Which Came First, Chicken Or Egg?
Ranked #1,330 in Culture & Society, #31,655 overall
The Chicken And Egg Cycles!
This question have been famous and been asked from many years ago, but the real answer have not yet to came up. Nobody can come up with a good answer with a 100% prove to it.
So now it is your chance to share your thoughts. What do you think? The Chicken or the egg?
Here a funny answer from my friends on the question: " Ask god, he knows it!".
Image Source: [Chicken and Egg Photographic Poster] on Amazon!
The Chicken Side Prove 1: Proteins Theory
Research from the UK have found a way to use some of the protein parts to find out if chicken or egg came first. Protein is use to form a chicken before it is hatched from an egg, they found out that the chicken came before the protein was form in the body. So scientific proof plays a part that chicken really came before an egg.Read a more detailed article of how protein theory proves that chicken came first: CBS News Article on Chicken Came Before the Egg: "Scientific Proof"
The Chicken Side Prove 2: God Creation
If you are to ask a creationists whether the chicken or the egg came first, they would say chickens.Creationists said that god bring life to earth first and then ask them to mutiply. So if god bring life was created first by god then the chicken will exist first, then the god ask them to mutiply, this is when the egg is started to hatched by the chicken.
Find Out More About Creationism: This is a link that can help you understand more about Creationism and how it proves that chicken came first!
The Creation Guide Book
Creationist Debate: The Encounter between the Bible and the Historical Mind
Amazon Price: $18.01 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
Read about creationists. As mention earlier: "God created lifes and ask them to multiply", this books tells us on creations and how it is related to the god.
The Egg Side Prove 1: Evolution Theory
Read the full answer on how evolutionist proves that egg come first
Image Source: [Baby Chicks and Carton of Eggs Poster] on Amazon.
The Evolution Guide Book
Why Evolution Is True
Amazon Price: $9.08 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
The Evolution Guide book, tell us why we should believe in the evolution theory and learn more about it!
Evolution Vs Creation!
Which people do you support? The creationist or evolutionist?
The Chicken And Egg Debate Book
The Chicken or the Egg? (Rookie Read-About Science)
Amazon Price: $1.95 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
Read the science book and learn more about whether the egg or the chicken came first.
Wikipedia Sources On Chickens Or Egg Came First.
- Wikipedia: Chicken Or The Egg?
- Wikipedia is one of the most credible sources out there! In this wikipedia page, they will prove to you why chicken or egg came first in an unbiased way!
- Wikipedia: Evolution
- As you know the evolutionist would say that the egg came first due to meme and genes logic, now you can learn more about evolutions to understand better how it is linked to egg came first rather than the chicken.
- Wikipedia: Creationism
- The god bring life to earth first, which is the theory of creations. Now read the full meaning of creationism and how it is linked to chicken came first rather than the egg!
Voting Poll: Which Came First?
Chicken Side Or Egg Side? Share Your Thought!
We can't find out the real answer on whether the chicken or the egg came first, but now you stand the chance to speak for your sides and share your thought and theory!
So which do you think come first? Chicken Or Egg? Share your thought and theory.
Fetching blurbs now... please stand byThe Chicken Side
i am in no side says:
how to make an egg? chicken. how to make a chicken? egg. it doesnt make sense... who's with me?
Posted February 12, 2012
Kyle says:
Chicken's side!!!
Posted February 12, 2012
Katrina says:
God didn't create Adam and Eve as a baby, He created them as adults. So I think its the same with all animals. They came not fom the egg. So I go for the chicken's side. :)
Posted February 12, 2012
Admin says:
So the answer is The Egg Side
Posted January 19, 2012
123 says:
i came 1st hehe
Posted January 19, 2012
rakesh says:
nothing come first i am saying iam the egg side because
Posted December 13, 2011
lalllallalalalland says:
chicken came first because of oc-17 and god created it
Posted November 12, 2011
Vijay Mahima says:
god creted the earth in 6 days in that I think that one of the creatures was chicken.
Posted October 24, 2011
man332 says:
Chicken comes first because of evolve of change in life and on earth.
Posted August 15, 2011
vaginal says:
the chicken had to because there is a protein in a hens ovarys that has to be there in order to create the egg.
