All about Nothing(if)

?Now by Is nothing(if) what of clear. More really. You are. You ask me. Let it be. Know you. What by wished having unless existing. Is it till endlessly but hopefully thing. Every about know to trying. Is it :Something?

Believe me, it is the simplified version of my lens. Don't worry you will get it in the end.

I considered two things in this discussion: 1) Things that exist in this world. 2) And nothing(if). We can define the things that exist in this world as something which occupies space, or has got mass, or simply if it exists in this world. These things are what i call somethings' in my discussion. I consider pass in my discussion in two contexts. First one is to pass away from this real world to nothing(if) form. This passing away process is what i assumed as transition. This pass not only happens for living beings but also for non living things. Every somethings' in this world attempts to reach nothing(if) randomly many different times hoping to reach nothing(if) for ever. This random transition is what i named pass. When it passes, it reaches nothing(if) form for zero seconds. After reaching that form, it retains its nothing(if) state if it knew 90 % things in this real world ( discussed later ). Other wise it comes back to this world loosing its nothing(if) form (discussed later why) to become a new something. So only those somethings' which knows everything in this world manages to pass to nothing(if) state. By saying knowing every thing in this world means knowing everything including past, present events, and future occurrences. The other kind of pass is to know at least something in this world. This kind of pass is relevant to the real world where every somethings' are existing. This second kind of pass is not of importance in my further discussions. Fail means somethings' not knowing anything. No existing somethings' ever fail because, they know at least something.

I have given a detailed explanation of "something" somewhere hidden in my lens. You will find about it in the end. Fail is ruled out from my further discussions. Completeness in this world is an arbitrary name for those somethings' which knows everything in this world before transition. For the word percentage, i mean to say how much percentage of completeness is achieved by it while existing.

Let us start the discussion seriously. Nothing(if) can never be understood relative to something. Somethings' can never understand what it is. This is what i assumed from the beginning. Let me give two versions of nothing(if).

1) First Assertion: Lets assume the case, somethings' reaching the nothing(if) state after transition, and trying to understand what nothing(if) is. If there is something that it knows or is trying to know, then it is not nothing(if) at all, because, how can it know about anything, it being non existent. So it can never understand itself. This is how we can look about it in one way.

2) Second Version: Let the things that it ( nothing(if) ) knows be zero things. Nothing(if) knowing itself can be compared to an analogy of the mathematical equation zero plus zero. Adding zero with zero results in zero again. This analogy explains the final thing that it knows is itself. So in this way, analogy's equations are satisfied resulting in zero again, which implies, it knows itself retaining it's nothing(if) form. So it seems completely logical that it knows itself. So nothing(if) can understand itself.

The first assertion I made "to understand nothing is to fail", is what I said of in a sense of knowing "nothing" that we use in this world and not nothing(if). The feel of what we feel is also something that we know. Likewise somethings' know at least something in this world. The know that I used above is what I said in a broader sense and not the know that we use in general. This general know is also a part of that bigger know. To exist in this universe means that, it knows to exist, which proves it knows something. This proves every something in this world knows something. So anything which is something never fails at least in this world for now making my first assertion as not possible in this world, because something never fails. So this slightly explains every somethings' which exist in this world is there for a cause whether they be good or bad according to we something.

Let us assume we have a chance of understanding everything except "nothing(if)" while we are existing as something in this world. The infinite that I used in my third assertion is excluding knowing what nothing(if) is because, knowing nothing(if) is not possible to know as long as we are something. What I wanted to mean by third assumption is that something which knows everything except that of knowing what nothing(if) is, will attain 90 percent while it is existing in this world. But whats the point in knowing everything except nothing(if). Thats the reason I asserted of knowing everything except nothing(if) with an arbitrary high 90 percent and not 100 percent. Let this kind of something which attains 90 percent during its existence be named "a". Then the rest be named "non a's".

To actually pass is to know what nothing(if) is. After passing, a's attain cent percent, while non a's attain less than hundred percent. My second assertion is to say that to pass is to know what nothing(if) is, is achieved here at this transition point. This is to inform you that every existing something always keeps trying to pass which means it keeps attempting to reach nothing(if) state after. But, non a's come back to their real worlds, back again or possibly call regeneration. So this possibly explains regeneration of life for non a's. This regeneration may or may not occur for something which is "a", because, after transition it knows everything. It knows to control itself. Is this "a" in nothing(if) form god??

Here is how I believe in god. That something named "a" which knew 100 percent before transition in its real world is the one which becomes god after transition because of the combination of knowing what nothing(if) is, as well as knowing what it knew when it was something which on combining gives everything or a total completeness. So once this "a" becomes nothing(if) after transition,it knows infinite. So we can say, god is one being nothing(if) having knowing everything. We possibly cannot see him because he being nothing(if), we cannot see him being something, while existing. That seeing nothing(if) would possibly mean for us being something, having known what nothing(if) is which is what we assumed as absurd from the beginning. My FOURTH assertion of knowing everything including what nothing(if) is one who knows everything is god himself. So that something which achieved 100 percent in its real world while existing achieves the real cent percent after transition. So there is no escape for these non "a's" from this universe as long as they know of "everything" except that of knowing what nothing(if) is while existing (unless that nothing(if) "a" or so called god wishes ;)).You probably should have understood with the wish of nothing(if) "a", something could reach to nothing(if) state (knowing everything while existing) which is god indeed and in fact another god. This should make you clear of "something reached to god" that you would have heard, every now and then in your real life. They(non "a's") keep regenerating having their finite number being additive each time they are regenerated tending towards knowing infinite(excluding the meaning of nothing(if)), unless having wished by god, while they are existing.

You should probably be knowing by now what something is by writing those lines in the beginning reading it backwards ( that is, in my "simplified version of lens" module).

If you get what i wanted to mean by those lines, your answer should be a clear no by now.That possibly explains the force to know about everything for every somethings' existing in this world, except that to know what nothing(if) is while existing, and again, that possibly explains an important question of the existence of "living beings", which has more bandwidth of "knowing" by the feelings that it has. I believe we living beings are the wish of many somethings' which are tending to know everything, except knowing nothing(if), while existing and is on a process of hoping reaching nothing(if) forever.

Two things that make me terribly confused are:
One - How transition occurs :(
Two - The origin of every somethings' :(