that criminals need more guns in the world to fear. Maybe one day we will evolve past all the primal evils that are the main cause of crime, but right now we must deter thugs with firepower.

    Some kids don't get whipped enough like in the old days, so when they grow up to be criminals, they need to catch up on all that lesson teaching fear looking down the barrel of a gun.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:38 am | delete
    Hi gabrielangel: Well said, if there were no crime, there would be no need to protect ourselves.
  • billionare Aug 28, 2009 @ 5:21 am | delete
    Nice lens but my opinion for this is more guns can't have less crime...I think it will add more because many will have a guns and need more discipline.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:39 am | delete
    Hi billionare: Thanks for your thoughts and your perspective is totally respected.
  • TShirtFrank Aug 26, 2009 @ 6:25 pm | delete
    Great lens, I have a springfield .40 and .45 and love them. I wish I could take them everywhere!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:40 am | delete
    Hi TShirtFrank: Those are great calibers. Maybe one day you will be able to take them everywhere?
  • billionare Aug 18, 2009 @ 12:01 am | delete
    More guns means more trouble, everything can be resolved with conversations...
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:41 am | delete
    Hi Billionare: Although I don't agree with you, your thoughts are always welcome and repected.
  • theboyjlowe Aug 16, 2009 @ 7:17 pm | delete
    I could not agree more. People cannot figure out that guns don't kill people. People kill people. If you take guns away then you are giving the criminals more options.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:41 am | delete
    Hi theboyjlow: I just don't understand why more people don't see this issue the way you see it.
  • ShamanicShift Aug 13, 2009 @ 11:38 pm | delete
    AWESOME LENS! I didn't find it too long. Or maybe you could divide it into 2 or 3 more, all linked together - with 1 on the 'crimes against women' angle and another on legislative action (or divide the material some other way).
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:42 am | delete
    Thanks for the advice and for stopping by, ShamanicShift!
  • Sparke Aug 12, 2009 @ 9:56 pm | delete
    Can you tell I love this lens? I think of the right to carry a concealed weapon kind of like a one armed bandit. Would you pull the lever if you felt there was a chance you would be shot? LOL

    I firmly believe even the craziest of the lot wouldn't take a chance at marching in anywhere with an intention to shoot anyone if they felt a handgun could be concealed under anyone's blazer
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:43 am | delete
    Thanks Sparke!
  • Sparke Aug 12, 2009 @ 9:40 pm | delete
    Another point on the incident at Columbine High as well as any school shooting is that criminals and seriously disturbed people do UNDERSTAND that schools are GUN FREE ZONES. If they weren't and all teachers were are all armed with guns, a criminal would never walk into a school to begin with, with any belief they could get away with firing a gun to injure anyone. On the contrary, in this scenario this would be an entry in a Dummies 101 handbook, of the first place to NOT to go with a gun. LOL So the solution that would likely completely END school shootings is for all teachers to carry concealed hand guns. ;-)
  • Sparke Aug 12, 2009 @ 9:21 pm | delete
    Great Lens! I agree. It is our responsibility and Constitutional Right to defend and protect ourselves. Laws that restrict basic human Rights will NEVER make or keep us safe. I noticed the reference in a comment to Columbine High. My cousin was in attendance at this school on this fateful day. The famous image of the young man hanging from the window of that school was her best friend. Needless to say she was very traumatized by the incident. If every teacher and parent of a student had a gun at Columbine High on that fateful day it is likely the incident would have been very different and over in a flash with the only fatality being to the shooter that walked into that school on that day.
  • Sparke Aug 12, 2009 @ 9:10 pm | delete
    Love this Lens!! I noticed the comment on the lens regarding Columbine High. It seems the point was missed that it was the criminal(s) that had possession of guns on this day not law abiding citizens which is the problem. My cousin was in attendance at this school on this horrific and fateful day. The famous image of the young man hanging from the window of the school was one of her best friends. Needless to say my cousin was very traumatized by the incident. I agree firmly with the positions on this lens that gun control should be stopped and our second amendment right should be restored. It is indeed our responsibility and Constitutional Right to protect and defend ourselves. On the contrary laws that restrict our rights such as gun control will NEVER make us safe. If every teacher and parent of a child at Columbine High had a gun on that fateful day it is likely it would have been over in a flash with the only fatality on that day to the shooter that walked into the school
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:44 am | delete
    Thanks for the thoughtful comments, Sparke. I'm very happy that you like this lense. I just wish more people had the understanding and wisdom that you have.
  • jbs0425 Jul 26, 2009 @ 8:40 pm | delete
    great lens and very true
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:44 am | delete
    Thanks, jbs0425!
  • pyle_mountain Jul 23, 2009 @ 11:51 am | delete
    Hello Mike:

