The President's 9-11 conspiracy theory exposes Him to Impeachment
by 2 people |
Ranked #2,294 in News, #210,101 overall
What Never Really Happened
Now that the fake planes have been exposed ("September Clues" below), in case there are any Believers whose Faith is wavering, let's Never Forget the text of the most ludicrous conspiracy theory of all (George's Theory, subtly revised by Yrs Trly)
A Gospel from the New Apocrypha
[unAuthorised Version, Maison-Blanche, NY 02001]
Tim Osman is a 44-year-old former CIA intern who operated icognito in a Middle Earth cavern, fully-equipped with high-tech stuff like electricity and post-modern telecoms.
Early in the year AD 2001, Tim reverted to his muslim nom-de-plane.
Osama studied a few videos, borrowed one of Blackadder's ideas....and hatched a fiendishly-cunning plan, devilish in its detail, utterly impractical. Yet, according to the PerpeTraitors, Tim's impossible plan actually worked perfectly
* 19 flight-training school drop-outs would simultaneously hijack 4 airliners
* the allah-fearing muslim pilots would need a couple of hours to buzz the most secure airspace in the world and not risk any friendly fire, so all 35 USAF bases within range would operate strictly under exercise-drill orders
* the incompetent pilots could aim a bulls-eye hit at 2 Manhattan skyscrapers and demolish all 3 of them
* another pilot, a total imbecile who couldn't balance on a bike, would aim his Boeing with unerring accuracy and hole-in-one the undefended headquarters of the world's greatest military establishment
* the fourth novice flyer would then find the only patch of dirt in the US that invisibly swallows planes on touchdown, so that no more than a charred passport would survive the impact, even when that fire wasn't quite so friendly.
Osama's script would have been awarded a rejection slip in Bollywood: it's just too reminiscent of any old Western.
I wonder how many long-suffering families of victims of the tragedy agree that Dubya's conspiracy theory doesn't even begin to explain the catastrophic events of that day?
Of course, we know now that Osama is an invention the CIA just as their conspiratorial media moguls fabricated those phoney computer-generated planes that fooled so many TV viewers on 9-11-01.
A Gospel from the New Apocrypha
[unAuthorised Version, Maison-Blanche, NY 02001]
Tim Osman is a 44-year-old former CIA intern who operated icognito in a Middle Earth cavern, fully-equipped with high-tech stuff like electricity and post-modern telecoms.
Early in the year AD 2001, Tim reverted to his muslim nom-de-plane.
Osama studied a few videos, borrowed one of Blackadder's ideas....and hatched a fiendishly-cunning plan, devilish in its detail, utterly impractical. Yet, according to the PerpeTraitors, Tim's impossible plan actually worked perfectly
* 19 flight-training school drop-outs would simultaneously hijack 4 airliners
* the allah-fearing muslim pilots would need a couple of hours to buzz the most secure airspace in the world and not risk any friendly fire, so all 35 USAF bases within range would operate strictly under exercise-drill orders
* the incompetent pilots could aim a bulls-eye hit at 2 Manhattan skyscrapers and demolish all 3 of them
* another pilot, a total imbecile who couldn't balance on a bike, would aim his Boeing with unerring accuracy and hole-in-one the undefended headquarters of the world's greatest military establishment
* the fourth novice flyer would then find the only patch of dirt in the US that invisibly swallows planes on touchdown, so that no more than a charred passport would survive the impact, even when that fire wasn't quite so friendly.
Osama's script would have been awarded a rejection slip in Bollywood: it's just too reminiscent of any old Western.
I wonder how many long-suffering families of victims of the tragedy agree that Dubya's conspiracy theory doesn't even begin to explain the catastrophic events of that day?
Of course, we know now that Osama is an invention the CIA just as their conspiratorial media moguls fabricated those phoney computer-generated planes that fooled so many TV viewers on 9-11-01.
You can watch them again, in awesome stop-motion video in "September Clues". Take very special note of the scene where the WTC fireball appears out of blue sky. You may not remember seeing that no-plane-all-sky scene on TV on 9-11. Yet you remember the shots of their stupid computer-graphic planes: they repeated as nauseum the horror scenes they wantedto brand you with, and they hoped you'd forgive them the mistakes that revealed they were still (almost) human.
Which scenario do you believe now? Do you believe your own eyes, or do you still buy their conspiratorial deceptions?
The bereaved families are still waiting patiently for the truth together with George W, to be exposed in the highest court in the land.
