Thinking About Taxes
Ranked #21,549 in Culture & Society, #444,385 overall | Donates to Squidoo Charity Fund, Food for Everyone Foundation
A Progressive Proposal to Eliminate Corporate Income Taxes
This is a proposal for a fundamental change to the income tax structure. Some to the points may seem to come from the right wing fringe, but when taken together I hope to make the case for it as a progressive proposal. Note that this is a package deal--taking a piecemeal approach would defeat the purpose.
I'm not an economist--I don't even play one on TV--so I'm not going to attempt to assign numbers. Some actual economists may take exception to the proposal, but some may claim to have come up with themselves (possibly even correctly). I welcome intelligent commentary and discussion.
I'm not an economist--I don't even play one on TV--so I'm not going to attempt to assign numbers. Some actual economists may take exception to the proposal, but some may claim to have come up with themselves (possibly even correctly). I welcome intelligent commentary and discussion.
Eliminate Corporate Income Tax
The first point is to abolish corporate income taxation. This in particular has been a rallying cry for the right for a long time, but there are some sound reasons for supporting it.
It is the legal responsibility of any corporate officer to maximize profit. One of the ways to do this is to reduce expenses, and taxation is, potentially, a major expense. This has led to many companies "moving" their headquarters to low- or no-taxation countries while continuing to actually do business in the United States. In a number of cases, the offshore "headquarters" are no more than a mail drop, with the actual offices still at home. Eliminating the corporate income tax in this country would remove the incentive to violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the law.
Some on the left have made the argument that since corporations make use of the commons they have an obligation to contribute through taxes. I'll be addressing this further in the other two main points, but for now I'll just point out that this proposal only removes income taxes. Any taxes that are based on actual usage, such as gas taxes, licensing fees and even (real) property taxes are not affected here.
It is the legal responsibility of any corporate officer to maximize profit. One of the ways to do this is to reduce expenses, and taxation is, potentially, a major expense. This has led to many companies "moving" their headquarters to low- or no-taxation countries while continuing to actually do business in the United States. In a number of cases, the offshore "headquarters" are no more than a mail drop, with the actual offices still at home. Eliminating the corporate income tax in this country would remove the incentive to violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the law.
Some on the left have made the argument that since corporations make use of the commons they have an obligation to contribute through taxes. I'll be addressing this further in the other two main points, but for now I'll just point out that this proposal only removes income taxes. Any taxes that are based on actual usage, such as gas taxes, licensing fees and even (real) property taxes are not affected here.
Tax All Personal Income Progressively
Second, tax all personal income progressively. That is, abolish the tax advantages that are currently granted to investment income. The right has been arguing for the opposite--to increase these allowances to the point of removing taxation entirely (they haven't succeeded in going that far, but it's frighteningly close). The rallying cry for this has been that it's "double taxation"--that the investor is being taxed on money that has already been taxed at the corporate level. With the elimination of corporate income taxes, this argument no longer has even the semblance of validity.
Integral to this is the principle of progressive taxation of income. The more you make, the greater the share of your income that you can afford to contribute to the commons. The increase in the rate, however, should never be so steep that one retains more money by earning less.
Integral to this is the principle of progressive taxation of income. The more you make, the greater the share of your income that you can afford to contribute to the commons. The increase in the rate, however, should never be so steep that one retains more money by earning less.
Tax Policy Stuff on Amazon
These tax policy books from Amazon may or may not support the argument I made above....
Reader Feedback
-
-
JaguarJulie Nov 5, 2008 @ 3:02 pm | delete
- OK, you have my interest piqued! Tell me more about this package deal of a plan -- some examples of corporations and how much they would benefit. We have a company, we pay taxes, i.e., I'm all ears!
-
-
-
JaguarJulie May 6, 2010 @ 3:26 pm | delete
- Well there I go talking to myself again. ;) Ah, taxes ... you got me thinking about them again and how this has been our MOST taxing year for income taxes. Oh my!
-
Join Squidoo for Free
Not yet a lensmaster? Got something to say? Join for Free!
Orbitz!
True confession--I've added this module so that my mom can book her trip through it.... I'll pro'bly remove it later.
by RolandTumble
I'm an eclectic creative and impoverished aristocrat.... Okay, I'm a starving artist. I live in the upper left corner of the United States.
- 14 featured lenses
- Winner of 8 trophies!
- Top lens » Give Us a Tune on CafePress
Feeling creative?
Create a Lens!
Explore related pages
- How To Get Paid For Your Time On Twitter How To Get Paid For Your Time On Twitter
- Estate Executor Duties Estate Executor Duties
- 48 Ways to Earn Extra Money in 2012 48 Ways to Earn Extra Money in 2012
- Steps to Changing Your Career Steps to Changing Your Career
- The Best Jobs For The Future The Best Jobs For The Future
- Adbrite is better than Adsense Adbrite is better than Adsense
