CA Prop 8 - Writing Discrimination into the State Constitution
To many who voted, this might have seemed like one simple sentence, no more scary than a dictionary definition and nothing to get worked up about. But the sole reason for placing this one sentence into the constitution was to strip away the recently-won legal right of same-sex couples to enter into legal marriages. It effectively wrote discrimination into our constitution.
This page was originally created to help people get information before voting on Prop 8 and is now being updated to include more information about the ongoing struggle for marriage equality. Please read on!
Is Marriage a Religious Rite or a Legal Right?
It's both and could have remained that way if Prop 8 had been defeated
Although the proponents of Prop 8 stayed away from mentioning religion as the motivating force for their campaign, religion is the reason most people oppose gay marriage. Proponents wanted to declare marriage to be "between a man and a woman" because many religious people believe anything else is immoral based on Biblical teachings.Marriage happens with a legal license
But marriage is not, and never has been, solely about the religious ceremony. There are religious rites and legal rights, and the two are not interchangeable. You can stand before a priest, minister, rabbi or other religious leader and declare your vows, but that does not make you married according to state law.
Likewise, you can stand before a civil judge and sign a marriage license, but still not have a marriage recognized by your church. For example, in Catholic churches that follow a strict doctrine, someone who is married in a civil ceremony but doesn't have a corresponding religious ceremony is not married in the eyes of the church.
Marriage is a legal status bestowed by the state, not by a church. You become married when you sign a legal document, and that legal document gives you certain legal rights, responsibilities and obligations. The legal status of marriage is not about a religious ceremony. It is about entering into a legally binding relationship.
Nor is marriage simply about love. People do get married when they love each other and want to spend their lives together, but marriage does not prove love or give couples the right to spend their lives together. Marriage cements an existing relationship with a legal bond. It allows two consenting adults to be legally responsible for and to each other.
Marriage is a legal status
bestowed by the state, not by a church.
Think about how many people avoid marriage for that very reason. How many people do you know who have decided to live together rather than get married, at least in the beginning of their relationship? If a couple is in love, why NOT get married? The answer is simple - they don't want the legal rights, responsibilities and obligations of a married couple. They don't want to be legally responsible for someone else's debts or medical decisions. They don't want to share their wealth. They don't want to be legally responsible for another person. And so they don't get married because they recognize that marriage is a legal agreement into which they're not ready to enter.
Separation of church and state
Proponents of Prop 8 didn't want to advertise the religious impetus to pass this measure because our country was founded upon the idea of separation of church and state. But religious views (not legal ones) are the main reason most people oppose gay marriage. Why else would you deny two consenting adults the option to have the same legal rights and responsibilities of any other couple who wants to commit their lives to each other?
State laws cannot change people's belief systems, nor should they. Gay marriage will not change people's belief systems. Those who think the Bible condemns homosexuality will continue to believe it, as is their right. And those who believe two consenting adults should have the ability to join in a legal commitment will continue to believe it, as is their right.
When Prop 8 passed, the California Constitution was altered to include exclusionary language based on a religious belief system.
Marriage as a religious rite would not have been altered by the passage of Prop 8. But marriage as a legal right has now been taken away from same-sex couples throughout California.
Religious Leaders Who Oppose Prop 8
To Have And To Hold: Faith Leaders for Marriage Equality
Faith leaders share why they and their expressions of faith support the freedom to marry for gay and lesbian people. Featured: Rev. Jay Johnson, Rev. Tiffany Steinwert, Rev. Steven Baines, Rev. Lisa Dawn McCabe and Judith Longman, Rabbi Ed Feinstein, Sylvia Rhue, Bishop John Selders, Rev. Neil Thomas, Rev. Anne Hines, Rabbi Zachary Shapiro
Runtime: 334
7279 views
84 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
What About This?
The Bible also says adultery is wrong. Should married couples who engage in adultery lose their legal rights?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byNo, that's crazy! Their relationship is a private matter.
Sydney says:
That's dumb... it's between the people and the government should have nothing to do with it
Posted March 25, 2009
James says:
all religous people should lose their right to vote
Posted February 27, 2009
Kelly says:
Who says having sex outside of a wedded nulls a marriage?