September Clues: the Lens that Highlights the Fistfulls of Fingerprints...
...the PerpeTraitors stuck around the 9-11 Crime Scenery
As Banksters Steal Barack's Bail-Out Billion$....
"Loose Change" - the 911 movie that finally woke Americans up
Health Warning: This video could be harmful to your health and sanity. DON'T watch this documentary if your blood pressure is high. I do not want you to risk a coronary from witnessing this amazing evidence fingering the real 9-11 conspirators (1hr 30mins
"Loose Change" presents in-your-face evidence, by far the most compelling argument ever that the 9-11 attack was an inside job. The film opens with an offense planned in secret by the military in 1962. Decades later the direct legacy drags on in the desert and cities of Iraq, as well as in the ongoing loss of "freedoms" of American citizens. The film received wide attention after it was featured on a Binghamton, New York local FOX affiliate, WICZ-TV (FOX 40). It is one of the most watched films on the Internet, with over 10 million viewers by 2006.(written and directed by Dylan Avery, produced by Korey Rowe, researcher Jason Bermas, technical adviser Matthew Brown)
Comments welcome....
...but stick to facts please
submit
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Aug 25, 2009 @ 3:47 am | in reply to Nick Sullivan
- I would agree that "no-planes" seems silly. Utterly improbable in fact.
It took me 6 months after 9-11 to realize no Boeing was involved in the Pentagon strike. I knew then that the PerpeTraitors (sic) were lying.. all of Them from Bush on Up.
It was nearly 6 years before I finally realized that ANY Boeing theory is impossible: for proof check September Clues...check Veronica Chapman's perceptive analysis at http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm
Forget computer-controlled cutting charges or nanothermate or any other conventional controlled demolition. I agree with "demolition" but try to understand just how utterly remarkable was the "control" part.
WTC1 and WTC2 were brought down by something vastly more sophisticated than dynamite. The very existence of the horrific weapon deployed on 6 buildings that day will remain military top-secret for decades.
Visit http://www.drjudywood.com Just try to explain ALL the anomalies Dr Wood identifies.
-
Reply
- Nick Sullivan Nick Sullivan Aug 25, 2009 @ 2:50 am
- I like your part dispelling the obvious ludicrousy of the official account. Anybody with half a brain who's looked into 9/11 knows that the official account is nonsense.
I'm also 100% convinced all three buildings came down by controlled demolition. The evidence is undeniable.
The "no plane theory" is really silly though. I'm not insulting you 'the author" on a personal level and admire you for trying to speak out against the bullshit but come on man, two planes hit the towers. That's not what brought them down, clearly they were demolished by explosives, hence the free-fall speed, mushroom clouds and SYMETRICAL collapses despite non-symetrical damage.
You really lend no credibility to those of use smart enough to see through the lies by trying to spread this no plane nonsense though man. Ignorant fools unfairly tarnish everyone who doubts the official account with this no plane brush. Two planes definitely hit the towers. Not sure about the Pentagon but definitely the towers.
-
Reply
- InsideJob InsideJob Jul 3, 2009 @ 2:41 am
- "September Clues" is 1:31 long, you can watch it on google video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6407548186293238834&hl=en
or download it from mininova dot org, its a torrent file, use "utorrent" (free).
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Jul 2, 2009 @ 4:19 am
- September Clues - New First half (2008)
http://www.blip.tv/file/1272900/
September Clues Full-Length version on Google Video (2006 59-minute)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8045542387672451515
The price is right for both ;-)
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Jul 2, 2009 @ 4:11 am
- Nothing.... but NOTHING....changed my world outlook,
than the day I finally knew that the people who thought
the planes were fakes were absolutely correct.
I became aware that previously unbelievable events
hid behind all of the BigMedia headlines
I also discovered to my surprise that when you remove
the Boeings from 9-11, every story now makes sense.
All the inconsistencies fall away.
I have one little question to repeat here
"How did they make those skyscrapers VANISH"?
We THOUGHT we saw the Twin Towers
simply fall down.
But how many of us stopped to check exactly
what we were REALLY looking at?
Look at the videos again: we can actually SEE
the buildings disappear into thin air.
No Planes for sure, but NO Controlled Demolition
either.
A couple of Super-Smart researchers have
quietly analysed all the available official photos
The science they've discovered is vastly more intriguing
than any suspense writer could possibly have invented
www.DrJudyWood.com/wtc
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Jul 2, 2009 @ 3:23 am
- New "September Clues" video shows How it Happened.
