Renewable Energy Sources

Nanotechnology is a simple short term solution for implementing alternative, renewable energy systems. It is a cost effective way to implement solar and wind power systems, which generally depend on the weather for energy output. By using chemical techniques inexpensive solutions of nanoparticles can be prepared and applied to materials for use in ultra capacitors. These units will be cost effective and will conduct electricity at a higher rate than is currently possible. Nanotechnology can be used in battery technology. Nanocomposite materials greatly increase the surface area at which chemical reactions occur in batteries. It enables increases in the battery's output while reducing it's size. In the long term nanotechnology could enable power to be harnessed from renewable sources and stored until we use the power at a later time. This is a technology whose time has come as we don't have a system in place that effectively stores power in this fashion. However there are researchers who are working in this direction and new discoveries are coming almost daily. It is almost the way every major innovation in our country has occurred. When the internal combustion engine was developed, there were several inventors working toward the same end without any of them having any knowledge of what the other was doing! The same could be said of the steam engine. Credit for a great deal of this information comes from material written by David Walker and Dr. Mark Daugherty of IPC Corporation. This technology is another advent in getting to a place where we free ourselves from costly fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy.

This is an example of science providing a solution to a problem that seems mundane. There have been many detractors of solar power whose main defense has been no way to store surplus power. That is an old tired excuse and there are many more ways than the one indicated here to store solar power. We must consider the economy and the environment when we make our decisions regarding renewable energy sources and alternative energy.

The kitchen shown above is stylish, up to the minute, utilitarian, and completely solar powered!

In August of 2008 the town of Rock Port Missouri announced that they had the first completely wind powered community in United States history. There are only four wind turbines supplying all of the power that Rock Port needs. Rock Port is a small city with only a little over 1300 residents. Rock Port's wind power is supplied by four wind turbines on agricultural lands inside the city limits of Rock Port which is in Atchison County. They use 13 million kilowatt hours of electricity each year. The four turbines will probably produce around 16 million kilowatt hours per year.
The excess power generated but not used will be purchased by the Missouri Joint Municipal Utilities for use elsewhere. At the University of Missouri, Extension specialists say that there are opportunities for wind power to be used in northwest Missouri.
Currently 24 wind turbines operate in Atchison County, 24 operate in Nodaway County, and 27 operate in Gentry County. University of Missouri Extension specialist say that wind farms will produce 1.1 million dollars a year in county real estate taxes. The taxes will be paid by wind energy developer Wind Capitol Group from St. Louis Missouri. This is a situation heretofore unheard of (the increase in tax dollars) in rural areas like these. Using wind power will help landowners in these areas, as they will lease part of their property for wind turbines at rates of 3,000 to 5,000 dollars.
The success of this venture is bringing other wind energy companies out to look at possibly acquiring sites in northwest Missouri. According to a U.S. Department of Energy map northwest Missouri has the state's highest level of wind resources. It also shows that a number of locations in this area would be suitable for wind development on a utility scale.
There is a 20 year life span for the turbines being used in Missouri, therefore they will provide electricity for that period before they would need to be replaced. The community will benefit greatly from this as they save money as well as the electric power companies in the area. An unexpected benefit is curiosity brings visitors from other areas which adds money received from tourism.
This is another example of the practicality of using renewable energy and thereby reducing CO2 emissions as well as eliminating greenhouse gas. We must lobby our elected officials to see that this is going to be one of the ways we save our environment and our planet.

This is a story that has implications for all of us. We can repeat this success all over the country with a little know-how and hard work. I thing everyone is ready this is the start of a new economy.