Posted June 23, 2011
Kelly says:
hmmmm tough one, The chicken. Life come first before it reproduces
Posted May 24, 2011
maytheforcebewithyou13 says:
God created everything in 6 days. The chicken would be among the created animals, so the chicken came first
Posted January 28, 2011
willisx32 says:
I have to take the chickens side. its evolution. you connot have an egg without a chicken
Posted December 01, 2010
ME says:
i am reaplying to this person who wrote a comment (the one after the comment from KenNadreau ) and said that the egg came first. firstly humans havent got to the far far far behind DNA and all that, and if u say that we were one day monekys or wat ever u wana call it just becuase our DNA is very similar than u should allso say that we were bananas one day cus our DNA is really close to bananas too soo if u wana say somethin then say something that makes sence!!!!
and too all of u who read this, people who say that humans have evolved from animals and wat ever
say that apes are 98% the same as humans. But that suggests apes have been studied as deeply as humans which we know they haven't. The difference is actually 1600 genetic differences., if we had evolved from apes why are they not on here answering questions ?? It's like an airline pilot saying we are only 2% out on our flight plan so we'll put down here.
Posted October 29, 2010
emcueto says:
only chickens can lay chicken eggs. whatever animal that laid the egg (which would become a chicken) was not a chicken itself (although it would have been very close), thus it's egg wasn't a chicken egg.
Posted September 29, 2010
Oliversbabycarecouk says:
Must Of Been A Chicken First, Else Who Kept The Egg Warm!?!
Posted September 28, 2010
my_never_bored_hands says:
The chicken was first, in my opinion. The God created everything, including chicken of course.
Posted September 27, 2010
says:
defiantly the chicken
Posted September 16, 2010
Laddoo says:
Well its funny - cuz I love both. i think I did about a recent study which kinda proved that the chickens came in first -so I'd stick with that!
Posted September 14, 2010
M_Ann_Musselman says:
I don't necessarily side with the creationists, although I definitely don't side with evolution. I side with Biblical truths. In Genesis 1:24 it says: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
That was from the King James Version of the bible. Even though it doesn't say that God specifically made the adult animals, it does make more logical sense, since the verse is talking about every living thing.
Even though mammals and other offspring grow in the womb, they are not considered 'living beings' until they are born. Eggs cannot cluck until they are hatched.
Posted September 12, 2010
JaguarJulie says:
OMG, this has got to be the original debate -- a good one -- that can be quite perplexing. I'm going with the chicken.
Posted September 12, 2010
Cheryl says:
I really enjoyed this lens as well as, all the comments on it. It was cleverly done and, brought a lot of information to those who read it. I believe the chicken came first. Perhaps the rooster, like Adam the man. Then after Eve was created and the whole idea of population came about, he might have created the hen thus, the egg appeared.
Posted August 20, 2010
lisbeth wesst says:
THE ROOSTER HAD TO COME FIRST, FOR THE EGG IS NOT FERTILE WITHOUT IT
Posted August 18, 2010
4U2C says:
This one is easy. Since God creates all that IS, which is visible to the trained eye, by all that ISN'T, the hen came first. There is a major problem with the mindset that the egg came first. Let's follow the "egg first" reasoning to its logical conclusion. Ok - it hatches. What does it mate with? If it is a male, it is not going to reproduce on its own. If it is a female, where is the male, to fertilize the egg? How does the chicken that comes from the egg find another newly-hatched chick? We are definitely in the age of "professing themselves to be wise, they became fools". It was the chicken, first. Actually, it was chickens - a male, and a female.
Posted August 18, 2010
AJD says:
Can a child survive without a parent? If there was no chicken to hatch, feed and protect the egg, it would never live to grow into a chicken. Chicken first, all the way.
Posted August 16, 2010
Tannu says:
Chiicken
Posted August 15, 2010
swaffi says:
Definitely the chicken. All you have to do is pick up a bible and read Genesis 1:20-25. No eggs mentioned here
Posted August 12, 2010
FindLostFamilyMembers says:
Chicken first for sure! I'm believe in God create life first like He create Adam and Hawa.
Posted August 12, 2010
awbarton222 says:
I think a woman must have giving birth to the first chicken, then the egg came after.
Posted August 11, 2010
blue22d says:
Chicken. God created the chicken. And secondly, a chicken can lay an egg but an egg, in itself, cannot lay a chicken.
Posted August 11, 2010
Susan52 says:
nnaij, I agree with you. God created the chicken. The rest is history.