(video recently updated by the producer)
Watch the 9-11 PerpeTraitor-magicians pull
vid-fake Boeings out of thin air:
http://bit.ly/1aLcGo
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Jun 26, 2009 @ 8:20 pm
- Since I first wrote the above disparaging document, "September Clues" is available in full-length video...and of all the 9-11 research I've ever found anywhere it is by FAR the most convincing info on how AND WHY we must eliminate the ^*%#%^ BOEINGS.
The Monstrous Myth which has become embedding in the collective consciousness of the peopl of the BigMedia-consuming world has created (as of course the PerpeTraitors fully intended it so to create) the greast obstacle to the Truth being propagated...
Google "September Clues" and I'll be very surprised if the first of the 6 parts doesn't show you (AT LAST, maybe) that all 4 Boeings were either fakes or decoys....or both.
It will also serve to prove to your Doubting Friends (the ones that always knew you were Nice but a bit NutCase) that you are super-sharp and they need to find out before it's too late....that Obama is every bit as dictatorial as Dubja.
BTW Where's the Birth Certificate? What else is he hiding?
Miker
-
Reply
- hommedespoir hommedespoir Jan 2, 2008 @ 8:37 pm
- Surely none of the bereaved families still believe that ludicrous conspiracy theory about incompetent arab flight-school dropouts on first solo flights across totally-controlled airspace....let alone scoring a bulls-eye on the most heavily-defended military establishment in the world?
-
Reply
- NickCPhilly NickCPhilly Aug 26, 2007 @ 10:06 pm
- http://www.youtube.com/v/Rs_JNKw9dh0
Join the 9/11 Truth movement for a day of resistance at Ground Zero on 9/11/07.
-
Reply
- merlin617 merlin617 Jul 16, 2007 @ 8:32 am
- Book of revelations: "the final conflict will be on the Mounts of Megiddo, the final victor will be born in the west."
I used to think it would be an American president, I now think it could be Alex Jones (God bless and protect him)
BBC announces WTC7 collapse.... (8mins)
...while the building is seen on screen, still standing for another 20 minutes.
A fascinating video uncovered from BBC archives today shows BBC reporter Jane Stanley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her. You can forgive British TV people not recognising a New York landmark, but these guys must have been reading from a prepared script. Somebody must have known about the collapse of WTC7 at least twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11.
Hint: any controlled demolition job takes many weeks careful work to plan and prepare for. Trust me, I'm an architect ;) Google search to find evidence of this planning, you don't just have to take building owner Larry's word he pulled it ;) Even if he did put a big foot in his mouth.
Oh, and BTW: not long after this vid was first made public, the BBC "couldn't find the original tape". I wonder why?
Hint: any controlled demolition job takes many weeks careful work to plan and prepare for. Trust me, I'm an architect ;) Google search to find evidence of this planning, you don't just have to take building owner Larry's word he pulled it ;) Even if he did put a big foot in his mouth.
Oh, and BTW: not long after this vid was first made public, the BBC "couldn't find the original tape". I wonder why?
BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. More info at http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm
Runtime: 436
1044745 views
43932 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
9-11 was an American conspiracy
Rudi, lying through his teeth
Giuliani pases the buck, lies through his teeth
Who's really to blame for the Command Centre being located right in the middle of the disaster called 911?
Rudi points to everybody else, and then he walks...and walks...
Is he a rival to Dubya?
Rudi points to everybody else, and then he walks...and walks...
Is he a rival to Dubya?
The REAL Rudy: Command Center
http://TheRealRudy.org/ "It's just not possible." That was the sentence we heard over and over from families who had firefighter sons, brothers, husbands and fathers killed on 9/11, from experts on emergency response, and from investigative journalists. It was just not possible that Rudy could so distort what happened on 9/11 and his role on that terrible day.