Posted December 06, 2008
Tammylove says:
It's up to them - not everyone else! The "law" or the "church" shouldn't have a say. It is up to the couple! Personally I feel if you don't care enough about your mate to be faithful to them then you should care enough about them to let them be free to find someone who will care enough to be faithful to them. All three people in an adulterous relationship are cheating themselves! Everyone deserves love & respect! If someone cheated on me, I love and respect myself enough to let them go find their happiness and free myself of "feeling cheated". But, if I decided to forgive then that would be my choice alone and the law or the church, the neighbors, the country, nor anyone else has any business in my personal relationships! However, if I decide to forgive... that means I will forget it too... you can't stay together to punish each other... it's the past let it go and if you can't move on because it's your choice... not because it is the law or another persons belief!
Posted November 30, 2008
spirituality says:
No - it's their business to figure out if their relationship can survive that.
Posted November 03, 2008
jfield says:
I do love the verse, "Judge not, lest ye be judged." I wish more Christians lived that one.
Posted November 02, 2008
aidenw says:
Jesus' teachings are based on love. He rebuked the Pharisees for always citing the Mosaic laws to condemn what he did. Many people are doing the same thing today condemning others by using the Bible. To me it's simple. Whatever is based on love is all good.
Posted October 15, 2008
chefkeem says:
The government needs to stay out of our personal lives. That's all. The lawmakers motivations are fake, anyway. It's all about appeasing their right-wing busy-bodies!
The bible says - love your neighbor. This means tolerance and letting people find their own path in life. It does NOT mean to judge others. Read the bible and follow its teachings, "bible thumpers"!
Posted October 15, 2008
susan says:
The bible says lots of things.
Posted October 11, 2008
Well, why not? If they don't act married, why should they receive the benefits?
Carol says:
Yes!
Posted November 03, 2008
"(An) amendment banning same-sex marriages is a form of gay bashing and it would do nothing at all to protect traditional marriage."
- Coretta Scott King in 2004
Should We "Override a Right Now in Place"?
Argument from the former Canadian PM in favor of same-sex marriage
"The debate here today is not about whether to change the definition of marriage - it has been changed.
The debate comes down to whether we should override a right that is now in place."
- Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin speaking to the House of Commons in 2005 before nationwide same-sex marriage was approved.
California and other US states are not the only governments to struggle with the issue of allowing or not allowing same-sex couples to marry. In Canada, individual provinces began legalizing same-sex marriage in 2003. By the time the Civil Marriage Act was introduced in 2005 to extend this right across the nation, eight of 10 provinces and one of three territories had already legalized same-sex marriage.
In his speech supporting the Civil Marriage Act, PM Martin made an eloquent argument in favor of same-sex marriage. Part of the speech explained why he favored marriage for all rather than a separate law for gay couples. Here is what he said:
"(Civil unions) would give same sex couples many of the rights of a wedded couple, but their relationships would not legally be considered marriage. In other words, they would be equal, but not quite as equal as the rest of Canadians.
The courts have clearly and consistently ruled that this option would offend the equality provisions of the charter. For instance, the British Columbia Court of Appeal stated that, "Marriage is the only road to true equality for same sex couples. Any other form of recognition of same sex relationships... falls short of true equality".
Put simply, we must always remember that "separate but equal" is not equal. What is more, those who call for the establishment of civil unions fail to understand that the Government of Canada does not have the constitutional jurisdiction to do so. Only the provinces have that. Only the provinces could define such a regime, and they could define it in 10 different ways, and some jurisdictions might not bother to define it at all. There would be uncertainty. There would be confusion. There would certainly not be equality."
Would You Take Away Someone's Rights?
Words of Wisdom from 1948
"The essence of the right to marry
is freedom to join in marriage
with the person of one's choice."
- Quote from Perez v. Sharp, the 1948 CA Supreme Court decision that legalized interracial marriage in California nearly 20 years before the U.S. Supreme Court followed suit. California was the first state in the union to allow interracial unions.
Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Opposes Prop 8
Governor against taking away legal rights
Who Opposes Prop 8?