The car shown above here is the Tesla Roadster, it is a beautiful automobile. What is even more beautiful is the fact that no gas is required. 'Filling' this vehicle only requires an electrical outlet. I show this car to show the high end of electric car. This car will go from 0-60mph in 4 seconds. A charge will take you up to 250 miles and cost only $5, good by any standards.The founder of this company expressed it well. To paraphrase he said, you don't have to have an electric car that resembles a souped up golf cart. The 92,000 dollar price tag means this is a luxury vehicle. It looks and runs better than most gas powered luxury vehicles. There are more cars shown below, and they are futuristic,well engineered and they are electric! Take it from me the new generation of vehicle will take us neatly into a future that is carbon dioxide free and sustainable.
The first car shown was invented by William Morrison in 1887 and he exhibited it in a parade. New York used electric cars as taxis in the early 1900's.
The second car shown below is the Dodge EV. From 0 to 60mph in 5 seconds. This car is the American answer to the Tesla Roadster, so it is not an average consumer car. This 2 passenger electric rear wheel drive will take you 150-200 miles on one charge. It travels at speeds up to 120mph and has 270 horse power. Simply plug it in and go!

The next car shown below is the Venturi Volage Roadster. All electric vehicle with 295 horse power, and 1711 pounds of torque, and will travel from 0-60 in 5 seconds. It will reach speeds of 160mph and will travel 200 miles on one charge. The car weighs 2,369 pounds and each wheel is independently powered. It goes into production in 2012. The second picture of the Venturi is to show those doors, very nice!

The next in line is the Nissan NuVu all electric vehicle. This vehicle's roof is lined with a dozen solar panels. It seats 3 and is 3.3 meters long. The maximum speed is 75mph and it will travel 80 miles on one charge. The powertrain runs on 2 lithium batteries and will start production in 2010. I wanted to show the outside and inside of this vehicle as the inside is really well done.

This next car is the Chrysler Pea Pod. It is a neighborhood electric vehicle, perfect for urban and suburban areas for short trips or commutes. It seats four and it is 114 inches long. It weighs 2,200 pounds, and the maximum speed is 25mph. The need for 2 pictures is the unusual shape and you can see the inside from the side view.

This next one is the Super Slim Lumeneo Simera EV. It is a 2 seat 4 wheeled electric vehicle narrow enough to manuver like a motorcycle. It has dual electric motors with 20hp power wheels. The car is 2.4 meters long (around 8 feet) and 80 cm wide (less than 3 feet) and lithium ion battery power. This vehicle is priced at between 20-30 thousand Euros. It will be in production by 2009.

Last but certainly not least, is the Chevrolet Volt. This is an electric vehicle that will run on gas after 40 miles electric travel. The time it spends running on gas is mostly to charge the lithium ion battery pack. It's price tag is 30-50 thousand dollars. Chevy is working on similar models that will be more moderately priced.

The auto industry is in a state of collapse and there is a need for a new way to do business. There is a company in Israel that has an innovative program to build and deploy mass-produced electric cars in that country. Word is that President Obama will adopt this technology for the United States. There is a major car manufacturer in this country that has a team they have put together in order to manufacture these cars by the hundreds of thousands and have them on the road by the year 2010. Renault-Nissan agreed some time ago to build these cars.

The new admistration is a perfect fit for this kind of technology as it can revive the auto industry that is against the ropes now and failing fast. The factories could be retrofitted to manufacture this type of vehicle and that alone would create thousands of new jobs. Once the retrofit was complete the auto unions would have plenty of work for their members. The result of the Obama administration embracing this technology would be immediately obvious to the public.

Better Place, the Israeli auto manufacturer, established 14 months ago by entrepreneur Shai Agassi, aims to switch cars worldwide from the pump to the plug, using battery-powered electric vehicles that would recharge at parking meter-style "charging spots," on a grid powered by renewable energy.

Israel, Denmark and Australia are committed to the idea. The Japanese government invited Better Place to work with its local car manufacturers on an electric car venture. The state of Hawaii signed up to a pilot program recently. Hawaii is President (elect) Barack Obama's home state, that is to say it is where he was reared by his grandmother and his mother, although Illinois is his home state of record.

