Animals Should Be Rescued After a Natural Disaster

Ranked #8,586 in Culture & Society, #174,908 overall | Donates to Humane Society of the United States

HERE'S WHAT I THINK - Animals Should Be Rescued After a Natural Disaster

Animals are living creatures that experience pain and sadness and they deserve to be rescued. The efforts to save animals are totally independent of the efforts to save human lives. So, I am not talking about a rescue effort that leaves a child to save an animal. There are organizations and people whose job it is to save the lives of animals in times of disaster.

Animals are important for so many reasons. My reason is purely for love but in Haiti the animals are needed for transportation and labor. In some disasters people are devastated by the loss of a pet that is part of their family. In other disasters treasured wildlife is the heart of the country. Take a look and see why we should save the animals in times of natural disaster.


Not Left Behind Available at Amazon

Don't Forget The Animals!

Please watch the videos below. They tell a story that can't be told with words.

Hurricane Katrina Animal Rescue

Loading

Not Left Behind: Rescuing the Pets of New Orleans

Not Left Behind: Rescuing the Pets of New Orleans

Amazon Price: $8.13 (as of 02/16/2012)Buy Now

Not Left Behind is the story of how Best Friends Animal Society rescued thousands of pets from the storm-ravaged, flooded streets of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. The story is told through the images of Best Friends photographer Troy Snow and the words of five Best Friends rescuers-frontline troops representing thousands of volunteers across the country who helped save lives and reunite families.

Victorian Bushfires Animal and Wildlife Victims - Donate to the RSPCA

Loading

Well, What Do You Think?

Should Animals Be Rescued After a Natural Disaster?

Loading Fetching blurbs now... please stand by

Yes, you're right! The animals should also be saved.

prisilla says:

yes because it is sad to see things that its not right to treat animals wrong from others and they should be save by all they have been throw to.

Shobha Malhotra says:

Absolutely...no discussion on this>

Jack2205 says:

The animals should be saved. It might make it easier for the people going through the disaster if they could be reunited with their pets. They wouldn't lose them along with everything else that they lost.

imaginemdd says:

If people prepare for a 'what if' with their animals, it will help enormously. Chances are that people who are prepared as much as they can be for themselves and their families are also going to consider the animals in their 'families,' too. I wrote a lens about pets and earthquakes and it really opened my eyes about how much you can do to prepare all around. Yes, people first. People also suffer the loss of their homes and their pets. There's so much suffering and loss.

Sylvestermouse says:

Well, everyone knows my heart for animals by now. They need our help too. There is absolutely no reason why animal rescue workers could not or should not work to save as many lives as possible. Seriously, does anyone think any of the people willing to save an animal wouldn't save a person if they found one trapped or hurt. For that matter, a lot of the people there trying to help people would help a trapped animal. Rescuers are just that. They rescue the one closest to them that needs help. Some are specially trained to help animals and some are specially trained to help humans. I think we should support everyone willing to help out in their own field of expertise. I think God for every willing pair of hands in service to others.

FernLady says:

I absolutely want the people saved first. I couldn't stop crying yesterday seeing parents desperate to find their children as time is running out. However, I also appreciate concern for saving the animals. I remember during Katrina people were being reunited with their pets and they were heartwarming stories in the midst of such tragedy.

kimmanleyort says:

Animal rescue teams should be a presence along with the organizations working to save people. I remember reading about people during Katrina who were devastated about the loss of their pets.

TheWhistler says:

ABSOLUTELY! Not only for themselves but for what they do for humans, to bad humans seldom do the same for them. Also a lot of people will not leave their animals in a disaster. I know I couldn't. I would never be able to live with myself.

EelKat says:

Yes. And not just natural disasters either. When our house burned down 4 years ago, my dog was trapped inside. A fireman went in to get him. I am forever grateful to him for going in there and bringing my Buddy out.

OhMe says:

Definitely, the animals should be saved and I am so glad that there are organizations who do that.