Organizations that have taken an official position against Proposition 8
Civil Rights Organizations
ACLU Northern California
ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties
ACLU Santa Barbara Chapter
ACLU of Southern California
Anti-Defamation League Southern California
Asian Pacific Islander (API) Equality
Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California
Chinese for Affirmative Action (CAA)
California NAACP
Equality California
Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)
Greater Sacramento Urban League
Japanese American Citizens League
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF)
NAACP - Oakland Branch
Organization of Chinese Americans - Orange County Chapter
Labor Organizations
AFSCME California PEOPLE
California Federation of Teachers
California Labor Federation
California Nurses Association
California Teachers Association
Communication Workers of America District 9
San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association
SEIU California State Council
United Farm Workers
UNITE HERE!
United Teachers of Los Angeles
Community Based Organizations
AIDS Emergency Fund
API Equality LA
API Equality SF
Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
Asian and Pacific Islander Family Pride
Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom
Billy DeFrank Lesbian & Gay Community Center - San Jose
Black AIDS Institute
Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion and Ministry
Chinese Rainbow Association
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of LA (CHIRLA)
ElderHelp of San Diego/Aging As Ourselves
Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
Family Equality Council
Freemont Alliance for a Hate-Free Community
Gay and Lesbian Alliance of the Central Coast (GALA)
Jordan/Rustin Coalition
Justice Matters
Latino Coalition for Justice - LA
L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center
Lesbian and Gay Lawyers Association of Los Angeles
Mexican American Concilio of Yolo County
National Council of Jewish Women Los Angeles
Network on Religion and Justice for Asian and Pacific Islander LGBT
Pacific Center
Pacific Pride Center - Santa Barbara
Sacramento Gay and Lesbian Center
San Diego LGBT Community Center
San Diego LGBT Pride
San Diego Psychological Association
San Francisco Human Services Network
San Francisco Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center
Sonoma County Pride Committee
Sonoma State University Academic Senate
South Asian Bar Association of Northern California
South Bay LGBT Center
Southern California HIV Advocacy Coalition (SCHAC)
Southern California Lambda Medical Association
Southern California Psychiatric Society
Stanislaus PRIDE Center
The Center Advocacy Project San Diego
The One Love Campaign
Trans Equality
USC Medical Gay and Lesbian Organization (USC MedGLO) LA
Ventura County Rainbow Alliance
The Wall Las Memorias
Statewide Organizations
Bienestar
California American Academy of Pediatrics, California
California Faculty Association
California National Organization for Women (NOW)
California Psychiatric Association
California Psychological Association
Gay-Straight Alliance Network
Lambda Legal
Latino Issues Forum
League of Women Voters of California
Liberty Hill Foundation
National Association of Social Workers, CA Chapter
National Council of Jewish Women California
Pacific Coast College Health Association
Women's Foundation of California
Newspapers
Contra Costa Times
Los Angeles Times
The San Francisco Chronicle
The Palm Springs Desert Sun
The San Jose Mercury News
The Napa Valley Register
The New York Times
The Press-Enterprise
The San Diego Union Tribune
The Sacramento Bee
The Tracy Press
Santa Cruz Sentinel
Orange County Register
La Opinión
La Prensa San Diego
The San Francisco Bay Guardian
San Gabriel Valley Tribune
Redding-Record Searchlight
Google Speaks Out Against Prop 8
The Internet giant takes a stand against the proposition

Google co-founder Sergey Brin posted the following message on the official Google blog on Sept. 26:
As an Internet company, Google is an active participant in policy debates surrounding information access, technology and energy. Because our company has a great diversity of people and opinions -- Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals, all religions and no religion, straight and gay -- we do not generally take a position on issues outside of our field, especially not social issues. So when Proposition 8 appeared on the California ballot, it was an unlikely question for Google to take an official company position on.
However, while there are many objections to this proposition -- further government encroachment on personal lives, ambiguously written text -- it is the chilling and discriminatory effect of the proposition on many of our employees that brings Google to publicly oppose Proposition 8. While we respect the strongly-held beliefs that people have on both sides of this argument, we see this fundamentally as an issue of equality. We hope that California voters will vote no on Proposition 8 -- we should not eliminate anyone's fundamental rights, whatever their sexuality, to marry the person they love.