    Thanks for visiting the lens. You say it changed your mind about the issue, but in what direction? Also, I agree that this lens is too long, but I'm not sure what I would remove. You have any suggestions? Thanks, Ed.
  • MikeMitzner Jul 23, 2009 @ 11:27 am | delete
    I have to be honest- this lens changed my mind on the subject. There's way too much stuff on this page though, it would be much better if shortened...significantly.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:45 am | delete
    Thanks, MikeMitzner: We're proud to hear those words from you.

    Ed
  • stu1288 Jul 19, 2009 @ 5:34 am | delete
    wtf what a load of crap you moron
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:46 am | delete
    Hi stu1288: You're a funny person. Who are you directing this at?
  • jtblin Jul 10, 2009 @ 7:03 am | delete
    So stupid and dangerous. Should be removed. Some people never learn and have no brain. Watch Bowling for Columbine.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:48 am | delete
    Hi jtblin: Thanks for stopping buy. Your thoughts are exactly what I thought about your comment. But, we believe in the first AND 2nd Amendments around here. So, I chose to leave your comment as it is and on display for everyone to read. :)
  • dc64 Jun 27, 2009 @ 3:54 pm | delete
    I don't own a gun, but I do have a bow with arrows...it's quieter!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:48 am | delete
    Good for you dc64: I own several bows myself. But they're mostly for hunting.
  • Ryan_McCullen Jun 19, 2009 @ 3:32 pm | delete
    I really like how you pointed out the fact that they don't blame the car when a drunk driver kills someone...they blame the drunk driver. When a criminal shoots someone, why blame the gun? It's such an obvious concept to me that so many people can't seem to grasp. Thanks for a great lens.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:51 am | delete
    Hi Ryan_McClullen: It's so true! People go out of their way to blame guns, but never blame cars, water (drowning), hands, etc. that kills people! Such hypocritical, opportunistic anti-gun thinking is nuts!
  • Tipi Jun 18, 2009 @ 10:03 am | delete
    I grew up with guns and gun safety. Guns are a great equalizer! Very good lens!
    Susie
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:52 am | delete
    Hi again, Tipi! I love it when you comment on my lenses. You are very much appreciated!
  • Soren Jun 16, 2009 @ 7:52 pm | delete
    I love your lens! http://www.squidoo.com/LegalizeFreedom
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:52 am | delete
    Thanks, Soren!
  • Sadheeskumar Jun 12, 2009 @ 4:36 am | delete
    Lens on very different topic. I like this. Your good work earns you five stars to this lens.
  • CoCo_Bean Jun 1, 2009 @ 9:08 pm | delete
    Incredible lens, and yes, I agree!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:53 am | delete
    Thanks, CoCo_Bean!
  • CoCo_Bean Jun 1, 2009 @ 9:08 pm | delete
    Incredible lens, and yes, I agree!
  • RebootAmerica May 21, 2009 @ 11:21 pm | delete
    great site lots of info.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:53 am | delete
    Thanks for stopping by, RebootAmerica!
  • tandemonimom May 13, 2009 @ 6:24 pm | delete
    Glad to see this lens has been Angel blessed - definitely deserves it! I agree with Heather 326, barring mental illness or past criminal records, anyone should be able to own a gun with a simple safety test. Cars kill way more people than guns do, and any 16yo can drive a car!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 1:57 pm | delete
    Hi tandemonimom: Thanks for your thoughts and kind words.
  • Heather426 May 12, 2009 @ 10:30 pm | delete
    great debate topic! Our second amendment rights should trump anyway...the only thing is that I think a person should have to qualify for gun ownership, by passing a safety test and be a sane individual, and not have a criminal record. But criminals will get them no matter what. Utopia does not exist in this world and criminals love unarmed victims.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:56 am | delete
    Thanks Heather426, you thoughts are greatly appreciated!
  • mickey54 May 12, 2009 @ 6:34 pm | delete
    Thank You for this information! There are not enough people out there willing to speak up about this!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:55 am | delete
    Thanks, mickey54! I feel it is my duty to the safety of other people to speak up and let the truth be known!
  • pyle_mountain Apr 8, 2009 @ 12:59 pm | delete
    A special thanks to my favorite Squid Angel, KimGiancaterino! Keep up the good work!
  • KimGiancaterino Apr 8, 2009 @ 12:51 pm | delete
    Great lens... and always up to date. I grew up in an area where people kept guns. It wasn't a big deal. The bad guys will get them no matter what the laws try to do. Squid Angel Blessed.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:56 am | delete
    A special thanks to my favorite Squid Angel, KimGiancaterino! Keep up the good work!
  • WritingforYourWealth Feb 21, 2009 @ 9:17 pm | delete
    I don't have a gun, but my dog knows the command "Sic balls!" so burglars approach at your own risk. ;)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:57 am | delete
    Hi WritingforYourWealth: I have dogs too, but they don't know that exact command yet. :)
  • Twobit Feb 1, 2009 @ 4:58 pm | delete
    Very interesting and controversial topic! *thumbs up*
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:57 am | delete
    Thanks for stopping by, Twobit!
  • Wysiwigs Jan 17, 2009 @ 7:09 am | delete
    Awesome lens on a hot topic! 5* and a big, fat A-men :o)
    Http://www.Squidoo.com/ConnieCrankpot
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:58 am | delete
    Thanks for your support, Wysiwigs!
  • Northernista Jan 10, 2009 @ 7:47 pm | delete
    Fantastic lens, thank you!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:58 am | delete
    Hi Northernista:

