The Doubtful World of Roy Spencer
The greatest irony of Roy Spencer is that while he presents himself as a voice of skepticism and doubt, he has actually aligned himself with organizations that promote the opposite of doubt. Working with the Interfaith Stewardship Alliance, Spencer has been part of an effort to advocate environmental policy that's based on a "Biblical view" rather than science. Spencer has also been a defender of the pseudoscience of "Intelligent Design" Creationism, saying that the theory of evolution is really just a kind of religion.
Making science conform with previously-held beliefs isn't something that a true skeptic would do. The more one examines Mr. Spencer's work, the less he appears to be a skeptic, and the more he appears to be a simple ideologue. This lens is dedicated to an examination of Roy Spencer, and his rather partisan political agenda.
Sources on Roy Spencer
Independent information about Roy Spencer's political agenda
- Roy Spencer Profile
- DeSmog's information about Roy Spencer's agenda
- Roy Spencer Fact Sheet
- Basic facts about Roy Spencer from Exxon Secrets
- Roy Spencer on DDT, Evolution and Climate Change
- Deltoid on ScienceBlogs links to some more of Roy Spencer's more eccentric ideas
- Roy Spencer Debated
- Dr. Todd Albert debates Roy Spencer
- What if Roy Spencer is Right?
- Article questions: If Roy Spencer is right, does that mean that it's not a good idea to work with eco-innovation anyway?
- Roy Spencer is a Creationist
- The Way Things Break reviews Roy Spencer's Creationism
- Roy Spencer's Global Warming Muths?
- Roy Spencer's inattention to detail is critiqued in this article.
A History of Error and Bias
Roy Spencer has a history of mistakes with statistics, and mixing his politics and religion with his science
Roy Spencer gets lots of attention going on TV talk shows telling other people what's wrong with their science, but Spencer himself wouldn't withstand such scrutiny very well.Spencer's most famous research was into tropospheric temperatures that he claimed proved that global temperatures were cooling, not warming. It turned out that Spencer had made significant mathematical mistakes in his research, however, and when these mistakes were corrected for, Spencer's research showed warming, not cooling. In spite of these developments, global warming deniers still cite the old research as proof that global warming is a hoax.
There are more fundamental problems with Roy Spencer's approach to scientific work, however. His book on climate change science actually begins with a denial that scientific data are relevant to the debate. He demeans the data as "blindingly technical statistics".
If the facts aren't important to Roy Spencer's science, then what is? Religion, it seems, forms the foundation of Spencer's research. He's worked with a group called the Interfaith Stewardship Alliance, which states that climate policy should be based upon the religious prophecies of the Bible. Roy Spencer also argues that biology classes in public high schools should include the Christian Creationist curriculum of Intelligent Design Theology.
Roy Spencer's work with organizations that are funded by fossil-fuel giant Exxon-Mobil show, however, that religion isn't all that motivates his "scientific" work. Plain old money seems to play quite a large role as well.
Your Thoughts on Roy Spencer
Is Roy Spencer a credible source?
Give your thoughts here about the public relations career of Roy Spencer.
-
Reply
- hugh hugh Oct 24, 2009 @ 3:16 pm
- Most of the science on the left is benefiting tremendously from government funding of alarmist positions. People who call themselves liberals won't listen to anyone who is conservative or Christian. You liberals are the greatest deceivers and liars of all time, yet you accuse others who oppose you of opposing only for the purpose of gain. Open your eyes. This is not political. Conservatives who research this are trying to find out the facts and not jump to erroneous conclusions as you people seem to want to do.
-
Reply
- Rolf Westgard Rolf Westgard Sep 12, 2009 @ 10:32 am
- The number of charlatans denying the crrent warming cycle is dwindling. We still have Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma who knows even less about the subject than Al gore.
-
Reply
- bildterberg bildterberg Aug 1, 2009 @ 5:50 pm
- Jonathan, An advice: Leave this project and concentrate instead on
Your good journalistic work at globalresearch.ca
-
Reply
- bildterberg bildterberg Jun 23, 2009 @ 7:47 am
- Check these curves out:
http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/
Not very alarming amount of global warming here I should say.
I recommend the site above for those who would like to
get some overview of Dr Spencers research.
Maybe the most interesting issue is the sign of
the feedback from low clouds. In the IPCC-AR4 ch8 the sign of
that feedback is proposed to be positive.
Spencer points out indications that the sign
instead could be negative, which in turn implies the need of some
major revision of the IPCC model "projections" of future temperatures.
.
-
Reply
- Karl Karl Jun 19, 2009 @ 10:13 am
- Paul,
Kudos! You are absolutely right ... all you have to do is look at the current facts regarding his research to know how right he is, or at the very least, great unbiased attention needs to be paid to his work.
People like Ireggularworld totally frost me with their arguments and are part of the problem we have today.
1) They automatically discredit anyone that is a christian as not being legitimate. By the way, some of the most intelligent people I know and leaders in their fields of science and research are devout christians. Should we only listen to non-believers and satan worshippers as having the real facts.
2) His "follow the money" remark about who funds research as determining validity. He doesn't know that Al Gore is a major partner in one of the largest "Green" financial funds there is and is making millions off of investments in this fund and we are sopposed to belive he is some unbiased expert.
Typical left, regurgitate the party line..totally confused by facts.
- Load More