Should California Proposition 8 Be Passed or Defeated?
How will you vote?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byYes! I'm voting for it! I want to amend the state Constitution to prevent gay marriage.
Nelson says:
1: kids should be raised by a mother and father
2: churches will lose their tax exempt status and will be sued for discrimination for the gay couples they refuse to marry
3: my kids will be taught that homosexuality is normal in public schools when I want to teach them traditional family values. I'll have to take the time and extra expense to enroll them in private school.
4: California family code already guarantees them the same legal rights in a domestic partnership (a civil union)
Posted June 05, 2009
Paul says:
I would vote for it if I lived in California, because I don't want kids to be raised in a home with out a mother and a father. They need bot role models not 2 fathers if it was ment to be that way the guys could get guys pregnant. If the gays want civil union or tax cuts that married couples get fine. But subjecting kids to a un-normal life style come on! It is not normal or nature would have made it so guys could get guys pregnant.
Posted February 26, 2009
emeraldsandrubies says:
The core unit of our society is the family. When traditional family disintegrates, so does our society.
Posted November 20, 2008
RLA says:
Don't force us to change marriage, call your union something else. We want religious freedom, that's why the United States was created and is still strong today. Don't take away our right to keep the definition of marriage as it has always been.
Posted November 03, 2008
No! I'm voting against it! The state Constitution prohibits discrimination based on sexual identity, and I don't want to change that.
Sydney says:
No! People of different races are allowed to be married so why not people of different genders? Why should it matter? If your in love, your in love no matter who it is... no one can help it either way.
Posted March 25, 2009
Tammylove says:
Marriage is a promise that you will live, love, honor, and respect another person until the day you die. How many heterosexual marriages do you know that REALLY FULFILL those requirements?
Posted November 30, 2008
Tammylove says:
Why is it anyone's business who you marry? Why do you care what two consenting adults do behind closed doors? People are really stupid sometimes! And for those ignorant people who believe gay marriage should be opposed they should think about these things.
1. How would you like a camera in your bedroom?
2. How would you like someone telling you that you can't get married because of your race?
3. How would you like someone telling you that you can't get married because of your religion?
4. How would you like someone telling you that you can't get married because of your financial status?
5. How would you like someone telling you that you can't get married because of ... I could go on and on.
Now, lets get really stupid....
All of you homophobic people should vote for gays to get married.... cuz...
What do single people in today's world do? Sleep around!
And what is marriage suppose to do?
Create a monogamous relationship right! (yeah right)
But if being married prevents sleeping around then wouldn't people who are afraid of "the gay's activities" want them to get married so they stop sleeping around and spreading AIDS!
Check the stats! Then check your heart! How many "straight" people have affairs, commit adultery, and spread AIDS in 100% heterosexual relationships!
So what if they can't make babies together and that is "God's Plan" if that IS true... and they are doomed to burn in hell... why is it your business!
Adultery is also a "sin"
So is murder
Coveting you neighbors belongings (that is the American way, we all have to keep up with the Jones)
WE"RE ALL GOING TO HELL - IF THERE IS SUCH A PLACE
SO GET OVER YOURSELVES ALREADY
LIVE AND LET LIVE
UNLESS YOU WANT TO GIVE OTHERS THE RIGHT TO START DECIDING HOW YOU CAN LIVE YOUR LIFE! YOUR OPENING A CAN OF WORMS THAT COULD EAT IT'S WAY THROUGH YOUR WALLS!
Besides... it is just the insurance companies who try to prevent gay marriage so they can make more money and not have to cover these families!
Gay people will still live family lives with or without your permission! They just get screwed because of judgmental people and a greedy economy!
You lose nothing if gay people get married so why do you care!
They won't turn your kids gay or turn you gay if they live in your neighborhood... homosexuality is not contagious!
Sure, you have some people who "look" like they have "switched teams" but it's not really that way!
If they are gay, they have always been gay... but they are afraid because of society and ignorant people judging them so they pretend not to be gay and then they live lies.