    Thanks for your kind words!
  • XP Jan 10, 2009 @ 10:25 am | delete
    This lens is a real class act. Kudos to you for updating regularly. This should be mandatory reading. I wish I could give you more than 5* ... oh wait, I can.

    Blessed by a Squid (dark) Angel.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 8:59 am | delete
    Thank you, XP - I really appreciate that.
  • tara27oh Dec 9, 2008 @ 9:31 pm | delete
    alot of great information. i like the colors on this debate, wish we had more choices
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 9:00 am | delete
    Thanks, tara27oh! I appreciate your comment.
  • gabrielangel Dec 7, 2008 @ 1:38 am | delete
    Guns seem to be the new tool of evolution. There are so many stupid people in the world and not enough predators to eat them.

    Now these people get taken out when they try to commit crimes against the wrong people. Conversely, stupid people with guns end up shooting themselves, eventually. Just ask Plaxico Burress about that one (P.S. I am a Giant's fan, but damn he was dumb to do that).
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 9:00 am | delete
    Interesting thoughts, gabrielangel, and I totally agree with you about Plaxico - very stupid.
  • MiaBellezza Dec 5, 2008 @ 5:05 am | delete
    Very informative lens --> may the power be with you -->5*!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 1:58 pm | delete
    Hi MiaBellezza: Thanks for the kind words.
  • TheGreenerMe Nov 16, 2008 @ 10:58 am | delete
    Excellent debate! You've definitely done your homework to prove your case.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 1:58 pm | delete
    Thanks for your vote of confidence, TheGreenerMe!
  • The_Daz Nov 4, 2008 @ 8:32 am | delete
    Good Lens - shame I can't agree with the opinion!

