Nuclear Free versus Nuclear Weapons
Ranked #10,391 in Culture & Society, #210,934 overall
Nuclear Free versus Nuclear Power
The use of nuclear power is damaging to the human race and to the environment. I am a New Zealand citizen and I am very proud that my country (New Zealand) was the first country to officially and legally declare itself to be nuclear free back in 1987.
Picture source - Copyright to Larry Ross - Nuclear Free NZ
New Zealand was the first country to go Nuclear Free
By 1986 a nationwide poll indicated that over 90% of NZ citizens wanted NZ to become nuclear free and so in 1987, the Labour government (Labour being the left wing) passed a law claiming New Zealand to be a nuclear free country. The law specified that ships could not enter the 12 mile exclusive zone unless they proved that the vessel was not powered by a nuclear reactor AND that there were no nuclear weapons on board.
This effectively meant that US military and naval vessels were no longer permitted to enter NZ ports unless they specifically stated that the ship was NOT powered by a nuclear reactor AND did not have nuclear weapons on board. Since the USA had a policy of neither confirming or denying, this effectively meant that ALL US military vessels were banned from NZ ports.
As a direct result of New Zealand's law change, the USA stopped treating NZ as an ally and now ignores NZ in all military and defence policies and situations. The USA has continued to pressure the NZ government into repealing (or cancelling) their nuclear free law. NZ refuses to do so - and we have the right to remain nuclear free. This is how the USA treats any country that passes laws that go against US domestic or foreign policy.
NZ has now been a nuclear free country for over 20 years. This policy has benefited NZ as it contributes in a major way to New Zealands world wide image of being a clean green and safe country.
Picture Source - Copyright to The Peace Foundation
USA and nuclear weapons
Prior to this law being passed, New Zealand, Australia and USA has all been signatories to the ANZUS treaty. This treaty mostly allowed for the 3 countries to conduct military exercises together and to receive military and other intelligence from the USA. After this law was passed, the USA refused to continue honouring its ANZUS treaty obligations to NZ - but NZ has never formally withdrawn from the treaty. NZ was also downgraded from an ally of the USA to just a friendly country. The military combined exercises stopped and the intelligence gathering dried up.
As a result of its nuclear free status, New Zealand will never have a nuclear meltdown accident. Unlike other countries - USA, Russia and Japan - which have ALL had major nuclear accidents. (3 Mile Island, Pennsylvania in 1979, Chernobyl, Ukraine in 1986 and Sendai Prefecture, Japan in 2011). Admittedly the last was caused by a large earthquake but still, the reactor construction should have been done to a MUCH higher standard.
Just remember there is only ONE country in the entire history of this planet who has ACTUALLY DROPPED 2 nuclear bombs on an enemy. And it was not done to stop any war. It was done purely as a show of power. Japan was already in the process of surrendering.
Since the end of WW2, USA has continued to test nuclear weapons. They even tested nuclear bombs in the Australian desert and have refused to pay out any monetary compensation for illnesses and birth defects that have occurred as a direct consequence. This is how the USA treats its allies.
The USA constantly goes on and on about how the world should be a nuclear weapon free planet. BUT until the USA actually and physically destroys its entire nuclear weapon stockpile, then none of the other countries with nuclear weapons (Russia, France, Israel, China, India, North Korea, Pakistan and possibly the UK) will feel safe enough to destroy their stockpiles as well.
Picture Source - CS Monitor Newspaper - March 2010 - see link in last Paragraph above
Nuclear weapons
Should the USA destroy its nuclear weapons first to show that it truely wants a nuclear free planet?