Think about how you would feel if society was gay and you being a heterosexual had to pretend to be attracted to the same sex! Imagine how you would feel inside! If you had to get married and have sex with someone of the same sex!
Many gay people have emotional issues because they have been told something is "wrong" with them...
There is nothing wrong with them...
it is not your place to judge anyone...
so leave people decide their own lives!
Posted November 30, 2008
jfield says:
Only occasionally do I want to live in California. Now is one of those times so I could vote NO.
Posted November 02, 2008
Danali says:
No one should be treated differently because of who they love. There is no way that same sex marriage will hurt straight marriages in any way. If anything it will promote getting married and standing up for your loved one.
Posted October 22, 2008
More Arguments Against Proposition 8
This lens includes specific language from the California Supreme Court decision and the state Education Code so voters can make their own decisions.-
Arguments Against California Proposition 8
-
For a short time in 2008, California law gave same-sex couples the same rights and responsibilities of marriage as straight couples. Prop 8, a November 2008 ballot measure, amended the state constitution to revoke that right. Gay rights activists app...
4 Things You Can Do To Help Defeat CA Proposition 8
1. Give. - Recent reports show that the Yes on 8 camp is raising more money than the No on 8 camp. You can help by donating to the No on 8 campaign.
2. Volunteer. - The official No on 8 campaign needs volunteers to hand out information at local events and make phone calls to voters educating them about defeating Prop 8. Sign up to volunteer.
3. Spread the word. - The official No on 8 site encourages you to talk to others and to write letters to the editor of your local papers, and those are great. But there's another way Web users can help, and since you're reading this on the Web, this is where I'm going to throw in my own suggestions.
As I write this, if you search for "proposition 8" or "ca prop 8" or "california proposition 8" on Google, the Yes on 8 page comes up first. Google has officially come out in support of the No on 8 effort, but they don't change their algorithm to support their political views. You, however, can use their algorithm to help move the official No on Prop 8 page higher up in the search results.
How? Bookmark it. Digg it. Stumble it. Save it on Deli.cio.us, Mixx, Furl, Mister-Wong and JumpTags. Google gives higher rankings to sites that have more links pointing to them. So get started right now. Go to this page and Digg the official No on Prop 8 homepage.
Then go bookmark it at all the sites I mentioned above. Not only will this help the No on 8 homepage come up higher in Google search results, it will also make it easier for people using all those sites to find it and learn more about the proposition and why they should vote no. And if you have a blog, post an entry and put a link there, too.
You can also reprint the article above from this page or email a link to this page to others.
Information is power, the web is the information portal of our age, and the web is democratic. He who has the most links wins. So go link to No on Prop 8 and help people get information that will allow them to make an informed decision about their vote.
4. Vote. - This one is obvious. If you don't vote, nothing else matters.
Vote no on Prop 8.
Who's Funding the Yes on 8 Campaign?
Mormon Church is the largest donor
Between July 1 and Sept. 30, Prop. 8 supporters raised $22.8 million.
According to the Chronicle, "Some of the largest contributions to the campaign include $450,000 from philanthropist John Templeton Jr. of Pennsylvania, $400,000 from Fieldstead and Co., a foundation run by conservative activist Howard Ahmanson, and $300,000 from Focus on the Family, a Christian organization run by James Dobson."
In another article in the Sacramento Bee titled, "Mormons lead the way in financing Yes on Prop. 8 efforts," the newspaper reported:
"Church members have donated about 40 percent of the $22.8 million raised to pass the initiative since July, according to Frank Schubert, campaign manager for ProtectMarriage.com, the primary backer of the "yes" campaign."
Marriage Equality Shirts, Buttons and More
Decide For Yourself
No On Prop 8 - I Decide Ad
Young voters talk about why it's important for people to get up and vote down Prop 8. Protect marriage equality! http://www.NoOnProp8.com/idecide Prop 8 harms one of my children and my entire family, says Itzhak Perlman, world-renowned violinist. The constitution should not be used to treat people differently. Vote No on Prop 8!
Runtime: 67
85846 views
1863 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
Should People Outside CA Care About This Proposition?
Should non-Californians care about this issue?
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byYes, it could set a precedent that other states would follow!