Runtime: 428
303065 views
881 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
Firefighters Witnessed Explosions
EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY! / MacQueen NYFD 9/11 witnesses
Graeme MacQueen, Founding Director of the Centre for Peace Studies (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario) reads testimony from New York Fire Dept. firefighters: Angel Rivera: "When we hit the 19th floor, something horrendous happened. It was like a bomb went off. We thought we were dead. The whole building shook." NYFD Asst. Commissioner Stephen Gregory: I thought that I saw...low level flashes...I saw flash-flash-flash, and then it looked like the building came down. You know like when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw." Firefighter Daniel Rivera: "At first I thought it was... Do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear, 'pop-pop-pop-pop-pop'? That's exactly what, because I thought it was that, when I heard that frigging noise, that's when I saw the building coming down." NYFD Captain Karin Deshore: "Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash kept popping, all the way around the building, and that building had started to explode." The New York City Fire Department, under the direction of Fire Commissioner Tom Von Essen, collected the testimony of 503 first-responder EMTs, Port Authority police, and firefighters. It came to 12,000 pages. The 9/11 Commission, run by White House appointee and insider, Philip Zelikow, rejected the testimony, just ignored it, not germane to the foregone conclusion. Also, somewhat explosive. MacQueen's statement was drafted for the Vancouver 9/11 Conference, June 22-24, 2007. Snowshoe Documentary films (part 2 of 3)
Runtime: 612
65481 views
699 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
September 11, 2001 Dissected
by Joe Crubaugh
What really happened on September 11, 2001? There are too many speculations to examine in this space, but one ludicrous conspiracy theory deserves mention.
It goes like this:
A 44-year-old former CIA asset, operating out of a cave in Afghanistan, coordinated a plot whereby - without any inside help - four hijacked airliners, piloted by 19 flight school dropouts, flew around the most secure airspace in the world for almost two hours, unopposed by 35 in-range USAF bases. Then the incapable pilots brought down three (yes, 3) Manhattan skyscrapers, and even rammed a jet into the headquarters of the world's most technologically superior military without a single anti-aircraft missile being fired.
Many people who were witness and victim to the tragedy agree that, without help from both Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, this theory fails to explain the catastrophic events of that day. According to WTC maintenance employee, William Rodriguez:
"There's reality, and there's illusion.
"When illusion becomes reality, that's a problem. Nine-eleven is a giant illusion.
"Besides, what can they do to me? I'm a national hero, Bush told me so himself."
On September 11, 2001, Rodriguez opened locked stairwell doors for firefighters and single-handedly rescued 15 people. He was the last person to exit the North Tower alive.
An Opportune Nightmare
In criminal investigations, detectives look for a motive. In the case of the 9/11 tragedy, there were so many motives that it might be shorter to list who DIDN'T stand to benefit. Nevertheless, what follows are a few reasons some might have welcomed the attacks...
The Twin Towers Were an Asbestos Bombshell
Like many buildings built in the 1970s, the twin towers were constructed with vast quantities of cancer-causing asbestos. The cost of removing the Twin Tower asbestos? A year's worth of revenues at a minimum; possibly as much as the value of the buildings themselves.
The cost to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor would have run into the double-digit billions. In addition, the Port Authority was prohibited from demolishing the towers because the resulting asbestos dust would cover the entire city, which it did when they collapsed, resulting in many cancers with a confirmed link to the toxic WTC dust.
Despite its problematic condition, in January of 2001, Larry Silverstein made a $3.2 billion bid for the World Trade Center. On July 24 the Port Authority accepted the offer. Silverstein then too
What really happened on September 11, 2001? There are too many speculations to examine in this space, but one ludicrous conspiracy theory deserves mention.
It goes like this:
A 44-year-old former CIA asset, operating out of a cave in Afghanistan, coordinated a plot whereby - without any inside help - four hijacked airliners, piloted by 19 flight school dropouts, flew around the most secure airspace in the world for almost two hours, unopposed by 35 in-range USAF bases. Then the incapable pilots brought down three (yes, 3) Manhattan skyscrapers, and even rammed a jet into the headquarters of the world's most technologically superior military without a single anti-aircraft missile being fired.
Many people who were witness and victim to the tragedy agree that, without help from both Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, this theory fails to explain the catastrophic events of that day. According to WTC maintenance employee, William Rodriguez:
"There's reality, and there's illusion.
"When illusion becomes reality, that's a problem. Nine-eleven is a giant illusion.
"Besides, what can they do to me? I'm a national hero, Bush told me so himself."
On September 11, 2001, Rodriguez opened locked stairwell doors for firefighters and single-handedly rescued 15 people. He was the last person to exit the North Tower alive.
An Opportune Nightmare
In criminal investigations, detectives look for a motive. In the case of the 9/11 tragedy, there were so many motives that it might be shorter to list who DIDN'T stand to benefit. Nevertheless, what follows are a few reasons some might have welcomed the attacks...