    Despite statistics and NRA blurb - it's a fact that countries with fewer gun crimes have greater gun control, with notable exceptions for responsible citizens, of which the US is sadly lacking. With the largest proportion of citizens in prison in any 1st world nation - surely it's time to look at the causes of crime and not just apply a bandaid of giving every one a gun, so that only the bad guys die.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:01 pm | delete
    Hi The_Daz: Thanks for your thoughts, they're much respected, even though I can't agree with them. I'm all for solving the problem of crime. But I don't see why law-abiding citizens need to continue to be helpless sheep while social scientists debate the causes of crime. Why can't we have both? Also, we must be cautious with statistics and comparing different countries as that tends to create in an inaccurate view of the truth.
  • garethjax Oct 6, 2008 @ 11:03 am | delete
    The lens is hitting a nerve, very good.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:02 pm | delete
    Hi garethjax: That's the best kind of lens! ;-)
  • GreenRevolution Sep 26, 2008 @ 3:28 pm | delete
    Very interesting lens on a very controversial topic. It certainly has a lot of people talking and that's a good thing. Excellent work!
    5 *****
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:02 pm | delete
    Thanks, GreenRevolution - you are certainly correct - people talking in a civilized manner is a good thing!
  • Amy_blog Sep 26, 2008 @ 4:38 am | delete
    amazing lens,
    I like here!
    welcome to my lens
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:03 pm | delete
    Appreciate your comments, Amy_blog
  • JJNW Sep 25, 2008 @ 1:19 am | delete
    Awesome, Awesome, Awesome lens. Like the old west - when the *Good Guys* got Guns, they chase of the Bad Guys!! BRAVO!! 5 stars! I am a gal that grew up with guns and I have a great respect for them and am passing that respect on to my children.

    Also, THANKS for visiting and favoriting my lens http://www.squidoo.com/SarahPalinGlasses
    Very much appreciated!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:03 pm | delete
    Hi JJNW: Thanks for the kind words and I certainly enjoyed your lens.
  • bigqin Sep 18, 2008 @ 9:46 am | delete
    I live in a city where it's illegal to discharge a firearm, and we have an almost non-existent murder rate too.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:05 pm | delete
    That's awesome, bigqin! I'm glad your city is so safe. It's illegal to discharge a gun in most cities in the United States - unless someone is trying to kill you.
  • chadsteele Sep 9, 2008 @ 8:52 am | delete
    You reap what you sew... invest in education, you get smarter... invest in guns, you get violence... why not put all this energy into educating and empowering young people instead of the weapons industry?
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:06 pm | delete
    Hi chadsteele: Thanks for your thoughts. You're correct, you do reap what you sew. But you don't understand what it means to carry a gun. It means investing in personal safety. You invest in personal safety - you'll be more safe. Now we just need to scale that so everyone (except the criminals) will be more safe.
  • ideadesigns Sep 4, 2008 @ 9:56 am | delete
    You have so much good information, I must bookmark this! I didn't know the UN wants to prohibit all civilian ownership of firearms. That's globalization control for you.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:08 pm | delete
    Hi ideadesigns: Oh yes, the UN want's all guns destroyed - except the guns that those in power have. That's why we see such hypocrisy at high levels. That's why people like Diane Feinstein (sp) and Sylvester Stallone speak out against guns, but carry them personally.
  • funwithtrains Sep 2, 2008 @ 12:47 pm | delete
    Great lens! Unfortunately, by the time police can get to a crime scene most of the time someone is already hurt. I'm for allowing honest adult citizens defend themselves with firearms.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:09 pm | delete
    Hi funwithtrains: You are so correct. The police are great, but they can't be everywhere. Why call them and wait for help? Doesn't make much sense, does it?
  • SquidPoint Aug 28, 2008 @ 10:34 am | delete
    Your lens has been given the vote of SquidPoint
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:10 pm | delete
    Thanks for the vote, SquidPoint!
  • WrinkleCreamSpecialist Aug 27, 2008 @ 10:30 pm | delete
    I am not sure what to make out of it. Your lens looks nice however.. ;)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:11 pm | delete
    Hi WrinkleCreamSpecialist: Thanks for your kind words about the lens.
  • Michael_Allen Aug 9, 2008 @ 10:55 am | delete
    I was walking my daughter to the store the other day and there is a gun shop along the way. In the window was a poster of kill shots for an assailant. It was unique, but I thought it was beneficial. I don't live in the crime capital of the world, but my street isn't that safe either. We have wannabe thugs all over the place and they will do what they have to do to prove themselves. If every law abiding citizen had a gun and trained with it to be able to hit the target, these wannabe thugs wouldn't get away with everything they try. I truly believe that. There really is no arguing that arguments for gun control are coming from individuals who have little clue with the entire issue. They enable the criminal and blame the law abiding citizen while literally standing in shock when someone says that guns carried by law abiding citizens will make the streets safer. They don't trust law abiding citizens as a reflection of a lack of trust in themselves.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:12 pm | delete
    Completely agree with you, Michael_Allen!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:12 pm | delete
    Completely agree with you, Michael_Allen!
  • Cumberland Aug 8, 2008 @ 6:21 pm | delete
    I didn't see this box before I commented above, so I'll just add another hearty "Well Done".
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:12 pm | delete
    Thanks again, Cumberland!
  • StephanieManning Jul 31, 2008 @ 8:43 pm | delete
    Great point of views. Working for the Sheriffs Office I would have to say that...'Violence is not the answer" however, I do believe that it's a good idea. Some counties, including several in Georgia will actually FINE you if you don't have a gun. With strict laws that actually REQUIRE you to carry a gun, the crime rate is lower. People know that you have a gun and that...duh you will use it, helps to make them think twice. I think all senior citizens should have to carry a gun. LOL. It would keep gangster from robbing them.....The new law which we call the "Castle law" is a great concept. It means that if some dumbass comes in my house in the middle of the night or even prowling around my yard and can shoot him with out thinking twice about it. As bad as the world is getting it's gonna be 'kill or be killed' before long.