Posted August 11, 2010
rlmodranski says:
I wasn't going to chime in, but I can't help myself . . . think about this logic for a moment . . . A chicken can't appear out of thin air (although those of us who believe the chicken came first, don't think she came out of thin air) . . . but an egg (embryo) can . . . ummm . . . I'm confused . . .
Posted August 11, 2010
Namolo says:
The chicken first because God created the male and female chicken and these two began to multiply.
Posted August 11, 2010
nineth-writer says:
Chicken first. I heard US statistic research the chicken and eggs. Chicken is the first
Posted August 10, 2010
GladlyMom says:
Definitely the chicken. Genesis doesn't talk about God creating eggs, but all kinds of animals and birds, etc.
Posted August 10, 2010
HealthObsessed says:
I would have to say the chicken...for sure!! There couldn't have been an egg without a chicken first : )
Posted August 10, 2010
says:
The "egg people" are all saying that the modern chicken came from an egg, just not a chicken egg. Well, that still makes me wonder, which came first, any egg-laying creature, or the egg?
I understand and believe much of evolution, but I am always drawn to the story of creation. So I vote chicken. Like humans and other animals, God created them and said "multiply."
Posted August 10, 2010
nnaij says:
For some reason I believe the creation theory, god bring lfies to earth and ask them to multiply!
Posted August 02, 2010
The Egg Side
iloveresearching says:
Everything starts with an EGG like us we came from a sperm. I'm respecting God look, in the bible God created the flying birds do you think it will appear just like that?? God is soo good xD
Posted February 08, 2012
Admin says:
So the answer is The Egg Sides
Posted January 19, 2012
Admin says:
god wanted to create more animals but he cant think of any more so he created a random egg that will hatch then the egg later hatched to a hen
Posted January 19, 2012
JSchaper says:
I once saw a documentary (can't remember the name) which settled the this for me. The theory in this documentary was that there must once have been an ancestor creature to the chicken.
This creature was 99.99999(to infinity)% chicken, but it was not 100% chicken. This almost-chicken then went on to lay an egg. A tiny mutation happened to the DNA of the unhatched chick, turning it into the very first 100% chicken.
Therefor, the egg came first, and the first chicken was hatched from it.
Posted December 15, 2011
krizyl says:
egg cause the chicken first lay egg and then the egg became chicken i know God created chicken first but this timee the cycle
Posted November 04, 2011
mahima says:
egg
Posted October 24, 2011
Maria says:
No animal can evolve or change during its lifetime it happens in the womb or egg.
Posted April 13, 2011
nezume says:
Dinosaurs laid eggs. Dinosaurs have been around longer than chickens. Obviously it has to be the egg right?
Posted September 16, 2010
Spydah says:
I am more of a creationist rather than the evolutionist but I believe that yes god did create life on Earth, but he created it so that it could evolve and improve. so he created very simple lifeforms, which over years evolved into dinosaurs, giant lizards, as we all know lizards lay eggs, and from dinosaurs we get the creatures of modern day, including chickens, so if dionosaurs lay eggs then surely the egg came before the chicken
Posted August 20, 2010
LotusPetalYoga says:
The egg. natural selection shows us that those best adapted to their environment are those that survive to reproduce. there was some sort of ancestor tot he chicken that was not what we call a chicken of today but very very similar. One small mutation or variation led the egg it laid to be the first 'true' chicken.
Posted August 12, 2010
DebMartin says:
I feel it's the egg. Guess I'm a dinosaur sort of evolutionist.
Posted August 11, 2010
Ernest says:
A bird of some sort laid an egg and when it hatched it had evolved into a new species, it grew and laid an egg which evolved a little more. Over many years it became the bird we know as a chicken. If you believe God made the chicken and all other Life in The Universe, ask you one question "who made God?"
Posted August 11, 2010
KenNadreau says:
Well, if chickens evolved from dinosaurs, which there's all kinds of proof they did, then the chicken became a chicken over time through a series of egg mutations. When the animal that finally came out of one of these mutated eggs could actually be called a chicken is not yet known. But whenever that took place doesn't matter in this debate. The truth is, one day there was an egg mutated enough to produce a chicken rather than a dinosaur.