Sydney says:
yes they should care because what happened and what will happen will take a step up and other states could follow
Posted March 25, 2009
Tammylove says:
Too many people are sheep! Even though other states can make their own laws... ignorance will give the sheep a veil to hide behind!
Posted November 30, 2008
emeraldsandrubies says:
If gay marriage would have been legalized in California, it is likely that other states would have followed suit.
Posted November 20, 2008
jfield says:
California has often led the charge for social reform. If Prop 8 passes, I fear there is less than no chance for gay marriage to ever become legal in other states.
Posted November 02, 2008
No, individual states have always been able to make their own laws regarding marriage
Same-Sex Marriage Around the World
Where is same-sex marriage legal?
In other parts of the world, however, entire nations have struggled with this question and granted legalized marriage to same-sex couples, including our northern friends in Canada, the largely-Catholic nation of Spain and even a country once known for denying rights to many - South Africa. Many other countries offer legalized domestic partnerships.
Here is a list of countries that have legalized same-sex marriage as of this writing:
The Netherlands - 2001
Belgium - 2003
Canada - 2005
Spain - 2005
South Africa - 2006
The Latest News on Prop. 8
Fetching RSS feed... please stand byLearn More About Same-Sex Marriage
Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families under the Law (Queer Ideas)
Amazon Price: $16.47 (as of 11/25/2009)![]()
From Publishers Weekly: With her freshman book, law professor Polikoff, who has taught, litigated and written about family law, civil procedure and sexuality for more than 30 years, deftly argues that the law's narrow definitions of family and marriage no longer work in today's society-not just for the LGBT community but the country at large. With many households following untraditional family models, Polikoff says, we need to look at ways the law can change to value all families beyond those created by marriage, including same and different-sexed, married and unmarried couples. Polikoff draws on legal history and contemporary (often eye-opening) court cases to make her argument. Topics such as inheritance, tax consequences, workers' compensation death benefits, social security, probate, adoption and health care, plus their impact the diversity of today's family units are simplified for the reader. Polikoff wades through legislation and legalese with style and substance, plus a touch of flair. Impeccably researched, the book offers an evocative read that takes in the full breadth of the issues affecting marriages and avoids pedantry while remaining persuasive.
Gay Marriage Bans in Other States
More marriage issues on the November ballot
Arizona - Proposition 102
Arkansas - Initiated Act 1
Florida - Amendment 2
Think About This
"Letter to Dr. Laura" is humorous look at the religious argument against same-sex marriage
There are strong feelings on both sides of the Prop 8 argument, so I hope this might provide some levity while also serving as a catalyst for thought.
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? - Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Your fan,
Yea or nay, have your say!
I'll allow both sides to voice an opinion here, as long as the conversation stays civil.
Also, if you believe this lens is well done, please take the time to give it a star rating if you are a Squidoo member. If you're not a member of Squidoo, you can join here to rate this page.
If you're not a Squidoo member, you can still leave a message below. Please share your thoughts respectfully.
-
Reply
- spirituality spirituality Jun 2, 2009 @ 5:41 am
- Great lens - you've been blessed by a squidoo angel :)
-
Reply
- LairMistress LairMistress Feb 27, 2009 @ 11:08 pm
- Terrific first lens! Let's have more, please!!
-
Reply
- a_willow a_willow Jan 4, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
- You are one of October graduates! Come by and answer few questions to show the way to those who will follow! Wish you many, many more great lenses!
-
Reply
- Margo_Arrowsmith Margo_Arrowsmith Dec 8, 2008 @ 4:42 pm
- In North Carolina there are lots of Baptist Churches that marry gay people! So they can get married through religion, the state needs to catch up! Since when to religions grant more rights than the state?
-
Reply
- Tammylove Tammylove Nov 30, 2008 @ 11:44 am
- This is a great lens! Good job! Education is the key! People fear what they don't know, they fear change, and the "church" uses fear and guilt to control people in order to dig into their pockets! The church is the biggest business their is! I am extremely spiritual but the church that judges you and teaches you to judge others is exactly the opposite of what Jesus said!
- Load More
by 24 people |








