No Cruiser Video? Why Police in New Hampshire Usually Don't Use Cruiser Videos During DWI Arrests by Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
Ranked #626 in Local, #62,026 overall
Why Don't Most Police Use Cruiser Videos in New Hampshire? By DWI Defense Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
This page features New Hampshire DWI laws and New Hampshire DWI case examples involving driving while intoxicated (DWI), driving under the influence ("DUI"), operating under the influence ("OUI"), aggravated DWI and boating under the influence ("BUI") cases by New Hampshire DWI defense lawyer Mark Stevens. See my blog articles and hear a radio show regarding the police refusal to video record New Hampshire DWI arrests. If you have been arrested for DWI, DUI, OUI or BWI in New Hampshire, call for free initial consultation and case evaluation for your DWI, DUI, OUI or Boating While Intoxicated case at 603-893-0074,
Mark Stevens
Law Offices of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
603-893-0074
http://www.byebyedwi.com
http://www.byebyedwi.blogspot.com
New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
NH DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens' Blog
New Hampshire DWI laws and DWI updates.
UPDATE: September 25, 2009. See My blog entry today for a story about a woman who "tested positive" on a breath test gadget installed in her car that was caused by exposure to hairspray.
Fetching RSS feed... please stand byWhy Not Mandatory Roadside and Breath Test Videos Like in South Carolina? By New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
The Text of South Carolina's Fair Law on Mandatory Videotaping in DWI cases
SECTION 56 5 2953. Incident site and breath site videotaping; admissibility as evidence; purchase and maintenance of videotaping equipment.
(A) A person who violates Section 56 5 2930, 56 5 2933, or 56 5 2945 must have his conduct at the incident site and the breath test site videotaped.
(1) The videotaping at the incident site must:
(a) begin not later than the activation of the officer's blue lights and conclude after the arrest of the person for a violation of Section 56 5 2930, 56 5 2933, or a probable cause determination that the person violated Section 56 5 2945; and
(b) include the person being advised of his Miranda rights before any field sobriety tests are administered, if the tests are administered.
(2) The videotaping at the breath site:
(a) must be completed within three hours of the person's arrest for a violation of Section 56 5 2930, 56 5 2933, or 56 5 2945 or a probable cause determination that the person violated Section 56 5 2945, unless compliance is not possible because the person needs emergency medical treatment considered necessary by licensed medical personnel;
(b) must include the reading of Miranda rights, the entire breath test procedure, the person being informed that he is being videotaped, and that he has the right to refuse the test;
(c) must include the person taking or refusing the breath test and the actions of the breath test operator while conducting the test;
(d) must also include the person's conduct during the required twenty minute pre test waiting period, unless the officer submits a sworn affidavit certifying that it was physically impossible to videotape this waiting period. However, if the arresting officer administers the breath test, the person's conduct during the twenty minute pre test waiting period must be videotaped.
The videotapes of the incident site and of the breath test site are admissible pursuant to the South Carolina Rules of Evidence in a criminal, administrative, or civil proceeding by any party to the action.
(B) Nothing in this section may be construed as prohibiting the introduction of other evidence in the trial of a violation of Section 56 5 2930, 56 5 2933, or 56 5 2945. Failure by the arresting officer to produce the videotapes required by this section is not alone a ground for dismissal of any charge made pursuant to Section 56 5 2930, 56 5 2933, or 56 5 2945 if the arresting officer submits a sworn affidavit certifying that the videotape equipment at the time of the arrest, probable cause determination, or breath test device was in an inoperable condition, stating reasonable efforts have been made to maintain the equipment in an operable condition, and certifying that there was no other operable breath test facility available in the county or, in the alternative, submits a sworn affidavit certifying that it was physically impossible to produce the videotape because the person needed emergency medical treatment, or exigent circumstances existed. Further, in circumstances including, but not limited to, road blocks, traffic accident investigations, and citizens' arrests, where an arrest has been made and the videotaping equipment has not been activated by blue lights, the failure by the arresting officer to produce the videotapes required by this section is not alone a ground for dismissal. However, as soon as videotaping is practicable in these circumstances, videotaping must begin and conform with the provisions of this section. Nothing in this section prohibits the court from considering any other valid reason for the failure to produce the videotape based upon the totality of the circumstances; nor do the provisions of this section prohibit the person from offering evidence relating to the arresting law enforcement officer's failure to produce the videotape.