    While I don't agree with all of the laws some should be more strict. Carrying a gun for protection, and not abusing the right. Could be the best option!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:13 pm | delete
    Thanks for the great thoughts, StephanieManning - I completely agree with you!
  • SemperFidelis Jul 30, 2008 @ 4:13 pm | delete
    Wow! Excellent work on this one Pyle. Blessed by a Squid Angel today! :o)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 2:14 pm | delete
    Thank you Semper, for the Angel Blessing. You are greatly appreciated!
  • rose08 Jul 25, 2008 @ 7:07 pm | delete
    I agree with Griever on the point "It's not in our guns it's in our culture".

    When you bring out your opinion "Want Less Crime? Add More Guns!" I believe you are limitting the usage of guns within "protection", but not all people with guns will think so, guns can also be the tool for attacking.

    There're many ways for protection. First of all, the root solution would be planting peace in people's mind, providing good living condition over the country that people can afford their living easier. The more people enjoy their life naturally, the less crime. Government, social media, educational institute, industries have the responsibilities to create nice and peaceful environment. That's the culture.

    I also notice you mentioned the biometric safe on your my nightstand. I read some news about biometrics
    relating to biometric safes, biometric access control, seems very good solution for home protection.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:20 pm | delete
    Hi rose08:

    Don't you believe it would be good to do both? Promote safety and peace? Arming law-abiding citizens promotes safety for those people and deters criminals from committing those bad crimes.
  • pyle_mountain Jul 20, 2008 @ 4:05 pm | delete
    To Couch-Covers-Melanie:

    Thanks for stopping by. In general, I would NOT suggest that you ARM teenagers with any type of "weapons" - however, I haven't quite decided if the cutoff age should be 18 or 21. Before that age, people have yet to develop enough "character" and "track record" to determine if they can responsibly carry any type of item for self-defense.

    What I do find AMUSING is that politicians immediately seek to BLAME and OUTLAW knives, guns, etc. - suggesting THAT will have ANY effect on the crime problem. Using knives as an example, how many of those UK teenagers do you believe could pick up a kitchen knife at home? The point is that politicians need to quit using items (guns, knives, rocks, cars, etc.) as a scapegoat for criminal behavior. In addition, outlawing guns, knives, etc. has little effect at keeping those items out of the hands of those desiring to cause harm with them. For example, where I live you must be 18 years old to buy and smoke cigarettes.
  • bygproductions Jul 19, 2008 @ 11:04 pm | delete
    My husband will love this lens, I'll have to email it to him.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:20 pm | delete
    Thanks, bygproductions! Hope your husband enjoys it.
  • Ileneonhealth Jul 10, 2008 @ 6:09 am | delete
    Great lens. Keep up the good work!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:21 pm | delete
    Thanks, lieneonhealth!
  • kiwisoutback Jul 9, 2008 @ 3:42 pm | delete
    Great work! Best use of Hey Monkeybrain! I've seen yet.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:21 pm | delete
    Thanks for the kind words, kiwi!
  • Couch-Covers-Melanie Jul 9, 2008 @ 12:23 pm | delete
    I guess you would save the "knife" problem with UK teenagers the same way? Give them all knifes and let them be afraid of each other?

