Branding (for body art)

1 - I can do better 2 - Jury's out 3 - Pretty darn good 4 - Splendiferous 5 - Awesometastic by 11 people | Log in to rate

Ranked #584 in How-To, #5,729 overall

Body Art By Burning

Branding was most often used historically to mark property, most often livestock but also sometimes human.  It was also utilized as a method of marking or punishing criminals both in Europe and Asia, and as recently as the founding US Pilgrim fathers.

In modern day body art, the technique is being explored as a way of making a monochromatic, permanent skin design which is more organic in line and color than what is created by tattooing.

Types of Branding 

  • Strike Branding - this is where a branding iron is made, heated and then pressed against the skin. DO NOT USE ANYTHING MADE FOR BRANDING ANIMALS, WOOD OR FOOD UNLESS YOU WANT A GIGANTIC BLOB OF SCAR TISSUE.
  • Electro-Cautery Branding - this technique is done using a medical device originally designed to stop bleeding by sealing the bleeding blood vessels.
  • Direct Fire Branding - this method involves putting something in direct contact with the skin and lighting it on fire so that it leaves burns.

Modern Discussions of Body Art Branding 

All of the books listed here, I own. They discuss and show branding in the modern body art context. Info includes techniques, story of specific brands and pictures of brandings in action. This is not something that should be undertaken lightly or done at home by person's without training in the procedures.

The last book I actually contributed to, and it includes pictures of my own brandings.

Modern Primitives (Re/Search)

Avg. Customer Rating: Amazon Rating

Amazon Price: (as of 01/06/2010) Buy Now
List Price: $19.50
Used Price: $19.96

ModCon: The Secret World Of Extreme Body Modification

Avg. Customer Rating: Amazon Rating

Amazon Price: (as of 01/06/2010) Buy Now
List Price: $29.99
Used Price: $138.87

Tattoos - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References

Avg. Customer Rating: Amazon Rating

Amazon Price: $28.95 (as of 01/06/2010) Buy Now
List Price: $28.95
Used Price: $21.95

Usually ships in 24 hours

Branding Links and Info 

Multi-Strike and Electro-Cautery Branding
Featuring branding, the deliberate use of burning for aesthetic body decoration. Includes multi-strike branding, electro-cautery method.
Leg Branding
I had 3 rings branded around my calf on September 3rd, 2000, Labor Day Weekend, with an electrocautery by Steve Haworth along with assistant Beki.
Fakir Intensives - Basic Branding Course
The Basic Branding Course is designed for those who wish to expand their skills in the Body Arts by learning "The Kiss of Fire".
Aftercare from Infinite Body
The healing of a branding goes through two stages: a initial healing period during which the skin is open and scabbing (2 - 6 weeks), and a longer period during which the scar tissue forms and stabilizes (2 - 12 months).
NecroRogIcon » Blog Archive » My Branding
I love my branding! I've wanted one for years, and when a friend said that she was learning how to brand and needed an initial 'victim' to test her skills on, I jumped at the opportunity.
Branding
Much as designs can be inked or cut into the skin, they can also be burned. Designed and executed by an experienced body artist, branding can produce subtle and organic body art designs.

Let Us Know What You Think Of Branding! 

Loading poll. Please Wait...

Branding Irons for Anything EXCEPT Humans 

antiques and collectibles, cooking accessories, art and woodworking

None of these branding irons should be used on human skin. The nature of our flesh combined with several healing factors is such that to use any of these items will result in a huge blob of unrecognizable scar tissue and not an aesthetic design.

Loading Fetching new data from eBay now... please stand by
eBay

Branding Q&A 

I got the following question sent to me recently and thought I'd share my reply with all of you...

Q: Is it safe to get branded right on your spine? Could it cause damage?

A: I would not recommend branding right over the spine at all. It really doesn't have enough meat and padding to support a brand well. And, since these are deliberate 3rd degree burns down into the middle skin layers, I personally would not brand someone right on their spine. On the off chance that an accident happened and a deeper burn occurred, it would be probably be lawsuit-level damage.

Brands are best done on the areas of the body that are flatter with more muscle and body fat. The shoulder blade area of the back is more suitable as it has much more muscle mass on it. Upper arms, thighs and calves are also good locations. Remember the more this area flexes and moves, or gets rubbed by clothing, the harder and more painful it is going to be to heal. And healing a brand takes forever compared to a tattoo.

To Brand or Not To Brand 

How do you feel about branding?