(C) A videotape must not be disposed of in any manner except for its transfer to a master tape for consolidation purposes until the results of any legal proceeding in which it may be involved are finally determined.
(D) SLED is responsible for purchasing, maintaining, and supplying all necessary videotaping equipment for use at the breath test sites. SLED also is responsible for monitoring all breath test sites to ensure the proper maintenance of videotaping equipment. The Department of Public Safety is responsible for purchasing, maintaining, and supplying all videotaping equipment for use in all law enforcement vehicles used for traffic enforcement. The Department of Public Safety also is responsible for monitoring all law enforcement vehicles used for traffic enforcement to ensure proper maintenance of videotaping equipment.
(E) Beginning one month from the effective date of this act, all of the funds received in accordance with Section 14 1 208(C)(9) must be expended by SLED to equip all breath test sites with videotaping devices and supplies. Once all breath test sites have been equipped fully with videotaping devices and supplies, eighty seven and one half percent of the funds received in accordance with Section 14 1 208(C)(9) must be expended by the Department of Public Safety to purchase, maintain, and supply videotaping equipment for vehicles used for traffic enforcement. The remaining twelve and one half percent of the funds received in accordance with Section 14 1 208(C)(9) must be expended by SLED to purchase, maintain, and supply videotaping equipment for the breath test sites. Funds must be distributed by the State Treasurer to the Department of Public Safety and SLED on a monthly basis. The Department of Public Safety and SLED are authorized to carry forward any unexpended funds received in accordance with Section 14 1 208(C)(9) as of June thirtieth of each year and to expend these carried forward funds for the purchase, maintenance, and supply of videotaping equipment. The Department of Public Safety and SLED must report the revenue received under this section and the expenditures for which the revenue was used as required in the department's and SLED's annual appropriation request to the General Assembly.
(F) The Department of Public Safety and SLED must promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of this section.
(G) The provisions contained in Section 56 5 2953(A), (B), and (C) take effect for each law enforcement vehicle used for traffic enforcement once the law enforcement vehicle is equipped with a videotaping device. The provisions contained in Section 56 5 2953(A), (B), and (C) take effect for a breath test site once the breath test site is equipped with a videotaping device.
Mark Stevens YouTube Video 603-893-0074
New Hampshire DWI Defense Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
DWI Defense Lawyer in New Hampshire Mark Stevens
Law Office of Mark Stevens http://www.attorneymarkstevens.com/ If you have just been arrested for DWI you have probably just spent the worst night of your life. You have been subjected to a battery of roadside gymnastics, handcuffed, humiliated and embarrassed. You have wondered whether your name will be in the paper. You have wondered whether you will be fired when your boss finds out about this. You may have had to call a loved one to pick you up at the police station in the middle of the night. The next critical decision you have to make is whether to get a DWI defense lawyer. The United States Supreme Court has noted repeatedly that misdemeanants who have counsel tend to fare better than those who do not. In Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 35-36 (1972) the Court found that misdemeanants with attorneys are five times more likely to have charges dismissed as misdemeanants without counsel. Law Office of Mark Stevens 5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079
Runtime: 140
3169 views
0 Comments:
curated content from YouTube
New DWI Booking Atrocity in Shreveport
Why Did This Cop Turn Off the Truth Machine
Cop Attacks Pedestrian
Another Reason WHy Police Don't Want to Be Videotaped
UPDATE 12/11/08: Well, it could be worse I guess. They could have called the Hamilton PD to come and provide EMT services to the victims of this brutal police attack. The Herald reports that tt seems that the Hamilton PD has been lying about their EMT credentials for the last 10 years.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1138363
New Hampshire DWI Laws Blogs
- New Case Results on ByeByeDWI.com - "Tazed But Not Suspended" by ...
- Hello everyone. I have posted two new case results on my website, one a dismissal of a boating while intoxicated charge and the other is the dismissal of an ALS suspension after the driver was tazed: http://www.ByeByeDWI.com ...