The Renault-Nissan vehicles will cost about the same as conventional cars for now, but will be less expensive eventually. They have comparable acceleration, can reach comparable speeds (of 150 to 180 kph) and can run 150-200 kilometers on a single battery.

The mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsome, has announced that he will transform the city's civic center into the massive sustainable energy site and resource center pictured above. This new center will have solar panels, wind turbines, living roofs and other renewable energy resources. These renewable resources will reduce San Francisco's energy needs by 33 percent, there will be an 80 percent decrease in potable water use, it will be energy efficient and have water efficient fixtures. There will also be a reduction of wastewater discharge of 45 percent.

Mayor Newsome was attending President Bill Clinton's climate initiative when he announced this project.

In his own words he said, "San Francisco's Civic Center sits at the core of one of the most visited cities in the world. What better way to educate the world on sustainability than by transforming that core to showcase how we can use water more efficiently, promote food security, and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. San Francisco has always been a leader - willing to think differently and act boldly. And now, our Civic Center will stand as a global model for how we achieve a more sustainable future".

This project will go into the planning stage at the end of October 2008. When this planning process is complete, the project will start by the end of the year 2009.

San Francisco recently was one of the first urban areas to grant building permits for wind turbines.

The following is an article written by Al Gore and published by the New York Times on November 9,2008. It is intended to show the importance world leaders place on changing to powering our society with renewable energy sources and alternative energy.

THE inspiring and transformative choice by the American people to elect Barack Obama as our 44th president lays the foundation for another fateful choice that he - and we - must make this January to begin an emergency rescue of human civilization from the imminent and rapidly growing threat posed by the climate crisis.

The electrifying redemption of America's revolutionary declaration that all human beings are born equal sets the stage for the renewal of United States leadership in a world that desperately needs to protect its primary endowment: the integrity and livability of the planet.

The world authority on the climate crisis, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, after 20 years of detailed study and four unanimous reports, now says that the evidence is "unequivocal." To those who are still tempted to dismiss the increasingly urgent alarms from scientists around the world, ignore the melting of the north polar ice cap and all of the other apocalyptic warnings from the planet itself, and who roll their eyes at the very mention of this existential threat to the future of the human species, please wake up. Our children and grandchildren need you to hear and recognize the truth of our situation, before it is too late.

Here is the good news: the bold steps that are needed to solve the climate crisis are exactly the same steps that ought to be taken in order to solve the economic crisis and the energy security crisis.

Economists across the spectrum - including Martin Feldstein and Lawrence Summers - agree that large and rapid investments in a jobs-intensive infrastructure initiative is the best way to revive our economy in a quick and sustainable way. Many also agree that our economy will fall behind if we continue spending hundreds of billions of dollars on foreign oil every year. Moreover, national security experts in both parties agree that we face a dangerous strategic vulnerability if the world suddenly loses access to Middle Eastern oil.

As Abraham Lincoln said during America's darkest hour, "The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew." In our present case, thinking anew requires discarding an outdated and fatally flawed definition of the problem we face.

Thirty-five years ago this past week, President Richard Nixon created Project Independence, which set a national goal that, within seven years, the United States would develop "the potential to meet our own energy needs without depending on any foreign energy sources." His statement came three weeks after the Arab oil embargo had sent prices skyrocketing and woke America to the dangers of dependence on foreign oil. And - not coincidentally - it came only three years after United States domestic oil production had peaked.

At the time, the United States imported less than a third of its oil from foreign countries. Yet today, after all six of the presidents succeeding Nixon repeated some version of his goal, our dependence has doubled from one-third to nearly two-thirds - and many feel that global oil production is at or near its peak.

Some still see this as a problem of domestic production. If we could only increase oil and coal production at home, they argue, then we wouldn't have to rely on imports from the Middle East. Some have come up with even dirtier and more expensive new ways to extract the same old fuels, like coal liquids, oil shale, tar sands and "clean coal" technology.