The Twin Towers Were an Asbestos Bombshell
Like many buildings built in the 1970s, the twin towers were constructed with vast quantities of cancer-causing asbestos. The cost of removing the Twin Tower asbestos? A year's worth of revenues at a minimum; possibly as much as the value of the buildings themselves.
The cost to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor would have run into the double-digit billions. In addition, the Port Authority was prohibited from demolishing the towers because the resulting asbestos dust would cover the entire city, which it did when they collapsed, resulting in many cancers with a confirmed link to the toxic WTC dust.
Despite its problematic condition, in January of 2001, Larry Silverstein made a $3.2 billion bid for the World Trade Center. On July 24 the Port Authority accepted the offer. Silverstein then too
This article has been posted unedited, in its entirety, in terms of permission granted by www.ezinearticles.com
This is the most concise and accurate summary of researched accounts of events of 9-11-01 I've read. I personally would endorse the analysis as well as the conclusions, both stated and implied.
All credit for the article is due entirely to the author, Joe Crubaugh.
I would also commend very highly for your attention the following 911 videos in the modules below.
Many researchers are still reluctant to face certain facts, and an enormous amount of energy is spent explaining the inexplicable. I have described on another lens why I personally am certain that there were no planes flying into any of the WTC buildings, nor into the Pentagon. The evidence for faking the planes is totally overwhelming, and you don't have to look far to find it. Once I accepted that fact, ALL the other conflicting evidence fell into place. There's disinformation everywhere.
It takes no imagination to realise why the perpetraitors would especially not want us to know there were no planes, remotely or otherwise, involved in the demolition of the 3 WTC towers.
Obviously even they can't hide the fact that no plane hit WTC7: clearly it was a conventional demolition to control (although it would have taken weeks to plan and prepare). However, they will follow Saddam to their graves rather than admit the actual means by which the Twin Towers were obliterated.
If you looked very closely again at the photo at the top of the page, (or go to http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/ for a better photo) you'd see a building that is neither collapsing following a jet-fuel fire, nor falling neatly (as did WTC7) under controlled demolition.
Looks to me, it's exploding like a mini-nuke.
The notion behind my hint seemed at first to be even more ridiculous than the no-planes idea, but again, the more I look into the evidence, the clearer the more realistic is the conclusion.
Feel free to comment, Guestbook provided ;)
This is the most concise and accurate summary of researched accounts of events of 9-11-01 I've read. I personally would endorse the analysis as well as the conclusions, both stated and implied.
All credit for the article is due entirely to the author, Joe Crubaugh.
I would also commend very highly for your attention the following 911 videos in the modules below.
Many researchers are still reluctant to face certain facts, and an enormous amount of energy is spent explaining the inexplicable. I have described on another lens why I personally am certain that there were no planes flying into any of the WTC buildings, nor into the Pentagon. The evidence for faking the planes is totally overwhelming, and you don't have to look far to find it. Once I accepted that fact, ALL the other conflicting evidence fell into place. There's disinformation everywhere.
It takes no imagination to realise why the perpetraitors would especially not want us to know there were no planes, remotely or otherwise, involved in the demolition of the 3 WTC towers.
Obviously even they can't hide the fact that no plane hit WTC7: clearly it was a conventional demolition to control (although it would have taken weeks to plan and prepare). However, they will follow Saddam to their graves rather than admit the actual means by which the Twin Towers were obliterated.
If you looked very closely again at the photo at the top of the page, (or go to http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/ for a better photo) you'd see a building that is neither collapsing following a jet-fuel fire, nor falling neatly (as did WTC7) under controlled demolition.
Looks to me, it's exploding like a mini-nuke.
The notion behind my hint seemed at first to be even more ridiculous than the no-planes idea, but again, the more I look into the evidence, the clearer the more realistic is the conclusion.
Feel free to comment, Guestbook provided ;)
by hommedespoir
Hello VideoViewers!
I've made it something of a personal mission to try and uncover what really happened on 9-11-01. What I present on this page is car...
(more)Explore related pages
Conspiracy Theories- I have long been fascinated by Conspiracy Theories - 911, The Illuminati, Diana'...
Ron Paul: The Best Hope For America Ever- But let it not be said that we did nothing. Let not those who love the power of...
PNAC- A look at The Project For The New American Century.
Watch 9-11 TV shots in extreme close-up: Original scenes deceived the experts too- by Mike Rose You've probably seen much of this TV footage before... it's all be...