YES
ravenko says:
They should lead the way and help the other countries get rid of theirs
WebaliciousGuides says:
Yes, but at the same time they should work with other nuclear countries to get rid of theirs as well. There's no justification for nuclear weapons - they can't distinguish between civilians and combatants, meaning thousands of innocent people will die if they're used, not to mention the environmental damage that would be caused. There's no way that it can count as reasonable self-defence.
Helenee says:
Somebody has to do it. Of course, there's a big chance the US would be attacked if it destroyed its nuclear weapons -- on the other hand, perhaps other nations would be more eager to defend the US. As things stand now, sorry, they don't have public opinion by their side...
annmackiemiller says:
well yes but will they - no
nickupton says:
Ideally yes, but US foreign policy has pissed off so many people around the world that it would probably be a signal for its increasing number of enemies to attack.
I admire New Zealand for sticking to its own opinion on this.
NO
Langa95 says:
I believe that we should dispose of all nuclear weapons. However I see this as an unlikely and dangerous target. It only takes one stupid country keeping one to throw global power out of whack. If the US disposed of theirs first they would be the target of bullying from other powers with these weapons. Even though I am not a big fan of the US especially after its terrible tactics in the Cold War I still think that for theirs and the world's safety they should keep their weapons.
karmicchristian says:
Since your question starts with "Should the USA destroy its nuclear weapons first..." My answer would be no. On the other hand we currently have a 'world' body called UNO - which literally has no powers in its hands. A body like the UN should empower itself or be vested with enough powers, to help all the countries to deescalate nuclear arms within set deadlines. That would be a fairer option IMO.
simplyoasis says:
Ideally yes, but realistically... I'm not so sure.
miaponzo says:
Yes, Ideally yes, but realistically... I'm not so sure. This is a very complicated issue.. but I'm going to say, no... just for ultimate safety... although there are many other issue involved here, too. Wow! Complicated!
sandyspider says:
I agree that it has to be a united effort. We can't destroy our nuclear weapons leaving ourselves vulnerable to the enemy.
The Rainbow Warrior bombing
One of the ships that was planning to sail to Mururoa was the Rainbow Warrior - which was owned by the environmental group Greenpeace.
The boat was tied up to a wharf at the Ports of Auckland in New Zealand. On 10 July 1985, 2 bombs ripped through the hull of the Rainbow Warrior sinking it. All but one of the crew managed to get off the boat safely before it sank. The bombing was eventually traced to members of the French Secret Service. At first France denied that it had had anything to do with the bombing. Eventually when confronted with all the evidence, the French Government admitted that it had given the orders.
This bombing on New Zealand soil was a major catalyst to changing peoples minds about nuclear testing. In 1986 a national poll was conducted and the numbers had shown a marked increase from 60% to over 90% of citizens now in agreement about NZ going nuclear free.
Picture Source - Greenpeace - Rainbow Warrior - 1985
WarGames
In 1983 a small movie was released - called War Games - in which a young computer genius accidently almost starts World War 3. Its hard to find this movie on video or DVD, but it is available on Netflix. This movie is now almost 30 years old and one would hope that the human race has learned its lesson. Unfortunately this movie's message is still relevant today. This is the movie trailer.
A strange game (referring to global thermonuclear war).
The only winning move is not to play
Fukushima Nuclear Reactor - March to May 2011
Cooling down the reactors - March 17, 2011
Dr. Michio Kaku analyzes the situation around nuclear power plants in Japan. ABC News - March 25, 2011
Chronology of events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
Radioactive exclusion zone and hot spots around the Fukushima Plants - May 10, 2011
It is OFFICIAL. Fukushima Reactor Number 1 is in a state of Nuclear Meltdown!!!! May 12, 2011 (Thursday)
Radiation spreading from Fukushima down as far as Tokyo and there is now talk of mass evacuations - June 9, 2011
The Ongoing Fallout of Fukushima, and Around the World - Australian documentary - 20 August 2011.
So what happened at Fukushima?
Graphics source - Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Number
Main Article - National Post Newspaper, Toronto, Canada March 16, 2011
Nuclear free or not - that is the question
So the Question is - Do you think nuclear power (and weaponry) is still the right way for our planet to go or do you think ALL nuclear power (and weaponry) everywhere should be banned permanently?
Should the planet make a serious effort to go Nuclear free?

YES
ravenko says:
Then it would be a perfect world, if there was a chance of that
karmicchristian says:
In an ideal world. Yes
WebaliciousGuides says:
Yes, more research and investment should be made in renewable energy.
Helenee says:
Is p1$$1ng on our food and bed ok? I believe there are alternative power sources, and I would go 100% with governments asking me to seriously reduce my energy consumption (don't think only of turning on less switches, it goes much much deeper), IF they closed down nuclear plants.
annmackiemiller says:
definately - it is all coming back to bite us
NO
says:
It would be reat if we could just get rid of them, but its not just like some other co8ntries such as north korea would
Nuclear Free Resources
- Japan Nuclear Plant Explosion - March 12, 2011
- Wikipedia
- New Zealand nuclear free zone
- Wikipedia
- New Zealand - History of the Nuclear Free Zone
- Greenpeace website
- End the Nuclear Age
- Greenpeace website
- Nuclear Free New Zealand
- A grassroots anti-nuclear movement started in New Zealand by Larry Ross
- The Rainbow Warrior Bombing - 1985
- Wikipedia
- Nuclear Nations and the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
- Wikipedia
- Fallout - Report on Fukushima - August 2011
- 60 Minutes Report - from Australia
Please don't be shy - talk to me....
-
-
ravenko
Jul 4, 2011 @ 3:40 pm | delete
- Awesome lens what a great subject
-
-
-
karmicchristian
May 23, 2011 @ 8:49 am | delete
- This lens is a potential bomb, waiting to explode (nuclear or not - I am not clear). :) Great topic. Thanks. :)
-
-
-
simplyoasis
May 17, 2011 @ 1:20 pm | delete
- Very nice lens, great debate!!
-
-
-
Helenee
May 17, 2011 @ 8:21 am | delete
- Great subject for a debate, Serenia.
-
-
-
celeBritys4africA
May 13, 2011 @ 4:34 pm | delete
- Congrats for a fantastic lens.
-
- Load More
by Serenia
I am Serenia from Canada (and New Zealand)
I won LOTD on April 26, 2011
Purple Stars - 10 at last count
Angel for the following categories -
Weste...
more »
- 189 featured lenses
- Winner of 43 trophies!
- Top lens » The Book of Wealth
- This lens »
Won purple star

Explore related pages
- Navy Nukes and the Navy Nuclear Program Navy Nukes and the Navy Nuclear Program
- Chernobyl Diaries Chernobyl Diaries
- Nuclear Energy, Your Opinion? Nuclear Energy, Your Opinion?
- How to choose radiation dosimeter for household How to choose radiation dosimeter for household
- USS Harry S. Truman USS Harry S. Truman
- USS Theodore Roosevelt USS Theodore Roosevelt