    Sorry but there is no way I can support your views.

    couch covers
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:22 pm | delete
    No, Couth-Covers-Melanie, I'm talking about adults here, not kids.
  • totalhealth Jul 7, 2008 @ 11:30 am | delete
    amazing lens and great concept. 5 stars for this excellent lens
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:23 pm | delete
    Thanks, totalhealth!
  • BusyQueen Jul 2, 2008 @ 8:45 pm | delete
    Gave you 5 stars*****
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:23 pm | delete
    Thanks for the stars, BusyQueen!
  • Steve-SEO-UK Jul 2, 2008 @ 9:51 am | delete
    This is all alien to us folks in the UK. Basically we are not allowed to have any form of weapon for defence. We have had many instances where people have used say shotguns to defend themselves against potential violent criminals breaking into their property and have been sent to jail and sued by the criminal for damages (if they survive). Also had a bit of a culture shock when on holiday in Tampa. I was looking around a store and came across a gun department. I was amazed - just doesn't happen in the UK. I don't think many people in the UK have even handled a gun, let alone fire one off. I personally have had the experience of shotgun, SLR and an old 303 bolt action when I was in the army cadets. Amazing experience - but to point and shoot someone - I'm not sure I could. But if my wife and son where is grave danger, I wouldn't give it a second thought - Bang! you're dead man and my family is safe.
    Anyway, great Lens.
    Steve
    Water Co
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:25 pm | delete
    Thanks for your perspective, Steve-SEO-UK!
  • XP Jul 1, 2008 @ 1:02 pm | delete
    This is top notch work.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:25 pm | delete
    Thank you, XP!
  • alicesy Jun 25, 2008 @ 9:38 pm | delete
    Excellent Lens. I like the quality insight you have provided here about Want Less Crime? Add More Guns!. Keep up the good work.

    Please check out my Police Jobs Blog.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:25 pm | delete
    Thanks for the kind words, alicesy
  • Jun 24, 2008 @ 9:47 pm | delete
    Hi,
    I love your lens. Given you 5 stars.
    Check out my 1st lens "Weight Loss and Back Pain".
    Thank you.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:26 pm | delete
    Thanks for the stars!
  • eccles1 Jun 23, 2008 @ 9:29 pm | delete
    Hey Ed! I just read the amazing article 'The Threat of Pigieons and Other Fundamentalists
    By Seth Godin on your lens - Wow and so true!
    thank you
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:26 pm | delete
    Thanks eccles1, it is a great article!
  • EditorDave Jun 21, 2008 @ 1:08 pm | delete
    Again, Bravo for an excellent lens that makes the point. If you play the part of the "victim", the crooks and outlaws will easily "prey" on you. If you play from a position of responsibility and knowledge (and, the possible possession of the ability to fight back with convincing power --whatever it takes), you are less likely to be a "victim". Whether it's a battle of wits or a battle of brute force, more is better. Thanks again for a good "thought-piece" and "wake-up call".
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:27 pm | delete
    My thoughts exactly, EditorDave!
  • McMick Jun 20, 2008 @ 4:53 pm | delete
    Great message.

    Most liberals and or anti-gun rights people, just won't face the facts put out by the FBI'S Uniform Crime Code showing as I recall that over 2 million crimes are prevented from those who legally own guns.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:28 pm | delete
    Facts are hard to face when they don't line up with a skewed world view, McMick, you are correct!
  • Cozmo Jun 19, 2008 @ 8:51 pm | delete
    I never go anywhere without my Glock 27!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:28 pm | delete
    Good for you, Cozmo!
  • ricarde Jun 19, 2008 @ 9:35 am | delete
    Simply a masterpiece! Great concept!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:28 pm | delete
    Thanks, ricarde!
  • futurmajic Jun 18, 2008 @ 8:23 am | delete
    Very good lens, 5 stars. Even after reading this there are some still stuck on brainwashing. That is what is really wrong with this world, peoples inability to see reality when it is right in front them.