No! I don't have anything against animals but all efforts should be used to save people.

eclecticeducation says:

I think people need to come first. Yes, animals should be rescued, if it won't keep a person from being rescued, it won't get in the way of human search and rescue teams and if it won't put a human at risk to save it.

rms says:

People have to come first, and then save the animals.

vanidiana says:

We can make a different team to focus rescuing the animals.

happynutritionist says:

I wish there was a choice for both, but since I lean toward all efforts going first to people, I'll put my post here, but I LOVE animals and they are an immediate second after every living human possible has been rescued...and if they come across an animal in need in the process, of course, help it:-)

bethd821 says:

I'm as much as animal lover as anyone else, but I think people should come first, too. Animals have more honed instincts and are better at survival than people. This is a great debate and I was really torn as to which side to write on.

spirituality says:

It really depends on the natural disaster in my book. If it's between helping a human and an animal - I say help the human. But if there is energy, money, manpower to help the animals as well as the humans, please do help both.

I know people get traumatized of natural disasters, loosing their house, their pets, their children, their parents, neighbours, friends, loved ones... But in that list losing people is still worse than losing a pet. Sure: if on that plane there's room for a pet, and not for a child, rescue the pet. But refusing to help a human because there is a pet to be rescued is just foolish. Sorry to say it.

If push comes to shove I do think the dog, cat or paraquat has a higher chance of being able to fend for itself without human help anyhow.

Pukeko says:

I agree completely with Kab. People first. Then animals, except in the case where they may be needed for food. (Yes we do have love our pets, but this question is about disaster and emergency)

newbizmau says:

I agree with Kab. There is so much devastation that if we don't help the people of Haiti, how can we ever expect it to be a safe place for the pets and animals to live. This is a great topic, but I can barely think of the animals when there are now so many homeless people, and children that now need adopting. There are over 900 children on their way to the US and there are plenty more left behind. They need more than our charity right now. They need a hero.

kab says:

People first. Then animals. Once the people are all safe and cared for, then efforts can be made to help the animals. If a boat is sinking, I want the life rafts filled with people. If the weight limit will not fit another human, then by all means, toss a Chihuahua in. The last man on the boat can feel free to let as many animals on the last raft as he can. I apply the same rules to natural disasters on a larger scale. People should not starve so that animals can eat. People should not suffer so animals can have medical supplies. Help the animals, yes. But not at the expense of humans.

 

HELP AUSTRALIAN ANIMAL FIRE VICTIMS

Loading

Horses of the Storm: The Incredible Rescue of Katrina's Horses

Horses of the Storm: The Incredible Rescue of Katrina's Horses

Amazon Price: $12.45 (as of 02/16/2012)Buy Now

On August 29, 2005, the United States suffered one of the worst disasters ever when Hurricane Katrina slammed into southern Louisiana and the Gulf Coast. In the midst of uncertainty and chaos was born the largest equine rescue ever. Horses of the Storm is a collection of grippingand ultimately inspiringfirst-hand accounts of how the Louisiana State Universitys Equine Rescue Team spearheaded a dedicated group of heroic staff and volunteers that saved hundreds of horses. In addition, Horses of the Storm will also contain a take-away of tips to prepare horse owners before, during, and after a disaster.

We Donate To the Humane Society of the United States

Take a Look!

The Humane Society of the United States seeks a humane and sustainable world for all animals-a world that will also benefit people. We are America's mainstream force against cruelty, exploitation and neglect, as well as the most trusted voice extolling th

Take a Look at These Sites!

Loading

Guestbook

Thanks for Visiting!

submit

More Great Horse and Pony Sites

Take a Look!

Loading

About This Animal Loving HorseAndPony

Loading

by

HorseAndPony

I am an animal lover and think animals should be saved after a natural disaster. What do you think? Take part in this debate and let your thoughts b... more »

Feeling creative? Create a Lens!

Become a Horse Rescue Volunteer  

Loading

Giving Thanks for The Horse  

Loading