Loading Fetching blurbs now... please stand by

I really like branding

Maria says:

I have 2 strike brands on my back. One is our initials and the other is a heart with swirls. It took some time and a lot of strikes to form but it didn't hurt anymore than a tattoo. Both my brands have healed white but I should think that has something to do with placement.

Jack says:

I'm branding my sub in january and both her and i are really excited about it. its a big step for her and i am proud of her for it. But it shouldnt be taken lightly its there for life

steve says:

hey i just got a frat brand on my left bicep. it burn down to the fat. how do i take care of it?

Nelson says:

I have a P on my are for Pirate. I've never been a huge branding or tattoo guy but this is sick. I really like it.

jackson says:

As I was growing up, I did a few brands, scars and tattoos on myself as a rite of passage. I needed ritual to move on and was not getting that from my family or community. I did these in private places and only those most intimate with me know they are there. I am a professional and I am glad they are not visible. They are there only for me. They mark times when I had to make hard decisions. Branding was the most painful of my self markings. They have faded just to scars over the last 15 years. I didn't know what I was doing. My last brand, ironically, was to remind me to be gentle with myself and to allow myself the same forgiveness I extend to others. Please be gentle with yourself.

Getting burnt is not my idea of body art

luvmyludwig says:

I am by no means against anyone else having themselves branded, but it's not for me. I have a tat now, and want some more in the future. I would also love to have a few piercings. To each his own, but no way, no how, do I want to be burned on purpose. :)

CM says:

I am here for research. I am writing an essay on tattoos and one of my sub-topics is covering the different forms of tattooing. I have several tattoos myself and recently had my back piece finished, which covers half of my back. Although I love tattoos and I feel that everyone has a right to express themselves however they choose, I think human branding is very extreme and should not for the faint of heart. According to the research I have done, branding often takes twice as long as getting a traditional tattoo and is at least twice as painful.

Kaos says:

I've always felt that "body art" which is not yet culturally "mainstream" is often more of a psychological than aesthetic statement. Women having their ears pierced has for sometime be accepted as something quite ordinary in Western Culture, just as facial scarification is quite ordinary in some African cultures. As such it is indicative of nothing more than a preference for a particular aesthetic or part of a cultural ritual, about as peculiar as male circumcision. Having met many individuals with more, uh... exotic body piercings, it is evident to me that it is not simply and always an aesthetic preference, but in many cases a statement about one's level of psychological development. Before anyone accuses me of claiming that some people's piercings mean they are not "normal" people, let me say that normal is a meaningless term since it assumes that "deviation" from some accepted norm is pathological. "Normal" is useless because it leaves no room for expressive individuality. On the other hand, the term "ordinary," in my experience, defines a line between what is common and what is uncommon, the uncommon often indicating a need to express individuality in ways that are regarded as oppositional, odd, peculiar, attention grabbing, etc. On closer examination a good many of such individuals choosing more extreme forms of body art appear to need some sort of external evidence of individuality to resolve an internal ambiguity or lack of confidence. Often, there is other corroborating evidence that such individuals find it difficult to think comfortably of themselves with an "ordinary everyday identity" and so they resort to extreme, painful or risky body modification (mortification, scarification, mutilation) to confirm or call attention to there individuality when in fact all of us are already special and quite unique, just like everyone else. I'm sure I'll take a lot of heat for suggesting that cultural definitions of "ordinary" say something about psychological development, and that "culturally extreme" forms of personal expression, including body "art" that is not ordinary, is often a way to compensate externally for validation by something visible and extreme, at least to intimates if not the general public, since it is not possible for them to accomplish this internally.If one looks at human development, what one finds is the gradual development of internal tolerance for resolving psychological difficulty and the abandonment of needing to engage the outside world to resolve an internal issue. What I am suggesting and which I do not expect to be a popular view here is that scarification in Western cultures, is not infrequently mutilation as a compensation, or, according to some authors, related to addictions since it may be accompanied by the release of endorphins to such a degree that the craving cannot be resisted. But I do wonder why it is that most individuals who will criticize my view, which is by no means absolute and serves only to demarcate a debatable spectrum, would not choose to brand their face. Neither would most agree that cutting off of the last third of one's pinky was defensible as an aesthetic choice any more than they would agree that someone insisting that amputating a limb or removing one's nose was simply consistent with a particular aesthetic. Before you start in with the heat, recognize that I believe there is a spectrum and that not everyone who chooses this form of expression is "extra-ordinary."

 
view all 31 comments