But in every case, the resources in question are much too expensive or polluting, or, in the case of "clean coal," too imaginary to make a difference in protecting either our national security or the global climate. Indeed, those who spend hundreds of millions promoting "clean coal" technology consistently omit the fact that there is little investment and not a single large-scale demonstration project in the United States for capturing and safely burying all of this pollution. If the coal industry can make good on this promise, then I'm all for it. But until that day comes, we simply cannot any longer base the strategy for human survival on a cynical and self-interested illusion.

Here's what we can do - now: we can make an immediate and large strategic investment to put people to work replacing 19th-century energy technologies that depend on dangerous and expensive carbon-based fuels with 21st-century technologies that use fuel that is free forever: the sun, the wind and the natural heat of the earth.

What follows is a five-part plan to repower America with a commitment to producing 100 percent of our electricity from carbon-free sources within 10 years. It is a plan that would simultaneously move us toward solutions to the climate crisis and the economic crisis - and create millions of new jobs that cannot be outsourced.

First, the new president and the new Congress should offer large-scale investment in incentives for the construction of concentrated solar thermal plants in the Southwestern deserts, wind farms in the corridor stretching from Texas to the Dakotas and advanced plants in geothermal hot spots that could produce large amounts of electricity.

Second, we should begin the planning and construction of a unified national smart grid for the transport of renewable electricity from the rural places where it is mostly generated to the cities where it is mostly used. New high-voltage, low-loss underground lines can be designed with "smart" features that provide consumers with sophisticated information and easy-to-use tools for conserving electricity, eliminating inefficiency and reducing their energy bills. The cost of this modern grid - $400 billion over 10 years - pales in comparison with the annual loss to American business of $120 billion due to the cascading failures that are endemic to our current balkanized and antiquated electricity lines.

Third, we should help America's automobile industry (not only the Big Three but the innovative new startup companies as well) to convert quickly to plug-in hybrids that can run on the renewable electricity that will be available as the rest of this plan matures. In combination with the unified grid, a nationwide fleet of plug-in hybrids would also help to solve the problem of electricity storage. Think about it: with this sort of grid, cars could be charged during off-peak energy-use hours; during peak hours, when fewer cars are on the road, they could contribute their electricity back into the national grid.

Fourth, we should embark on a nationwide effort to retrofit buildings with better insulation and energy-efficient windows and lighting. Approximately 40 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States come from buildings - and stopping that pollution saves money for homeowners and businesses. This initiative should be coupled with the proposal in Congress to help Americans who are burdened by mortgages that exceed the value of their homes.

Fifth, the United States should lead the way by putting a price on carbon here at home, and by leading the world's efforts to replace the Kyoto treaty next year in Copenhagen with a more effective treaty that caps global carbon dioxide emissions and encourages nations to invest together in efficient ways to reduce global warming pollution quickly, including by sharply reducing deforestation.

Of course, the best way - indeed the only way - to secure a global agreement to safeguard our future is by re-establishing the United States as the country with the moral and political authority to lead the world toward a solution.

Looking ahead, I have great hope that we will have the courage to embrace the changes necessary to save our economy, our planet and ultimately ourselves.

In an earlier transformative era in American history, President John F. Kennedy challenged our nation to land a man on the moon within 10 years. Eight years and two months later, Neil Armstrong set foot on the lunar surface. The average age of the systems engineers cheering on Apollo 11 from the Houston control room that day was 26, which means that their average age when President Kennedy announced the challenge was 18.

This year similarly saw the rise of young Americans, whose enthusiasm electrified Barack Obama's campaign. There is little doubt that this same group of energized youth will play an essential role in this project to secure our national future, once again turning seemingly impossible goals into inspiring success.

Al Gore, the vice president from 1993 to 2001, was the co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. He founded the Alliance for Climate Protection and, as a businessman, invests in alternative energy companies.