Sex and the Internet
Ranked #94,253 in Computers & Electronics, #1,510,116 overall | Donates to KIVA
How-To Use Sex on the Internet without being a Pervert
I play with the WordTracker service like some people play sudoku or scrabble, or crossword puzzles. It seems pointless yet I enjoy the challenge of finding interesting words and phrases to use as content starters.
Books About Sex from Amazon.com
Can We Reclaim Sex as Normal & Natural?
sex , WordTracker, and SEO Miracles
Surprising Things About Sex
For months I've been trying to find key phrases that DON'T involve sex. Finally, I ran the word sex (as an exact match) and was surprised to learn that "sex" has an excellent KEI of 66.659!
I'd assumed that the word sex was overexposed.The truth is that despite millions, six-hundred and ninty-six million to be more exact (696,000,000) competing pages, there is still a need on the web for content about sex.
The numbers are higher if you count spelling variations like Sex, SEX, SEx, and SeX. We live in a strange world.
WordTracker estimates that google will send a high-ranking site 169,489 visitors in a 24 hour period! MSN would send 204,251 and Yahoo! would send 46,002. This is major traffic. Even if people were just dropping by to see look it would be exciting and profitable if you had ads that pay per view.
If people actually hung out for a while, clicked a few AdSense ads and purchased something life would be great.
What's the downside to sex as content? Would you have to have sleazy naked pictures? Could you have nice art nudes instead? Would people stay to debate the difference?
Could you build repeat traffic without being Victoria's Secret or some other soft porn site? Could you be a soft porn site and live with yourself?
These are things to think about. Sex is after all a normal human function that most normal adults engage in or a regular basis. As a content provider should you just totally banish it from your arsenal of possibilities? Could the non-pervs among us reclaim perfectly good, innocent words like sex and woman from the people who have turn them into "nasty", to-be-avoided" words? Is it worth the effort to try? If we decided that it was how would we start? I'm a curious woman so I ask, I wonder, I'd truly like to know.
I'd assumed that the word sex was overexposed.The truth is that despite millions, six-hundred and ninty-six million to be more exact (696,000,000) competing pages, there is still a need on the web for content about sex.
The numbers are higher if you count spelling variations like Sex, SEX, SEx, and SeX. We live in a strange world.
WordTracker estimates that google will send a high-ranking site 169,489 visitors in a 24 hour period! MSN would send 204,251 and Yahoo! would send 46,002. This is major traffic. Even if people were just dropping by to see look it would be exciting and profitable if you had ads that pay per view.
If people actually hung out for a while, clicked a few AdSense ads and purchased something life would be great.
What's the downside to sex as content? Would you have to have sleazy naked pictures? Could you have nice art nudes instead? Would people stay to debate the difference?
Could you build repeat traffic without being Victoria's Secret or some other soft porn site? Could you be a soft porn site and live with yourself?
These are things to think about. Sex is after all a normal human function that most normal adults engage in or a regular basis. As a content provider should you just totally banish it from your arsenal of possibilities? Could the non-pervs among us reclaim perfectly good, innocent words like sex and woman from the people who have turn them into "nasty", to-be-avoided" words? Is it worth the effort to try? If we decided that it was how would we start? I'm a curious woman so I ask, I wonder, I'd truly like to know.
Free Bonus Text
6 "clean sex" key phrases with good KEI's
Books About Sex from Amazon.com
What's more natural and normal than sex?
by MultiPurpose-Woman
I'm Gwendolyn Kelly, ... * web site owner: Join me at MultiPurpose-Woman; * visual artist (BFA & MA in Fine Arts from the University of Louisville)... more »
- 0 featured lenses
- Winner of 2 trophies!
- Top lens »
Feeling creative?
Create a Lens!