    If we were all at a higher level no guns would be needed, but unfortunately there are people walking around at lower levels.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:29 pm | delete
    That's the way I see it as well, futurmajic!
  • sudever Jun 15, 2008 @ 1:35 pm | delete
    Welcome to the 'Global Group - Everything from Anywhere' Group
    ( http://www.squidoo.com/groups/global )
    5 stars for your great lens!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:29 pm | delete
    Thanks for the stars, sudever.
  • tdove Jun 15, 2008 @ 11:09 am | delete
    You make some really valid points here and not only have you started a great fight up there, but this is a very nice lens. 5* and Thanks for joining G Rated Lense Factory!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:30 pm | delete
    Thanks, tdove - I appreciate that!
  • jgeogh01 Jun 12, 2008 @ 3:52 am | delete
    I totally agree. I recently debated this at school and won by a landslide - and most of my classmates are uber liberal anti-gun democrats.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:30 pm | delete
    Good for you, jgeogh01!
  • jgeogh01 Jun 12, 2008 @ 3:52 am | delete
    I totally agree. I recently debated this at school and won by a landslide - and most of my classmates are uber liberal anti-gun democrats.
  • pyle_mountain Jun 11, 2008 @ 12:45 pm | delete
    Hello KimGiancaterino,

    I will certain accept your Squid Angel Blessing and thank you kindly for it was well. I appreciate your kind words.

    PM
  • Timbob Jun 11, 2008 @ 11:34 am | delete
    Great lens, good topic to discuss. keep it up!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:31 pm | delete
    Thank you, Timbob.
  • KimGiancaterino Jun 10, 2008 @ 9:42 pm | delete
    Well argued... Please accept my Squid Angel Blessing for making people think on both sides of the issue.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:31 pm | delete
    Hello KimGiancaterino,

    I will certain accept your Squid Angel Blessing and thank you kindly for it was well. I appreciate your kind words.

    PM
  • Marc_Sandford Jun 5, 2008 @ 11:45 am | delete
    Gun control is when you use both hands.

    I tell ya I'd just love to pop off this annoying little dog that always bugs me when I jog in the morning. I'd have to pick a different running route afterwards cause the dog's owners would be looking to pop me off. Life kinda sucks that way.

    It would be so cool if everyone carried around their own gun like in the westerns where fast reflexes and nerves of steel ruled the day. If someone insults you, you just take it out onto the street... People would be very polite with each other because they know the other is packing a gun. Hey, mutually assured destruction works. The cold war is proof out that!

    So what side of the gun control issue do you think I'm on? Damn, I love this monkeybrain thing. This is fun!
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:34 pm | delete
    Interesting post, Marc_Sanford.
  • eccles1 May 28, 2008 @ 5:23 pm | delete
    I think you are right!! good lens
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:34 pm | delete
    Thank eccles1.
  • JAV010 May 17, 2008 @ 7:40 am | delete
    i love this lens ! thanks for info 5 stars :)
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:35 pm | delete
    Thanks for the stars, JAV010.
  • JAV010 May 17, 2008 @ 7:40 am | delete
    i love this lens ! thanks for info 5 stars :)
  • Classicvideogamesplus May 16, 2008 @ 4:23 pm | delete
    Nice lens and am a firm believer in owning firearms and gun safety/responsibility taught to all. Criminals will find guns anyways so not being able to own a firearm/handgun puts you at a major disadvantage if you or your family are put at risk.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:36 pm | delete
    We see things the same way, Classicvideogamesplus!
  • Grasshoppa May 5, 2008 @ 10:48 pm | delete
    Police are not the first respondents to violent crime. The victims themselves are the first. Any bystanders are the second. It is ridiculous to arm the people who won't even get there in time to stop the violence, and yet refuse to arm the people who must first respond and therefore have the first opportunity to stop it. Who would you rather have shot -- a couple of perpetrators, or a campus full of unarmed students? It's time to stop treating the guns and gun owners like criminals and start treating the violent perpetrators like criminals.
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:36 pm | delete
    You are so right, Grasshoppa!
  • Michaud68 May 2, 2008 @ 1:43 am | delete
    5*'s totally agree I carry my Sig 229 everywhere I go Its Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it
  • pyle_mountain Sep 14, 2010 @ 6:36 pm | delete
    Good for you, Michaud68!

by

pyle_mountain

pyle (aka Ed) is an entrepreneur. He enjoys time with his family, riding his Harley, hunting, messing with horses, shooting, and he also loves to play... more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!

Explore related pages

Related Tags