Skip to navigation | Skip to content

Share your knowledge. Make a difference.

Nikon F100

1 - I can do better 2 - Jury's out 3 - Pretty darn good 4 - Splendiferous 5 - Awesometastic (by 0 people)   Your rating: 1 - I can do better 2 - Jury's out 3 - Pretty darn good 4 - Splendiferous 5 - Awesometastic

Ranked #8172 in DIY, #239775 overall

Rated G. (Control what you see)

The best value in a 35mm film camera

 

Nikon introduced the F100 in 1999, as a lighter-weight, professional-quality sibling to their F5 body. The F100 quickly became many pros' second body. The F100 was discontinued, along with most other Nikon film bodies, in 2006.

The F100 retailed for about $1500 at its introduction. Today, you can pick up a used F100, in excellent condition, for under $300. I'll explain why I think this is the best value in a 35mm film body today.

How I got mine 

A casual stop in Palo Alto

I bought my first SLR, a brand-new Nikon FE, in 1982. I was an undergraduate at Stanford University. I purchased the camera from Keeble and Shuchat Photography, located in Palo Alto's California Avenue business district just off the Stanford campus.

After a couple of years' fling with digital, I decided to return to film. I researched the Nikon F4, F5 and F100.

I no longer live in Palo Alto, but I frequently have business there. On a recent trip, I stopped at Palo Alto Baking Company for pastry and coffee, and to read a few pages of Ron Paul's The Revolution: A Manifesto.

From Palo Alto Baking Company, a short walk across the street took me to Keeble and Shuchat's used equipment store. I was torn between the F4 and the F5 at the time and wanted to check them out in person.

Well, they had neither F4 nor F5, but they did have several F100 bodies. Handling it, I realized that it was pretty well the perfect size and weight for my type of photography.

Ken Rockwell, in his review, complained about dust entering the body. A quick question to the salesman dispelled this concern: "Not even when we used them as rental cameras." I walked out with a near-mint F100, with strap and body cap, for under $340, including 8.25% sales tax.

After mulling over lens selection and realizing I had no immediate budget for anything else, I returned a couple of days later and picked up a mint Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 AF-D for less than $90.

New Flickr Photos 

img181 by tsuacctnt

img181

img189 by tsuacctnt

img189

img198 by tsuacctnt

img198

img203 by tsuacctnt

img203

img204 by tsuacctnt

img204

img205 by tsuacctnt

img205

img194 by tsuacctnt

img194

img195 by tsuacctnt

img195

img212 by tsuacctnt

img212

img182 by tsuacctnt

img182

New Guestbook 

Like this lens? Want to share your feedback, or just give a thumbs up? Be the first to submit a blurb!

Nikon F100 links 

Nikon F100 Review by Thom Hogan
A review of the Nikon F100 body by noted Nikon author and photographer Thom Hogan.
Nikon F100 Review by Ken Rockwell
Ken Rockwell's Nikon F100 review. Caveat: I have not found dust to be an issue. Neither did my camera vendor, "even when we used them as rental cameras."
X
DarylDavis

About DarylDavis

I've been an amateur photog, off and on, since 1982. After a couple of years' fling with digital, I'm back to film. I currently shoot a Nikon F100 35mm body.

DarylDavis's Pages

See all of DarylDavis's pages