Posted August 11, 2010
says:
The Egg came first because an Egg is a method of growing an Embryo that evolved over time. A Chicken isn't going to appear out of thin air like the Creationists believe that's absolutely insane. What are creationists going to say once Mankind traces DNA far far back into time, and there's still no proof of God's existence but merely evolution? I think they're already quite far back and still God lacks influence on the creation of life. Let me guess, God did it to confuse us-- ahem. Anyway this isn't my subject of research but I'm definitely on the side of Evolutionists and evidence, fact, proof not speculation, faith and delusion.
Posted August 11, 2010
grannysage says:
I agree with the dinosaur theory. There is a Canadian scientist who believes he can reverse engineer a dinosaur from a chicken. Do a Google search for dinosaurs from chickens.
Posted August 10, 2010
RawBill says:
This debate was actually in the news recently and perhaps this is where you came up with the idea for this lens. Scientists say that the chicken came first. But I think that the egg came first as dinosaurs were laying eggs long before the chicken was around. I believe that the chicken then evolved from these dinosaurs over years.
Posted August 10, 2010
says:
People are actually researching this? Lol...
Posted August 10, 2010
YouthAssistanceforthePoor says:
the chicken came first, can't have an without a chicken!!!
Posted August 10, 2010
myfairladyah says:
Something other than a chicken laid
An egg which would be stricken
With a mutation in its DNA that made
It develop and hatch into a chicken
Posted August 10, 2010
AmericanDreamer says:
Outside of creationism, (which I don't believe is mutually exclusive to evolution, since you could take it that God created original life and then helped to guide evolution to create the animals that he wanted), there is really no logical reason to think that the chicken came first.
What happened, was that a precursor to the chicken, a bird which was extremely similar but not exactly the same, eventually laid an egg which, due to gene mutation, would hatch into a chicken. This egg was a chicken egg, because the animal which came out of it was a chicken, even though it was laid by a bird which was somthing increadibly similar but NOT a chicken.
Thus, the egg came first.
Posted August 08, 2010
bloodhungry says:
Somewhere along the line (in my opinion) an ancestor of the chicken must have had a gametic mutation that caused the egg of a chicken ancestor to evolve into what we know today as a chicken egg.
Posted August 04, 2010
spirituality says:
I voted chicken above, but I've changed my mind. Greekgeek has a point: the first chicken was born from an egg. The first egg didn't come from a chicken.
Posted August 02, 2010
Greekgeek says:
Having seen dinosaur fossils behind my parents' condo in Utah, I can safely say that eggs predate chickens. Of course, those were dino eggs! But birds evolved from dinos, so I stand by "egg."
Posted August 02, 2010
Iplay Chicken Or Egg Board Game
iplay Which Came First? Chicken or Egg?
Amazon Price: $10.47 (as of 02/16/2012)![]()
Im sute you all have play a lot of board games, but have you tried the chicken or egg board game?
Comments And Feedbacks!
-
Reply
-
jimmyworldstar
Jan 25, 2012 @ 4:22 pm | delete
- I've heard a theory stating that a chicken came about during mutation as an egg. That makes more sense. Also, it's foolish to even frame this as a creationist/evolution debate.
-
-
Reply
-
kalpana
Oct 2, 2011 @ 10:05 am | delete
- nyc answers frm all
but did nt got the perfect answer
-
-
Reply
-
manlalakbay
Jul 31, 2011 @ 4:28 am | delete
- Woah! I have published a lens a while ago about which came first: a chicken or an egg? and I was surprised after I found out on the related lenses of that published lens that someone had already made a lens about this. Is it okay to have a same topic here in squidoo? coz I don't want to delete my new lens. Thanks. :)
-
-
Reply
-
GrowWear
May 22, 2011 @ 9:41 pm | delete
- I figure we can some up with the definitive answer is we'd just ask the turtle. :)
-
-
Reply
-
jackiebolen Jan 5, 2011 @ 8:52 pm | delete
- The answer is obvious! Chicken!
-
-
Reply
-
mcochs
Oct 6, 2010 @ 12:29 pm | delete
- Interesting lens, I liked it!
-
-
Reply
-
Mrmakingusmile
Oct 3, 2010 @ 8:00 pm | delete
- There both good to eat. I side with the egg.
-
-
Reply
-
emcueto
Sep 29, 2010 @ 1:22 pm | delete
- chicken!