- Bye Bye DWI by New Hampshire DWI Defense Lawyer Mark Stevens 603 ...
- New Hampshire DWI laws, aggravated DWI laws, boating while intoxicated laws and DWI defense topics and issues hosted by DWI defense Lawyer Mark Stevens and ByeByeDWI.com The Law Offices of Mark Stevens are located in Salem, ...
- .PRO Domain deleted: BYEBYEDWI.PRO
- To register BYEBYEDWI.PRO go to: http://www.encirca.com/cgi-bin/register.cgi?domain=BYEBYEDWI.PRO&action=register.
- "Green Tongue" Evidence Tossed Again: Junk Science Exposed in ...
- As you can see in this case, a blood test entirely disproved this officer's "training and experience" about "green tongues". Have a safe day, Mark Stevens http://www.ByeByeDWI.com http://www.ByeByeOUI.com http://www.ByeByeDUI.com ...
New Hampshire DWI Links by Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- New Hampshire DWI Defense Lawyer Mark Stevens' Website 603-893-0074
- New Hampshire DWI, DUI, OUI, aggravated DWI, boating while intoxicated, and boating under the influence laws and case examples by New Hampshire DWI defense lawyer Mark Stevens. Call for free initial DWI case consultation. 603-893-0074.
- New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens' DWI blog
- New Hampshire DWI blog by New Hampshire DWI lawyer Mark Stevens. 603-893-0074.
- New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens' Facebook Profile 603-893-0074
- New Hampshire DWI defense lawyer Mark Stevens' facebook profile. 603-893-0074.
- The Truth Machine
- Why didn't the police video record your arrest? New Hampshire DWI laws. DWI, DUI, OUI, aggravated DWI laws by New Hampshire DWI lawyer Mark Stevens. Call Mark Stevens at 603-893-0074 for free New Hampshire DWI case consultation.
- New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens' MySpace Page
- New Hampshire DWI defense lawyer Mark Stevens' MySpace page. Call 603-893-0074 for free New Hampshire DWI consultation.
- Mark Stevens' DWI Wikizine
- New Hampshire DWI laws. DWI, DUI, OUI, aggravated DWI laws by New Hampshire DWI lawyer Mark Stevens. Call Mark Stevens at 603-893-0074 for free New Hampshire DWI case consultation.
15 officers beat 3 unarmed men with clubs
New Hampshire Criminal Defense Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
New Hampshire DWI Defense by Mark Stevens 603-893-0074

Salem, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer Mark Stevens. Call for free initial case consultation for your New Hampshire DWI, boating while intoxicated or other criminal charges. 603-893-0074.
Pastor Beaten in Roadblock
Beaten and attacked with taser
Mark Stevens
Law Offices of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
603-893-0074
Follow Me on Twitter
byebyedwi

- aka Twitter
- 0 followers
- 0 following
-
- Londonderry man accused of shooting twin is arraigned - EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA - http://shar.es/aDbsL
-
- "Zero tolerance":Gosling Meadows drug suspects evicted | SeacoastOnline.com: http://bit.ly/4KMcBN via @addthis Mark http://www.byebyedwi.com
-
- Prosecutors: N.H. murder suspect took victim ID | SeacoastOnline.com: http://bit.ly/6X8DJe via @addthis http://www.byebyedwi.blogspot.com
-
- @JustinMcShane I thought you ARE a jedi Justin! Have a good one, Mark http://www.ByeByeDWI.com
-
- Murder suspect watched as divers searched for well | SeacoastOnline.com: http://bit.ly/4R5M07 via @addthis
Guest on Show about Breath tests
Breath tests in High Schools?
by ByeByeDWI
Explore related pages
Related Topics
ByeByeDWI Recommends...
- New Hampshire's Aggravated DWI Laws By New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- The Sixth Amendment by New Hampshire Criminal Defense Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- Boating While Intoxicated: Floating Field Sobriety Tests by Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- The One Leg Stand Test by New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- Giving Your License and Registration to a Cop: What he's really looking for by New Hampshire DWI Lawyer Mark Stevens 603-893-0074
- More...