-
-
Reply
-
Oliversbabycarecouk
Sep 28, 2010 @ 9:43 am | delete
- Im A Chicken Fan, Science Will Come Up With The Answer In The End!
-
-
Reply
-
my_never_bored_hands
Sep 27, 2010 @ 10:07 pm | delete
- Very informative lens and funny in the same time. Thumbs up.
-
-
Reply
-
GonnaFly
Sep 26, 2010 @ 10:11 pm | delete
- Excellent lens, but I'm still convinced that God created the chicken first ;-)
-
-
Reply
-
Laddoo Sep 14, 2010 @ 10:11 am | delete
- I am a chicken fan - but I love eggs too - cant decide. I did go with the chicken - but I dont think the eggs will be happy when I meet them for breakfast tomorrow!
-
-
Reply
-
JaguarJulie
Sep 12, 2010 @ 4:52 am | delete
- I love chicken!
-
-
Reply
-
4U2C Aug 18, 2010 @ 7:38 am | delete
- One definition of science, is "the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena". True scientific theory has to be able to be duplicated, before it can be accepted as "scientific fact". It has to be observable. We can observe male and female chickens reproducing. We cannot observe an egg reproducing. Congratulations on your LotD - well-done, and a lot of fun!
-
-
Reply
-
LotusPetalYoga
Aug 12, 2010 @ 5:38 pm | delete
- In science you can never 'prove' anything with 100% certainty. What is fact for one person is not fact for another and facts change. Theories on the other hand are supported by hundreds of observations and hypothesis that have been tested thousands of times and always supported. There has never been any scientific evidence that does not support the theory of evolution. Creationism is not a science nor is it a theory, its a belief system. To be science, you must be able to test/support/reject a hypothesis. I appreciate this page and the debate you bring to the table! Very well done.
-
-
Reply
-
Aug 15, 2010 @ 11:32 pm | delete
- Seriously? Your first sentence can be proven wrong.--uh, gravity, laws of thermodynamics, speed of sound, speed of light...etc. Your second and third sentence's are just as backwards--something is actually called a fact because it is proven and a theory because it changes all the time; hence the theory of evolution keeps changing. And actually the theory of evolution is a belief system too, it has never been proven; to believe in it you have to have faith. There are scientific facts and there are guesses. No offense, but i hope you don't actually teach this.
-
-
Reply
-
Aug 15, 2010 @ 11:43 pm | delete
- http://senzless.blogspot.com/
http://www.squidoo.com/your-body
-
-
Reply
-
nwabueze eleke
Aug 16, 2010 @ 7:59 am | delete
- Ever seen the real face value image of Africa complex building heart center temple house body of manhood host glorious spiritual head being of human race? Just take a look at cosmic micro wave radiation background of Atlantic ocean current motion store crystal globe cosmic kind of beast egg in air form central core fluid intelligent system atmosphere that give s you a solution clean information non - science friction evidence of the one that came out first.
-
-
Reply
-
nwabueze eleke
Aug 16, 2010 @ 7:59 am | delete
- Ever seen the real face value image of Africa complex building heart center temple house body of manhood host glorious spiritual head being of human race? Just take a look at cosmic micro wave radiation background of Atlantic ocean current motion store crystal globe cosmic kind of beast egg in air form central core fluid intelligent system atmosphere that give s you a solution clean information non - science friction evidence of the one that came out first.
-
-
Reply
-
ClearwaterCPA
Aug 12, 2010 @ 6:02 am | delete
- Too deep for me to think about early in the morning, but an interesting topic for a lens. Something I wouldn't have thought about. Thanks!
-
- Load More
by Aldric_Chang
Aldric Chang is a creative businessman who is active in music composing and production, internet marketing, casual games production, animation production,... more »
- 219 featured lenses
- Winner of 12 trophies!
- Top lens » Rat Rod
- This lens » Selected as Lens of the Day
Explore related pages
- Dinosaur Timeline - When did dinosaurs live? Dinosaur Timeline - When did dinosaurs live?
- Is Imagination More Important Than Knowledge? Is Imagination More Important Than Knowledge?
- Jurassic Park for Real? - Cloning Extinct Animals Jurassic Park for Real? - Cloning Extinct Animals
- Raising Baby Chicks Raising Baby Chicks
- Erich von Daniken Books Erich von Daniken Books
- Creationism VS Evolution Creationism VS Evolution
